RKLB工厂参观:卫星、航天器与任务控制中心
- Rocket Lab 的资本效率文化始于极端约束:Electron 以80人、不到1亿美元的成本进入轨道,而 Beck 认为 Richard Branson 在最近的竞争对手 Virgin Orbit 破产前投入了12亿美元,当时公司“手里只有寥寥几次发射”。 Beck 将这种文化追溯到以低于10万新西兰元(约6万美元)创立公司,以及 Ernest Rutherford 的名言:“我们没有钱,所以必须思考”("We have no money, so we have to think");他也完全认同 Molly 关于“资金消化不良”的观察:他见过最惨烈的失败,往往也是拿到最多资金的项目。
- Rocket Lab 的护城河不止于发射;Beck 认为,发射是巨大护城河,航天器部件同样是巨大护城河。 “不管你有多少资本。明天你站出来说‘我要造1000颗卫星’,祝你好运”——供应链“小得可怜且高度碎片化”,只有掌握航天器的全部部件,Rocket Lab 才能“真的想造什么航天器都可以造”。
- 2021年 IPO 同时出于务实与个人层面的考虑:用上市公司纪律约束企业,并打造一家能超越创始人、延续数代的公司。 “这个行业太多公司都由创始人定义……如果有一天创始人、CEO以及所有这些人突然没了,这些公司究竟会怎样?”父母留给他的唯一嘱托是“产生影响力”;只有公司持续运转,这种影响力才能延续到他身后。
- 在 M&A 上,一位一年完成3笔收购的人给出坦率警告:“不建议这么干。” 他用二手车场作比:车场上的每辆车都擦得锃亮,直到开回家的路上才发现遮阳板在吱吱作响;反直觉的是,“不存在所谓小型收购”,小公司耗费的时间远远超过大公司。
- Beck 强调,Rocket Lab 做的是不能失败、周期极长的任务:寿命12年、要经受“恶劣至极的辐射”、服务防务和星际任务;在月球项目中则承担部件和系统层面的角色。 美国月球政策反复横跳——“不,不,这次我们真的要去月球了”——如果你是一家月球公司,会“把资产负债表搞得一团糟”;Rocket Lab 则站在系统层面参与,而不是绑定某一项任务。
- 他对新太空公司的判断是:低估工作的难度,也没能造出可靠的产品。 从把东西送入轨道,到让它在轨道上运行12年或飞抵一颗行星,中间的差距“极其巨大”。“如果你想找一个死亡之谷,那大概就是它。”
- 对于还停留在 Long Beach 参观印象的人,规模参照是:Rocket Lab 在全球约有13英亩工厂空间;Beck 说,洛杉矶两座园区约有800名员工,此外还包括新西兰、澳大利亚、弗吉尼亚州、Albuquerque、Tucson、Middle River(Neutron 正在那里建造)、Toronto、德国和密西西比州 Stennis。 “这只是 Rocket Lab 很小的一部分”——大量工作,包括国家安全项目,都没有出现在镜头前:“有没有什么是我们不被允许看的?”“很多。”
1. 20年的“一夜成功”:从废品场配件到独角兽
- Beck 回顾称,Rocket Lab 于2006年在新西兰成立,最初只是“我们自己的小型技术开发公司”;2009年,亚轨道 RTA-1 让 Rocket Lab 成为南半球首家进入太空的私人公司——但不是进入轨道——当时总资本投入低于10万新西兰元,按当时汇率约合6万美元。那枚火箭上还装着 Beck 从废品场捡来的 Swagelok 接头,因为他只能买得起3.20美元的卡套。“好点子往往来自这种困境。”
- 公司箴言借自 Ernest Rutherford,也因此有了 Rutherford 发动机:“我们没有钱,所以必须思考。”
- 公司扩张路径是:2010年开展 DARPA 项目,研发新型推进剂和推进系统;2013年迁出新西兰、转为美国公司,并拿到 Khosla Ventures 的500万美元 A 轮融资——在当时“能想象的最疯狂金额”——随后做出了首台3D打印 Rutherford 发动机并完成热试车;2014年由 Bessemer 领投 B 轮;2015—2016年,Launch Complex 1 动工并完工,成为“全球首个私人轨道发射场”;2017年,Rocket Lab 发射首枚运载火箭、完成 D 轮融资并成为独角兽;2018年发射了3枚火箭。
- 第4枚火箭对 Beck 来说意义私人而深刻:他从小就梦想进入 NASA,办公桌和工具箱上一直放着一架塑料航天飞机,但始终没能成为 NASA 员工。“外籍人士、没有学位……客观上我太笨了。看起来没戏。”
2. 节俭成为文化——以及资金过度为何会致命
- Beck 主动给出的对比是:Electron 用不到1亿美元、80人的团队就实现入轨;而对 Virgin Orbit,他说自己认为 Richard Branson 在公司最终破产前投入了12亿美元。“我们永远不是资金最充裕的那家……每一项都被压到最后一丝余量。”
- 对于“8号铁丝”这个标签,他并不喜欢:在新西兰,这意味着“东拼西凑地把东西拼起来”,而“我恰恰不是那种东拼西凑的人”。但这个说法隐含的另一层意思——“手头没多少资源也要想办法做成事”——他承认“技术上确实准确”。
- Molly 说创业公司会“死于资金消化不良”,Beck 完全认同:“完全同意,绝对同意。”那些失败得最惨烈的公司,往往也是拿到最多资金的公司。
