打造代币化时代的 Citadel Securities|DeFi Frontier
- 主持人将这项业务——在不同段落中分别称作 Access、Axys 和 Axis——定义为“代币化时代的 Citadel Securities”。新推出的 Prime 服务是一个 RFQ 平台,为金融科技公司聚合跨资产兑换流动性,无需为每家交易所分别预先备资,并通过灵活条款缓解资产负债表压力。这是一项 B2B 业务,而非面向零售客户;Kim 表示,自己的目标是为结算流动性搭建基础设施,而不是服务于他所说的99%加密项目聚焦的投机性流动性。
- Kim 表示,自己进入加密行业约9年,参与套利接近10年。他曾是 QCP Capital 的首位员工,之后创立了一只市场中性加密资产/货币套利基金。主持人引用的数据是:自2018年以来年化回报26.87%,Sharpe 比率4.89,仅2022年出现亏损。Kim 的结构性判断是,加密资产在数十个、甚至数百个交易场所之间交易,包括 Binance、Hyperliquid 和 CME,因此即使过去几个月、甚至可能整整一年的波动率已经下降,价格偏差仍持续存在。
- 需求逻辑是“资产负债表即服务”:金融科技公司将像按需调用算力一样,按需获取资产负债表容量。一家将 SGD→USDT→CAD 的汇款公司,或一个在后台发起 RFQ 的券商买入按钮,都不可能为兑换准备1亿美元、再为客户另备1亿美元。Prime 允许运营商无需预先注资即可交易,之后再结算。Kim 将出入金流称为“沉默交易量”,并表示,在电子化转型推动外汇市场转向非银行流动性提供商后,非银行结构已经占据相关市场最高40%的份额。Prime 仍处于早期阶段,目前已从一家未具名的头部交易所起步,并正与金融科技合作伙伴洽谈。
- USDX 和 sUSDX 构成交易台背后的无许可、链上资本池。Kim 将 USDX 描述为合成流动性资产,将 sUSDX 描述为其质押版本;同一套资金同时支持套利、做市和 RFQ 流动性,利润最终流向质押者。Origin Vault 过去一个月的回报约为11%,sUSDX 的收益率则超过20%,具体取决于质押比例。主持人另称,网站显示的盈利率约为21%。Kim 表示,Origin Vault 在锁定期结束后正转向一种包含 sUSDX、DeFi 活动、积分和真实利润的生态系统模式。下一步计划推出 BTCX;Kim 还称,此前从未有过将复杂的 HFT 级收入流回馈给参与者的先例。
- 面对主持人的信任拷问——如果投资者可能血本无归,为什么还要接受20%或10%的回报?——Kim 认为,要求全面披露策略是 DeFi 的误区,而不是机构惯例。他表示,完整披露会招致策略抄袭并带来安全风险。Access 计划与更多独立鉴证中心和机构验证者合作。Kim 称,储备完全具备流动性,风险管理由轮班交易员和工程师24/7运转,同时监测各交易所的储备证明及资金流,并进行资本再平衡。他还声称,Access 是加密行业唯一拥有跨多个周期盈利经验的团队。
- Kim 明确声明这不是投资建议:如果“被逼到墙角”,他会说市场已经触底;回调仍有可能,但“行情才刚刚开始”。他表示,在过度自信地判断周期时点之后,人们可能会感到意外;他将 Robinhood 网络上的活跃度视为本轮的 PEPE 或 Unibot 阶段。被问及 FOMO 的7个以上钱包、滑点和费用时,他称 Prime 的机会是“100%”。Access 正在把代币化 Nvidia 股票和 Nvidia 永续合约用于原子套利策略,并将业务扩展至 Robinhood、Solana、Canton 和 Base。
1. 加密市场碎片化结构上的十年套利
- Kim 表示,自己约9年前进入加密行业,曾是总部位于新加坡的做市商 QCP Capital 的首位员工,之后创立了一只专注于加密资产与货币交叉领域套利的市场中性基金。主持人引用的数据是:自2018年以来年化回报26.87%,Sharpe 比率4.89,仅2022年出现亏损。
- 他的结构性判断是:“不同于股票——某项资产只有一个交易所可以交易——”加密资产存在数十个交易场所;如果把 DEX 和区域性交易所算在内,可能达到数百个。团队接入 Binance、Hyperliquid、CME 等平台,交易加密资产、稳定币和股票之间的价差。Kim 表示,价差持续存在;过去几个月、甚至可能整整一年的波动率虽然有所下降,但碎片化的市场结构仍在不断制造机会。
- 中心化和去中心化交易所都在增加传统金融资产,Kim 认为,随着市场进一步碎片化,将需要更多流动性提供商来同步不同市场的价格。
2. Prime:面向金融科技公司的资产负债表即服务
- 主持人将这项业务描述为“代币化时代的 Citadel Securities”,而 Kim 将 Prime 定义为一个 RFQ 平台,让金融科技运营商无需为每家交易所预先备资,即可接入聚合流动性;平台还提供灵活条款,以减轻资产负债表压力。主持人转述 Ashwin 的比喻:金融科技公司获取资产负债表容量,就像软件按需调用算力。
- 运营场景非常具体:券商的买入按钮可以在后台向多家流动性提供商询价,因为没有任何一家供应商能全天候提供最优价格。汇款公司可以接收新加坡元,将其兑换成 USDT,把价值转移至加拿大,再支付加元;从经济实质看,它需要一家提供跨资产 SGD-to-CAD 兑换的服务商。
- 约束在于资产负债表容量。加密资产之间的兑换需要库存和原子结算,但金融科技公司不可能“在网络上为兑换放1亿美元,再为客户另备1亿美元”。Prime 允许它们无需事先注资即可交易,之后再结算,从而避免所需资本翻倍或变成3倍,也减少额外借款需求。
