Rhino——如何交易新闻而不被虚假信号骗到
- Rhino 的核心原则是:长期存活,而不是一份惊艳的损益表,才是交易能力唯一经得起时间检验的证明。 他在2016-17年上行行情中赚到钱,2018年靠山寨币和期权亏光,通过反复充值并爆掉 BitMEX 账户,直到2019年底才停止爆仓。只有经历2020-21年和2022年熊市后,他才觉得自己真正具备了能力:“你可以连续5年做得很好,却在犯蠢的2个月里毁掉5年的努力。”
- 他最喜欢的交易,是在主导叙事和市场情绪同时走向极端后,反向交易这套叙事。 关税恐慌期间,他等到市场从不相信演变为大萧条式恐慌;伊朗战争期间,“把伊朗从地球表面核平”的威胁,则标志着言辞几乎没有进一步恶化的空间。这笔交易本质上是“什么都不会发生的仓位”:如果灾难真的发生,市场还有更大的问题;如果没有发生,风险资产就会反弹。
- 逆向交易只在拐点附近有效,持续逆向则是“智力自慰”。 Rhino 一年大概只用1到2次社交媒体情绪信号,比如 BTC 连续打印约10或11根周线阴线、交易员开始渴望更多下跌之后。在普通牛市中,人群看多只是因为价格在上涨,硬要对着市场做,只会把性格特征变成亏损。
- 事件驱动的下影线,在恐惧中的消息没有带来更多抛售时,可能形成异常不对称的失效位。 CLARITY Act 被否决前,市场给予其通过的概率本来就只有约18%,但 BTC 随后的下影线很浅;之后 FOMC 加息也没有跌破那根K线,进一步强化了该位置。这样一来,代价只有几个百分点的下行风险,对应的却可能是 Hyperliquid 等资产约20-30%的上涨空间:“消息出来后的即时反应”不一定是市场的自然状态。
- Rhino 仍愿意交易加密货币,但已经看不到大型长期配置中明确的结构性边际买家。 ETF 这条主线、对 Trump 监管支持的预期、Trump coin 和 DATs 要么已经兑现,要么已经失败;据称沉睡了12或13年的钱包也卖出了数十亿美元 BTC。ETH 和 SOL 仅勉强突破2021年高点便被“摧毁”,如今他的流动净资产约95%都在 TradFi;加密货币主要是战术性永续合约交易的场所。
- 当真正的优势是多年积累的主观判断时,试图把“edge”精确表述出来反而被高估。 Rhino 无法把自己的流程压缩成一套公式,但他会识别市场状态,对涨跌方向保持情绪中立,耐心等待、执行,并观察知情资金的买卖如何体现在价格上。“当你持续盈利了足够多年之后,你会清楚自己确实有优势——只是未必能把它定义出来。”
- 他2026年的失望,源于没有抓住机会,而不是爆仓。 他的收益大致跑平 Nasdaq,意味着被动持有指数也能得到同样结果;与此同时,他没有做好金属、能源和存储器交易,而且减少了在交易桌前的时间。他不认为市场正在变得更难:波动率提高了归零风险,但也提供了更多足以改变人生的“击球机会”;他的应对是重新增加盯盘时间,而不是彻底重塑方法论。
1. 长期存活把早期运气变成真正的交易生涯
Rhino 在2015年底或2016年前后进入 TradFi,几乎没有金融背景。股市平稳上行,让他在 Nvidia、AMD、加拿大大麻股以及铀矿逻辑上做多获利;他当时以为铀矿交易靠的是基本面,如今则称之为运气。真正留下的教训是,他始终低估抛物线式行情——卖掉一个随后从2X变成20X的仓位。
轻松赚到的钱,让他在真正具备能力之前就以为自己很厉害。之后他持有山寨币一路跌向零,并在2018年崩盘期间交易期权,几乎亏光全部资金;2018和2019年,他反复给 BitMEX 账户注资、把账户做大,随后再全部爆掉。直到2019年底,爆仓才终于停止;也正是在那时,他离开了最后一份传统工作。
2020年新冠暴跌前后的及时降风险和重新加风险,再加上 Nvidia 看涨期权,让 Rhino 从微不足道的本金进入“真正参与这场游戏”的阶段。但他没有立即给自己下结论,而是等到一个完整周期走完:2020-21年取得强劲收益,随后在2022年成功转空,才让这套表现看起来可以重复,而不是只适用于某一种市场状态。
他的标准,是在无法回测的压力下仍然活下来。家人去世、关系危机,或者连续2个月缺乏纪律,都可能抹掉5年的有效积累;3AC 从惊人扩张到崩溃,就是最极端的样本。“长期存活才是这场游戏里真正唯一重要的事。”(Longevity is really the only thing that matters in this game.)
2. 最好的反向交易,始于单一叙事吞噬整个市场
Rhino 形容自己是“非常、非常纯粹的主观交易员”:依靠多年积累的模式识别、新闻经验、情绪变化和直觉,而不是一套固定系统。他在公开平台上的仓位表达,其实没有读者想象得那么神秘——明确写出“我在这里买入”或“我在这里卖出”,他会视为真实观点;周围大量模糊的发言,则只是娱乐。
他最喜欢的交易,始于一个支配所有价格波动的总叙事。关税恐慌期间,Trump 越来越激进的提议推动市场持续下跌,原本不以为然的交易员逐渐转向大萧条和贸易战崩溃预期。价格跌到足以支撑风险回报后,这种从不相信到恐慌的转变,就成了他寻找多头机会的信号。
伊朗事件提供了更典型的“末端言辞”案例:不断升级的威胁最终发展到要抹去一个约有9000万人口的国家。Rhino 的框架很简单:要么真的发生这种级别的事件,交易员就会有更大的问题;要么言辞已经耗尽制造新增下行空间的能力。他把由此展开的反向交易称为“本质上就是一个什么都不会发生的仓位”。
悲观情绪帮助他止盈,也让他避免“喝下 Kool-Aid”,但同样会让他过早否定新想法。他并不是永久看空者:经历了2022年的残酷行情——包括大型公司财报后跳空下跌约30%——他判断做空端的大部分利润空间已经消失,之后转为以做多为主。
3. 情绪只在极端位置有用,不是永久的逆向信号
Rhino 不接受交易员必须独立产生每一个想法的规则。如果自己没有观点,而一位可信且已经证明盈利能力的朋友十分确信某笔交易,他可能会盲目跟随;擅长链上市场的朋友,也能替他覆盖自己不跟踪的领域。但他不会仅仅因为另一位交易员看空,就放弃自己原有的看多逻辑。
Twitter 情绪一年大概只在1到2次真正有用。2022年 BTC 连续打印约10或11根周线阴线后,那些此前一直抵抗下跌的交易员似乎已经“对这些红色K线成瘾”,并敌视任何在支撑位做多的人。真正有价值的不是单独的看空发言,而是价格位置与敌意情绪同时达到极端。
持续逆向交易会失败,因为“逆向只有在拐点才赚钱”。2020-21年,市场普遍看多准确反映了价格上涨,散户在行情中段和后段也确实赚到了钱。Rhino 更尖锐的判断是,永久看空者迷恋的是站在群体对面并战胜群体的智力优越感:“归根结底,这就是智力自慰。”
4. 一根浅浅的消息下影线,可能定义整笔交易
Rhino 寻找的是那些在原本平静的时期吸收了整个市场注意力的事件。如果市场期待的冲击终于到来,而价格反应却很浅,市场就同时提供了信息和清晰的失效位;重要性不是靠正式的新闻分级系统判断,而是看注意力和直觉。
CLARITY Act 决策前,市场给予其通过的概率已经约为18%,所以被否决基本在预期之内,但仍带有不确定性。BTC 浅浅的下影线给了偏多的 Rhino 一个近距离止损位;之后 FOMC 加息仍未跌破那根K线,同一区域就变成“双重强化的失效位”。Hyperliquid 等资产随后可以在仅承担几个百分点明确下行风险的情况下,上涨约20-30%。
Trump coin 事件提供了相反方向的案例。SOL 一度触及约300-310美元,随后回落至约260美元下方,也就是前一轮周期高点下方;此前美国现任总统刚刚发行了一枚 meme coin。Rhino 将这场超现实的狂热和失败的突破,视为做空 SOL、降低现货敞口的直接机会。
他拒绝 Thread Guy 试图把 Zcash 事件与 Lighter 宣布推出 Robinhood 永续合约归入同一套交易逻辑。那些事件改变了市场对基本面的判断;Zcash 的价格则下探至约250美元、收在约360美元附近,导致失效位过宽,无法支持合理杠杆。只有当一个位置与失效位之间的距离足够短、能够保留不对称性时,它才有用。