3. 上市:当下带来纪律,日后带来延续
- 2021年上市有两套理由:一套是理性的商业理由,另一套近乎理性、但本质上是个人诉求。前者是,“上市公司身份会教会你极端的纪律——不能胡来、浪费资本却不交付成果”;后者是打造一家能够延续数代的航天公司,因为“你活着时可以产生影响,但如果能让这种影响在死后继续,那么间接而言,影响力就大得多”。
- 同一年完成3笔收购,Beck 的评价是:“不建议这么干,真的很痛苦。”他的二手车场比喻是:车场上的每辆车都闪闪发亮,开回家的路上才发现遮阳板在吱吱作响;讽刺之处在于,“不存在所谓小型收购”,一些小公司耗费的时间远超一些大公司。
4. 发射是烟花,也是护城河;部件同样是护城河
- Beck 的平台化逻辑是:大家盯着火箭,是因为它是“天空中那朵巨大的烟花”;但发射本身是“巨大护城河”,航天器部件“同样是巨大护城河”。面对高度碎片化的供应链,新来者即便资本充足,也不可能明天就造出1000颗卫星;Rocket Lab 要实现端到端布局,前提就是把航天器所需的全部部件纳入自身掌控。
- Beck 强调,Rocket Lab 面向的是寿命12年、要经受极端辐射、绝不允许失败的任务,包括防务和星际任务;相比之下,短周期的低轨任务“可以被允许失败”。在月球项目上,Rocket Lab 向其他方提供部件和系统,并站在系统层面而非任务层面参与;对一家纯月球公司来说,月球还是火星的政策反复会“把资产负债表搞得一团糟”。
- 他对新进入者的结论是:它们低估了工作的难度,也没有造出可靠的产品。“把东西送入轨道,和把东西送入一个能运行12年或飞往一颗行星的轨道之间,差距极其巨大……如果你想找一个死亡之谷,那大概就是它。”
5. 参观展示了什么——以及没有展示什么
- Long Beach 任务控制中心是 Rocket Lab 五个任务控制中心之一,曾控制飞往火星的 ESCAPADE 航天器,以及 NASA 的月球任务 CAPSTONE;后者是 Artemis 的第一项任务,用于验证 Gateway 特殊轨道是否稳定。全天候运行期间,控制权会交给新西兰,“总有地方阳光普照”("it's always sunshine somewhere")。现场展示的 CAPSTONE 是2号工程模型,也就是备份件;真正飞行的航天器已经在约500万英里外、围绕太阳运行的近似日心轨道上。“就像《Contact》一样。你总得造两台。”
- 生产线上可以看到电推进卫星产线,推力器用于位置保持和部分升轨;热模型会接受热、振动和冲击测试;还有 LOXSAT,这是 NASA 用于测试在轨长期储存液氧的项目——“如果要做星际任务,这一点至关重要”。
- Beck 的梦想任务是金星:其上空约50公里的云层理论上可能孕育某种生命。他称,那里发现的磷化氢气体痕迹“只可能来自有机共生”;这项任务的目标就是前往金星探测生命。
- Long Beach 之外,该基地还有3座建筑;两座园区合计约800名员工,Rocket Lab 在全球约有13英亩工厂空间,覆盖新西兰、澳大利亚、弗吉尼亚州、Albuquerque、Tucson、Middle River、Toronto、德国和密西西比州 Stennis。Middle River 是 Neutron 的建造地。大量内容没有对外展示:“我们有很多国家安全项目。”
If you turn up tomorrow and say, “I want to build 1,000 satellites,” good luck. The CAPSTONE mission to the Moon we did for NASA a few years ago—that was done out of here.
Really?
Yep. The Electron rocket was under $100 million, and 80 people put the first rocket into orbit. These particular missions are very difficult missions. They have a 12-year lifespan, operate in nasty, nasty radiation, and are missions that just cannot fail. We have 13 acres of factory—
Really?
—around the world, yeah. So this is a pretty small piece of Rocket Lab.
Is there anything we haven’t seen or aren’t allowed to see?
Lots.
We just saw a tiny portion.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
We are here today at Rocket Lab in Long Beach with Sir Peter Beck. Thanks for having us.
Oh, thanks for coming. Appreciate it.
So what are we going to see today?
