[BidClub_]
Sohn Conference Foundation · · 12 分钟

Alexandra Engler 在 Sohn 2025 推介 Celanese

Alexandra Engler

YouTube
TL;DR
  • Aren Capital 的 Alexandra Engler 在 Sohn 大会上做多 Celanese,认为其价值应为「每股79美元,较当前交易水平高出50%以上」。 该股自2024年9月以来下跌63%,经历了业绩指引下调、削减股息和第四季度业绩为负;Aren 自4月中旬开始看好 Celanese,尽管股价此后上涨30%,但仍认为「我们的投资逻辑目前尚未反映在股价中」。
  • 核心判断是:占公司一半业务的 Acetyls,正受益于甲醇投入价格上升,利润将出现「结构性增长」,而「许多人尚未对此予以关注」。 结构性供应中断——尤其是伊朗工厂冬季停产、优先保障居民供暖——将使全球甲醇产能减少5–6%;未来3年,美洲以外的供需缺口扩大35%,超过1200万吨,推动美洲产能利用率预计在2028年达到95%。
  • Celanese 位于全球醋酸成本曲线最左侧:其控制美国63%的产能(前三家合计控制90%),生产醋酸所用甲醇的44%,相较甲醇采购方和中国生产商拥有近50%的成本优势。 商品市场的基本逻辑是:可变投入成本决定边际成本,边际成本决定价格;因此,待产能稳定后,甲醇成本上升应会支撑醋酸价格走高。
  • 过去一年甲醇价格飙升、醋酸价格却维持平稳的谜题,答案在于产能:Celanese 自身的低成本 Clear Lake 扩建项目,以及中国新增产能压制了价格。 随着「美国新增产能已成为过去」,Engler 预计美国醋酸价格到2028年上涨30%,带动 Acetyls EBITDA 较2024年增长50%,并比2028年市场一致预期高出25%。
  • 未能实现协同后约20亿美元 EBITDA 目标、目前仅约13亿美元的 Engineered Materials,「更像一个黑箱」,但 Engler 认为其下滑「基本已经结束」。 单车收入似乎已经触底;通过分析破产的尼龙竞争对手 Ascend,她认为 Nylon 66「几乎没有更多盈利可供流失」。
  • 估值的非对称性在于:公司企业价值180亿美元、市值55亿美元,即使盈利承压仍有20亿美元 EBITDA和8亿美元杠杆自由现金流——「按今天27%的杠杆自由现金流收益率买入整家公司」,而从2027年开始现金流收益率「将超过20%」。 其他催化剂包括已经启动的合资企业及股权投资变现;Methanex 则被点名为布局甲醇主题的另一种方式。
摘要 · 为研究而整理的核心内容

1. 一场特异性错位:下跌63%,投资逻辑尚未反映

  • Engler 的投资框架是:Aren 专注寻找「特异性错位」和长期结构性扰动,而 Celanese 正是其中一个案例——自2024年9月以来下跌63%,原因包括2022年底完成重大收购后持续 miss、第三季度后下调业绩指引并削减股息,以及第四季度业绩为负。
  • 她的判断是:业绩负面修正「接近尾声」,而市场对 Engineered Materials 的聚焦,已经「遮蔽了 Acetyls 业务即将出现的真正积极变化」。股价自4月中旬以来上涨30%,但「上行空间仍然可观」。

2. 甲醇:无人关注的结构性供应冲击

  • 逻辑在于:Celanese 是全球低成本醋酸生产商,依托低价美国天然气、专有技术、生产醋酸所用甲醇的44%,拥有约50%的成本优势,并控制美国集中产能的63%;甲醇因此成为其重要且高度波动的投入品,其成本有助于决定边际成本和大宗商品价格。
  • 甲醇价格因供应中断飙升,其中部分是暂时性的,包括美国和挪威工厂停产;但结构性因素——伊朗工厂每年冬季因居民供暖需求停产——将使全球产能永久减少5–6%。未来3年,美洲以外的缺口扩大35%,超过1200万吨,推动美洲产能利用率预计在2028年达到95%。随着运营问题解决,价格「未来几个月可能下降」,但持续数年的供需错配仍将支撑价格上行。

3. 醋酸为何没有跟涨,以及现在为何会跟涨

  • 绿色平线背后的原因是:历史上甲醇价格会传导至醋酸价格,但今年 Celanese 自身低成本 Clear Lake 扩建项目以及中国新增产能压低了价格。
  • 随着美国新增产能告一段落,Engler 预计美国醋酸价格到2028年上涨30%,Acetyls EBITDA 较2024年增长50%;这也是她预计2028年 EBITDA 比市场一致预期高25%的依据。

