散户之王:交易加密周期 | Ansem
Ansem 对 Binance 事件的交易判断是:只要交易所继续运营,一笔可控罚款将标志着监管恐惧见顶,而不会击垮 Bitcoin。 当时 BTC 接近 $37,000,他预计年末突破前可能在 $33,000-$37,000 区间震荡;他记忆中的先例是 2020 年 BitMEX 诉讼,当时市场处于“周期底部”。Coinbase 是他跨情景配置的标的,理由包括现货ETF托管、国际永续合约、质押和 Base。
短期资金轮动偏向 Bitcoin 而非山寨币,但更大的周期可能在 BTC 重新定价后重新点燃山寨币风险。 Jonah 表示,Solana 的现货买家和曾在 $19、$25 价位错过机会的 VC,最终在 $45-$50 附近追高,享受到一轮小幅上涨后便不再提供明显增量需求。Ansem 认同,随着 BTC dominance 收复约 52%,alt/BTC 交易对看起来接近顶部。他预期 BTC 可能先触及4万美元中段,随后在更高位置盘整,“山寨币又开始玩起来”。
Ansem 的结构性押注是,Solana 将凭借与 Ethereum 模块化路线相反的一体化架构,成为加密市场第三大资产。 Ethereum 正转向结算层,而执行和数据可用性则分散到各类 L2、链下 DA、Celestia、NEAR 及多个代币,价值如何捕获仍不清晰。Solana 的答案更务实:全球规模化性能需要强大的验证者,而“所有事情都在 L1 上完成”既可能吸引非加密领域的 Rust 开发者,也适合消费、游戏和 DePIN 应用。
他的周期持仓将基础设施敞口与一个可能发展成持久业务的应用结合起来:Coinbase、Solana 和 Parallel。 Coinbase 可以把大约1亿名已完成KYC的用户导入 Base 和链上活动;Parallel 则有足够的战略深度吸引 Magic: The Gathering 玩家,同时不要求他们理解 NFT。更大的判断是,本轮周期可能诞生真正从消费者身上赚钱的企业,“不论市场上涨还是下跌”,而不只是靠交易所收取交易费。
加密市场可重复的优势在于抢跑注意力,然后识别注意力已经无处可去的时刻。 Ansem 交易 UniBot 时,其估值约为500万美元,此前使用量和费用数据已经验证了“带币的 Maestro”。Jonah 用 AI 代币说明同样的前置逻辑:在催化剂尚未明确前买入,因为注意力最终可能不可避免地到来。另一端,如果成交量达到此前日成交量的2-3倍,甚至超过代币市值,可能意味着狂热已接近耗尽。
Ansem 的风险框架将约70%的核心投资组合与30%的“degen”仓位分开,并把投机收益回流到高确信度持仓。 Avi 补充了一个行为信号:反复刷新投资组合,或准备截取盈利截图,都是应该降低敞口的提示。Ansem 最强烈的警告是,不要在只涨不跌的市场里连续满仓押注;“我是天才”的自信会抹掉此前制定的止盈计划,而写交易日志能帮助投资者找回情绪接管之前的决策。
嘉宾们都认为加密市场可能剧烈重估,但对于下一轮顶部是否需要经典的短促泡沫,还是会经历更长时间的缓慢上涨,意见不一。 Ansem 预计还会出现一轮抛物线式周期,顶部之后下跌约70%;只有当加密市场在约6万亿美元见顶、并保有数万亿美元底盘时,波动率才可能下降。Jonah 最初选择 2025 年 1 月 21 日;Avi 选择 2025 年 3 月;Jonah 随后改选 2026 年 3 月 15 日。Ansem 认为,市场也可能长时间震荡上行。
1. Binance 的监管执法更像出清事件,而非生死危机
节目录制于 11 月 21 日,距离 Janet Yellen 预计就 CZ 发布公告约1小时。当时 BNB 剧烈波动约10%,讨论围绕3种情景展开:国际追捕、监管继续悬而未决,或一笔可控罚款让 Binance 得以继续运营。
Ansem 表示,如果 Binance 能够缴纳罚款并继续运营,他预计 Bitcoin 会消化这一消息,或许在 $33,000-$37,000 区间震荡,并在年末前上破;除非监管机构真的关闭交易所,否则执法往往会成为“恐惧顶峰”(“peak fear”)。
他对比了 2020 年第四季度的 BitMEX 诉讼,诉讼之后市场快速拉升。Binance 诉讼首次出现时,BTC 在接近 $25,000 处筑底;几个月后涨到约 $37,000,Ansem 认为 BlackRock 的 ETF 推动以及剩余监管悬念,说明“我们差不多已经把所有坏消息都消化掉了”。
2. Bitcoin dominance 让山寨币全面解禁的信号没那么简单
Jonah 认为,Solana 在那些拒绝 $19 和 $25、最终追到 $45-$50 的买家获利一小段后看起来更弱了;这些买家随后不再提供明显的增量需求。Ansem 则表示,消息传来时他本就已经在考虑减仓,因此反而更难执行。
Ansem 认同 alt/BTC 交易对“接近顶部”。BTC dominance 曾从约54%回落至52%,随后把52%转为支撑;嘉宾们虽然拿 dominance 是否值得做技术分析开玩笑,但也承认这张图看起来异常干净。
他预计更可能出现的路径是:Bitcoin 突破、山寨币相对 BTC 下跌,迫使交易者意识到自己缺少 BTC 敞口。若 BTC 升向4万美元中段,随后可能在更高区间盘整,资金再轮动回小市值资产。
3. Solana 的一体化设计,是对 Ethereum 模块化路线最清晰的制衡
Ansem 仍把 Solana 归为山寨币,但预计本轮周期会“把它坐实为第三大资产”。他的层级判断是:Bitcoin 是独立的货币资产,Ethereum 越来越像结算基础设施,而 Solana 是领先的一体化 L1。
他对 Ethereum 价值捕获的疑问仍未解决。可能有大约10个 L2 代币,执行层逐渐离开主网,项目则在 Ethereum、链下系统、Celestia 或 NEAR 上选择数据可用性,他目前还看不清价值将如何在整个堆栈中分配。
Solana 押注的是相反方向:执行留在一条高性能链上,暂时不需要 L2 扩容。其工程师接受这样一个现实:要让全球分布式网络接近 Nasdaq 级别的速度,就需要高性能机器,而不是要求所有人都运行并验证节点。
他谨慎限定了自己的技术权威:虽然曾经是软件工程师,但并未在 Ethereum 或 Solana 上开发过。他更有限的观察是,EVM 熟悉度能够留住加密原生开发者,而 Solana 可以从更大的 Rust 工程师群体中招募那些此前没有加密经验的人。
4. Coinbase 和 Parallel 押注的是分发能力与真实消费需求
Coinbase 是 Ansem 的主要周期持仓之一。他看重现货ETF托管、国际永续合约、覆盖多条链的 Coinbase Cloud 质押,以及其近期更有效服务加密原生用户的转向。
Base 承载着更大的分发逻辑:Coinbase 拥有约1亿名已完成KYC的用户,而链上加密活动仍给人一种“只有我、你和 Twitter 上所有人”的感觉。只要把这批中心化用户中的一部分转化为真正的链上用户,Base 就拥有最强的零售用户导入机会之一。
Ansem 亲自玩过 Parallel 后,认为这款交易卡牌游戏具备足够的战略深度,因此将其作为更长期的持仓。它的阵营、能力和复杂度可以吸引 Magic: The Gathering 玩家,同时也能让新用户在不购买 NFT、甚至不知道什么是加密的情况下入门;Jonah 通过 OpenSea 快速估算,发现其历史卡牌交易量约为1.61亿美元。
