Sohn Conference Foundation · · 9 min
Mohammed Anjarwala pitches Blue Owl at Sohn 2025
TL;DR
- Mohammed Anjarwala's Sohn pitch is Blue Owl: the leader in private credit with an "annuity-like" fee stream, expected to about double earnings by 2028 for "more than a 2x multiple of money, more than 30% IRR in less than three years." Stock at around $19 is about 20x forward P/E; at a 25x multiple—justified versus direct comp Ares trading in the mid-to-high 20s—it's $36, plus $3 of dividends along the way, and another "$4 to $5 of incremental upside" if the acquisitions discussed go well.
- The business-quality case: the management company takes "no balance sheet or credit risk," 90% of managed capital is permanent, 100% of earnings are fee-related, and there's "very little carry here." That makes it "both defensive and resilient and it's got high growth. It's rare to get both those things at the same time."
- Tailwind one—private credit is taking share from syndicated loans, from ~10% to 20% of the market in five years, because loan and funding duration are "far better matched" and it doesn't rely on bank warehousing. When the tariff announcement shut the syndicated market down "a couple of months ago," private lenders kept committing—and Blue Owl grows at more than double the market rate by writing "scale, billion-dollar-plus checks" few players can match.
- Tailwind two—retail: alternatives allocation is 3% versus institutions at 20%; getting even halfway there is "$10 to $15 trillion of potential inflows." Blue Owl's evergreen monthly inflows are up 5x in three years to over $700M per month, retail is about 20% of total capital, and one of its products currently yields 10%—four points of base rate plus six points of "remarkably stable and resilient" spread.
- The moderator's one pushback: if Blue Owl lacks carry, how do you value it against Blackstone, Apollo, Carlyle, and Ares? Anjarwala says carry has shifted to employees as the industry moved from LLPs to corporations, while equity-oriented alternative managers have more balance-sheet and carry volatility. He calls Ares and Blue Owl "purer" and specifically says Ares probably should trade at a premium multiple to some equity-oriented alternative managers.
Digest · the substance, structured for research
1. Blue Owl as an annuity-like management company
- Anjarwala's framing: Blue Owl's management company sits atop private credit funds, collects fees, and takes "no balance sheet or credit risk." Ninety percent of capital is permanent—like a publicly traded BDC whose investors cannot redeem but can trade in and out—and 100% of earnings are fee-related, with "very little carry."
- The pitch's core tension resolved up front: "it's a business that's both defensive and resilient and it's got high growth. It's rare to get both those things at the same time."
2. Two secular tailwinds—share gains and retail
- Private credit's share of the syndicated loan market went from ~10% to 20% in five years because loan and funding duration are "far better matched" and private lenders do not rely on bank warehousing for the initial commitment. During the tariff-announcement stress a couple of months earlier, syndicated markets "basically shut down" while private lenders kept committing.
- Blue Owl grows at more than double the market rate by targeting the highest end of the market: scale transactions where billion-dollar-plus checks are written. Few players can do that, and Blue Owl can write in size, move with speed, and offer borrowers a one-stop shop.
- Retail: 3% is allocated to alternatives versus 20% for institutions; getting even halfway there could mean "$10 to $15 trillion of potential inflows." One of Blue Owl's products currently offers a 10% dividend yield—four points of base rate and six points of remarkably stable and resilient spread. Its evergreen monthly inflows are up 5x in three years to over $700M per month; retail is about 20% of capital. "Retail is hard. It's about brand and distribution, and Blue Owl has built both."
3. The math to $36
- The company earned 77 cents per share last year; Anjarwala thinks that will about double by 2028. Almost all of the growth is coming from asset growth, with a big chunk from the private-wealth retail channel. At around $19, the stock is about 20x forward P/E; Ares trades in the mid-to-high 20s, so he views 25x as appropriate, implying $36 plus $3 in dividends—">2x multiple of money, more than 30% IRR in less than three years."
- Acquisitions could turbocharge growth by opening new markets where Blue Owl can run its playbook: build retail products and grow institutional funds organically. The asset-backed market could be multiple times larger than it is today.
- The acquisitions provide another "$4 to $5 of incremental upside" if they go well.
4. The carry question—and why fee stability can support a higher multiple
- The moderator's challenge: how should investors value Blue Owl versus Blackstone, Apollo, Carlyle, and Ares, which have "a much higher percentage of carry"?
- Anjarwala's answer: the industry evolved from LLPs to corporations, and much of the carry shifted to employees while public entities came to have more management fees. Equity-oriented alternative managers can have more volatile earnings because they sometimes have a balance sheet and more carry in the public company's earnings; credit-focused players are "better in that sense." He calls Ares and Blue Owl "purer" and specifically says Ares probably should trade at a premium multiple to some equity-oriented alternative managers.