- Kim 将出入金活动称为“沉默交易量”(silent volume):这部分交易不会明显体现在链上,但随着支付和汇款公司采用稳定币,规模正在增长。他指出,资本市场早期的电子化转型推动外汇市场转向非银行流动性提供商;如今非银行结构已占据该市场最高40%的份额,而他认为代币化会加速这一转变。
- Prime 已从一家未具名的头部中心化交易所起步,先提供基础兑换服务。Kim 强调,RFQ 平台仍处于非常早期的阶段,目前正在与金融科技公司洽谈,市场整体也存在更广泛的流动性供需错配。
3. USDX 与 sUSDX:交易台背后的链上资本池
- 主持人将 Origin Vault 和 USDX/sUSDX 池与 Prime 的运营资本联系起来;Kim 确认,Access 的资产,包括 sUSDX,被用于中心化交易所、DeFi 和 RFQ 平台上的套利、做市以及为金融科技公司提供流动性。
- Kim 将 Access 描述为“全球首个依靠 DeFi 进行资本形成的流动性提供商”。其目标终局是结算流动性,而不是投机性流动性;Kim 表示,后者才是99%加密项目关注的方向。他还称,自己早期采用或测试 Ripple 产品的经历让他认识到,连接不同市场的基础设施比某种代币或稳定币本身更重要。
- USDX 被描述为一种用于提供流动性的合成资产,sUSDX 则是其质押版本。Kim 表示,Origin Vault 的存款锁定期已经结束,正在转向一种包含 sUSDX、DeFi 活动、积分和真实利润的生态系统模式。下一项资产计划是 BTCX,之后还将推出其他面额。
- Origin Vault 前一个月的回报约为11%;Kim 表示,sUSDX 的收益率超过20%,取决于质押比例,受收益类应用和整体走高的资金费率推动。主持人另行指出,网站显示的盈利率约为21%。Kim 声称,此前从未有过将复杂的 HFT 级收入流回馈给参与者的先例;他将其与 Web2 流动性提供商发债或借入资金的模式进行对比,其中也包括向代币项目融资。
- Kim 确认,所有策略使用的是同一套资金;“如果戴上交易员的帽子”,这类活动本质上是价差交易,即同时低买高卖,利润最终流向质押者。他也认可主持人将其比作一家拥有无许可链上资本池的受监管金融科技公司,并补充称,Access 为持牌金融科技公司提供流动性。
4. 稳定币协议接连失败后的高收益信任难题
- 主持人提出了信任一项主动管理策略的风险:部分资本存放在中心化平台上,既然投资者可能血本无归,为什么还要接受20%或10%的回报?他引用了一些曾经盈利的稳定币协议最终失败的案例,并将透明度问题形容为走钢丝。
- Kim 表示,DeFi 存在一种误区,认为只有公开每一项交易细节才算透明。在他看来,完整披露会让竞争性交易公司复制策略、损害盈利能力,同时制造安全风险。他称,Access 将与更多独立鉴证中心和机构验证者合作,在不暴露运营细节的情况下核验储备。
- Kim 将 Access 与无担保稳定币,以及储备缺乏流动性或存在期限错配的生息结构区分开来。他表示,Access 的储备完全具备流动性;风险管理由跨时区轮班的交易员和工程师24/7运转,团队会跟踪每家交易所的储备证明以及大额资金流入流出,再进行再平衡和资本调配。
- Kim 进一步声称,Access 是加密行业唯一拥有跨多个周期盈利经验的团队。
5. 有保留的触底判断——Robinhood 网络活动成为套利场所
- Kim 先声明这不是投资建议。“如果非要把我逼到墙角”,他会说市场已经触底;这并不排除回调可能,但“从目前的情况看,行情才刚刚开始”。他认为,本轮周期让所有人都成了周期择时专家,大家此前预期10月到来,TikTok 上也反复出现“别买,等到10月”的说法,因此人们可能措手不及。
- Kim 将 Robinhood 网络当前的活跃度与上一轮周期的 PEPE 或 Unibot 阶段相比较。他称其为“金融疯狂”(financial madness),但认为该网络前景不错,交易活动也会很可观。主持人介绍称,FOMO 提供7个以上钱包,并面临用户对滑点和费用的抱怨;此外还有一款应用专注于流动性永续合约和 swap。Kim 的回答是,Prime 的机会“100%”存在。
- Access 的套利范围并不限于基础加密资产,还包括代币化 Nvidia 股票和 Nvidia 永续合约。Kim 表示,相关现货头寸可以互换,并用于原子套利,即刻实现利润,而不必等待到期或依赖之后的价格转换。他称,公司正扩展至 Robinhood、Solana、Canton 和 Base;不同的代币化资产形态可能在真实资产、线上市场和中心化交易所之间形成价差。
- 主持人在结尾的概括是:“价格分歧”只是更委婉的说法——人们正在支付惊人的费用,把资金换成 Robinhood 网络上的“鸡巴币”(boner tokens)。
完整逐字稿
Chris, thank you for joining us. How are you doing? Congratulations.
Greetings. Thank you for inviting me.