We’ll try and show you a little bit of Rocket Lab. We’re spread across the entire United States, Germany, New Zealand, and a little bit of Australia, so there’s a lot to see. But we’ll show you headquarters here, a little bit of satellite manufacturing, and some engine development.
Amazing. Let’s walk through. You have one of the coolest entrances I’ve seen.
Does it remind you of anything? This is how I test how much of a sci-fi nerd you are.
Star Trek?
No. It’s probably a little old. It’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. It’s like—
That’s exactly what I was getting at.
Yeah. I think it’s—
Yeah.
—the best sci-fi movie ever made because it’s the most accurate. But this bit is supposed to remind you of the bit where they shut down the HAL 9000 computer, you know?
Mm-hmm.
“Don’t do that, Dave.” It’s like that.
Do you have any other inspiration from sci-fi movies in here?
No.
No?
Just the one, yeah.
When we walked in here earlier, we were stuck to the timeline because it’s jam-packed with so much stuff. There’s so much going on. It might be cool to walk through some of that and show what you have—
Sure.
—in the lobby area. It seems like a showcase.
1. Rocket Lab Starts With Nothing
Yeah. Like any company, it’s the 20-year overnight success. We started the company in 2006, down in New Zealand. Between 2006 and 2009, we were our own little technology development house.
Mm.
In 2009, we launched our first suborbital rocket, called RTA-1, and we were the first private company in the Southern Hemisphere to reach space—not orbit, just into space.
Just 3 years after starting.
Yeah. I think we had a total capitalization of under 100,000 New Zealand dollars, which was about 60,000 U.S. dollars at that point.
Wow.
Yeah.
And to think there are billionaires starting companies now that don’t actually reach space.
This is true, yeah. I think one of the success stories of Rocket Lab has been—we have this saying. Well, actually, we stole it from Ernest Rutherford, and that’s why the engine is called a Rutherford. He said, “We have no money, so we have to think.” That’s kind of the ethos of the company. We came from very humble beginnings, and on that rocket there are Swagelok fittings that I salvaged from a junkyard.