5. 图表会暴露知情参与者无法隐藏的东西
Rhino 毫不掩饰自己是“看图觉得不错就交易”的人,但这并不是机械地画头肩形态。他的逻辑是信息型的:更聪明的分析师和内部人士可能比他知道得更多,但要据此行动,就必须买入或卖出。因此,他们试图隐藏的信息最终会通过价格显现出来。
这也是为什么坏消息伴随价格坚挺,有时比交易员自己的叙事更重要。几次交易中,Rhino 注意到无法解释的强势,先行买入,随后在1或2天后看到相关消息浮出水面。用老交易员的话说,信息已经“显示在盘口里”,尽管他和 Thread Guy 一样不太喜欢这句话。
2025年秋季的 Pump.fun,是一个纯靠图表交易的典型案例。Rhino 避开了上线阶段,观察价格深跌后形成建设性底部,同时注意到几乎所有人都坚称自己永远不会买它。可见的多头只有少数几个,包括 Thread Guy;这组信号最后被他概括成一句话:“所有人都拒绝做多它,但现在图表看起来不错。”
宏观判断也通过同样的主观综合进入交易。Rhino 吸收 Fed 政策、政治、经济和价格信息,直到它们“在潜意识里融合”成看多、看空或不确定;只有在市场真正关心某项数据时,他才会专门研究具体发布内容。2022年,这意味着 CPI 和6月原油顶部——当时原油与风险资产几乎呈直接反向关系。
6. 财富保全会改变目标函数
当净资产达到重要规模后,Rhino 认为控制下行必须占据主导地位。波动市场每年至少应该提供“3或4次足以改变一代人的机会”,因此上行机会会自行照顾自己;真正困难的是避免在熊市中留下大坑、陷入心理失衡,以及从巨额回撤中漫长爬回来的过程。
他最近一次最接近警戒线的经历,是2023年的 AMD 财报交易。当时股票和图表都看涨,他通过看涨期权承担了过高杠杆;AMD 盘后最初大幅跳低,威胁到一笔重大亏损,随后却完全收复跌幅,并指向单日约10%的上涨。他最终逃了出来,但止盈过早,也意识到这次存活依赖的是超大仓位最终反弹。
仓位大小仍然取决于具体情境,而不是固定公式:信念强度、全账户风险和到失效位的距离,比报价上的杠杆倍数更重要。失效位很近时可以下更大仓位;接飞刀时则应分批买入现货,而不是使用杠杆。2023年,他每月提取永续合约利润而非继续复利,并用这些资金在2022年熊市后重建现货仓位。
工具选择同样直接。Rhino 交易 TradFi 期权,却从未交易加密货币期权;他偏好永续合约,并告诉 Thread Guy:“不要交易期权。”在他看来,对大多数人而言,期权“基本就是一台烧钱机器”;所谓杠杆,如果不知道加密仓位相对于交易员完整投资组合有多大,也没有太大意义。
7. 加密货币有交易机会,但下一个结构性买家并不清晰
在 BTC 从约6.7万美元涨至8.3万美元的近期行情中,Rhino 没有买到绝对底部,此前交易过 HYPE,随后参与了 CLARITY Act 和 FOMC 这套交易。之后,Ethena、Zcash、HYPE 和 LIT 似乎都失去了最强的结构;BTC、SOL 和几乎整个 ETH 则在年度开盘价附近被强行压制。若这些位置被重新站回,他会考虑承担风险;若跌破约8.1万美元,他就会“开始冒汗”。
他长期犹豫的核心,是缺少边际买家。加密货币已经经历了 ETF 从猜测到获批的阶段、对亲加密货币 Trump 总统任期的预期、Trump coin 以及 DATs 阶段;其中几条叙事已经明显令人失望。与此同时,沉睡了12或13年的钱包卖出数十亿美元 BTC,Rhino 将其解读为聪明持有者可能正在卸货。
周期回报递减进一步放大了问题:SOL 和 ETH 仅略微超过2021年高点,随后便被“摧毁”。除非能够持续“pico 狙击”底部,否则 Rhino 看不出有什么理由要把一半净资产放在现货 ETH 上多年。如今他的流动净资产约95%在 TradFi,永续合约交易所里的资金则留给他认为自己最擅长交易的加密工具。
他目前的长期现货仓位包括相当规模的 Google 和 Amazon,以及规模更小的 PS、FIX 等仓位。他更愿意讨论单笔杠杆交易,因为这类交易有明确的开始、结束和失效位;现货仓位可能持有数月,不需要他为每一次波动承受心理压力。
8. 市场没有变难,但今年暴露了他不擅长的市场状态
Rhino 目前对 TradFi 的偏向是看多,但没有设定固定目标。许多交易员原本预计10年期美债收益率上升会击穿风险资产,然而即使收益率呈抛物线式上行,市场也几乎没有反应;他认为10年期收益率可能只是在追赶经济增长潜力。对他而言,市场不反应本身比债券市场的细节分析更重要。
他不认为市场正在逐步变难。更高的波动率提高了归零风险,但2020年以来也反复出现荒谬叙事、牛市和熊市,任何一年都提供了更多改变人生的机会。地缘政治动荡、干预主义色彩更强的 Fed、技术快速发展、社交媒体和总统沟通方式,都说明波动率可能已经成为新常态。
不过,按照他自己以机会为调整基准的标准,2026年是他本十年表现最弱的一年。他的收益大致跑平 Nasdaq,换句话说,买入指数后放着不动也能得到同样结果;而他没有充分捕捉金属、能源和存储器交易。减少在家和交易桌前的时间可能是原因之一;他的补救方案是投入更多注意力和交易活动,而不是创造一套新哲学。
最近代价最高的一次错失,是韩国存储器交易。Rhino 买入 EWY 看涨期权时,隐含波动率约为30%;尽管他认为该指数过去一年已经翻倍,也看到其日内经常波动2-5%,但仍然如此操作。Nvidia 财报反转、伊朗战争爆发后,他卖掉了短期限看涨期权、长期期权和现货。EWY 后来逼近约200美元,让他明白:“为了精准抓住局部顶部而牺牲一个真正好的入场点,根本不值得。”
9. 交易优势是活出来的,不一定能被写成一句话
Rhino 不接受交易优势必须能够被定义和量化的说法。多年的盈利本身就是证据;识别出2020-21年宽松的市场状态、对市场涨跌保持低度在意、耐心等待,以及比平均参与者更好地执行,都可以构成优势。主观交易优势在拥有者还没有足够精确的语言将其包装出来之前,就可能已经真实存在。
公开损益表并不能解决证明问题。一张惊人的截图可能来自诈骗、其他地方的对冲,或者一个账户做多、另一个账户做空后只展示盈利的那个账户。Rhino 更看重一个人的措辞、推理、交易展示方式、可信朋友的推荐,以及最终通过近距离接触判断对方是否真的敏锐。
在他看来,Jez 或 Loliit 这类分析能力很强的账户可能只有约4万至6万名粉丝,而娱乐型账号的粉丝数却是其数倍,这件事很说明问题。他对 CT 的问题很直接:“你来这里是为了娱乐,还是为了真正……跟随最聪明的人并赚钱?”
10. 专业性、复盘与饥饿感,构成剩下的复利循环
Twitter 仍然帮助 Rhino 澄清交易逻辑,也充当可检索的交易日志:他可以回看2021年11月,还原当时的心理状态,检查什么做对了、什么做错了。Twitter 也带来了声誉、资源、亲密友谊,以及许多说他的工作改变了自己人生的人发来的消息;不过他如今发帖更少,也不确定这个账号还能持续多久。
他的风险建议包含一个令人不适的转变。要把一个很小的账户做成足以改变人生的资本,有时可能需要在一笔交易上“把筹码全部压上”;但要在此之后活下来,就必须放弃这种心态,转向责任感。很多交易员只能做好其中一种模式,却无法在两种模式之间切换。
他建议把交易当成法律、工程或医学来对待,而不是寻找捷径。书本无法教会执行,但一边阅读、一边实盘交易、看图并投入必要的时间,可以加速模式识别:只有自己犯过错误,书里的概念性警告才会变成真正的经验。Rhino 推荐 Market Wizards、《股票作手回忆录》和 John Murphy 的技术分析著作;他读过100多本书,也积累了成文件夹的笔记。
他的目标经历了几个阶段:先是不想再就业,再到买房,然后保障家人,最后变成每年都要进步。虽然2026年打破了连续进步的记录,但他的热情已经回来:交易与心理学、政治、统计学和经济学结合在一起,构成那份让他觉得“就是为我量身打造”的工作。交易了约10-12年后,真正驱动他的问题是:如果再投入20-30年持续精进,最终会走到哪里。
完整逐字稿
Yo, yo, yo.