This is a new episode of our DeFi Frontier series. We are excited to learn more about your latest announced product, Axys Prime. Axys Prime, as I understand it, is similar to Citadel Securities, but for the tokenization era. Ideally, you will work with neobanks, brokerages, funds, and businesses working with digital assets.
1. From trading commodities to cryptoasset arbitrage
We want to know everything about this “balance sheet as a service,” so let’s get straight to the point. Chris, why don’t we delve a little deeper into your past? Remind us again what you worked on before. You have a long history of trading in this area. How did that lead to the creation of Axys?
I joined the crypto space about 9 years ago. I was the first employee hired at QCP Capital, a market maker based in Singapore, and later founded a market-neutral hedge fund that focuses on arbitrage strategies at the intersection of crypto and currency markets. Today, we are building Access, a cross-asset global liquidity provider.
We just launched our first RFQ platform to provide two-way conversion liquidity for fintech apps and fintech firms.
Chris, we want to know more about Access Prime and what you do at Access in general, but before we get into that, I will say that few teams have been trading in the crypto space since 2018. This is not a long list.
I was looking at your results, and you’ve had a 26.87% annualized return since 2018, even before Axys launched. This is a Sharpe ratio of 4.89. You had 1 loss-making year, and you can probably guess that it was 2022.
Maybe tell me a little more about what you were doing in the crypto sphere at such an early stage, because it always amazes me that people were already applying high-level strategies back then, while I was just trying to buy VeChain or something like that.
Of course. Let’s start with the background. Before coming to crypto, I worked in commodities and forex trading and got into crypto because of arbitrage opportunities when we saw a price gap in Bitcoin across the market. This was already ongoing at the institutional trading level at the QCP hedge fund, so I’ve been involved in arbitrage for almost 10 years.
For me, the most interesting thing about the crypto industry in general is that crypto assets are fungible and also cross-border in nature. But I would say that the source of profitability for our strategy is market structure and volatility, and crypto assets are at their peak here.
