[BidClub_]
Sohn Conference Foundation · · 11 分钟

Alex Silver 在 Sohn 2026 推介 BWX Technologies

Alex Silver

YouTube
TL;DR
  • Alex Silver 是 ANM Capital Management 的 CIO(管理资产3.5亿美元,2024年与 Charlie Penner 共同创办),在“多重可持续长期增长趋势的交汇处”推介 BWX Technologies——数据中心能源需求、国防支出与能源安全。 演讲稿将 BWX 描述为一家市值2000万美元的公司。公司累计建造400多个海军核反应堆堆芯,至今没有发生过一起安全事故,也是唯一持有 NRC Category I 许可证的公司。
  • 政府业务约占营收75%,是下行保护:业务具备持续性和增长性,有合同保障,并采用单一来源采购。 业务脉络可追溯至1860年代的 Babcock & Wilcox,经过 Manhattan Project 和1954年的 USS Nautilus;95%的员工持有安全许可,BWX 拥有北美唯一获得认证的大型核部件制造产能。商业业务约占营收25%,包括医用放射性同位素和药品,以及商用核电部件。
  • 针对“SMR 来得太晚”的争论,ANM 持“完全不同的看法”:关键基准是实现与大型燃气轮机电厂相当的供电速度,而后者如今因零部件积压需要约4–5年。 Oklo 和 NuScale 在这一时间窗口内可能难以达标,而 GE Hitachi 的 BWRX-300——BWX 正在参与的 SMR 之一——已经开工,预计交付周期为4–5年。
  • 潜在的空白市场是压水堆 SMR:BWX 约10年前的 mPower 设计在客户兴趣方面“远超当时水平”,同时获得包括 NRC 在内的监管机构正面评价。 目前压水堆 SMR 领域“没有明确的领先者”。Silver 认为,只要客户兴趣能够为项目降低风险,今天就可以围绕更新后的设计启动商业洽谈。
  • 按约200美元起算,分部加总包括:市场化供应商增长及已宣布但尚未完全计入共识预期的机会,贡献95美元(45%);已知但尚未授标项目中经概率调整的卖铲子业务中标机会,贡献50美元(25%);以及开发此前称为 mPower 的设计,贡献约80美元(40%)——“上行空间超过100%”。 公司及投资者材料将 SMR 市场规模定为2040年3000亿美元,而 CEO 表示,全球可能需要“数百座、数百座反应堆……如果是小型反应堆,则可能达到数千座”。
摘要 · 为研究而整理的核心内容

1. 一个有真实业务托底的核能平台

  • Silver 的开场框架是:BWX Technologies 位于能源需求、国防支出和能源安全的交汇处;与 Oklo 或 NuScale 不同,“BWX 今天就在产生营收,而一些同行的营收完全在未来。”
  • 政府业务约占营收75%,为美国海军潜艇和航空母舰提供反应堆。BWX 累计建造400多个海军核反应堆堆芯,未发生过安全事故,自1950年代起一直为海军供货。Silver 提到单一来源合同、唯一持有 NRC Category I 许可证的公司,以及贯穿 Babcock & Wilcox、Manhattan Project 和1954年下水的 USS Nautilus 的历史脉络。他的判断是:“进入壁垒高得几乎无出其右。”公司95%的员工通过安全审查,并拥有北美唯一经过认证的大型核部件制造产能。

2. 卖铲子,但一次就是500公吨

  • 商业业务约占营收25%,包括一项规模不大但高增长、高毛利的医疗业务,为诊断和治疗提供放射性同位素与药品;同时向商用核电建设方供应相关设备,例如“那座高90英尺、重500公吨的压力容器”,用于容纳核反应堆堆芯——这类资产很难找到比它更重、也更不容易过时的。
  • 商用核电获得了罕见的两党支持。Silver 指出,近期行政措施缩短了 NRC 对反应堆的认证时间,并降低了获得批准的成本。

3. SMR 的时间窗口之争,以及空白市场所在

  • Silver 将传统吉瓦级反应堆与工厂制造、模块化、单体约300 MW或更小的 SMR 区分开来,后者可以通过模块化叠加满足需求。他还区分 Gen 3 设计与通常未经验证的 Gen 4 系统:前者采用传统反应堆已经使用的技术。在 Gen 3 体系内,沸水堆将水加热成蒸汽,压水堆则保持水体加压,并通过蒸汽发生器产汽。
  • 面对“太晚了”的观点,ANM 认为,目前可用的燃料电池和往复式发动机“不可能满足长期能源需求”。真正相关的检验标准,是能否达到与大型燃气轮机电厂相当的投运速度;按照零部件积压情况,后者如今需要约4–5年。按这一标准,Oklo 和 NuScale“可能难以达标”。
  • GE Hitachi 的 BWRX-300 是一款300 MW沸水堆 SMR,BWX 正在参与开发,项目已经开工,预计交付周期为4–5年。不过,一些买家可能更偏好压水堆,因为它们在传统反应堆市场中更普遍、也更为熟悉,因此建造成本应该更低。Silver 表示,目前压水堆 SMR“没有明确的领先者”。