4. Engineered Materials 触底:通往79美元的算术

  • 这项收购原本预计带来约20亿美元协同后 EBITDA,但目前仅约13亿美元。其一半产量流向汽车行业,整个业务「更像一个黑箱」;不过,单车收入似乎已经触底,而对破产尼龙竞争对手 Ascend 的分析让 Engler 认为,Nylon 66「几乎没有更多盈利可供流失」。
  • 估值算术是:在盈利受压期间,公司市值55亿美元、企业价值180亿美元,仍有20亿美元 EBITDA和8亿美元杠杆自由现金流——对应当前27%的杠杆自由现金流收益率,2027年起现金流收益率超过20%,此外还有合资企业和股权投资变现。目标价为79美元,意味着超过50%的上行空间;Methanex 则是布局甲醇主题的另一种方式。
Alexandra Engler

Hi, I’m Alexandra Engler, and I’m the founder of Aren Capital. Before we begin, please note this presentation is for informational purposes only and may include forward-looking statements based on current expectations and projections, which are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Aren is a fundamental investment firm focused on idiosyncratic and industrial secular disruptions, short and long, across the capital structure.

Idiosyncratic dislocations are situations where securities experience severe, sudden sell-offs due to things such as financial distress, litigation, or unexpected earnings shortfalls. Secular disruptions are characterized by industries on the precipice of enormous change, where the winners and losers in 3 to 5 years will be very different from those historically. We believe these dislocations are inherently connected, as idiosyncratic dislocations can cause secular disruptions and vice versa.

1. Celanese's Hidden Acetyls Tailwind

This chart is a great example of an idiosyncratic dislocation we dive into. The equity is off 63% since September 2024. This is Celanese, a large global chemical company. Earnings have continually underperformed expectations following a transformative acquisition at the end of 2022, and the equity reacted quite negatively following a guidance cut and dividend cut after the third quarter.

Negative results for the fourth quarter led the stock down further. We’ve liked this name since mid-April. While it is up 30% since then, we don’t believe our thesis is in the stock price currently, and there is still meaningful upside. Investors have rightly focused on the negative stream of earnings revisions coming from Celanese over the past year.

The transformative acquisition within its Engineered Materials segment was supposed to result in a segment of about $2 billion post-synergies. That segment is instead running at about $1.3 billion in EBITDA, so clearly something has gone wrong. Investors are also rightly focused on Celanese’s levered balance sheet, which was used to fund the acquisition.

However, we think negative news flow is close to an end, and the focus on Engineered Materials has obscured real positives coming down the pike for the Acetyls business. Most notably, we believe the Acetyls business, which is their other large segment, is in for a structural rise in profits due to higher prices for its key commodity input, methanol. We don’t believe many are yet paying attention to these trends, and we think this will drive earnings meaningfully higher over the next few years.

Celanese is an $18 billion enterprise-value global chemicals and special materials company that is number 1 or number 2 in most of its markets. The Acetyls business is about half the company and is the largest worldwide producer of acetic acid. Importantly, it is the most vertically integrated, both on its input costs and on its downstream uses, which provides significant advantages.

Engineered Materials, which makes up the other half of the business, produces specialty polymers that are often specced into their end platforms. This business sells about half of its output to autos and the other half to industrial and electronics end markets. While this company is levered, it still has a $5.5 billion market cap, generates $2 billion in EBITDA, and generates $800 million in levered free cash flow even while earnings are under pressure.

Summarizing our investment thesis, Celanese is the low-cost producer of acetic acid worldwide, and we believe pricing in acetic acid is poised to inflect higher over the coming years. We believe the earnings decline in Engineered Materials is largely at an end and that the company has strong cash-generation capabilities and additional value levers, giving it lots of runway. We see asymmetric upside given our entry valuation, and we think we are creating the company at 27% levered free cash flow today.

2. The Acetyls Cost Advantage

Going deeper, let’s walk through the acetic acid business. Celanese sits to the far left of the global acetic acid cost curve. Its plants are the ones in the dark green bars here, due to access to cheap natural gas, vertical integration with its own methanol production, and proprietary technology.

While the global acetic acid industry is more dispersed, the U.S. industry is quite concentrated. Celanese controls 63% of U.S. production capacity, and the top 3 producers control 90% of U.S. production capacity. Here on the left, you can see that Celanese produces 44% of the methanol used in acetic acid production and is the most vertically integrated large Western producer.

On the right, you can see that this provides almost a 50% cost advantage compared to others that are purchasing methanol or Chinese acetic acid producers. Given this cost structure, methanol prices are a substantial input cost into acetic acid prices and the variable with the most volatility. If you go back to your Commodities 101 days, variable input costs of commodities determine marginal costs, which set commodity prices.