Parallel 还计划打造更大的 IP,包括一款 AI 第一人称游戏,角色可以执行任务并随着时间成长。对 Ansem 而言,这将检验加密行业能否最终做出这样的公司:消费者是因为产品好玩而付费,而不是仅仅因为市场在上涨。
5. 一轮交易糟糕的周期,成了下一轮周期的模板
Ansem 2017 年进入加密行业,此前在 Georgia Tech 主修计算机科学、辅修商科,在一门新兴技术课程中了解到 Bitcoin,之后又听工作中的导师讲起在 Bittrex 和 BitMEX 上交易。Twitter 则通过 Cobie、TraderSZ、Loomdart 等交易者发布的图表和轮动框架,构成了他的非正式课程。
他在 2017 年的操作并不理想:Bitcoin 上涨时仍持有山寨币,以 BTC 计价遭受重创,也没能卖在顶部。但那一轮周期让他看到了模式:资金会以反复出现的方式流经 Bitcoin、ETH 和山寨币,即使每一轮的新版本都会改变路径。
2019 年以及女儿出生后,他暂时离开市场。后来他注意到 BitLord 发布中国街道空无一人的照片,而市场还没有意识到 COVID 的严重程度。由于了解纽约地铁的人口密度,他在 3 月崩盘前买入 Boeing 看跌期权;交易最终获利,但他在 Boeing 约70%暴跌前就平仓了。
DeFi Summer 把他从扑克桌重新拉回市场。看到山寨币实现数倍上涨、而 BTC 仍在 $10,000 附近,他确信 Bitcoin 会回到历史高点;这套轮动框架后来又在 Ethereum Gas 费暴涨时把他引向 Solana。
6. 加密行业的建设者与想赚100倍的交易者,共处同一个市场
Ansem 在 2022 年 Breakpoint 认识的 Solana 建设者,即使经历市场回撤,仍然对 DeFi、消费产品和去中心化物理基础设施保持兴奋。他们的信念和技术进展帮助 Ansem 维持看多,即使时间线上的大多数人都认为这笔仓位很愚蠢。
零售交易者的动机不同:有普通工作的人可以算出,仅靠储蓄买不起理想的房子,也无法真正缩短几十年的工作时间。加密市场提供了一种高风险可能性,让人“从人生后段削掉几年”,于是他们不断追问什么资产可能上涨10倍或100倍。
Jonah 将这种冲动与传统经济流动性的恶化联系起来,同时保留了风险警示:加密市场像互联网泡沫时期,少数巨头会崛起,但大多数项目会失败。Ansem 指出,2013 年市值前100的代币中有90%已经消失,后来的周期也在重复这一模式。
7. 一线交易者先制造叙事,基金之后才发现它们
Ansem 形容自己在微型市值币上属于第二批,而不是最早一批。专业小组会监控约10万-$20万估值的新部署,进行 rug 检查,核查流动性锁定,并追踪部署者历史;他通常会等到项目在500万-$1,000万附近出现“一点点脱离速度”后再研究。
UniBot 是他最清晰的案例。有人在3万-$5万估值时就发现了它,但 Ansem 在约500万美元时看到这是一个交易 shitcoin 的 Telegram 机器人,并将其与没有代币的老牌项目 Maestro 对比,再通过费用和持续的用户活跃度验证了这一判断。
到约2,000万美元时,他开始更公开地讨论 UniBot;随着产品显示出 traction,后续又出现 VC 投资和 CoinGecko 分类。他想表达的不是每个微型市值币都能活下来,而是 DeFi Summer 和后来的各种主题,往往先在链上实验者之间出现,之后才进入时间线和风投组合。
Jonah 将这笔交易概括为预测人们接下来会讨论什么:即使不知道确切催化剂是什么,也可以提前买入 AI 敞口,因为注意力最终不可避免。Ansem 更尖锐的说法是“抢跑注意力”(“front running the attention”);顶部出现在所有人都在讨论、所有人都已持仓,而“已经没有人可买”的时候。
8. Solana 的财富效应将流向协议、DePIN 和文化资产
Ansem 表示,如果 Solana 重估至 $100 以上,并经历类似 Ethereum 的第二轮周期,新增财富持有者会涌入生态代币和 NFT。与上一轮的区别在于质量——他称早期许多 Solana 山寨币,包括 OXY 和 MAPS,“基本都是骗局”。
他的协议观察名单包括 Jito:它结合了 MEV 基础设施、验证者和流动性质押资产 JitoSOL;MarginFi 则因在此前一个 Solana 借贷协议的大额仓位和薄弱风险参数造成 Solana DeFi 受损后,仍强调安全性而得到他的认可;Jupiter 是聚合器,“Solana 上几乎所有人都在这里交易”。
Aurory 等游戏可能有所帮助,但他更想寻找 DePIN,因为能够全球扩张的应用非常适合 Solana 的效率。他提到了 Helium、Hivemapper 和 Render,后者市值已经超过约10亿美元;但他也承认,“说实话,我没有一份好的名单”。
在文化资产方面,他正尝试寻找 Solana 的 CryptoPunks。Mad Lads 是候选项目之一,因为其团队拥有 Backpack Wallet,正在建设交易所,并拥有可执行 NFT 基础设施;但他明确表示,最终胜出的可能是另一个收藏品。
9. 决定周期收益能否留存的,是纪律而非信念
Ansem 认为,meme 币最重要的信号是极端现货成交量:日成交额达到前几日的2-3倍,并且超过市值。按他的回忆,PEPE 在 Binance 上市后的顶部,成交量约为24亿美元,而市值约为10亿美元或16亿美元;抛物线式价格走势和连续每日翻倍进一步确认了这一信号。
Avi 补充了一个情绪指标:如果他刷新投资组合5次,或想把截图发给朋友,他就会考虑卖出。逻辑是,交易者比自己承认的更相似,因此个人的兴奋可以作为全市场狂热的代理指标。
Ansem 建议将约70%配置在 Bitcoin、ETH、Solana 或最高确信度的山寨币上,另外30%用于链上新项目、永续合约和其他投机交易。一线交易提供上行空间,但利润应当回补核心仓位,这样一次隔夜50%的亏损不会摧毁整个周期。
对于周期终点,Ansem 预计还会出现一轮抛物线式重估,随后回撤约70%;如果周期在约6万亿美元见顶,之后维持数万亿美元的底盘,波动率可能终于下降。Jonah 不认同加密市场只能暴涨或归零的假设,并以原油在 2020-2022 年的长期震荡上行为例,认为持续上涨的 Bitcoin 可能带来反复的山寨币季,同时让过早判断顶部的交易者付出代价。
他们给出的具体顶部预测是:Jonah 选 2025 年 1 月 21 日;Avi 选 2025 年 3 月;Jonah 再次选 2026 年 3 月 15 日。
We were like, “Should we get a retail trader on the show?” Avi was like, “Yes, no-brainer answer.”
I am the William Wallace of retail.
I would clarify this: he’s not really retail, but the leader of retail.
I try to help him out, bro. I try to help him out—the quarterback of retail.
Do you ever wear Jalen Hurts-style eye paint when you show up to trading?
