Sohn Conference Foundation · · 11 min
Alex Silver pitches BWX Technologies at Sohn 2026
TL;DR
- Alex Silver, CIO of ANM Capital Management ($350M managed; co-founded with Charlie Penner in 2024), pitches BWX Technologies at “the intersection of multiple sustainable secular growth trends” — data-center energy demand, defense spending, and energy security. The transcript describes BWX as a $20 million market-cap company. It has built 400+ Navy nuclear cores over time without a single safety incident and is the only company to possess NRC Category I licenses.
- The government segment (~75% of revenue) is the downside protection: durable, growing, contracted, and sole-sourced. The lineage runs from Babcock & Wilcox in the 1860s through the Manhattan Project and the USS Nautilus in 1954; 95% of the workforce holds security clearances, and BWX has the only certified large nuclear-component manufacturing capacity in North America. Commercial operations are ~25% of revenue and include medical radioisotopes and pharmaceuticals as well as commercial nuclear components.
- On the “SMRs are too late” debate, ANM takes “an entirely different view”: the bogey is time-to-power competitive with large gas-turbine plants, which now take about 4–5 years because of the parts backlog. Oklo and NuScale “could struggle” to hit that window, while GE Hitachi’s BWRX-300 — one of the SMRs BWX is working on — is under construction with an estimated 4–5-year delivery period.
- The potential white space is a pressurized-water SMR: BWX’s decade-old mPower design was “way ahead of its time” in customer interest but favorably viewed by regulators, including the NRC. There is “no clear leader” in PWR SMRs today. Silver believes commercial discussions could begin today on an updated design, contingent on customer interest de-risking the project.
- Sum of parts from about $200: merchant-supplier growth plus announced opportunities not fully in consensus is +$95 (45%); probability-adjusted pick-and-shovel wins on unawarded projects +$50 (25%); and developing the design, referred to earlier as mPower, +$80 (40%) — “over 100% upside.” The company and investor materials size the SMR market at $300B by 2040, while the CEO talks of “hundreds and hundreds of reactors globally… thousands if it’s small reactors.”
Digest · the substance, structured for research
1. A nuclear platform with a real business underneath it
- Silver’s opening frame: BWX Technologies sits where energy demand, defense spending, and energy security overlap — and unlike Oklo or NuScale, “BWX is producing revenue today unlike some of its peers whose revenue is entirely in the future.”
- The government segment (~75% of revenue) supplies U.S. Navy submarine and aircraft-carrier reactors. BWX has built more than 400 Navy nuclear cores over time without a safety incident and has supplied the Navy since the 1950s. Silver cites sole-source contracts, the only company possessing NRC Category I licenses, and a lineage through Babcock & Wilcox, the Manhattan Project, and the USS Nautilus, launched in 1954. His verdict: “barriers to entry about as high as you could find.” Its workforce is 95% security-cleared, and it has the only certified large nuclear-component manufacturing capacity in North America.
2. Picks and shovels, but 500 metric tons at a time
- Commercial operations (~25% of revenue) include a small but high-growth, high-margin medical business providing radioisotopes and pharmaceuticals for diagnostics and treatment, plus supplying commercial nuclear builders with items such as “that 90-foot-tall, 500-metric-ton pressure vessel” that houses a nuclear core — assets that “don’t get much heavier or lower obsolescence than that.”
- Commercial nuclear has rare bipartisan support. Silver points to recent executive action shortening NRC reactor-certification timelines and reducing the cost of obtaining approval.
3. The SMR timing debate — and where the white space is
- Silver distinguishes traditional gigawatt-scale reactors from factory-made, modular SMRs of roughly 300 MW or less, which can be stacked to meet demand. He also distinguishes Gen 3 designs, using technology already found in traditional reactors, from typically unproven Gen 4 systems. Within Gen 3, boiling-water reactors heat water into steam, while pressurized-water reactors keep the water pressurized and use a steam generator.
- Against the “too late” crowd, ANM argues that fuel cells and reciprocating engines available today “can’t possibly meet the long-term energy demands.” The relevant test is time-to-power competitive with large gas-turbine plants, which now take about 4–5 years based on the parts backlog. Oklo and NuScale “could struggle” on that basis.
- GE Hitachi’s BWRX-300, a 300 MW boiling-water SMR that BWX is working on, is already under construction and has an estimated 4–5-year delivery period. But some buyers may prefer PWRs because they are more common and well-known in the traditional-reactor market and should therefore be cheaper to construct. Silver says there is currently “no clear leader” in PWR SMRs.
4. mPower: a potential PWR option
- About a decade ago, BWX developed the mPower PWR design. Silver says it was “way ahead of its time” in customer interest, was favorably viewed by regulators including the NRC, and, based on ANM’s diligence, could still be competitive on a time-to-power basis.
- BWX could leverage its existing capabilities and credibility; Silver points to Navy submarines as operating examples of BWX-built PWR technology. He says BWX should proceed only if customer interest can de-risk the project, though commercial discussions could begin today around an updated mPower design.
- The company could remain a merchant supplier or develop the design itself or through a joint venture. Silver does not believe that would significantly cannibalize existing sales because buyers for PWRs and boiling-water reactors differ. The company and its investor materials size the SMR market at $300B by 2040. Its CEO says decarbonization, AI, and electrification could require “hundreds and hundreds of reactors globally… thousands if it’s small reactors.”
5. The math: >100% upside, government downside protection
- From about $200, the merchant-supplier case — including announced opportunities not fully in consensus and continued base-business growth — adds about $95, or 45%. Probability-adjusted pick-and-shovel wins on known but unawarded projects add $50, or 25%. Developing the design adds roughly $80, or 40%. Silver’s total is more than 100% upside.
- He says downside is protected by the government business, which is contracted, growing, and sole-sourced, unlike nuclear competitors facing more binary futures.