4. mPower:一个潜在的压水堆选项

  • 约10年前,BWX 开发了 mPower 压水堆设计。Silver 表示,该设计在客户兴趣方面“远超当时水平”,也获得包括 NRC 在内的监管机构正面评价;根据 ANM 的尽调,它在供电速度上仍可能具备竞争力。
  • BWX 可以利用现有能力和信誉;Silver 提到,海军潜艇就是 BWX 建造的压水堆技术已投入运行的案例。他说,只有在客户兴趣能够为项目降低风险的前提下,BWX 才应推进,但围绕更新后的 mPower 设计,商业洽谈今天就可以开始。
  • 公司可以继续作为市场化供应商,也可以自行开发该设计,或通过合资企业开发。Silver 不认为这会显著蚕食现有销售,因为压水堆和沸水堆的买家不同。公司及其投资者材料将 SMR 市场规模定为2040年3000亿美元。CEO 表示,脱碳、AI 和电气化可能需要“全球数百座、数百座反应堆……如果是小型反应堆,则是数千座”。

5. 算式:上行空间超过100%,政府业务提供下行保护

  • 从约200美元起算,市场化供应商情景——包括尚未完全计入共识预期的已宣布机会,以及基础业务持续增长——增加约95美元,即45%。已知但尚未授标项目的经概率调整的卖铲子业务中标机会增加50美元,即25%。开发该设计增加约80美元,即40%。Silver 计算的总上行空间超过100%。
  • 他说,政府业务提供下行保护:该业务有合同保障、持续增长且采用单一来源采购;相比之下,核能竞争对手面临更趋二元的未来。
Alex Silver

Hi. I am Alex Silver, and I am your little booth thing. I am also the CIO of ANM Capital Management, which Charlie Penner and I co-founded in 2024. We manage $350 million and are actively engaged investors in higher-quality businesses.

The opportunity that I am going to discuss with you today lives at the intersection of multiple sustainable secular growth trends. The first is addressing the increased energy needs across the country, data centers, and beyond. The second is increased defense spending. The third is the overlap of those two, which is energy security.

1. BWXT Anchors Nuclear Growth

That company is BWX Technologies. BWXT is a $20 million market-cap company that is best known for making the reactors that power U.S. Navy submarines and aircraft carriers. They have an incredible track record, having built over 400 nuclear cores for the Navy over time without a single safety incident.

The business itself can be divided into 2 segments. The larger of the segments, government operations, accounts for about 75% of the company’s revenue. That differentiates BWXT from other competitors in the nuclear power space, like Oklo and NuScale, in that it gives BWXT a business to build upon.

The other 25% of revenue is commercial operations. That exposes BWXT to the significant upside in the commercial nuclear power opportunity. Currently, BWXT serves this market as a service provider for fuel components and other services.

2. The Government Business Moat

Let’s first dive into the government services operations. BWXT has been supplying the U.S. Navy with nuclear operations since the 1950s, when it was part of Babcock & Wilcox, which itself has a legacy that goes back to the 1860s. In fact, B&W designed and supplied components and services for the first U.S. nuclear submarine, the USS Nautilus, which was launched in 1954. It was an equipment and service provider for the Manhattan Project.

Today, BWX Technologies is the only company to possess NRC Category I licenses. These are some serious nuclear chops.

We like this business for some pretty obvious reasons. The government business provides durable, long-term, and growing contracts that obviously benefit from increased defense spending and, ultimately, from spending on space projects.

The barriers to entry are about as high as you could find for a business. In addition to its 60-plus-year track record, it has a highly specialized manufacturing footprint with the only certified large nuclear-component manufacturing capacity in North America. It has a highly skilled workforce—95% have government security clearances—and it has sole-source contracts. Some serious moats, folks.

3. Commercial Nuclear Drives Expansion

Importantly, the government business also gives BWXT a springboard for developing its portfolio of commercial nuclear opportunities. So, let’s move over to the commercial space.

We’re going to make a quick stop in the medical business. This business provides radioisotopes and pharmaceuticals that are used in medical diagnostics and treatments. This is a small but high-growth, high-margin, and high-quality business.

We’re going to focus now most of our time on the core of the commercial operations business, which is commercial nuclear power. Currently, BWXT is the pick-and-shovel supplier to the companies building their own reactors in the commercial nuclear industry.

Instead of picks and shovels, they make things like that 90-foot-tall, 500-metric-ton pressure vessel that houses a nuclear core. Assets don’t get much heavier or have lower obsolescence than that.

The same high barriers to entry exist for this business as for the other ones. Importantly, BWXT is producing revenue today, unlike some of its peers whose revenue is entirely in the future.

Commercial nuclear is a growth market, especially if we’re going to meet the demands expected in the future from AI and other aspects of society. It also enjoys rare bipartisan support, including recent executive action that shortened the timelines for NRC certification of reactors, which reduces both the timeline to approval and the cost of getting there.

4. SMRs Could Meet Future Demand

Speaking of the nuclear market, let’s talk about its structure. First, there are traditional reactors. Think about a gigawatt or so in power. Those provide enough power for a city of 800,000 to 1 million people.