You know what I should do? I should do streams and come out like I’m a football player, in a full costume. I need a mic costume, bro.
You should show up to a Solana hackathon with the Super Turbo Warlord gear.
No, I need that.
It’s 1:53 p.m. on Tuesday, November 21, and we’re about an hour out from the announcement where Janet Yellen is going to talk about how she took down CZ. The headlines are slapping the tape right now, and the markets are whipping around. BNB is up and down 10%, and we don’t know what’s going to happen.
We could break it down into scenarios: if she says X, then Y happens. Ansem, how are you trading this?
Honestly, I’m expecting Bitcoin to hold strong here. That’s what I’ve been looking at. I think alts had their little run; they’ve done 2–3x. I think alt pairs are kind of topping, but Bitcoin has been strong.
If this regulatory news is basically just a fine and Binance can keep operating as it did before, I think we’re fine. I think we just keep going up. We might chop around a bit in the 33–37 area, but I’m expecting Bitcoin to break out before the end of the year.
I also have Coinbase. I have a ton of Coinbase, so all scenarios are Coinbase scenarios.
I think you tweeted this out, but basically everything at this point sends Coinbase to infinity.
No matter what the outcome is, unless they come out and say, “Every single exchange that has ever operated, we’re going to come after you next.” I guess that’s the one scenario. But in that case, we might as well pack up. We’ll all go back to trading pink slips or something.
We war-gamed this a little bit at my old place. We were chatting about it before the podcast, and there are sort of 3 scenarios.
Scenario 1 is CZ in handcuffs, an international manhunt, and a bunch of crazy OFAC and AML violations. Scenario 2 is just limbo. We’ve been in scenario 2 for—I don’t know how long. It feels like years, but it’s probably just months, and I’m getting a little tired of it.
Then scenario 3 is a manageable slap on the wrist, and the thing sends after a while because CZ and Binance pay their fine, and Binance is still dominating the marketplace after that. I don’t know. I agree with you, Ansem. I think this thing just keeps chopping with an upward trend.
But I wanted to ask you, against the backdrop of what you just said: tell us a little bit about yourself. How long have you been in crypto? Have you seen any scenarios similar to this during your history trading, with previous exchanges under fire? How are you referencing this versus the earlier parts of your career in crypto?
I’ve been in crypto since 2017. I was a software engineer before, but I was just trading crypto on the side. I was basically doing both at the same time, and I went full-time crypto in mid-2021.
I’ve seen 1.5 cycles, I guess. I came in midway through 2017, so that was half a cycle, when I didn’t know what I was doing.
I think it’s similar to the BitMEX lawsuit, which was in 2020—Q4 2020, I believe. I referenced it earlier this year when the lawsuit against Binance came out. I was like, “The last time they did this, it was basically the cycle bottom, and we ripped from when that news dropped.”
It’s kind of similar. Most of these things, if they don’t shut down the exchange entirely, have their peak fear when the lawsuit and everything comes out. Then it gets priced in from there.
Crypto is supposed to operate in a way where it doesn’t get shut down by one exchange going under or one exchange not being in control of everything. Bitcoin is its own thing entirely. We see that in the reaction to these markets, when people are basically saying, “Fuck you, we’re not selling our crypto because the government is coming after us.”
Earlier this year, when we bottomed around $25,000, that was the initial lawsuit announcement. Now we’re at $37,000, and we’re coming to the end of it. It seems like we’re getting all the bad news out of the way, with BlackRock on the side of pushing for all these ETFs next year.
It seems like we’re in the final stages of the worst part of the regulatory stuff. This came at a time when I was already thinking about reducing exposure a ton, so this actually makes it way harder for me.
You’re the biggest Solana bull I know, but it definitely looks the weakest. It has looked weaker than it has in a very long time. All the spot buyers and VCs that were chasing it, that didn’t want to buy at $19 and didn’t want to buy at $25, all bought at $45–$50. They got their little pop, and now there just doesn’t seem to be a spot bid in the market for this thing anymore.
That dragged everything up, in a sense, and obviously you had the BTC run as well. But now I’m thinking it’s back to BTC dominance. People had their fun with alts, and what I’m looking for is maybe we chop down to $34,000 or $33,000, then rotate right back into alts. You can reallocate to all your small caps again.
Right now, it looks kind of tough to be long if you’re just basing it on the charts. The flip side of the argument is that Binance removes everything you’re worried about, then you just have the BTC ETF, the ETH ETF, and probably a Solana ETF after that. It’s one of the weirdest spots we’ve been in over the last 2 months. The last 2 months were just so straightforward.
For sure. I agree, though. I think alts are near the top, against Bitcoin for sure. I can see a scenario where we get a Bitcoin breakout, alts pull back, and everybody says, “I don’t have enough Bitcoin.”
Then we get to the mid-$40,000s, maybe, and when we pull back from there, that’s when alts start having their fun again, when Bitcoin is chopping around at a higher level. I feel like people are ignoring Bitcoin. It’s really not that far off the highs.
BTC dominance is at the highs, right?
In that sense, it’s not being ignored. It pulled back a bit. It was at 54%, went to 52%, and now it’s popping again.
BTC dominance flipped 52% into support. I know. Fucking chart, dude.
That’s a cursed chart. If I were to draw a line there, that would be a sexy line.
I’m looking at it too. I’m with you.
Can you walk us through this? Do you think of Solana as an alt? Is Solana an altcoin?
Definitely an alt. I think this cycle will cement it as number 3. That’s how I’m looking at it.
This cycle, the focus for ETH is that they’re pivoting to the modular thesis. In that thesis, I’m not sure how the value gets distributed across the entire stack. There are 10 different L2s, all of them are going to have tokens, and some of them will be doing off-chain DA instead of using ETH for DA. Some may use Celestia for DA, and some may use NEAR for DA.
With ETH DA, it’s looking like ETH is going to be more of a settlement layer. That transition from everything happening on Ethereum to Ethereum being more of a settlement layer, with execution happening on other blockchains, makes it unclear to me how value accrues across the stack.
But I think it’s pretty clear that Solana is on the complete opposite side of that thesis. It’s the integrated L1 thesis: do everything on the L1, and you don’t need to scale via L2s yet. It’s the monolithic opposite of Ethereum.
You have the settlement layer, then you have Bitcoin, and then you have one integrated L1. I think Solana is by far in the lead against the other L1s right now, just because of everything it has gone through and how strong the community is. The developer community and the teams there now are much stronger than they were a couple of years ago, so I think it will be a solid number 3.
You’re an engineer. Can you tell us why so many engineers love Solana? Is it an amazing engineering experience versus EVM? Is there something computer-science-related that us finance guys can’t understand? Help me get it.
I think they’re just more practical on the scaling arguments around Ethereum versus Solana. Solana people aren’t as focused on full decentralization, where everybody runs a node and everybody needs to validate the chain.
The Solana guys are like, “If you’re going to make a globally decentralized system that can operate at the same speed as the Nasdaq, you’re going to need some high-powered machines operating the network as nodes.” They focus on that as the practical way this is going to work long term.
There’s no real way around it. It doesn’t really make sense to do it any other way. I don’t know about Rust versus Solidity, or how many engineers prefer one over the other. Everybody in crypto is very comfortable with the EVM, and I think that’s why a lot of crypto people are so big on Ethereum, including the L2s that focus on the EVM.
But Solana attracts a lot of developer talent that doesn’t already have experience in crypto. There are a ton of Rust engineers outside of crypto who don’t know anything about crypto, but they know Rust and know how to program in Rust. Solana gets a lot of that attention as well.