3. Methanol Supply Is Tightening

So what has been happening with our input costs? Here you can see that methanol prices have been spiking over the last year and a half. Why is that? It’s because there have been a number of supply outages worldwide. While some of these are temporary, such as plant outages in the U.S. and Norway, a lot of these are structural, such as Iranian plants being offline during the winter so natural gas use can be prioritized for residential heating.

We believe many of these structural elements will continue, taking away 5% to 6% of worldwide capacity into the future. In addition, methanol is one of the few chemicals today where demand is poised to outstrip supply. The world outside of the Americas is short methanol, and this deficit will increase 35% to over 12 million metric tons over the coming 3 years.

All of this leads to a larger pull on production from the Americas to fill the demand in the rest of the world. We forecast the Americas’ utilization rates to rise dramatically to 95% by 2028. What we generally see in other industries where demand outpaces supply is substantially higher price volatility, with meaningful upside to prices, just as we’re seeing in methanol posted prices today.

Higher utilization leads to higher prices, and we forecast increases in methanol prices over the coming years. As you can see in the purple line, our models correlate well with historical regional methanol prices, using the appropriate commodity price inputs, utilization, and relationships between regions. These models then drive our forecasted methanol prices.

While methanol prices might decrease over the next few months due to operational issues being resolved, we believe strongly that there is a sustained increase in methanol prices due to the supply-demand mismatch over the coming few years. Now that we’ve walked through their input costs, what has happened to acetic acid output prices?

4. Acetic Acid Prices Are Turning

Historically, changes in methanol prices translate through into acetic acid prices, which drive Celanese’s profits. However, we haven’t seen that this past year, as you can see by the flat green line on this chart. Why? It’s because we’ve seen increases in acetic acid capacity.

Specifically, Celanese expanded its low-cost Clear Lake facility in the U.S., and Chinese capacity has driven utilization lower in China. In the U.S., this increase in capacity is now behind us. Changes in methanol pricing generally do a very good job of explaining changes in acetic acid prices, outside of this last year when we saw a large increase in capacity. We expect these changes to continue to correlate as capacity stabilizes.

Let’s simplify this into supply-and-demand charts. Here is a stylized version of the acetic acid supply curve, where demand intersects to determine price. Higher methanol costs raise the acetic acid cost curve and should raise acetic acid prices, keeping demand constant. You can see that in the green line.

However, this increase in methanol prices came at the same time as increases in capacity. In the U.S., this was low-cost capacity, which drove acetic acid prices back down. You can see the move from the green line to the gray line. On a go-forward basis, we believe increasing methanol prices will now translate into higher acetic acid prices in the U.S.

As we are past capacity additions, we undertake a similar exercise to the one we did with methanol prices to forecast forward acetic acid prices. As capacity utilization stabilizes, those higher methanol prices translate into higher acetic acid prices. We forecast U.S. acetic acid prices to increase 30% by 2028 from current levels.

All of this drives higher Acetyls EBITDA over the next few years, increasing 50% by 2028 from 2024 levels. This drives our difference from consensus. Now turning to Celanese’s other division, Engineered Materials, the segment that has underperformed following its acquisitions, this segment unfortunately is more of a black box.

We’ve broken out what we think is Celanese’s segment revenue attributable to autos and revenue per car produced by geographic area. It seems to have bottomed over the last few quarters. The company also acknowledged that it has lost meaningful profitability in its Nylon 66 business.

Analyzing the financials of a bankrupt competitor in the nylon business, Ascend, we believe there are little earnings left to lose from this part of the business. On a go-forward basis, we believe EBITDA is troughing this year and has 50% growth prospects driven by the Acetyls business over the next 3 years.

We are well above consensus in the outer years, showing EBITDA that is 25% above 2028 Street numbers. We also believe the levered free cash flow profile is quite attractive, as we’re investing in a company we believe can generate cash flow yields north of 20% starting in 2027.

We think there are additional upside levers through monetizing JVs and equity interests, as the company is doing currently, as well as through higher demand in the U.S. if domestic manufacturing increases. I’d note that another way we are likely to play the secular theme of higher methanol prices is through Methanex, the world’s largest producer of methanol.

5. Celanese Is Worth $79

In summary, we believe it is worth $79 a share, or over 50% higher than current trading levels. The company has significant cash generation. We believe earnings in Engineered Materials have troughed, and most importantly, we see significant tailwinds in the Acetyl business.

Celanese is a great example of what we do at REN: investigate dislocations, distill complicated situations into their few key drivers, and find anomalies and data points that lead us to forecast industrywide changes. Thank you for your time.

Alexandra Engler 在 Sohn 2025 推介 Celanese — 文字稿与摘要 | BidClub