Then there are small modular reactors, or SMRs. Those are about 300 MW or less, and on the larger end can power a large data center. Unlike traditional reactors, SMRs are made in a factory and are modular, so they can be stacked to meet demand as needed. They also have economies of scale in manufacturing.

If we look at SMRs, we can split them into 2 categories: Gen 3 and Gen 4. Gen 4 reactors typically rely on unproven technology and systems, versus Gen 3 reactors, which use technology already in traditional reactors today.

Gen 3 reactors can be further split into boiling-water reactors and pressurized-water reactors. In a boiling-water reactor, the heat from the rods heats the water, which turns into steam and spins the turbines. In a pressurized-water reactor, the pressure keeps the water from boiling, and that water then goes through a steam generator, which produces steam.

Before going deeper on this path, I want to address a debate about SMRs up front. Some argue that it’s going to be too late for SMRs to meet the current wave of energy demand. We at ANNM have an entirely different view.

With on-site power options like fuel cells and reciprocating engines that are available today, they can’t possibly meet the long-term energy demands that are forecasted. So, we believe the bogey is to deliver power on a time frame competitive with large gas-turbine-fired plants, which now take about 4 to 5 years based on the backlog of parts.

While some players like Oklo and NuScale could struggle to be competitive in this time frame, we believe it’s possible for other SMRs to be competitive on a time-to-power basis.

In the boiling-water SMR category, GE Hitachi’s BWRX-300, a 300 MW reactor—hence the 300—is already under construction today. In fact, it’s one of the SMRs that BWXT is working on, and it has an estimated delivery period of 4 to 5 years.

However, there are only so many SMRs that GE Hitachi can make, and not all buyers are going to want boiling-water reactors. Some will prefer pressurized-water reactors in the SMR space. That’s because, in the traditional reactor space, pressurized-water reactors are actually more common and well-known, so they should be cheaper to construct.

If you go onto the U.S. submarines I referenced earlier, all the BWXT reactors on them are pressurized-water reactors. Despite all of this, at this very moment, there is no clear leader in the SMR pressurized-water-reactor category, which is where things really begin to get interesting.

5. BWXT Revives Its mPower Design

About a decade ago, BWXT developed a pressurized-water reactor called mPower, which was way ahead of its time in terms of customer interest but was favorably viewed by regulators, including the NRC, at the time. The design was very attractive and significantly advanced and, based on our diligence, could still be competitive on a time-to-power basis.

If the company were to develop this SMR, BWXT could also leverage its existing capabilities and credibility in the SMR space. In fact, if you want to see an SMR that is operating outside of the tiny ones floating on a barge, supposedly in Russia or China, you’d have to find a Navy submarine, board it, and there you will see a pressurized-water-reactor SMR built by, you guessed it, BWXT.

Of course, BWXT should only do this if it believes customer interest exists to de-risk the project, but we believe it can do so and could even begin commercial discussions today based on the existing mPower design, as it is updated.

6. Multiple Paths Create Value

This leaves BWXT with several attractive paths to create value from here. The first option is to stay only as the pick-and-shovel supplier, continue to supply large reactors and boiling-water SMRs with parts and services, and wait for another company to take the lead in the pressurized-water-reactor space.

Another option would be for BWXT to develop mPower either on its own or through a joint venture and thus capture more revenue for each reactor than just being a supplier of components and services. Importantly, we don’t believe this would cannibalize existing sales to a significant degree, given that there are different buyers for pressurized-water reactors and boiling-water reactors in the traditional space and the SMR space.

The company itself and its investor materials say the SMR space will be $300 billion by 2040 alone. Furthermore, based on the company’s recent quarterly conference calls and the CEO’s comments, we think that we agree with what they say, and they agree with our perspective.

I quote the CEO’s words: “If we’re going to decarbonize the grid, meet the energy needs of AI, meet the energy needs of electrification, we’re talking about hundreds and hundreds of reactors globally. Large reactors. Translate that into thousands if it’s small reactors. We are very bullish on this opportunity.”

7. The Valuation Offers 100% Upside

So, what does all of this mean for the stock? Today, BWXT is about $200, and we believe there are multiple paths to create significant upside from here.

If the company continues to act only as a merchant supplier to other SMR companies, including announced opportunities not fully in consensus numbers, and the base business continues to grow as it is, there’s about $95, or 45%, upside in the next few years.

Layering on the probability-adjusted pick-and-shovel wins for known projects that are not yet awarded adds another $50, or 25%. Should BWXT choose to develop Empower on its own or through a joint venture, in addition to being a supplier to others, we see additional upside in the range of $80, or 40%.

Altogether, that’s over 100% upside from current levels. Of course, the downside is protected here by the company’s government business, which, I remind you, is contracted, growing, and sole-sourced.

That differentiates BWXT from its other nuclear competitors, which face far more binary futures. So, that's BWXT. Thanks very much.

Alex Silver 在 Sohn 2026 推介 BWX Technologies — 文字稿与摘要 | BidClub