I was a developer, but I haven’t been a developer in crypto, so I’m not going to claim to have built things on Ethereum or built things on Solana. I don’t have that frame of reference.
I think ETH benefited in the last run from the majority of people who were getting into crypto being general retail. You didn’t get as many builders coming in, in my opinion. You got builders coming in on the tail end of the cycle.
On the tail end of the cycle, people say, “Okay, I made money. I quit my job. I can start coming in. I can start developing.” Especially in 2021, you saw a lot of people building copycats and useless applications—a bunch of casinos.
Now I think we’re finally getting away from that in some capacity, which has made me pretty bullish on individual assets. There are a bunch of things I look at now that I couldn’t really look at in 2019 and 2020—things I wanted to buy, feel comfortable holding for a year, and not think about.
Other than BTC and ETH, everything used to be a straight rotation trade. Now I feel like there are things I’m willing to hold for a long time. For example, I played Parallel. It’s a dope game. It’s actually pretty good. It’s usable.
It’s a value-y project, but I think I can hold that for the next 6 months and feel pretty confident. There’s actually a ton of good stuff out there, and I know you keep tweeting about cycle bags—just buying these things, holding on to them, and forgetting about them.
What are your cycle bags? Shill us so we can buy them for you.
One of my cycle bags—you just called one out—but my main ones this cycle are Coinbase, which I like a lot. I think they’re in a really good position with the spot ETFs coming. They’re going to be the custodian for all of those.
They’re also expanding internationally, with their perpetuals and Coinbase Cloud for staking. They’re working with a ton of chains outside of just Ethereum, too. I think they’ve pivoted really well to be more crypto-centric and crypto-native in how they operate.
Coinbase got a lot of flak over the past few years for not being in touch with what crypto people were looking for. I think in the past few months they’ve done a really good job of that.
I also think the Base L2 is super strong from a retail-onboarding perspective. Coinbase has so many KYC’d people. If they’re able to get those people onto the actual chain, that’s huge.
There are around 100 million people on the Coinbase centralized exchange, but on-chain it’s basically me, you, and everybody on Twitter. We still haven’t really accomplished getting retail on-chain in crypto, and I think Base is one of the best chances of doing that.
I love Solana, as you guys know, for many reasons. I don’t really need to go into detail there. Parallel is also one of my cycle bags. I didn’t expect it to be a long-term play, but I started looking more into it, and the game is actually very complex and fleshed out as a trading-card game.
There are layers to it. You have to play it for a while to get good at it and really understand how to play well, which I think is really dope. You’ve seen them start to pierce into the Web2 segment of gaming.
People who play Magic: The Gathering also like Parallel. Once you tap into a market of gamers who don’t care about crypto, but the game is good enough for them to play, you have an option to onboard them without requiring them to buy an NFT or know what crypto is.
Then you have the crypto-native people who are going to be the first ones using all these applications. Parallel has a really cool intersection where it can tap multiple different markets.
I said the other day that this is the cycle where we’re going to see a lot more actual strong businesses come out, other than just exchanges that print money off fees. If you have a game that people really enjoy and are willing to spend money in to upgrade and be better than other people, that’s going to be a successful business if it can onboard enough consumers who are willing to spend regardless of whether the market is up or down.
I think we’re going to see some businesses emerge this cycle, and that could be one of them. I like Parallel a lot.
I’m looking at Parallel Alpha here on OpenSea. Some of these trading cards are worthless, and some of them are trading for 1 or 2 ETH. It looks kind of like Magic. Is that the experience?
I always thought of Magic as this amazing game, but the exchange for cards is terrible. You deal with these bitter old men, and they take you out.
Wait, back up, Jonah. How do you know anything about Magic? How do you know anything about Magic? I didn’t peg you for a Magic: The Gathering guy.
It came out during my high school years. I didn’t play that much. It was mostly with kids I knew from school.
Did you ever play in any tournaments?
No, I didn’t make it that far.
That’s my closest comparison. I played Yu-Gi-Oh! when I was younger.
There are 4 different factions, I believe, and each faction has its own special abilities. Your deck has 20 cards, and you play against somebody else. Each card has its own attack, defense, and special ability.
You basically try to take the other person’s health points down to 0 before they kill you.
They also have other games outside of just the trading-card game. That’s the first one, and they plan on making other games as well. The newest one they’re working on is an AI-first-person game based on the Parallel avatars.
Basically, your AI goes out on quests, and you update your character as it goes. That’s their next game. It’s going to be an entire franchise of different things.
This is bananas. I just ran the numbers on OpenSea after you brought it up. We’re looking at $161 million of volume printed on these trading cards since the project kicked off.
There’s real stuff happening here under our noses. Part of why we wanted to have you on so badly is because you’re paying attention to it. I’m too fucking old, and Avi is too busy slinging institutional volume and trading the tokens that can handle it. We need people who are in the weeds looking at interesting stuff.
Thank you for telling me about this. I’m going to try to buy some cards.
You can start playing it. I can get you access to the beta. The open beta comes at the end of the year, but I can get you in.
Yes, please.
I mean, the trenches have been so profitable. Not that I can play them in any size—it’s just not really my game—but as an outside observer who pays attention to the people who pay attention to the trenches, it’s kind of nuts. All the on-chain stuff has been popping off left and right. Money can be made.
We’ve had some polished billionaires on the show who come from interest-rate trading. We’ve talked to Anatoly from Solana, who’s a developer and a super-genius. We haven’t talked to any retail-type people in the trenches.
How did you get attracted to crypto? Tell us how you managed to survive these cycles and develop your process without a formal trading background. How did you do it?
I went to Georgia Tech and studied computer science. My minor was in business, and one of my classes for my minor was an emerging-technologies class. My professor was a huge Bitcoin guy, and Bitcoin was one of the focuses of that class.
That’s when I first learned about Bitcoin. I’ve always been at the intersection of finance and technology. My major was computer science and my minor was business, so I’ve always been in that area.
When I graduated in 2017, I had a mentor at the job I was working at who was a huge crypto guy. He was like, “Dude, I’m making a ton of money trading on Bittrex, BitMEX, and all these sites.” He started telling me about altcoins, and I was like, “Okay, let me look into this and figure out how to do it.”
That’s when I started trading in 2017. I’ve always been on Twitter. I’ve always been online—I was a Tumblr guy, played World of Warcraft, played League of Legends—so I had been online forever.
When I started looking into crypto, I thought, “Let me figure out who the crypto people are on Twitter.” That’s when I found Cobie, TraderSZ, Loomdart, and all those guys.
When I was learning how to trade in 2017, I started posting charts like everybody else. I didn’t have any followers, but I posted a ton of charts while I was learning technical analysis from those guys. They were talking about how cycles work, how altcoins versus Bitcoin work, how money flows down through the ecosystems, and all of that.
I saw it in 2017. I didn’t trade the cycle well at all. I was all-in on alts when Bitcoin was ripping, so I was down a ton against Bitcoin. I also didn’t do a great job selling the top.
But I saw the cycle and knew what it looked like and how to play it when it came back again.
In 2020, when DeFi Summer happened, it started popping off. I was actually playing poker with a lot of crypto people and wasn’t really that active in the markets. Then people started talking about shitcoins on Uniswap, and I was like, “Okay, let me figure out what this is and get back into it.”