Hello, hello.
Wow.
Yo, how’s it going?
Mr. Rhino, welcome to the stream, dude. It’s good to have you here.
Yeah. Thank you for having me. It’s been a little while in the making, man, but we finally got it done.
I know. I wasn’t sure. You told me you were going to come on, and I was like, “All right. See you in a couple years.” But you’re here, you’re on, and I’m excited.
Look, I think it’d be good to start with—do you want to just rip a quick little intro of your trading lore? The time period, when you got started, and why you got started? Honestly, I think you came onto my radar pretty late—2023, I want to say.
Probably from Ansem. But I’ll give you some quick flowers too, because I said at the beginning of the stream that my first six-figure altcoin trade was spot pump in fall 2025, and you were the one other person who was extremely long. You were my confluence on that.
Oh, yeah.
So, shout-out to you. But yeah, I’ll let you flow a little bit on your start in trading.
1. From Stocks to Crypto
Sure, sure. I’ll give a brief history. It’s not terribly interesting, but essentially, I started trading toward the tail end of 2015, going into 2016. I started in TradFi, and I really had no background in TradFi or finance at all. I wasn’t fucking retarded—I knew what a stock was—but beyond that, I had no real understanding of how markets worked or anything.
I found crypto shortly after, probably in early 2017.
Yeah.
Yeah. I started in 2016.
Just make s—
Yeah, yeah, no worries. I won’t say that. Yeah, I started in 2016, found stocks, and then I got into it at a very favorable time. The 2016 and 2017 market for equities was a very smooth uptrend, so I was basically longing like any retail trader would and making a lot of money.
I thought I was a genius, and then, heading into 2018, I ended up over-rotating, holding a bunch of altcoins down to zero. I was also trading options in TradFi, so I essentially lost everything at that point. That’s where my actual learning of how to trade began, I would say.
At what point do you think you got good?
I mean, there are various phases of it. I was definitely never good at the start, even though I was making money, which is a dangerous thing that happens in trading pretty often. That was two years of me thinking I was good until I lost everything.
And everything was just up only? You were just perpetually long?
Yeah. In 2016, I found NVIDIA and AMD pretty early, and I would buy those. There was also the whole Canada-legalizing-marijuana thing at the time, so that trade was super parabolic.
I also had a fundamental uranium thesis. I got in on the fundamental side of things—or what I thought was fundamental—but really, I was just being lucky. The only thing I really learned from the first two years was that I was always underestimating how far a parabolic trend could really go.
I would buy some marijuana stock, it would go up 2X in a month, and I would sell it feeling like a genius. Then it would 20X over the course of the year. So that was always interesting.
And—
As far as when I got good, it was toward the end of 2019. In 2018 and 2019, I was essentially working a bunch of jobs. I would spin up a new balance, go on BitMEX, load it up, run it up to a certain number, and then blow up over and over.
Toward the end of 2019, I stopped blowing up. But I wouldn’t really consider myself good until I completed a full market cycle. I did really well in 2020 and 2021, and then I managed to flip bearish into 2022 and do really well that year. That was when I really felt I was doing well.
Do you think you did well in 2021 as a core ideal, like a crypto believer, or was it just a parabolic market that you were riding?
I’m not really much for core beliefs. I think in my real life I’m super optimistic, but as far as trading goes, I’m pretty pessimistic and cynical.
Oh.
So it was definitely never this belief in the mission. Maybe Bitcoin I could kind of believe in at the time, but I wasn’t like, “Oh, NFTs are going to change the world,” or any of the other stuff people were talking about at the time.
Are you a nihilist across all markets?
I wouldn’t say I’m a nihilist. I’m just pessimistic, I suppose, which is sometimes good. It helps you take profits on things and not really drink the Kool-Aid, as they say.
But it also means it takes a lot of effort for me to find new things and not immediately go, “Oh, that’s retarded.”
Makes sense. At what point did you become a full-time trader? You mentioned you were working jobs and running up accounts on BitMEX to get there.
Pretty much the end of 2019 is when I had my last job.
2019. And you’ve been full-time trading since then?
Yeah.
Whoa. That’s wild. What was your breakout trade? Did you have a specific, “I can quit my job” type of trade, or an “I’m really good” type of trade?
I imagine I’m different from most people you’ve interviewed. From what I’ve seen of a lot of the people you interview, it’ll be like, “Oh, I went all in on Trump,” or, “I went all in on HYPE,” or something like that.
I just had a series of good decisions over the course of the period from the start of 2020 through 2025. Obviously, there were some big trades littered throughout that, but it wasn’t really one specific trade.
Besides that, I guess at the start of 2020, when the COVID crash was happening, I happened to de-risk and re-risk really well. I also hit some calls on NVIDIA, and that took me from trading with money that wasn’t really going to change my life to at least playing a real game.
Why do you think you have to complete a full market cycle before you can know if you’re actually built for it?
I mean, how many people have we seen do really well in bull markets, which are a relatively short amount of time, and even run it up to 9 or 10 figures? You see all these people, and then in 2022 they all blow up.
Longevity is really the only thing that matters in this game. Even if you do well for 3, 4, or 5 years, you really don’t know how you’re going to respond to stressful situations, or even real-life stuff.
If your family member dies or your girlfriend cheats on you, are you going to have the discipline to step away and not trade, or are you going to blow up your account? You can do really well for 5 years and ruin 5 years of good work in 2 months of being stupid.
Did you say 10 figures?
Yeah. There was the whole 3AC thing, where Kobe was talking about how they spun it up to insane numbers much quicker than he ever did, but then everything went the way it went.
It’s like that book—and this is the scene in Fooled by Randomness at the beginning. I hate that book, but it’s a pretty good intro segment.
Okay, when I was giving you an intro, I called you the face of vague-posting on Twitter. Sometimes it can be hard to tell how you’re positioned. You actually mix it up, though. You do get serious. You post positions, charts, entries, and exits. We’ll talk about some of your recent ones.
But you do swing on it. How would you describe your trading style? When you’re in flow, you’re hot, and you’re executing the way you want to execute, what is your style? What is your system, if you have one?
2. Trading Without A Fixed System
For one thing, I think that’s a huge misconception. What happens is that a lot of people only see part of your tweet. So if I’m shitposting sometimes, people will take that as serious.
Mm-hmm.
But I’ve made it pretty clear over the years that the only times I’m actually taking positions are when I say, “Hey, I’m buying this here, selling this here.” All the other stuff is just me fucking around.
As far as my actual style, I don’t really know. I’d say I’m a very, very pure discretionary trader, and I just act on impulse. That’s built up through—I've been trading for 11 or 12 years now—so there are various patterns I’ve seen before, whether it’s a certain type of news trade, sentiment shifts, or things like that.
But I wouldn’t say I have a discernible, “This is what I do” sort of trade.
Are there any patterns across a lot of your big wins that are similar setups?
Yeah, there are a few. My favorite type of trade, which has probably made me most of my money, is when the market has an overarching narrative that everyone is focused on.
For example, when there was the tariff scare going on—
Of course.
—the entire market was focused on what Trump was saying, and he was just saying more and more ludicrous numbers in terms of the tariffs he was going to put on China or various countries.
Obviously, the price started reacting to that. Once it declined by a significant enough percentage that it made sense to start looking for longs, you saw the sentiment shift from people who didn’t really believe the tariff stuff was going to be anything to take seriously. They started flipping and saying we were going to go into a Great Depression, that this whole trade war was going to collapse, and stuff. That would be when I would get into longs and whatnot.
It was similar with the Iran war, where it was escalation after escalation, and then Trump was starting to talk about how he was actually going to nuke Iran off the face of the earth. People were somewhat taking that seriously, which is like, okay, either he’s going to nuke a country with 90 million people off the face of the earth, in which case we have bigger problems, or he has no more rhetoric that can be more extreme than this, so the market’s not going to really react further to the downside. But people were taking it very seriously.