Really?
Well, yeah, because I could only afford the ferrules, not the cost of the fittings. I would get the fitting from the junkyard and buy the $3.20 ferrules to put in it, then recondition it into a fitting, you know? It was seriously constrained stuff. But from that adversity come good ideas.
Mm-hmm.
In 2010, we won some work with DARPA and developed a new kind of propellant and propulsion system. We did a little instantizer rocket-launched UAV [?]. Then 2013 is really where we started to grow up. That’s when I went out of New Zealand, came here to the United States, and started raising our first venture capital.
Hmm.
Khosla Ventures were the first folks to put some venture capital into the entity. At that point, we flipped from being a New Zealand company into a U.S. company. Khosla put $5 million in for the Series A round, which, at that time for me, was the most insane amount of money imaginable.
Yeah.
For that, we got our first 3D-printed Rutherford engine hot-fired and proved out a whole lot of composite structures and stuff.
Mm.
Then we did the Series B round in 2014, with Bessemer leading that. In 2015, we broke ground on Launch Complex 1 in New Zealand. That was the very first private orbital launch site. In 2016, we finished it. In 2017, we launched our first vehicle and raised our Series D round, and we became a unicorn at that point. That’s when things started to move a bit.
Big deal.
Yeah. In 2018, we launched 3 rockets. Probably the 4th rocket in the stable, rocket number 4, was one of the more satisfying ones for me personally. Prior to this, I was a kid sitting in New Zealand, dreaming of working for NASA.
Mm.
I had this little plastic space shuttle that would sit on my desk beside me. When I started my career in engineering, it used to sit on top of my toolbox, then on top of my laptop, and so on and so forth. I never really got to be employed by NASA, but I got to launch their payloads.
And you couldn’t be employed by NASA because you didn’t go to college, right?
Yeah, no. I was objectively too dumb. I was also a foreign national, so foreign national, no degree—it wasn’t looking good.
Hmm. How does that bleed into the culture here? I’ve heard that you’re a number-eight-wire type of person. What is that?
Oh, no. It’s a New Zealand saying.
Yeah.
Number-eight wire. I actually personally hate it because it—
Really?
—means, well, it has two connotations. In New Zealand, it means to bodge stuff together.
Mm.
And I’m the opposite of a bodge-stuff-together kind of guy.
Yeah.
But its subliminal meaning is more about making do with not much.
Mm.
Which I think is technically accurate.
Yeah. So how does that—even from the beginning—bleed into the culture today?
Well, today, if you look at what we achieve with the amount of capital resources that we expend, it’s always pretty significantly better than most people.
Mm.
For example, the Electron rocket was under $100 million, and 80 people put the first rocket into orbit. At the time, our nearest competitor was Virgin Orbit, which was funded by Sir Richard Branson. I think Richard put $1.2 billion into that company before it ultimately went bankrupt with a handful of launches under its belt. So, yeah, we are never the most well-financed, although as a public company we’ve certainly been much more well-endowed than we ever have been. It’s hard-baked into the culture here that everything is ground right down to the very last bit.
There was an interview we did where someone mentioned that startups often die from indigestion of funding.
Totally. Absolutely. If I look back and think of lots of startups that I’ve seen or been involved with, the ones that have failed most spectacularly have been the ones that have been funded most heavily.
Yeah.
Or the most significantly.