My friend Jeremy and I made a group chat on Telegram. That’s when everybody was trading against each other and trading microcaps on Uniswap. We went straight from poker into trading on Uniswap.
You didn’t leave the market, though, right? You were still in it and had your finger on the pulse the whole time. You didn’t take a breather in 2019 and look at other stuff?
I took a breather. I was more focused on my actual day job in 2019. I traded in 2018 and 2019, but my daughter was born in late 2019, which was also right around when COVID happened.
That whole time period, I wasn’t looking at markets. Then the COVID crash happened.
I remember BitLord was on Twitter talking about COVID in China. He was walking around Shanghai or Beijing—I think it was Shanghai—and there was nobody on the streets. I thought, “That is completely wrong for China,” because I had been there and knew what those streets looked like. Something was up.
I started looking at the U.S. markets, and in my head I thought, “As soon as COVID gets to New York, we’re fucked.” Everybody on the subway is face-to-face. If it spreads that fast and doubles every day, as soon as the first case gets into New York, it’s over.
People weren’t really worried about it, so I was short Boeing. I bought puts on Boeing, thinking, “Whenever people figure out that this is an actual thing, airlines are going to get crushed.”
I was short Boeing right before that crazy crash in March. That printed pretty well, but I closed it too early. I didn’t expect it to go down 70% in a couple of weeks.
After that, I started paying more attention to the market. Everything crashed, and I thought, “Okay, we’re playing poker with crypto people.” Then people started talking about DeFi Summer, and everything ripped.
I looked at the chart and thought, “How the fuck did I miss this 100x?” Bitcoin was trading at $10,000, so I thought Bitcoin was at least going back to its all-time high. I knew that for a fact.
I tried to tell everybody, “Bitcoin is going to rip soon. All these alts have done all these multiples, and Bitcoin hasn’t moved yet. That money is going to start flowing down into Bitcoin.”
They didn’t even know what Bitcoin was. They were like, “What is Bitcoin? We know Ethereum and Uniswap. We don’t care about Bitcoin.” Their introduction to crypto was trading on Uniswap.
That’s how I became active again that cycle. Bitcoin was my first big trade. Then I thought, “What else should I look at?” Gas fees were spiking on Ethereum, so I started looking at Solana. That was probably my best trade that cycle.
I had that framework for how to rotate capital between Bitcoin and altcoins, and I knew a little bit of technical analysis. It has always been easy for me to pick up new things, so trading Solana wasn’t hard for me to understand.
That was one of the weirdest periods, when people were getting into crypto through Uniswap and ETH but weren’t touching Bitcoin. Back in 2016 and 2017, everybody’s first stop was Bitcoin, so I was used to the opposite happening: the wealth effect from BTC into alts.
Then people started onboarding because of the crazy yields in DeFi. They were thinking, “I can make 100%. I can make 1,000%. I can 5x my money in a month if I go into DeFi.” People were going straight to small caps on Uniswap.
It just shows you how much the crypto market changes within a year, but also how much the same things happen again. You just have to pattern-match differently.
It’s like when your teacher gave you a problem set and then the test was a different version of that problem set. You just have to figure out how to superimpose it onto the new problem.
Why is it that this cycle should be the opposite, with money trickling from Bitcoin into alts?
I don’t think it was directly just altcoins into Bitcoin. There were also a lot of TradFi flows pushing the market up around that time period.
But generally, the people who are really good at trading crypto cycles have always had Bitcoin as their core asset. Now, for some of them, it’s Bitcoin and ETH.
If you have people buying altcoins when they’re down 90%, they usually know what they’re doing. They’re going to protect their gains by going back into Bitcoin or taking profit into ETH.
Whenever those people print on alts, they think, “Let me take profit into Bitcoin and take profit into ETH.” The crypto natives are often on the same side as these funds, and they know what they’re doing, so they control a lot of how the market flows.
I don’t think it’s directly Bitcoin to alts and alts to Bitcoin. I think this cycle there’s going to be a lot of institutional focus on Bitcoin because of the spot ETF.
BlackRock’s connections with people in finance are massive. In my head, I’m thinking, “Bitcoin is going to be the first thing all these people with gold allocations, stock allocations, and real estate allocations look at.” They’ll think, “Let me get 1% or 2% of Bitcoin and add it to my portfolio now that BlackRock is stamping it as safe for people.”
That’s what I think is going to happen. It also legitimizes the crypto space further across the board. If Bitcoin is stamped, then ETH is next.
Then the question becomes, “What are people building in crypto that makes sense outside of traditional technology and finance?” Once that happens, that’s when everybody says, “Okay, crypto is cool. Crypto is here to stay.”
I think this is the cycle where that happens. People argued that it was last cycle, and you could make that argument, but because DeFi was so new, I think it’s easier to make that argument this cycle, once everything has been through the ringer and survived.
In your poker circles and in the retail community that you clearly lead—sorry, not run—what’s the mood like? Can you give us a sense of what people who are passionate about crypto, this market, and this technology are saying after getting beaten up throughout 2022?
There are 2 main groups. You have the developers and builders. I’m closest with the Solana community of builders, not as much with the Ethereum guys, though I know some of them as well.
Even when I was at Breakpoint in 2022, they were super excited about the future of crypto and everything they were building: DeFi, consumer applications, decentralized physical infrastructure, and everything across the board. They were excited about the future and what they were building.
That energy made it a lot easier to be bullish this year, even while everybody else was saying, “Dude, you’re a fucking idiot. What are you talking about?”
I’ve talked to these people. I understand this technology and the advantages it has versus Ethereum and other chains. This thing is going to turn around eventually. Having those relationships and talking to them made it easier for me to make that bet.
On the other side, you have the retail degenerates. Everybody is trying to 100x whatever spare funds they have.
Right now, I’ve talked about it a little bit on Twitter, but you have a ton of people working day jobs who aren’t making enough to afford a really nice house in a short amount of time. They know that if they calculate how much they’re saving year over year, they’ll be working for a long time.
They see crypto and think, “I can shave a few years off the back end by making some extra money in the markets.” So everybody is asking, “What should I buy? What are we looking at this cycle? How do I 10x?”
I get a ton of questions like that. It’s the energy of people in the markets: they’re looking for a way to get some extra cash. A lot of people on the retail side of crypto are focused on that.
Then you have the builders, who are more focused on, “No, we’re building real things here for the future of finance and the future of technology.” It’s a nice dichotomy.
It’s nice to hear that from you. We’ve had this thesis sitting in our financialized ivory tower about why there’s an interesting casino element to crypto, but you bring up a really good point.
Life in America and in many other places has gotten away from normal people, and that’s not fair. You have to invest well to achieve financial outcomes that used to be part of the standard package.
My mom worked for the Postal Service and bought a house in the hills in California on a government salary. That’s not happening anymore. I see the appeal in crypto. It’s cool that people can get out there and trade technology that has a future, but obviously there’s a lot of risk involved.
It’s tough to navigate, isn’t it?
I see a lot of comparisons to the early 2000s. I wasn’t around then, but from looking at it, that era seems similar to me. A ton of companies popped up, and they were the giants of the past 2 decades, but there were also a ton of companies that went to 0.
Look at the altcoins we’ve had since 2013. If you look at the top 100 in 2013, 90% of those coins aren’t even around anymore. Go to 2015 and do it again; most of them aren’t around. Go to 2017 and do it again; some of them are still here.