Unlike stocks, where there is only 1 exchange for trading a particular asset, there are dozens of them here, and if you count all the DEXs and regional exchanges, perhaps hundreds. We trade price divergences on crypto assets, stablecoins, and stocks, whether it’s Binance, Hyperliquid, or CME. We are connected to all these platforms.
I would say that we manage to get such returns because these discrepancies are constant. Returning to the market structure, the same asset trades at different prices around the world.
Although the volatility of crypto assets has been decreasing for the past few months, perhaps even a year, there are many interesting developments happening in this area right now. Centralized and decentralized exchanges are adding traditional financial assets, which means more liquidity providers are needed to synchronize prices and, in essence, provide liquidity across different platforms.
2. What is Axis Prime?
So, Chris, you recently introduced Access Prime. This Access Prime is what I call balance as a service. I think many people perceived Axys primarily as a DeFi protocol for generating returns, but Prime looks like you’re building something much bigger.
What does Axys Prime actually provide? Is this a real strategic direction for Axys now?
Axys Prime is our RFQ platform for fintech operators who can access aggregated liquidity without the need to pre-fund each exchange. We also offer flexible terms that will help fintech operators reduce the burden on their balance sheets.
Our goal is to become the leading global provider of cross-asset liquidity for all of these types of indices through our platforms.
3. Axis’s first six-figure OTC trade for a leading CEX
Let’s talk a little more about who needs a service like Access Prime. We have already mentioned neobanks and brokerage companies, but how exactly do they need this, and what is the reason for the popularity of this new service that you provide?
Over the past 10–15 years, we have witnessed the rise of fintech companies such as money transfer platforms, payment services, and even new brokers. These are exactly the types of businesses that need liquidity for conversion, and they all operate through OTC desks.
Currently, they all work with many liquidity providers at the same time. I think this figure has been steadily increasing over the last 3–4 years along with the spread of stablecoins.
We see a big gap: there is a missing link of liquidity providers who have access to different markets and asset classes and also combine them to provide cross-asset conversion. We see a growing demand from the fintech world, and there is a big mismatch between that demand and supply.
4. Balance sheet as a service
Chris, when I spoke to Ashwin from your team, he made a very apt argument that I think captures this idea perfectly. He said fintech companies would access the balance sheet in the same way that software accesses computing power on demand, instead of owning the infrastructure.
Can you elaborate on this a little more so we can better understand what problem you’re solving?
Fintech companies implementing stablecoins and other tokenized assets must work with many over-the-counter liquidity providers. For Robinhood, one of these is Citadel Securities. This means that they partner with trading departments that can offer instant transactions, but with flexible calculations. For your end customers.
When you go into the app to buy shares, the brokerage firm works with a liquidity provider on the backend, which provides prices for fintech brokers or payment platforms to form the final value.
As for us, I believe the need for balance is growing due to the era of tokenization we are currently witnessing. Stablecoins now come in a variety of formats and standards. Stocks also now come in a variety of formats and standards. There are so many versions of Nvidia stock, for example.
You need an institution that will come in, aggregate this fragmented liquidity, and also synchronize the prices. This makes it easier for fintech operators to provide their services.
5. Betting on neobanks and fintech adopting stablecoins
So, Chris, is Access betting on neobanks and services like payment apps that implement stablecoin infrastructure? Are you trying to take such a position in the market to really win? Does this make sense?
Yes, and this is no longer just speculation; it is a proven fact. We see from the data that the adoption of stablecoins in various capital markets is indeed happening.
Now let’s move on to tokenization. I would say that the non-crypto community, namely the fintech world, has found the real application of blockchain: the storage and transfer of value, right? Everything else, in my opinion, is just speculation.
At this point, it’s inevitable that tokenization, including stablecoins, will change the way the financial world functions. If you look back at the old era, it is said that the digitalization, or electronic transformation, of capital markets pushed the foreign exchange markets toward liquidity providers rather than banks. Now non-banking structures occupy up to 40% of the market, as opposed to banks, and I think that in the era of tokenization, this will only accelerate.
Regarding how Axis Prime works, the service you provide is not entirely clear to me. Are you replacing another partner or service, or is it a completely new service that specifically serves businesses related to digital assets?