2. Rocket Lab Goes Public
This episode is brought to you by Brex, my favorite. You become what you spend on, and I refuse to spend my time on work that shouldn't exist. Expense reports, receipt chasing, and manual closes. The companies building what's next, from Vercel, OpenAI, Anthropic, Granola, and Deepgram all made the same call. They all run on Brex. Brex is the intelligent finance platform that combines cards, expenses, and banking into a single stack with agentic finance built in. AI agents that handle expenses automatically, enforce policy before spend happens, and close your books in minutes. That's why Sorcery runs on Brex, so I can spend time on building and not busy work. It's time to get Brex AF. Learn more at brex.com/sorcery. That's B-R-E-X.com/S-O-U-R-C-E-R-Y. Bye. Turing is training the next generation of AI with tasks that require real expertise and real-world judgment. That's why companies like Nvidia, Anthropic, Salesforce, and Gemini partner with Turing. Turing builds realistic reinforcement learning environments and data systems based on real operational traces, the kind of infrastructure frontier labs need to train super intelligence. Visit turing.com/S-O-U-R-C-E-R-Y.
So as we walk through the timeline, there's a really interesting point where, in 2021, you go public and make a ton of acquisitions.
Yeah.
So what was the process for going public here, and how do you see that happening today with everything that's going on with SpaceX?
Yeah, so there were a couple of reasons to go public. One was logical, and one was—well, almost logical, but personal. I think being a public company teaches you extreme discipline. You can't be messing around as a public company, wasting capital, and not delivering. The company has always had a really strong culture of delivery, but as a public company, it's just much, much more intense.
Mm.
The personal reason why I wanted to take the company public is that I'm trying to build a multigenerational space company. So many companies in this industry are defined by their founders or a small group of people. You have to ask yourself, when they ultimately kick the bucket, what happens to those companies? The only thing that my parents ever said to me as I was growing up was, “Have impact.”
Mm-hmm.
“Have the most amount of impact in your lifetime.” You can have an amount of impact when you're alive, but if you can keep that impact going after you're dead, then, by proxy, you have much, much larger impact.
Mm.
So the idea here with going public is enforcing that discipline so that when I'm long gone, this thing just keeps going and going and going. Whereas a private company, it's like, if the founder, CEO, and all of that just carks it one day, then what truly happens to those companies?
It's interesting, because this is when you start making a heavy amount of acquisitions, which has become one of the defining factors of the company as you build out the entire platform. You're not just a launch company, and I think that's a big misconception. You do a lot of components and space manufacturing and that kind of thing. So how do you see the evolution of Rocket Lab as we look through this entire timeline and what goes forward?
Yeah, it seems to just be a constant exponential ramp-up. That's certainly what it feels like. To your point, 2021 was a very busy year. We went public and acquired 3 companies.
Mm.
Don't recommend that. It is really painful.
Why? Because of regulatory stuff with each acquisition, or?
Well, anytime you acquire a company, it's like you go out to a used car lot.
Mm.
This is going to—They're going to hate me for this analogy. But you go out to a used car lot, and you look around the nice, big, polished car. It all looks great and it's all shiny, and then it's not until the drive home that you realize the visor's squeaking, the wheel's rumbling, and all of the things that just aren't quite right.
Yeah.
There's no such thing as a small acquisition. Ironically, some of the smaller companies have consumed vastly more time than some of the bigger companies.
Mm.
It's just a lot of work to integrate a company in, aggregate all the financial systems, and get the culture where you want it. It's just a huge piece of work. So doing 3 at once was not fun. But ultimately, it was great. We got there in the end.
Mm-hmm.
To your point, I think people focus on the rocket because it's the big firework in the sky, and everyone gets emotional, and it's all very cool. It's hard to get emotional about a reaction wheel or a star tracker—a little component that goes into a spacecraft. But the reality is that launch is a huge moat, and all of these spacecraft components are huge moats as well.
Right.
It doesn't matter how much capital you've got. If you turn up tomorrow and say, “I want to build 1,000 satellites,” good luck. It's just not happening, because the supply chain is so small and fractured. We saw that, to get to this end-to-end space company in our vision, we needed to own all the components that go into the spacecraft so that we could literally build any spacecraft we want.
Wow. So we have mission control in here as well.