I like when there’s one narrative that the market’s focusing on and you can take the other side of that.
Essentially, a “nothing ever happens” position.
You actually had a tweet about that exact thing. I was going to bring this up. I actually forgot this happened, but I took this to heart about the Kharg Island thing because that was the moment where—I was getting microwaved covering geopolitics for the first time in my life. We were talking about the Iran war every day. We were talking about oil. I still have the—I guess you can’t see my camera, but I have the fucking oil barrel in the background—and I was getting completely microwaved covering geopolitics.
The whole time, I’m like, “I’m holding out, I’m holding out, I’m holding out.” Then that Kharg Island announcement came out, and I was like, “Okay, now I’m bearish.” You really sit down and think about it, and it’s like, dude, now you’re bearish? There’s a sub-1% chance that this is going to happen.
You always long the nuke threat because either it happens, in which case it doesn’t matter—you have bigger problems, like you said—or it doesn’t, and you’re long. I’m bearish now at, you know, a 6% yield on the 30-year, or whatever it is. I actually remember you had the seminal tweet about this that made me rethink some of my trading approach.
I’m curious about your use of Twitter for trade positioning. This is something that’s been tilting me, and I’ve just made a declaration that I’m going to stop paying attention. Reading people’s tweets about how they’re positioned drives me nuts, and it also feels like it’s a really small sample size that you over-index for.
Everybody is bearish, or everybody is bullish. Everybody is long, everybody is short, because nine people that I follow on Twitter—Chamba and Crypto Ethan said something. How much attention do you pay to how other people are positioned and to the narrative that you gather on social media and things like this? You are pretty active on Twitter.
3. Reading Twitter Sentiment
I think the optimal way to use Twitter—and this is something you’ll get used to—is following sharp people. I’ve been on Crypto Twitter since January 2018 on this account.
Jesus.
Taking it seriously. Yeah, dude, I’m fucking old.
I think following sharp people—which obviously most of Crypto Twitter does a very poor job of actually identifying—and copying them, especially when you don’t have your own ideas, is useful. I even have some friends whom I would consider sharp and whom I talk to on a regular basis, not on Twitter, where if I don’t have a trade idea and they feel strongly about something, sometimes I’ll just blindly copy them because I know this person is a profitable trader over the long run.
I don’t really believe in that whole “you can’t copy people to aid your trading” idea. I certainly wouldn’t change a trade that I’m making. If I’m bullish and someone else is bearish, I’m not going to change my thesis and take on their position. That’ll never happen.
As far as reading comments and stuff, I think I would just take everything with a grain of salt, only follow the sharp people, and understand that sentiment is only useful at these really extreme turning points that I was talking about. For instance, when the tariff stuff was happening, or even in 2022, I had this tweet where BTC had put in, I think, 10 or 11 consecutive red weekly candles. Obviously, that whole time down, people were being pretty bullish, and they just didn’t accept what was going on.
At the bottom, I started saying, “Yeah, you guys seem like you’re super addicted to these red candles now, and now you’re craving more because of how down you are.” Then you pair that with crashing into support levels or whatever, and you can say, “Oh, I’m longing now,” and you just get vitriol and counter-sentiment toward it, with people saying, “Dude, you can’t long. We’re going to go so much lower,” and this and that. I find it useful in those moments, but that’s maybe once or twice a year.
At extremes, up or down.
Exactly, because there’s this whole addiction people have to being contrarian at all times. But being contrarian only pays at turning points. Are you going to be contrarian during 2020 and 2021, when everyone’s bullish? No, everyone’s bullish because everything’s going up.
Retail does make a lot of money in the mid- to late stages of bull markets, so you can’t just be contrarian because you find it attractive.
People are addicted to being contrarian. I like that. Why do you think that is?
It’s a certain subtype of person, and actually one of my least favorite types of traders to talk to. I feel like in trading, if you’re 110 or 120 IQ, you’re slightly above-average intellect or whatever. It’s more in your interest to go to the left curve than to go to the right curve, because the right curve is filled with people who are actually extremely, extremely intelligent.
I think the people who enjoy being contrarian just have something against making money with the crowd. They also feel like if they’re shorting, it’s a more fun win intellectually. It’s just intellectual masturbation at the end of the day.
I shorted some coins recently and made some money, so I actually enjoyed it. I understood it for the first time. I’m long-only, and I understood for the first time that when you’re short and coins are going down, there’s this elitist feeling. It’s almost dangerous.
You’re right, though. There’s this crowd that tilts me so much on Twitter: the contrarian bears, always. Being a bear as a personality trait is inherently a little bit miserable, I think.
Yeah. You should just be able to flip. If you’re perma-dooming equity indices, I could just pull up a chart of equity indices and be like, “Okay, you’re just kind of retarded.”
What do you lean toward? Are you mostly long or mostly short?
After 2022, I went mostly long. I just didn’t have much interest in shorting because 2022 was such a brutal bear market. There were earnings calls from major companies, and they would just gap down 30% after hours, like Facebook and stuff. It was truly insane.
After that, I was like, “Okay, I don’t think there’s much juice left to short things.” I just have less interest in doing it now. One of the last times I was really pretty heavily short crypto as a whole was just after the whole Trump coin thing, where Solana deviated from all-time highs. That was such an obvious euphoria signal.
But yeah, I don’t really do it too much anymore.
How did you play that? How well did you play that?
I played it really well in terms of shorting Solana and de-risking spot and all that, but I didn’t really touch Trump coin too much.
Yeah, I meant the short side.
Yeah, I just held shorts, and it was a pretty simple play. Solana had been flirting with all-time highs, spiked to, I think, 310 or 300 or something, and then deviated back below 260, which were previous cycle highs.
You can just short that and be like, okay, dude, the president of the United States just launched a meme coin. That is not a sentence that I thought I would ever say in my life, especially being in crypto since 2017.
It’s crazy.
It’s just such a fucking weird trajectory that everything’s gone on. You can just short that, and then—that’s actually one of my favorite news trades, which also just recently happened. We had the CLARITY Act and then the denial, and the wick from that was really shallow.
Using those sorts of wicks or price points as invalidations for trades lets you set up super-favorable long or short setups.
Oh, like if the CLARITY Act red candle closes, you’re long. If it goes below that, you’re out, kind of thing?
Yeah, because a lot of people will misuse or misapply news trading. They think the immediate reaction to the news is the natural state of the market.
But essentially, the CLARITY Act was already at, I think, 18% going into it, so we kind of knew it was going to be denied.
100%.
But there was also this uncertainty and stuff. Then it gets denied. The wick is super shallow, so you're like, “Okay, I was long-biased before, and now I can use this as an invalidation.” Then there was also the FOMC rate hike, which didn't even breach that BTC down candle. It just went kind of close to it, so now you have a doubly strong invalidation.
Sorry.
Your upside is just so high because, you know, I think Hyperliquid and stuff ripped 20% to 30%. Obviously, Bitcoin went up a lot, but your downside was a few percent.
How do you identify a news event significant enough to act as an invalidation in either direction?
It's generally somewhat sentiment-wise, and then you can see a lot of this is, I guess, where the bull signaling stuff comes in. But it's just intuition: you can see that the entire market is focused and waiting for this event. There's not really much going on, and then the event happens and the reaction's fairly shallow.
Are you always trading these big news moments? Are you never letting one of these go to waste?
That's a hard question to answer because it really depends on what you qualify as a big news event. I would say I definitely miss stuff. Sometimes I'll just be gone for a month.
You were gone for a while.
I won't even open a chart. The last year, I don't think I've been home too much. Coincidentally, this is the worst year of trading I've had this entire decade.
Really? Of the decade?
Of the 2020s, yeah.
Why do you think that is, and what has gone wrong?
4. Trading Through Market Regimes
I've talked about this. I made a pretty long post about it. Essentially, I think the COVID market was just so easy and so telegraphed. We had ZIRP and all this super-accommodative and stimulative fiscal and monetary policy, so it was obvious we were going to go up while we were all locked inside just gambling.
Heading into the end of 2021, they kind of just reversed all the stances of what had happened, so that became a really easy one on the short side, which is when I actually started tweeting. Coming out of 2022, it was easy to be bearish just because of how fucking disgusting everything was, as far as the extent of the downturns, and then the FTX collapse and stuff.