That’s the risk of trading crypto. Some of this stuff is going to fail. I don’t think that’s necessarily bad, but it’s also why, when you’re right about certain things, you can hit 100x.
The market is still small enough that the big players can’t simply push size into everything. You’re front-running all those guys. That’s how I look at it. It’s similar to that dot-com era and the crypto explosion.
That’s why you see so much community in crypto. Anyone who seriously knows crypto understands that you have to pay attention to make money.
It’s actually tough, especially if you’re playing the gambling game or the small-cap game. You have to look at that position every week at least.
If you’re playing on-chain, you have to be looking at it. You can’t just ignore it, because at any moment the founders can mint, and you’re out.
Ethereum has an incredibly strong community. That’s a cult community of ETH people. They’ve been holding ETH for years and just never sell it. They literally hold a huge amount of their net worth in Ethereum.
That’s why you see these shitcoins pop up. Who are the people throwing $200,000 or $300,000 at $5 million or $10 million market-cap coins? It’s because people are literally storing all their wealth on-chain.
I have to ask a question about that, because this is a game I used to play. In 2020, I was flipping things like BASED and YAM and all this random stuff.
I actually have no idea what’s going on on-chain right now. I don’t even know how people are finding these small caps. I only see them when they’re at $15–$20 million, but sometimes I see people posting in chats about buying $500,000 worth.
Do you play this game, and how do you find these things?
I play it a little bit. I’m honestly always second. I’m in so many chats, and people are literally sending me things that launched at $100,000 or $200,000. I’m like, “How are you even finding these?”
They track a lot of the new launches and have lists of deployers they know are good. Some deployers are bad. They run rug checks on everything and ask, “Is this safe? Is liquidity locked? Who launched this? Who’s behind it?”
They play a lot of the $100,000–$200,000 games. I know a lot of people who do that. I’m there watching it, but I usually start paying attention once something has a little bit of exit velocity.
I’m thinking, “Let me figure out, at $5 million or $10 million, whether this has gone to 0 yet.” That’s how I found Unibot early this year.
I missed it at first. People bought it at $30,000, $40,000, or $50,000 market cap. I don’t know how they found it in all these chats, but they saw that it was a Telegram bot for trading shitcoins.
I thought, “Telegram bot for trading shitcoins? That makes a fucking ton of sense.” I was watching you guys do this every day, and I knew people were using Maestro, which didn’t have an associated coin.
I thought, “This is Maestro with a coin. This is one of the easiest theses I’ve seen.” I looked at the metrics, saw how much money they were making from fees, and saw that user activity was starting to become consistent.
I bought it around $5 million the first time. Then I started talking about it more around $20 million, and told people about it closer to $30 million or $40 million.
I was thinking, “This makes sense, and if they do well, this isn’t going to 0.” A few things like that pop up with these new, fair launches.
It’s cool because then VCs pick them up. Unibot ended up getting VC investment once it showed product-market fit. It turned into a whole section on CoinGecko, and other people started launching Telegram trading-bot coins. All these developers jumped in and said, “This is the new meta.”
It’s cool how those metas come to fruition in the trenches, then hit the timeline, and then the VC guys get involved. Now it’s a thing.
A lot of that happened with DeFi Summer, too. Everybody was yield farming, and then it turned into a real thing. That’s how these things happen in the trenches.
People store their wealth in ETH, and when they feel rich in ETH, they start buying CryptoPunks and ERC-20 tokens. What’s the trade idea here for Solana?
If Solana is the token of this next cycle, and people are storing their wealth in it—which, based on what I’ve seen on Twitter, sounds like they are—what happens if Solana starts to rip even more, or even continues the move it has made so far?
What trickle-down effects do we get? What are some interesting projects on Solana, or NFT projects, that you think will get picked up by the new Solana-rich people?
I think you’re going to see that wealth effect happen in the same way. I’ve been saying for a while that people wrote off Solana alts because, last cycle, they were basically all scams. OXY and MAPS were examples of projects that were really bad.
OXY and MAPS are wild to me. One thing people aren’t paying attention to is that OXY and MAPS make up something like $800 million of the claims on FTX.
There’s a massive OXY and MAPS position. Those tokens are basically worth 0. They’re 0. The hole is actually smaller than people expect because of that. There’s this massive fake amount of money that people are ascribing to the hole.
I remember when OXY raised $400 million in 2021—maybe it was the end of 2020. The consensus at the time was, “Yeah, ape it because it’s on Solana, but it’s probably never going to amount to much.”
What’s out there now that’s better?
If Solana gets repriced above $100 and has the kind of second cycle that Ethereum had, where it rips again, then when teams on Solana launch tokens, people are going to ape into them. They’ll ape into NFTs on Solana in the same way.
There are a few really strong teams. I like the Jito Labs guys a lot. Jito is a MEV team, and they also run validators and have a liquid-staking version of Solana called JitoSOL.
They’re a combination of Flashbots and Lido on Ethereum, but on Solana. They don’t have a token yet, and they’re running a points program right now. If they launch a token, I think it will probably be one of the strongest ones on Solana.
Then there’s MarginFi. They’re similar to Aave; they’re a lending-and-borrowing protocol. They’re doing some pretty cool stuff.
One of the issues last cycle happened with the risk limits on—maybe it was Solend. I don’t want to throw them under the bus, but there was a huge position on one of the big lending-and-borrowing protocols on Solana, and the risk parameters weren’t great.
Somebody built this position, and it ended up messing up a lot of Solana DeFi when they had to unwind it. The MarginFi guys have really been hammering the nail on being safe with how they operate, how they scale up, and how they build from the ground up. I like them a lot.
Jupiter has also gotten a lot of good reviews. They’re an aggregator, kind of similar to 1inch, but literally everybody on Solana is trading through Jupiter.
The experience is so much faster, easier, and more fluid compared with DEXs on Ethereum. That’s because of the underlying Solana technology.
I used Mango back in the day, before Solana blew up. I thought I was slick-looking and cool.
At the end of the day, though, you need real use cases on these chains for a DEX aggregator to be relevant. What are the exciting games on Solana? What applications are going to bring people over from Web2? Are we going to see those hit Solana, or are we not there yet in the cycle?
I think we’re there. Aurory is probably the biggest game right now on Solana, but there are a lot of new ones that we’ll see coming out.
What I’m really trying to figure out for Solana, and what I think will be the best play, is which DePIN plays on Solana are going to work. If I can identify those, that’s one application category that is very well suited to Solana versus other chains because of how much more efficient it is.
If you’re going to scale something globally, you need to do it on Solana. Applications like Helium, Hivemapper, and Render are possible because of the chain. Render is already big—it’s over $1 billion—but applications like those that are only possible on Solana are going to be the best plays.
I have to figure out which ones I want to hit. I honestly don’t have a good list for that yet.
So much of crypto is trying to predict what people will do next. Where are people going?
A few months ago, you could say, “At some point in the future, I’m 100% confident that AI will be talked about by everybody. Therefore, I want to buy AI coins.” You don’t know when, how, or what the catalyst is. You just know that at some point people will talk about it, so you buy it.
That’s sometimes when prices are low. Anytime Bitcoin is below, say, 70% of its all-time high, that’s kind of the mentality when you approach the market. You buy certain things because you know people will talk about them at some point, whether it’s a real bull market, a fake bull market, or an echo bubble. You don’t care. You know you’re front-running the attention.
That’s literally attention. The euphoria peaks happen when there’s no attention left to spend on something. When everybody is talking about it and everybody is all-in, there’s nobody left to buy. That’s when the euphoria peak happens.