3. Mission Control Reaches Mars
Yeah, one of 5. This is generally for satellite operations. Sometimes we'll do launch vehicle stuff in here as well, but it's mainly for satellite operations. This mission control has seen some really cool missions. A couple of spacecraft—ESCAPADE—on their way to Mars were all controlled out of here. The CAPSTONE mission to the Moon that we did for NASA a few years ago was done out of here.
Really?
Yep.
You did it out of this location?
Yep.
Oh, wow.
And in New Zealand, actually.
Mm.
Because it was a 24/7 operation.
Yeah.
Each control room would just hand off to the other. It was one of the advantages of having things in opposite hemispheres: it's always sunshine somewhere.
Mm-hmm.
So, yeah, it was really good.
Did you discover anything on the Moon that you can't share but you're going to share today?
No. No aliens. That mission was actually the very first part of the Artemis program.
Mm.
We went into a really weird orbit that the Gateway mission was going to go into to prove that the orbit was stable. It was a crazy, crazy mission. In fact, that's the CAPSTONE spacecraft behind us. That's engineering model number 2.
That one went to the Moon?
Yeah. Well, not that one. The one that went to the Moon is about 5 million miles away in an almost heliocentric orbit around the Sun, so that's a spare one.
RIP.
Yeah. It's like Contact. You always build 2.
Yeah. Mm-hmm. So the headquarters has this cool lobby. We have mission control.
Yep.
What are we going to see behind these doors?
4. Rocket Lab Builds Spacecraft
Yeah, so behind these doors is some of our satellite manufacturing. We have a number of programs being built in there. We always like to have a really cool program—not that they're not all cool, but a particularly cool one. Generally, what that means is we always have a mission to Mars or a mission to another planet in the clean room there. But, yeah, we'll go through here, and you can see some of the satellite manufacturing that's going on.
You have a super-special dream mission to Venus, right?
I do, yeah.
So what's that about?
In short, it's about: can we find life in the universe? I think that's probably one of the biggest questions as a human species that we can answer, right? Are we the only ones in the universe or not? Venus has this really unique cloud layer about 50 kilometers up that, in theory, can at least support some kind of life.
And there have been traces of phosphine gas found in there. Phosphine gas only comes from organic symbiosis.
Mm.
So the mission is to go there and actually see if we can detect life.
Yeah. I am late to the game on this movie, but I recently watched Project Hail Mary.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So now I'm obsessed with it.
There you go.
When are you going to start using astrophage for your propulsion?
Yeah, yeah, that would be good. Well, I'll tell you what: burning dinosaurs is not getting us there, that's for sure. Yeah.
And so you guys— I think in here you're doing some electric propulsion. Is that what I heard?
Yeah, this is one of our spacecraft programs, so you can see some of the buses in the background for our particular customer. This is a production line, so you start at 1 end and sort of move over to the other end if you have a spacecraft. That little tent is the electric propulsion integration, assembly, and test area. That's where we integrate these little electric thrusters.
Mm-hmm. And what's the use case for electric thrusters?
Good for station-keeping, a little bit of orbit-raising, and it just avoids having tremendous amounts of chemical thrusters on board. Yeah, these particular missions are very difficult missions. They're 12-year lifespan missions, operating in nasty, nasty radiation, and they're missions that just cannot fail.
Yeah.
I think there's always a big difference between low Earth orbit missions that have a short duration and are allowed to fail, and what we do, which is super hard—defense-related or interplanetary stuff—where you just can't have stuff fail.
Yeah. We just passed by 1 of your vending machines.
Yeah.
What is in that? I just saw some tape and some—
Oh, yeah, no, it's like supplies.
—electrical components.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay.
Not chips.
What is that?
Well, it just makes it easier for the staff if they need various bits and pieces—consumables for the—
Yeah.
—spacecraft build. Rather than going to a storeroom, having to stand in line, and asking somebody, you can just go to the vending machine and get it. It's just way faster.
That's innovation.
Wow. I'm sure if you asked them, they would rather have chocolate bars, but—
So, okay, we have this big, huge facility behind us.