After that, it got a lot more nuanced. I even tweeted in 2023 or 2024, “I just think it's going to be a lot harder for me to time these market cycle tops and bottoms as effectively as I did the last 3 or 4 years.” That kind of played out, where I sold a lot of stuff and talked about how I was getting bearish in the fall of last year after the whole pump and Tesla trade stuff.
Even though equity indices didn't really decline too much, they went sideways a lot, and it became much more of a stock picker's market. I don't think I'm super good at picking individual stocks. I'm not going to hit a SanDisk and hit it for a 10X and change my portfolio too much.
I generally do better at timing macro swings, as far as tops and bottoms in bull markets and bear markets. So there was a lot of sector rotation going on in equity indices that I didn't really take advantage of too well.
Do you think markets are progressively getting harder? I guess our anchor being COVID is not the best anchor, but is this a trend that's going to continue?
I don't think it's getting harder. I don't think the market really changes much at all. If anything, it's almost easier from a certain perspective. There's a higher risk of ruin because of how volatile things are, but because of how volatile things are, I think the chance to change your life in any given year is higher. There are just more at-bats.
If you look at what markets have done from 2020 until now, there have been so many absurd narratives, absurd moves, and bull and bear cycles all throughout that. So I don't really think it's more difficult.
Do you think this period of increased volatility is the new norm, or is it just a result of a decade-long bull market that will weather out as time goes on?
I think it's probably the new norm. There's more geopolitical unrest than we've ever seen—or not ever seen, but I'm not that old. So there's a lot of geopolitical unrest and uncertainty.
I feel like the Fed is more interventionist and more participatory in terms of how actively they're changing the economy, changing rates, and trying to manipulate the market. The market doesn't really affect the economy as much as it used to.
Then there's just the rate of technological innovation and change, the fact that so many things are on social media, and the president is doing what he's doing. It all points toward things continuing to be very volatile going forward.
By the way, I'm obsessed with your invalidation-candle thing, because I'm sitting here thinking about even the Zcash hack. It wicked to 250, which I guess was kind of an aggressive wick, and then it closed at 360. So that's a pretty big spread there, but there's a very clear invalidation if you were to go long after a 60% wipeout: if it goes back below that, it's like, yeah, we're done here.
Even with Lighter and the Robinhood announcement, where they're building their own perp DEX, it's very clearly a pretty significant news event that just happened, and it sort of gives you a line. It pumps over the bounce, and you're short. All right, we're probably going to keep going up here.
I wouldn't really qualify those as the same type of trade, just because it's not necessarily a news event. As far as Lighter, the actual fundamentals of the coin did change in that moment.
That's true.
A lot of the bullish speculation on it was that it was going to have this Robinhood integration, and they were very close to the line there. The Zcash thing, too—a lot of that was old FUD, but it obviously had a material impact. The invalidation is just so wide that it doesn't really become a trade you can take on leverage.
It is really wide, you're right. It's too much.
Yeah.
You hate Zcash, don't you?
Pass.
Earlier, you made a comment about the base contrarian being the worst—the type of trader you like to talk to the least. What is the type of trader you like to talk to the most?
I'm honestly not super collaborative with trades. I like having friends who I can talk to about aspects of the market that I'm not good at and don't pay attention to.
For instance, I have a few friends who are pretty good at on-chain, which I don't really pay any attention to. I just don't care. But if they send me a coin and they're like, “Yo, you should buy this. It's probably good,” I can just throw some money at it, and over the long run it's been profitable.
People who shore up your weaknesses are really good. Then, obviously, I just like talking to people who I consider super sharp. But yeah, I don't really talk trading with too many people.
I don't know what your net worth or P&L is, but as someone who has—
Zero.
—seemingly done very well, or at least is in a position to trade full time—
Mm-hmm.
—how conscious are you at all times of managing downside and not blowing up? How much of an effort are you putting into this consciously as you continue to trade?
5. Managing Downside First
I think once you pass a certain net worth, that has to be your main focus because if you've been in markets long enough, you know—especially with how we're talking about it—there's just a more volatile regime going forward. You just know every year there's going to be at least 3 or 4 pretty generational opportunities to make a lot of money, and sprinkled all throughout that, you can trade really well and make a good amount as well.
The downside is what you have to manage; the upside takes care of itself, right? You can just long things and they'll kind of go up if you're in that regime. But if you're getting caught in a bear market, crawling out of that, and not getting mentally tilted, those are the things that will destroy people.
So I definitely spend a lot more time trying not to draw down, and maybe that limits my upside more than it should, but it's a constant refinement process.
Do you have a circuit-breaker level where, if you draw down 15%, 20%, or 50%, you're done for a certain time period? Have you ever hit that?
Not in a long time, no.
What was your biggest drawdown?
I guess blowing up in 2018 and 2019 a few times was my biggest drawdown. But ever since then, the closest I really came to a material drawdown was, I think, Q4 of 2023. It was around AMD earnings, and I was super, super overlevered into call options.
Why?
It was early 2023, and shout-out Chumba—the chart looked bullish, so I was just fucking bullish. I was super bullish on equities in general, and AMD looked really good. They reported earnings, and it gapped down really hard after hours, so I was like, “Oh, I’m kind of fucked. I’m going to take a huge drawdown here.”
But then it retraced the full move after hours, and I knew I was going to wake up to probably a 10% gain. I ended up TPing way too early, because obviously AMD did what it did. But yeah, I was way too oversized, to be honest.
How do you think about position sizing and position horizon? What is your general time horizon? I know it depends on the position, but how do you think about time horizons when you enter a trade?
And how do you think about percentage sizing relative to your trading portfolio? How big are you going on some of these trades that you post?
6. Sizing The Trading Book
It depends. It definitely changed after 2023, when I was more focused on shoring up my spot portfolio than being like, “I’m going to leverage-trade my entire net worth.” Even in 2023, I was tweeting about how, at the end of every month, I withdrew all of my perp-trading profits instead of trying to compound them, and I would just use them to buy more spot crypto.
I think it’s a more responsible and easier way to compound, especially if you’re coming out of such a brutal bear market like 2022. That strategy obviously isn’t really valid at this point.
In terms of sizing and all that type of stuff, honestly, a lot of it is just gut feeling. If I feel like an idea is really good and has what I perceive to be a pretty tight invalidation, I’ll size harder. Whereas if I’m knife-catching something, I’m obviously not going to be levered going into it. I’ll just buy some, buy some more, and eventually hope it works out.
What do you have right now as long-term spot—long-term compounding spot, if anything?
I feel like that changes, and the weightings of that stuff change, so often that I’ve pretty much only been talking about leverage trades for the past few years. Right now, I have a decent bit of Google and Amazon and stuff.
I saw that post, yeah.
And then I have some random stuff like PS and FIX. It’s just too much to talk about, honestly. That’s why I like posting individual trades, because they have a defined start, a defined end, and a defined invalidation.
With the majority of my portfolio, if I’m spot-long, I’m not going to be overly sweating a move this way or that way, and it might last months and stuff. So, yeah.
How have you played this recent crypto pop from 67 or whatever to—what are we right now?—83? Scary. How have you played it over the last 3 months or so in crypto?
7. Crypto Positioning Now
I definitely missed the absolute bottom. I posted some HYPE trades that I was making before, which I was doing well on, and then missed out on the bottom and longed the whole CLARITY Act and FOMC rate-hike stuff.
Now it seems like a lot of the coins have broken the market structure that was making them super bullish, whether it’s Ethena, Zcash, HYPE, and all these things, even LIT. Then BTC, Solana, and almost ETH are being stiff-armed at this yearly-open level.
I think it’s a pretty good spot where, if we can flip those levels, you can look to risk back on. But if we break below 81, you’re going to start sweating. I’ve just been patient the last 2 weeks.
Interesting. What’s your general outlook for crypto from this stage—a 6-month, 1-year-plus, or 2-year time horizon? Are you generally bullish, or are you just trading the charts with no real bias in either direction? How do you feel about the direction things have gone?
I don’t really feel like I’m the best person to answer where I think it’s heading in 2 years, because I don’t understand or care for the tech side very much. I will say that I felt like coming out of 2022 was a lot easier to be bullish than coming out of 2025 or 2026, whatever you want to classify this bear market as.
Last year in the fall, I posted this long bearish manifesto, and it relates to something Jez talked about: Who’s the next marginal buyer?
Yeah. Like after the dumps.