If you front-run that, that’s how you make a lot of money in crypto.
From the culture side, NFTs are interesting. You have CryptoPunks on Ethereum. What are they at right now, a 60 ETH floor?
They’re still over $100,000. They went as low as 40 ETH, and they’re up 50% off the lows. I’m seeing a 55.3 ETH floor.
A good bet to make if you’re betting on the future of crypto is to figure out what the CryptoPunks equivalent will be on Solana, if you think Solana is going to be the third chain.
I’ve been trying to think through that. Mad Lads are possibly a good candidate because the team is doing a lot of different things for the Solana ecosystem.
They have Backpack Wallet, they’re building the exchange, and they have the xNFT infrastructure, which is executable NFTs that have all these other features. Mad Lads are basically their NFT.
I don’t know if they’ll be the one or if it will be another project.
That’s one thing I like about the way you explained your thought process over the course of the podcast.
You don’t get too married to things, and when things are about to fall out of bed, like during COVID, you didn’t look to crypto to save you. You went and bought Boeing puts.
How do you risk-manage things? When do you know you’re in euphoria and it’s time to unload?
I don’t have rules around how large portions of my portfolio should be. I trade more off the individual chart and individual coin.
I did pretty well with PEPE earlier this year. It was probably my best trade this year. It was one of those situations where everybody was piling into shorts on a meme that had no inherent value. It was literally just retail versus all the other traders in the market.
All these traders were going short, and PEPE was listed on Bybit. I thought, “This is definitely going to squeeze.” I was lucky enough to buy it earlier on-chain, and it was a popular meme in crypto. The frog was everywhere, so I thought it made sense as a way to capture attention in crypto.
Then it got listed, and everybody was shorting it. I thought, “They’re going to get steamrolled trying to go against this thing.”
For finding tops using technical analysis, I think volume is really good. When the volume spikes are 2–3x the previous daily volumes and are larger than the total market cap of the coin, you’re usually pretty close to a top.
On SHIB, when it topped, it was doing multiple billions of dollars in volume. When PEPE topped this year after it was listed on Binance, I think the volume that day was around $2.4 billion. The meme coin was at around $1 billion or $1.6 billion market cap.
You’re looking at PEPE versus USDT, right? You’re not looking at pair charts for the volume. You’re looking at the straight-up USD volume?
I was on-chain, and I had a long on a shady exchange—the only way I could get long on it. I was closing both at the same time, but I was really looking at the low-timeframe, 5-minute chart and trading off technical analysis.
Those volume spikes are usually pretty good indicators. Otherwise, it’s really based on technical analysis. Once something starts going parabolic, you know it’s going to top out soon. When the thing is doubling every other day, it’s done.
That’s the hardest part but also the most lucrative part: staying sober about this stuff. When you look at your Coinbase account or your on-chain wallet and it has exploded, it’s easy to say, “I’m good. Now it’s going to 3x from here.”
It’s very hard to stay calm and think, “What objective framework can I use now that will help me lock this in and not get too greedy?”
One rule that’s been really helpful is tracking your emotional response to things. If I’ve refreshed my portfolio 5 times that day, I have to think about selling.
I’ll be about to send my friends a screenshot of my portfolio, like, “Let me take some off.” Without fail, I’m sitting on my exchange thinking, “What are we at now? How much money did I make today?”
People are a lot more similar than we give them credit for. If a lot of other people are doing that as well, at some point they start thinking, “Wait a second, this is nuts. This is a lot. I need to start getting out.”
I’ve been saying this year that a good portfolio allocation is to separate your core portfolio from your degen portfolio.
Put 70%—Bitcoin, ETH, Solana, or whatever your highest-conviction alts are—in the core bucket. Don’t try to trade that all that much.
With the other 30%, do whatever you want: trade on-chain, trade perpetuals, yield-farm, and buy random new launches. Do that with a smaller portion of your portfolio, then redistribute back into your higher-conviction bags.
I think the way you make the most money in crypto is by staying in the trenches and being active with all the new rotations. But you also need a core portfolio so that you’re consistently long.
Even if you get messed up trying to trade low-timeframe stuff, or you’re wrong on a rotation and buy an altcoin that drops 50% overnight because something random happened on-chain, you still have your core portfolio. You’re not completely messed up.
Trade with a cool head. Discipline is the number-one characteristic of traders who make money consistently over time. The second is being able to manage your emotions properly, but discipline is definitely number 1.
The million-dollar question is whether you’re in your core portfolio for another parabolic cycle-top event. Are you here because you’re preempting another giant bubble, or do you believe we’re in a 20-year megatrend where crypto slowly starts to eat value transfer, the way software is eating the world in other areas?
Because crypto is so small right now, even if you assume that, on a longer time frame, we’re in a slow uptrend, the repricing is going to happen quickly. It’s going to be a parabolic bubble because the market is so small and it’s so easy for people to get access to it.
I’m still trading it that way. I still think there will be a cycle top, and then things will go down around 70% after that top happens.
But if we get to $6 trillion as the top for this cycle and then stay in the multitrillion-dollar total market-cap range, I think volatility will dampen because we’ll be a bigger market.
I think this is one of the last cycles where we’re still tiny.
Bernstein has been saying $10 trillion. If we get to $10 trillion, that’s not out of the realm of possibility.
The next bubble is going to be huge. People have now missed 2 cycles. If they haven’t gotten into crypto by then and this thing starts ripping again, there are going to be a tremendous number of people with a lot of money experiencing FOMO.
It remains to be seen when that top is. Maybe a good way to end this is to have everybody give the exact date of the next top.
I’m down.
I’ll go first. I think the exact top is going to be January 21, 2025.
I’m going to say March 2025.
I’m going to go a year later than you guys. I think it’s coming in 2026. Let’s say March 15, 2026. You heard it here first.
The reason is that by then the United States government will have thrown in the towel on pretending it has an inflation anchor and a way to pay back the debt. They’re just going to start printing their way out of this.
If there’s one thing crypto does right for your portfolio, it’s that scenario.
You’re literally giving us 2 full years of a bull market. I don’t know if my body can handle that.
Or maybe the bull market starts later. We get another year of hell, and then the top comes later.
You guys have been in crypto way longer than me, so you probably have this perception of crypto as something that either ramps, dies, or chops around violently and murders people.
I don’t know. I’ve traded some pretty big asset classes, and things don’t always work like that. You can have periods where something grinds higher.
Crude oil went from negative $37 to $120 a barrel between 2020 and 2022. It basically ground higher in a straight line. That can happen. We might be in the middle of one of these long grinds, and who knows?
That would be so frightening. If Bitcoin steadily goes up to $250,000, can you imagine how many altseasons we would have?
I would print. That would be crazy. There would be a new rotation every 3 months, and Bitcoin would just keep going up.
People would lose their minds. That would be max pain, because every 3 weeks people would be calling the top, selling everything, and losing all their money. That’s ridiculous. I actually think people would lose their minds.
Well, if that’s max pain, then that’s what’s going to happen. Even people are doing it now. The Bitcoin chart is just up, but it’s not ripping up; it’s just higher low, higher low, higher low, higher low, higher low, higher low, higher low, and everybody is shaking and panicking, asking, “Why is it not responding to stuff by going up?” Bitcoin has product-market fit. Bitcoin is real.