Yes, we are now in a new world where a new type of demand has emerged: conversion from stablecoins to various currencies, and now to tokenized shares. There are several different examples of what goes on behind the scenes.
Let’s say you click “buy” on a certain asset in a brokerage app, and the platform simultaneously requests a price for conversion from a liquidity provider like Axis in the background.
Typically, such platforms work with several of them. There is no single liquidity provider that gives the best price 24/7, 365 days a year. Therefore, they have to aggregate offers. When executing a transaction, the operator uses our price liquidity for the conversion without needing to maintain a large balance to conduct these transactions.
Another example: a money transfer company accepts Singapore dollars, converts them to USDT, transfers them to Canada, and withdraws them in Canadian dollars. In fact, it has conducted an operation to convert Singapore dollars into Canadian dollars. In this workflow, you must collaborate with a liquidity provider that performs these cross-asset conversions. To put it simply, we are a B2B platform that does not work directly with retail customers.
6. Opportunity to serve fiat x crypto conversions
When I think about swaps and deals between digital assets, this service looks pretty competitive on the web, at least from what I understand about the DEX aggregators that exist. However, when I think about fiat to stablecoins, fiat to any cryptocurrency, or vice versa, it's a “black box” for me that I've never fully understood. I know there is a huge demand for stablecoins, and they are still a staple of DeFi and the crypto market.
So I wonder if this is a big opportunity for Axys Prime to serve this type of business. Is there a huge demand for the ability to switch between stablecoins and fiat? Is this a service that your clients, say fintech companies or neobanks, demand?
Yes, definitely. We internally call this “silent volume” because it is not reflected on-chain. Many of the volumes of public exchanges are quite visible, but on- and off-ramp volumes are not so obvious to the network world. However, there is an influx of off-chain volume as all these payment and remittance companies start using stablecoins. So I think, at this rate, with all these fintech companies turning to over-the-counter (OTC) platforms for conversion opportunities, it's not going to slow down anytime soon.
Besides the actual conversion possibilities, there's also the issue of balance. Crypto-to-crypto can work on the network, but it has to be an atomic exchange. This means you must have a supply of assets to convert one into another. But fintech operators cannot do this. They can't keep 100 million on the network for conversions and another 100 million in reserve for customers. This is where we come to the rescue, allowing these fintech operators to trade with us without pre-funding. They do the calculations later, so they don't have to have double or triple the capital and take out additional loans.
7. Why do neobanks and fintechs need Axis Prime?
Chris, let's talk a little more about the B2B clients you help. I saw a tweet that Axis completed its first OTC transaction for a major centralized exchange. I was a bit surprised to see this because I didn't even know about the Axis Prime business line, but it looks like you're already fully operational. I don't know if you can name that partner, but what other types of partners do you plan to work with, or are you already working with now?
Yes, we just launched Axis Prime. We started with one of the leading exchanges as our client, for their basic conversion needs. We are also in talks with a number of fintech partners to help address revenue bottlenecks. I would say we are still in the very early stages of developing our RFQ platform. The fintech space in general is in dire need of liquidity. As I said, a lot of fintech lending is actually geared toward this, but we skipped that step to do the conversion right away.
8. Why Axis Prime benefits from the Origin Vault and sUSDx
Chris, I think it's becoming much clearer to us why you started with the Axis Origin Vault and why Prime is coming out now. Putting the facts together, it seems that you needed this pool of capital, this crowdfunding pool, to implement your arbitrage strategies, and also for on-demand liquidity or balance-as-a-service purposes within Prime. Does this sound logical? Is this where USDX and sUSDX become relevant now?
Yes, that's right. Maybe it's worth taking a step back and describing what we do. Axis is the world's first global liquidity provider to rely on DeFi for capital formation to provide itself with working capital. Access assets, including sUSDX, are used for arbitrage, as well as for market making and providing liquidity to fintech companies.
Our ultimate goal is to become an infrastructure for settlement liquidity, as opposed to speculative liquidity, which is what 99% of crypto projects focus on. If we take, say, Ripple, they have released a lot of products and infrastructure designed for fintech: on-demand liquidity, cross-border payments, and so on. As an early adopter or beta tester of Ripple products, I realized through market making and arbitrage that ultimately what matters is not the coin or stablecoin itself, but the infrastructure that connects the different elements, especially in the era of tokenization, when markets are fragmenting and we have imbalances around the world.