Yeah. Essentially, we had the ETF speculation-and-approval leg, and then we had the whole presidential bullish-bias leg, where we were like, “Oh, Trump is going to really push forward on regulations and make crypto a priority.”
Then he launched his coin before his inauguration, and that went how it went. There was the whole DATs thing and all that, and you could see those fail in real time. At the same time, some sharp people like CL were saying, “Oh, this is the most toppish Bitcoin has looked.”
I started feeling similarly, and then all these dormant wallets that hadn’t really moved for 12 or 13 years started selling billions of dollars’ worth of BTC, so it seemed like smart players were unloading. I just didn’t see who the next marginal buyer was. It also seemed like a lot of the vision of what crypto was going to be had changed.
I don’t really see how that’s changed for me personally. I don’t know what’s going to happen going forward to make me allocate a large percentage of my portfolio to spot ETH or spot Bitcoin or something.
Even last cycle, if you look at it in terms of diminishing returns and stuff, Solana and Ethereum only barely breached their 2021 cycle highs, and then—
Yeah, they did.
They got destroyed. So unless you’re, you know, pico-sniping bottom entries—which I know everyone on Twitter is, but I’m not all the time—it doesn’t really make a whole lot of sense to be like, “I’m going to hold half my net worth in spot ETH for the coming years,” at least from my perspective.
Got it. So you don’t have a substantial percentage of your liquid net worth allocated to spot Bitcoin at this stage. You’re just trading long and short leverage positions depending on key levels.
Yeah. About 95% of my liquid net worth would be in TradFi, and then I just keep some on various perp exchanges, because I do feel like the thing I’m best at with crypto is always going to be perps, not necessarily on-chain or any of that.
So, yeah, I just abuse some perp moves whenever I see them and focus more on TradFi.
Why do you think you’ll continue to be good as a trader? How do you not lose your edge, erode your skill, or just get washed?
8. The Unquantifiable Trading Edge
I’ve been doing it for a really long time, and I think most of the challenges with trading—I’m not overly focused on saying, “I need to have a definable, quantifiable edge,” like a lot of people are. “Oh, if you can’t define your edge, you don’t have one.” I don’t really believe in that.
Can you give me a take on that? I’m so sick of hearing it. It drives me crazy, because I feel like I don’t have one.
If you don’t have one that’s definable, that’s fine. But at a certain point, after you’ve been profitable for a certain number of years, it’s clear that you do have one. You might not just be able to define it.
But does it really take edge to participate in the market in 2020 and 2021, recognize that there’s all this stimulative fiscal and monetary policy, and understand that things are going to go up? On a certain level, fundamentals do matter, so if you can quickly identify that we’re in a bullish regime, I don’t know if you would call that edge.
I guess a nonquantifiable edge is that I truly don’t care if markets are going to go up or down, and I have the emotional discipline to wait for good setups and execute well generally. Not all the time, obviously, but above what other people have. So I guess that’s edge in a way.
I think that definable-edge thing is funny when you look at the monthly SPX chart and it’s like, all right, what was your definable edge? It’s like, you’re just—
Yeah, it’s a very sticky situation and typically tends to be something I think quant traders focus on more. Discretionary traders—I know a lot of people who are pretty retarded, myself included probably, who have done fairly well over the years.
What do you think about this trend? I would say it’s a market trend, but maybe it’s just a CT echo-bubble trend of posting P&Ls.
What do I think about posting P&Ls?
Yeah. And just the direction this is going, where everyone is just public-trading accounts and posting P&Ls.
If you don't have much of a take on it, we can skip it, but I thought you'd be an interesting person to ask.
I don't really have too many thoughts on it, I guess. It's not really something I spend time thinking about. It has been something in the past that sometimes unethical people will use. If you see a big P&L, you immediately think someone's a really good trader, but there are people who've made it through scamming.
There are people who are just hedging their book on another thing, or they're longing one account, shorting the other account, posting the big P&L, and being like, “Look, dude, I'm fucking sick.” So it's not something I pay super close attention to.
Okay. For something like crypto lore, can you give me a… We could do it by eras, but can you give me a crypto trading Mount Rushmore, a top 5? It doesn't have to be top P&L, but it could be flashiest, your favorite, highest skill, whatever. Can you give me a top 5 CT trader Mount Rushmore?
Yeah, let me check my following list one sec.
You don't follow that many people either. Let me see how many people you follow. You follow 185.
Yeah, sometimes that makes people upset. I have no idea why.
You also follow the same person 3 times, like their alts and shit.
Kobe’s definitely up there. For me personally, Lomo was pretty important, especially in 2018 and 2019, following him. I just saw him crushing the market at a time when it was very difficult, and I didn't really understand what was possible trading-wise at the time, so that was interesting to see.
I mean, you could probably put GCR up there, even though I didn't follow him super early on.
GCR, Loma, Cobie. That's a hot bunch of hot takes in there.
Yeah, I mean, it's pretty standard, right? I think CL probably deserves to be up there. I just really respect him as a trader, even though our trading styles are generally completely different. He hit a lot of really big swings, even this last top in 2025, and I just know for a fact he's sharp. This is not the most deep-dived list. I'm just scrolling my following.
I didn't prep you for it, to be fair. It's kind of a tough one to spot.
Dude, a fifth one? I don't know. Mount Rushmore's 4 people, so there you go.
There you go. Not bad. You said historically you've been pretty good at calling cycle tops and bottoms.
Yeah.
What do you think about TradFi markets right now? The AI trade in particular. I know you have, I think, Amazon, Google, or definitely Google. Maybe I made up the Amazon one. How are you positioned—
Yeah, Amazon too.
Okay. How are you positioned, and how much higher do you think we can go? I think Michael Burry has been on Twitter calling for 9 more months of a bull market recently. What do you think?
I mean, yeah, he probably said that 3 years ago as well. You just can't take too seriously what that guy's talking about. I'm pretty sure he's been shorting Nvidia for 2 years or something. I have no idea, dude. I don't know. I'm not really one for targets or anything. You just react to what's happening in real time.
It seems like a lot of people were screaming for markets to go lower right now with the whole 10-year thing, but it's probably likely that the 10-year is just trying to be competitive and catch up with growth potential. The fact that risk markets didn't really react to that at all, even though that shit was going parabolic, has me skewed to the upside right now. I don't know how long that'll last, but my current take is bullish.
How much attention do you pay to macro stuff? I feel like so many of my favorite traders have been completely laser-beam-pointed-at-their-head macro-pilled. How focused are you on Fed words, the Treasury, and bond yields? How much attention do you pay to that versus the charts, versus your own fundamental belief in assets or coins or whatever it is?
It all kind of plays together in terms of digesting all the information that's out there, and then it kind of melds in your subconscious to spit out a market view, whether that's up, down, or I don't know. I don't really pay attention to macro in super-specific detail like someone like Fa Zhao might, even though I think he's really good at it. I'm just not going to be looking into NFP data and all this.
The most I looked at was CPI in 2022, but that's because most of 2022 was just this worry about inflation leading to more rate hikes and stuff, and that was their whole goal, to get that down. For instance, in 2022, when crude oil topped in June, we had a really big rally in risk. They were pretty much directly inversely correlated.
I'm not really paying attention super-specifically. It's just broader-level: seeing what the Fed's talking about, seeing what the market is caring about or not caring about. So I haven't really been paying attention to this 10-year stuff for bonds, because I just don't really care.
Do you have any ability to quantify the intensity of the bull tingle? I don't even know how to ask that. Do you have any metrics to quantify if it's a real hard bull tingle or a soft bull tingle? Does the bull tingle have metrics?
As far as hard data, no. It's pretty much just gut feeling. Again, I kind of meme about how I don't think about markets at all, and it's all just intuition and stuff. But, like I said, the bigger trades I've taken at mega turning points definitely have some thought behind them and biases.
But then there will be a bunch of trades where I'll just look at the price action and be like, “Oh, this looks like it's going to go up a long way.” It might not be sized as hard as something that I'm super convicted in, but yeah.
Are you a chart-looks-good guy?
Yeah, for sure.
I hate the “chart looks good” shit right now because it's my favorite bit. Chumba had this tweet where someone tweeted at him a chart of Micron—
Yeah.
—and he was bearish, and it was like, “Chart looks good.” He was like, “Chart looked bad yesterday.” How is this possible? It's just like—
Yeah.
—the “chart looks good” thing is a funny bit, you know?