Mm.
Are we allowed to talk about this?
5. Rocket Lab Scales Beyond Launch
Yeah, this is a thermal model of one of our spacecraft that we built for a customer. It gives you a sense of the scale here. These are just aluminum blocks to represent thermal masses. Something like this, we'll build the complete spacecraft, and then it'll go into thermal, vibe, and shock testing before we actually start to put the real one together.
Mm. Where do you do all your testing?
It's all done in this facility.
Yeah.
We could go in there, but it would take forever to get you booted up into extremely flattering gear. But there's shock testing, environmental testing, and functional testing in there.
So we're in just 1 of how many buildings on this site?
3 buildings on this site. Overall, I did the calculation: we have 13 acres of factory space around the world.
Really?
Yeah, thereabouts. So this is a pretty small piece of Rocket Lab.
Oh my gosh.
Yeah.
So you have New Zealand, you have here, you have Virginia.
Yeah, we have—
Germany—
—Albuquerque, Tucson, Arizona, and a whole bunch of stuff in Middle River. That's where the Neutron rocket is being built. And then Toronto in Canada, and then Manark in Germany. Oh, you know, I'm blanking on a whole bunch: Stennis in Mississippi. So, yeah, all—yeah, a whole bunch of places.
How many employees are in this LA facility?
I think there's about 800, thereabouts, across the 2 campuses.
It's a lot. Are we allowed to look in here?
Yeah.
I always have to ask. You never know.
No, I know, but you have to look in here. This is beautiful.
This is beautiful.
Yeah, this is a project we're doing for NASA called LOXSAT. That big Christmas bauble on the top is actually a sphere full of liquid oxygen. We're helping NASA figure out how to store liquid oxygen in orbit for very long periods of time, which is super important if you're going interplanetary and doing long-duration missions.
People are now trying to mine that on the Moon.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, it beats having to carry it there, I guess. So, yeah.
Are you excited or hopeful about the Moon—the lunar programs, or whatever they want to do?
Oh, look, I mean, I'm like any space geek: I'm super excited.
Yeah.
But I guess where we play in the Moon stuff is that we provide a lot of components and systems to other folks doing the Moon stuff. That's mainly because there's a bit of whiplash there: America's going to the Moon. No, no, now we're going to Mars. Now we're going to the Moon again. Now we're going to Mars. No, no, this time we're really going to the Moon. That's fine, but when you're a Moon company, that just plays havoc with your balance sheet, and you're just swinging around all over the place. We get to play in these programs, but we like to play at a system level rather than a mission level.
What do you think the biggest mistake is for these new entrants to the space ecosystem? Apparently, the space economy doesn't actually exist.
Yeah.
But what do you think the biggest mistakes people—new entrants—are making in the space ecosystem?
That's a big question, because there are so many different facets to it. More generally, I would say it's the underestimation of how hard it is. But also, I'd say most failures are because people don't build reliable stuff. It's easy to rush it and throw something on orbit, but I think the distance between putting something on orbit and putting something on an orbit that can last 12 years or go to a planet—that gap is just massive. So, if you want a valley of death, that's kind of it.
We're just about finished at this location. Is there anything we haven't seen that we're not allowed to see?
Lots.
A lot?
Yeah.
We just saw a tiny portion of it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, we have a lot of national security programs, so these are the missions that we can show you.
Bummer.
Yeah.
Damn.
It's still pretty cool.
It's really cool.
Yeah.
I'm not knocking it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It's really cool.
Yeah.
Okay. So now we'll go over to the engine propulsion lab.
Yep.
Hey, it's Molly. If you enjoy our interviews, check out our newsletter, sorcery.vc, where we deliver a once a week top deals and tech headlines email, and also go deeper on our podcast interviews. Subscribe to Sorcery today. And don't forget to subscribe to the podcast on YouTube, Spotify, Apple, or wherever you listen. Link in description to sign up.