I would say that our main goal, starting with blockchain capital formation, is to synchronize liquidity around the world.
9. USDx, sUSDx, and the Origin Vault
Even before we learned about Axis Prime, you launched a profitable product—sUSDX. There was also a thing known as the Origin Vault, which launched, I think, a little over a month ago. This was on Upshift. What can you tell us about this? What is USDX? What is sUSDX? And what is the Origin Vault?
Of course. USDX is a synthetic asset to provide liquidity, and sUSDX is, of course, a staking version that receives rewards for participating in staking. We are going to launch many more Axis assets in the future, starting with BTCX. These can be of different denominations.
Ultimately, I would say that we're just getting started. Even though our Origin Vault deposit lock-in period has already ended, this is just the beginning. Now it is transitioning to an ecosystem storage format, which includes sUSDX and various DeFi activities to earn points and real profits.
Going back to USDX and sUSDX, which are our flagship products, if you want to make full profit, you can buy USDX and send it to staking.
10. Axis yields over last 30 days
Chris, can you remind us what the Origin Vault has been doing over the past 30 days, and are there any predictions for what it will be doing in the future?
Of course. Origin Vault's return over the past month was around 11%. This means that our sUSDX, depending on the staking ratio, yielded over 20%. Because of this yield application, and also because volatility funding rates are generally increasing in this area, we've been fortunate to capture a lot of these returns. I think this space of opportunity is growing.
We see a lot happening on the Robinhood network, even on centralized exchanges in the public space. So I think it would be a pretty lucrative source of income. It's worth noting that there has been no precedent for a complex HFT-level revenue stream actually returning profits to participants.
Typically, a Web2 liquidity provider issues bonds and borrows capital. A lot of the market-making guys in this space, like the token market-making guys, are creating very interesting structures to borrow a lot of assets from token projects. There are many ways that all these liquidity providers are raising capital, and I think this will be the first time for us that this will become a major channel for capital formation.
11. Where does sUSDx yield come from?
Chris, the income that these sUSDX owners are getting ultimately comes from Access Prime? Do I understand the connection correctly? So the revenue comes from what we call Access Prime?
That's right. The USDX and sUSDX inventory reserves are used for our arbitrage and market making, whether it's on centralized exchanges, in DeFi, or through our RFQ platforms. This means that we are engaged in market making for fintech applications.
If I put on a trader's hat, it's still classified as spread trading. You buy low and sell high at the same time. So, in that aspect, yes, the same inventory is used, and ultimately, the profits are funneled back to the stakers.
12. Global onchain capital formation + service to licensed fintechs
One last question to summarize this connection between Prime and sUSDX. We recently had Ri [?] on the podcast, and we described them as a regulated fintech with an on-chain, permissionless capital pool. Is it a similar structure here? You have a front-end business that works with exchanges, fintechs, and neobanks, but the capital that fuels that business is permissionless and on-chain through USDX and sUSDX.
That's right. Yes, I think that's an apt description. We want to emphasize that we provide liquidity to licensed fintech companies.
13. Challenge of trust + transparency with actively managed yield
Listen, Chris, another question about trust and transparency in this structure. We have seen many profitable stablecoin protocols fail over the past few years. At Access, users trust this active management strategy, and some of the capital is stored on centralized platforms. So how do you provide enough transparency to earn their trust without compromising the strategy itself? It seems like a pretty difficult thing, a real tightrope walk.
Yes, I completely agree. There is a misconception in the DeFi space that every detail of trading strategies must be publicly disclosed to be considered transparent. I don't think this is an institutional standard. If we do this, not only will profitability suffer as other trading firms use this information, but there will also be security risks, making us vulnerable to attacks.
We don't want this to happen, and to protect our LPs, we strive to ensure that the integrity of the strategy is securely protected. But that doesn't mean we don't want to be transparent. We are trying to find a balance between what institutional-level transparency means and compliance with DeFi standards. We will work with more independent attestation centers and institutional validators to help verify reserves without disrupting operations and risk levels.