Every day, more money goes into it, and the ETF is about to debottleneck some of those pipelines of money. You see sovereigns aping in—El Salvador, and the Central African Republic keeps happening.
Ethereum has real use cases. Solana will probably start showing up with cool games, DePIN, and all that stuff. Who knows? Maybe we end up with a vortex of inflows.
A 2026 top would be crazy. Linear growth for the next 2 years.
I didn’t call that. I said the top is in 2026. Maybe we have a nasty path to that point, but I think we get a steady grind. I believe it.
The reason crypto goes parabolic is that this market is full of degenerates. The people who trade these markets are willing to put their entire net worth into these coins.
That’s why you have these parabolic moves. In other markets, I don’t know if you have people putting such a large percentage of their net worth into random things. Maybe you do. Maybe retail is starting to do that now with Tesla and GameStop.
But as an asset class, I don’t think anybody is all-in on their net worth in oil at any given moment.
The market for Nasdaq or gasoline isn’t something the average retail person can trade or would care to trade.
Meanwhile, most of my TradFi friends are no-coiners. They say, “Crypto is going to die after it drains all the money out of everybody’s pockets.”
But you mean the entire world’s desire to gamble on a technological future? I’m sorry, but no, it’s not going to happen. If it does, then buying Bitcoin is probably bullish. That dystopian future is probably bullish for Bitcoin.
I want to ask you something for the screenshot of this podcast. Can you move your head so you’re in the image underneath the crown behind you—the Basquiat crown—so we can get a snapshot of you as the king?
There we go.
That’s it. We’re good.
Let me clarify: don’t go all-in on one thing. Please do not do that. That’s why I said to have a core portfolio and a degen portfolio.
I know people who have gone all-in and spun up 100x or 200x, but when you don’t have risk parameters and continue to trade like that—“I’m all-in on this, I’m all-in on this, I’m all-in on this”—somewhere along that path, it’s going to wreck you.
The thing about crypto is that the market can be up-only for months at a time. When you’re long during those up-only periods, your confidence keeps going up. You start thinking, “I’m a genius. I’m so smart. I made this much money in 2 months. I’ve never made this much money in my life.”
That confidence tricks you into making trades with no consideration of risk. It traps a lot of people toward the end of bull markets. They say, “I made this much, so I’m all-in on this,” and then they do it again and again until they trip themselves up.
At the beginning, they said, “I’m going to take profit back into this. I’m going to sell at these levels. I’m going to take profit at this time.” Then they forget.
That’s why I say to journal a lot when you’re trading. It’s easy to lose track of what you were thinking a few weeks or months earlier.
If you journal, you can open your book and turn back a couple of pages: “On March 21, I said this. I said I was going to sell when this 5x’d. Why am I not trying to sell now? What happened between then and now? Why is my mindset different?”
Usually it’s because you’re wrapped up in the market. You’ve committed yourself to something and gotten lost in it.
This is why you’re good. Discipline is the number-one characteristic of traders who make money consistently over time, and I’d say the second characteristic is managing your emotions properly.
Journaling helps with both. It helps with discipline and emotional management.
I’ve always found that half of emotional management is reminding yourself that you’re feeling something at any given moment.
When you’re in the moment and things seem very easy, it helps to have a reminder to stop and think. That’s half the battle.
For sure.
Maybe we should get a reunion of the Untitled Crypto Podcast together.
We need to get Cobie back.
Where is he?
He’s probably traveling the world in a van somewhere. I have no idea. He said crypto Twitter was too negative and that he was going to do fun things. I’m sure that’s what he’s doing. He’s probably still on crypto Twitter, checking it every day.
I honestly don’t know how you do it. I gave up on crypto Twitter about a year ago.
It’s pretty bad. This year has been particularly bad. The amount of negativity online has been nuts.
I get both sides of it. People DM me all the time saying, “Don’t pay attention to those guys. You helped me do this and this. You helped me think through this. You made me this much money.”
But the timeline is extremely aggressive when you have a lot of followers on Twitter. It’s a different experience.
It’s funny because I tweet the same way I did when I had 1,000 followers. I’ll tweet, “Ansem’s drunk again.” I was doing that when I had no followers. My friends would say, “Are you good? What’s up?”
Now I tweet about crypto, and people say, “Ansem is tweeting about crypto again.” When you have 100,000 followers, somebody is always going to have a problem with what you said.
It’s a numbers game.
It’s a numbers game. If you tell 5 people something, there’s a low chance that one of them gets angry at you. If you tell 100,000 people something, it’s highly likely that somebody will have a problem with what you said, especially if it’s not consensus.
Just don’t put your address on your Twitter profile and you’re good.
The thing is, people recognize me now. I walk outside and they’re like, “Yo, Ansem, are you serious? What the fuck?”
Does that happen in New York? Do they call you “the Godfather”? Is it, “What’s up, king?” Or is it more like, “What’s this shitcoin going to do this week?”
The first thing they usually do is pull up my profile picture and show it to me. They’re like, “Are you the dude from Twitter?” I say yes.
Then they start talking to me, and of course, at the end they’re like, “Okay, what’s the next coin I should buy? What should I buy next?”
Without fail.
It’s been happening pretty consistently lately.
I think people in finance gatekeep trading. They say, “To be a successful trader, you have to go to Morgan Stanley and sit on a desk for 2 years. That’s how you learn how to trade.”
I don’t think that’s true at all.
This is what I respect about both of you. I played that game. I wore the tie and sat at the desk, and all it did was pre-screen me to join what was ultimately the most ridiculous shitcoin casino of all time.
One thing that’s great about crypto is that it democratizes these markets. When there’s a crypto crash, unlike in crude oil, you don’t ruin entire economies. The impact is limited.
But there’s also a positive: it can create wealth, and it can create an alternative to some of these rigged TradFi systems controlled by suspicious people.
My cope is that it has taught a generation of people the power of second-order thinking. If you want to be successful, you have to ask, “How do I play this game? How do I think about this? How do I get better at this? What’s the monetary incentive to get better at this?”
People are actually having to put some brainpower into it, which is probably a good thing.
It’s also teaching people about finance. Obviously, the risks are much higher in crypto, but once you learn how to manage your own money, I think the process of managing your own money is going to shift much more back to the individual over the next few years and the next decade, rather than pushing that responsibility onto other people.
One reason is that people are going to be forced to do it. They’ll ask, “How do I become more efficient at scaling up my savings?”
The other reason is that I think we’re shifting away from trusting big corporate institutions and back toward the individual. You can see it across different markets in different ways.
Look at how marketing works now. There’s a ton of marketing directed at content creators. People with large online followings often do much better with marketing than big companies do with traditional advertising.
The individual is becoming a much bigger narrative.
I couldn’t agree with you more. Managing your own money teaches you risk-management techniques much more than offloading your money to a robo-manager ever will.
It’s impressive for me to have the opportunity to talk to you about what you’re doing. When I was your age, I had years of white-shoe banking experience, but I was a horrendous trader in hindsight.
You’re miles ahead. Your discipline and journaling are things I didn’t learn to do until my 30s.
Crypto forces you to grow up fast because you lose all your money. Then either you learn, or you get wrecked a few times and ask, “How do I stop this from happening?”
Thanks for coming on.
Thanks for having me. I appreciate it. This was fun.
We’ll have to get Cobie on next.
That would be an interesting one—calling in with Starlink. He’s probably actually in space.
Are you in the ISS? Why are you floating?
I have no idea.
Ansem, thank you so much. It was great talking to you, as always.