Yeah. Me and Chumba have definitely gone back and forth on it over the years a couple times, because he's always ragging on TA, and I'm just like, “Yeah, just because other people misapply this tool doesn't mean it's not worthwhile.” It's not like drawing head-and-shoulders and all this retarded shit. It's not that.
The easiest way I can talk about why looking at price is useful is that there are going to be people smarter than you analyzing the market. There are going to be people who have insider information, especially in today's regime politically.
No matter what all these intelligent and more informed people are going to think and know, all of that is going to manifest itself in the chart by people either buying or selling whatever they know. So there's no way for them to hide that sort of bias without impacting the chart.
If you know what you're looking for, then you can be like, “Okay, sure, there's a lot of quote-unquote ‘bad news’ coming out right now, but you can see that a lot of more intelligent people are buying.” There have been a few times in my career where I'll notice there's something developing, and I have no idea what, and then I'll buy something, and the news release comes out a day or 2 later.
This I like. It's the “it was written in the charts” concept.
Yeah. As the old heads say in the proverb, it was shown in the tape.
I hate when people say “tape.” I hate that. So, to that—
I don't know the rest of the proverb.
—I guess, from that perspective, how much attention do you pay to TA? Will you ever enter a strictly chart-looks-good type of trade?
Yeah, those definitely happen a lot in between the macro or event-driven theses that I'll put out. Even the Pump.fun trade was essentially just chart-looks-good, in fall 2025. It was literally just, “Okay, this is coming out. I'm not interested in playing new launches too much.” It dumped super heavily, and then it started making a constructive base.
At the same time, everyone was adamant that they weren't going to buy this thing. As far as I remember, it was you, me, and a couple of other people who were bullish at that time on Pump.fun. A lot of that trade for me was just, “Oh, all these people are refusing to long this, and now the chart looks good.” Pretty simple idea.
Do you have any sizing-math alpha you can give us? When you're entering a chart-looks-good Pump.fun trade?
Yeah.
How much size, how much leverage? Do you have any system that you come back to, or is it just like, “I don’t know, size it a little bit, this seems about right”?
It’s difficult to say because everyone’s financial position is going to be different. Sure, I might be using a good amount of “leverage,” but as a whole, crypto as a percentage of my book is just not going to be super high. So it kind of doesn’t really mean anything as far as leverage.
It’s just about sizing, how much I’m risking of my total book, how good I feel about this idea, and how far away the invalidation level is. It’s too context-dependent.
Do you ever trade options, or is it perps or perps and spot?
I trade quite a lot of options.
What do you think about this crypto options stuff? Do you just trade in these things?
I’ve never traded crypto options.
Got it.
I like perps a lot.
What do you think about options versus perps as a vehicle to trade? I never trade options. I’ve been trading a lot of perps. Do I need to learn how to trade options to—
No, definitely not.
—is that a leak?
No, do not trade options.
Really?
If I could give most people advice, most people should not be trading options. I think Jez laid it out pretty well in a longer post. Shout-out Jez. I think he writes about a lot of fundamental market-dynamic stuff really well, so he laid it out pretty well.
I think perps are just a superior instrument. Options are kind of a money incinerator for the majority of people.
Do you have a trade that you look back on and still think about, that you royally fucked up and wish you could have back?
Yeah, a lot.
Is there any one that really stands out?
In terms of recency bias, there was the whole memory trade that was going on. At the start of the year, I tweeted, “I’m super bullish on Korea because of SK Hynix and Samsung and stuff.” Then I was buying calls on EWY, and this is one of the times I’ll actually use options, because for some reason the implied vol on calls for EWY was 30-something percent, even though the index had moved—I think it had doubled the prior year.
It just didn’t make sense to me. It was having 2%, 3%, 4%, 5% intraday moves, and implied vol was super cheap. I was super bullish on this whole thing, so I bought calls. They repriced both directionally and through vol expansion.
Then the Iran war was getting more and more telegraphed. Nvidia reported earnings, and they were really, really stellar. They crushed earnings, went up a bunch after hours, and then retraced that move. I was already looking for a point to take profit on my shorter-dated stuff.
Uh-huh.
So I took profit on some of the shorter-dated stuff, the Iran war started, and the market started nuking. I was like, “Okay, great.” But then I kind of over-extrapolated. Sometimes you’ll mismanage execution by applying your local-top intuition to your longer-term stuff.
I ended up selling my longer-term options and my spot EWY, which for a little bit of time was actually a good play, but I just never reentered it after the Iran war settled. Then, obviously, EWY went to around 200, and there was a crazy bull market in memory.
I just kind of overmanaged that position even though I was fundamentally really bullish on it. Sometimes sacrificing a really good entry is just not worth it, even if you’re going to nail a local top.
That’s a tough one. That Iran war was fucked. Oh my God. Navigating that has been tough.
Yeah, I haven’t paid attention to that in 2 or 3 months.
Well, the market—it’s just, I don’t know if this is how it normally goes. I don’t think so. The market just stopped caring.
Yeah. I’m not really sure. It definitely seems like the market stops caring, and once the market stops caring, I kind of stop paying attention to it.
Well, I can’t just watch Fox News every day. I have to—You know what I mean? At a certain point, it’s like, how much? I can only watch so much Tucker Carlson before it’s like, “All right, guys, wrap it up.”
Yeah, yeah, enter a fucking psychosis.
Yeah, it’s like with everybody else. Why do you still post on Twitter?
Why do I still post on Twitter? That is definitely a good question that I’ve asked myself more recently.
You just love it, at heart.
No.
I think you do, dude.
I do enjoy posting trades, and I feel like it actually kind of makes you sharper when you’re laying out your thesis. It’s also really useful as a private journal. The fact that I can go back 5 years, to November 2021, and see what my mental state was, what my thinking was, where I went right, where I went wrong—it’s this huge journal. That’s super useful.
But I started out posting for the same reason everyone does: You want to gain a following, you want to get a reputation, you want to get access to intelligent people, news, deal flow, whatever—all those benefits that come with being a publicly known account.
Recently, I post a lot less. I’m less at my desk, even though I’m trying to be at my desk a little more for the next few months. Also, a lot of the unintended consequences were why I kept posting. I ended up making some really great friends in early 2022 and 2023—
Nice.
—who I’ve gotten very close with. I’ve also had a lot of messages from people over the years saying, “You know, you’ve helped me learn, you’ve kind of changed my life,” and this and that. So that was pretty gratifying.
But yeah, I’m not really sure what the future of my account is going to be or how long I’m going to be around.
I know you’re not a huge advice guy, but are there any mistakes a lot of new traders make that you think they should stop making, or something a lot of new traders don’t do that they should start doing—something you recommend?
9. Advice For New Traders
It’s pretty vague advice, but you actually have to pay attention to your risk management. That’s valid advice a little later in your career, but I think going from a small portfolio to something that actually matters to your life is such a difficult task that you kind of have to throw risk management out the window at some point and just go balls to the walls on a trade.
But shifting between that mindset and then being more responsible is something that a lot of people don’t have the ability to do. Advice—I don’t know. I don’t think advice is terribly useful. You wouldn’t really ask a lawyer, “Do you have any tips on being a lawyer?”
Facts.
You would just consume as much material as you can, treat this like it’s a real job because it is, treat it professionally, put in a lot of time, and then, if your emotional disposition is going to be beneficial or suited toward this job, you’ll find out pretty quickly.
What’s that Jerry Seinfeld thing about comedy? I would never ask somebody how to be a comedian. I would just fucking go do it.
Yeah, it’s like any job. But the reason that people view it differently is because, to be a lawyer, an engineer, or a doctor, you have to go through all this schooling. But to be a “trader,” you can just sign up at a brokerage and deposit some money.
The degree of difficulty is definitely similar to a lot of these professions.
What do you think about on-chain? Do you ever trade on-chain?
I do, but like I said, it’s mostly me tailing people.
You just gamble and punt, like punt it for fun?
Yeah, it’s kind of gambling, but I have a few friends who are pretty sharp on it and have made a lot of money on-chain. I’ll just ask them, or they’ll tell me, “Hey, you should buy this,” and I’ll just do it.
But it’s definitely not a huge size of my portfolio.
What do you think about the future of it?
The future of on-chain?
Yeah.
I don’t know. I’m probably not a great person to ask about that. I just don’t pay much attention to it.