14. How do you earn the trust of DeFi lenders?
By the way, while preparing for the podcast, I was visiting the access.to website and noticed that profitability had increased to about 21%. This is exciting, but at the same time, we hear our fellow investors online asking: Why even invest in any service with a return of 20% or 10% if I can potentially lose everything? This is especially true given some of the failures this year and other failures that have occurred with other protocols.
So, how do you work with this? How do you build a service through Axis Prime that can deliver that kind of revenue, and how do you gain trust with that kind of risk-reward ratio for investors on the network?
Yes, definitely. I think the whole liquid-staking trend is causing some PTSD from the unsecured stablecoins that were around a couple of years ago. There are also yield-bearing stablecoins, where reserves can be quite illiquid and there is a significant mismatch in terms of maturity.
For us, our reserves are fully liquid, and we have a 24/7 risk-management protocol that is managed by traders and engineers on a rotating basis, so we have full coverage across different time zones. We also track proof of reserves for all the different exchanges. Large inflows and outflows from such platforms are also under control, and we rebalance and reallocate our capital based on these metrics.
One last point: I think we are the only team in the crypto space with experience generating profits over multiple cycles. I think that's our unique trait.
15. Has the market bottomed and bull run begun?
So, actually, on the last question, Chris, I want to go back to your experience. You've been in the markets forever. You've been trading crypto for ages. I want to know whether we're in a full-blown bull market right now. I'd like to know your predictions for where digital assets are headed by the end of 2026. What is your prognosis?
Listen, none of what I'm saying is financial advice, but if I were pressed against a wall, I'd say we've hit rock bottom. That doesn't necessarily mean we won't have a correction, right? But from the way things look, I'd say it's just begun.
Looking back, I think this cycle made everyone an expert on cycles. Everyone was waiting for October. If you go to TikTok, the girls there say, “Don't buy; wait for October.” Everyone was expecting a “black swan,” and it was something like MicroStrategy had to fall before the bull run could begin. I think, given all of this, maybe people were taken by surprise.
And yes, the situation is similar to what we saw last cycle, for example, the PEPE or Unibot phase. I think we're starting to see this on the Robinhood network. Some call it financial madness, but that's what it is. There is a lot of movement there, and I think we have a good future ahead of us.
16. Could Axis earn from the Robinhood mania?
As you mentioned, regarding the financial madness and all this mania and trading activity on the Robinhood network recently, I'm thinking of 2 mobile apps. One caters to this activity on the Robinhood network and is called FOMO, and the other is a trading app focused on highly liquid perpetual contracts and swaps. Either way, both are very easy to use.
I'm not encouraging people to go there and play with meme coins, but I see opportunities there for Access Prime. So before I finish, I'm curious: When you look at a business like FOMO, for example, it gives you 7 or more wallets, and I hear a lot of complaints about slippage, commissions, and a bunch of other issues as people try to trade on this craze. Is this an opportunity for Access Prime?
Yes, 100%. At Access in general, we use free capital for arbitrage strategies. We go beyond simple cryptocurrency. Obviously, we have the most basic strategy on perhaps the 100 most popular coins, but we also apply it to stocks. We have tokenized Nvidia shares, and we also have perpetual futures on Nvidia.
These spot positions are interchangeable, as I mentioned earlier. These assets can be used for atomic arbitrage strategies, where profits are realized instantly rather than relying on an expiration date or price conversion. So yes, we are expanding to Robinhood, Solana, Canton, and Base.
Today, many different formats of tokenized assets are emerging. For whatever reason, there is a significant price discrepancy between real assets, prices online, and on centralized exchanges. I see this craving and excitement happening in a rather unexpected way. But, be that as it may, there are many requests for streams, which gives us opportunities both on and off the network.
“Price divergence” is a polite way to describe the fact that people are paying incredible fees to exchange funds for boner tokens on the Robinhood network. By the way, I don't own this token—just kidding. This is not a recommendation or a call to buy this token.
17. Closing
Anyway, I think this is a great time to start wrapping things up. Chris, thank you for joining us. Keep up the great work.
Honestly, I didn't realize that Access Prime was a true vision from the start, and it really reminds me of re. That was what really attracted us to re. You have, let's call it, regulated fintech with capital that can fuel it. So now we see how these businesses can grow online, but also operate outside of it and use the opportunity to aggregate capital online. Do you have any final words for us before we wrap up?
Thank you for inviting me. Thank you very much.