The chat wants me to ask you about the worst traders and counter-signals on CT, but—
Nah, dude. No. I’m trying not to be negative. This is going to go down a rabbit hole of me just saying obscene shit. Nice try, guys.
I told you I’d let you go for 30 minutes. It’s been 52, so I—
I will say one thing, though. As far as on-chain trading and stuff, it is interesting to me that people don’t really follow the accounts that are the sharpest. A lot of people on CT seem to be more interested in the entertainment side of things than actually following someone who’s smart and focusing on making money.
You can just look at someone like Jez or even Loliit.
Like, these guys who are very sharp and have made a lot of money.
Oh.
They’ll have 40, 50, 60K followers, and then you look at person XYZ, who chat kind of wants me to make fun of right now, and they’ll have multiples of their followers. I truly don’t understand what people are really on Twitter for. Are you here for entertainment, or are you here to actually follow the sharpest people and make money?
How do you identify sharps? I actually think I’m pretty good at this, but I think you’re good at it. I’m sure you’re good at it. How do you identify sharp traders on CT that you should follow?
You definitely need to be somewhat skeptical until you have, quote-unquote, “proof,” or a proofing system. You’ll have sharp friends and people you can actually trust very deeply, and they’ll be like, “No, this person’s legit.”
There’s no real way to know until you get close to someone. The language people use, the way they speak, the way they post their trades, and the way they post their ideas—you can kind of weed through it. I think if you have a certain degree of critical thinking yourself, you can weed through it and be reasonably accurate.
Do you, I guess, as sort of a wind-down, have goals as a trader? What are you trying to accomplish from here? Is it a P&L number you’re trying to hit? Is it general entertainment? Why? Do you have trading goals at this stage?
Yeah. It’s something that changes year to year, obviously. At first it was, “I want to make enough to not have a job,” and then it was, “I want to make enough to have a house,” and then it was, “I want to have enough that my family doesn’t have to worry about anything.” It keeps moving toward the right.
Eventually, it just became that I wanted to do better every year than the year before, and this is the first year of the 2020s, like I said, that I’m failing at that goal. I’m not doing better in 2026 compared to 2025.
But this job really was my dream job when I got into it. I actually love trading. I loved the whole experience of learning this. It combines a lot of my natural interests in psychology, politics, statistics, economics, and all this stuff. I was already interested in a lot of it, and this seemed to combine it in a way that almost felt made for me. I also just hated corporate politics and didn’t want to get a real job, as I’m sure a lot of traders feel.
Mm-hmm.
So I kind of burned out temporarily, and now the hunger is back. I just want to keep doing better and better because, relatively speaking, I’m still very young. It becomes a question of what you can accomplish in 20 or 30 years if you stick to this job, when I’ve only been doing it for 10 or 12. So, yeah, just constant improvement.
How do you recover from a bad year, like your worst year ever? Because I’ll say it from this context as well: I think there are a lot of relatively sharp people on CT right now who have driven themselves fucking crazy or torched a lot of money trading on-chain or trading purely memes, when macro crypto looks pretty good and things are trending in a good direction.
I think a lot of people have actually had a pretty brutal year in 2026. From that lens, and then from your personal lens, how do you come back from the worst year of your life trading?
It’s definitely not the worst year of my life. When I say bad—
Sorry, sorry, sorry.
When I say bad year, I mean I’m just not performing up to the opportunities the market is giving me. For instance, for the year, I’m basically up what the Nasdaq is up. Essentially, I could have done nothing, been all in the Nasdaq, and walked away for the entire year. That’s a shit feeling that I didn’t want to really sit with.
Yeah, yeah.
Especially when there was the metals trade into the energy trade, into the whole memory trade. I just mismanaged a lot of these things when there was so much opportunity to make so much money.
I’m not mentally tilted or down a ton or anything like that. Going forward, I’m going to try to put in a little more effort, more screen time, and be more active, because I’m sure part of it is just that I had my focus elsewhere.
What’s the lore on your PFP and Twitter handle?
Just random.
Really?
Yeah. Truly nothing.
Is that an AI PFP?
No.
Is it just some shit you stole or got pirated?
Probably.
Did you buy the rights to it, man?
Dude, I don’t even know where I found it. It’s been so long.
You drew it. Sick.
Dude, okay. As a sign-off, I really appreciate you coming on. I know you don’t—
Yeah, thank you for having me.
You don’t do a lot of these, do you? Once every 3 years or something?
This is pretty much the only one I’ve done. I think Z and I did some in a Discord about 3 years ago. We also streamed some League of Legends in 2022, but no one was around then, so…
Why did you want to do it? Just curious.
I don’t know. It’s kind of like anything. I just impulsively decided, “Hey, I feel like yapping.” I don’t really put too much thought into stuff like this.
What rank are you in League?
I don’t really play ranked anymore, but I’ve been playing League for a long time. Back when I used to play, I was Diamond 3, Diamond 2. Nothing crazy at all.
I don’t even know what that means, but chat wanted me to ask. It sounds good to me, man. This—
Not a very good chat.
The high ranks scare me, you know? I like the small ones.
Yeah. Yeah.
I’m happy you did it, man, and I appreciate you coming on. As a sign-off, is there any advice you would give yourself in your first year or two of trading? Or maybe, cross-referencing that, any advice you would give to another trader who’s in their first or second year and trying to figure out how this works?
As far as trading advice, not really. I think you can expedite your learning by reading and stuff. Obviously, you can’t learn to trade from books or from YouTube series and stuff. But if you’re consuming a lot of material while simultaneously trading a lot, staring at the charts, and putting in the required hours, you can at least accelerate your learning.
That’s what happened to me. I would read all these stories of traders making all these mistakes: “Don’t do this. Don’t do that.” You conceptually understand it, but until you make the mistakes, you don’t recognize, “Oh, that’s what that person was talking about.” But you can recognize those mistakes a little quicker than if you were just navigating the market yourself. Beyond that, you just have to put the hours in.
Do you have a book recommendation?
Market Wizards is good, Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, and John Murphy’s Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets.
Okay.
I’ve probably read—
Really? A TA book?
Yeah, just how to fucking draw support and resistance if you don’t know any of that. It doesn’t really matter, but I’ve probably read over 100 books on trading and statistics and all that type of stuff over the years. I have folders and folders full of notes that I wrote. So, yeah, just consume any and all material and commit to learning.
Are you a poker player?
Not anywhere near professionally or any good. I do enjoy it, and I had a stint of playing, but no, not really.
Are you a gambler? Do you go to the casino and fucking rip baccarat and shit?
Yeah, definitely.
Really?
Yeah, I like going to the casino. I like online casinos and all that type of stuff. I probably—
Online casinos, really?
Yeah, I probably should have taken some sort of fucking Rainbet sponsorship or some shit, but I don’t know. I just can’t sit up there and be like, “Yo, this casino is way better than this casino,” when they’re all the same.
What do you play on online casinos?
Dude, everything. Slots, fucking—
Do you really?
Chicken Crossing, everything.
Chicken Cross?
Yeah, not super often. I’ll just go through stints where I’ll load up a balance and gamble for fun.
What about sports betting?
I try not to, because the only sports I really watch are MMA and boxing, and I was like, “Okay.”
You’re a huge UFC guy, aren’t you?
Yeah, I love UFC. I try not to gamble too much unless the odds are super mispriced, because I just want some hobbies in my life that aren’t related to gambling.
What about Pokémon gacha?
I've been in TCG for a decent while, but I have this weird aversion to owning things, so I never really invested. I just like ripping packs and essentially gambling with really terrible Eevee.
So no physical art or anything?
No, no.
Really?
No, I don't really spend too much money except on flights and hotels and stuff.
Wait, can you give me one? When you first made some real bread, what was a dumb purchase that you made? Like, the first expensive thing you bought?
I mean, mine's kind of boring. It was just housing and land and stuff.
Okay. You can't really ask much further on land. No car?
Yeah, I mean, I don't really blow money, except I'll take a vacation that costs an obscene amount of money and not really care.
An occasional jet?
Sure.
Okay, moving on. Awesome. Dude, Rhino, you're a movie, man. I appreciate you coming on and dropping some lore. It is an absolute pleasure. I'm hoping that Bitcoin's most recent tweet turns into your tits long, and we can all win together forever, man. Thanks again for coming on.
All right, man. Appreciate it. Take care.
All right, much love. Have a good one. Peace.
Peace.
Dude, online casinos? I was not expecting that. I was not expecting that. Shout out to Rhino, man.