[BidClub_]
All-In · · 71 分钟

Spencer Pratt 谈如何修复洛杉矶:野火、无家可归、腐败与夺回城市之战

Spencer Pratt

YouTube
TL;DR
  • Pratt 的市长竞选,建立在对洛杉矶政府运转能力的个人控诉之上:1月7日,在火情已知、附近有一座500万加仑水库、且他多年缴税并以为这些税款会用于防护的情况下,他的家仍被烧毁。 他称现场没有警报,消防部门回复“没有可用资源”,Mayor Bass 从未调派固定翼飞机支援,911也拒绝派人前往他父亲的家。“我当时非常天真。”
  • 他的经济逻辑是,公共安全必须先于任何盘活房地产、餐馆、交通、旅游或市中心商业的尝试。 Pratt 提议先给予2或3周警告,随后执行现有法律;对药物依赖的无家可归者实施强制治疗,并在高密度社区之外建设按人群分流的设施。他的因果链条很直接:街道安全了,私人资本就会回来,企业重新开门,洛杉矶应该“让钱从ATM里喷出来”。
  • Pratt 将无家可归者支出描述为一场激励失灵,主导者是那些拿到公共资产却没有可衡量住房义务的NGO。 他提到Palisades火灾后筹得约1亿美元,以及与FireAid相关、列出200多家机构的名单;他还称Weingart一处物业曾据称以1100万美元挂牌,随后获得约2800万-2900万美元公共资金。他将每平方英尺750美元的建设成本,与开发商告诉他的250美元合理成本作对比。
  • 他提出的控制系统是“审计优先”的政府:追踪每一美元税款,发布简单易懂的仪表盘,并按结果而非活动量考核各部门。 Pratt 称自己已与IRS刑事调查人员会面6次,若当选将先审计所有无家可归者NGO;LAUSD、环卫、警察、消防、审批以及工会协议也都将接受同样审查。“没有问责。”
  • Pratt 承认自己从未管理过一座城市,但认为招募有经验的运营者本身就是市长的工作,而不是要求自己掌握每一项专业能力。 他说,管理500亿美元预算的高管愿意暂停经营自己的公司,或以每年1美元任职;科技从业者则声称,算法可以让围绕开发建设的官僚体系“提升100倍”。执行风险很大:几乎所有增长承诺,最终都取决于各部门、工会、市议员和Sacramento的配合。
  • 他的供给侧方案包括加快审批、自动放行符合标准的项目、降低拍摄费用,并把独立制作视为好莱坞最快能够恢复的环节。 Pratt 提到,一个保障性住房项目尽管承诺6个月完成,却卡了2年半;Venice一家不卖酒、也不卖熟食的基础杂货店则停滞了1年。Peter Chernin 通过 Pratt 转述的建议是:先扶持独立电影人,再争取大型制作回归,并恢复不设上限的后期制作业务。
  • 在政治上,Pratt 将自己包装成一名参加8年“服役期”的愤怒纳税人,而不是传统党派候选人。 他预测自己将在6月2日以51%的得票率直接胜选,称Karen Bass的在任者民调只有20%;将官员豪宅与自己的Airstream作对比的草根广告,已经成为竞选的情绪引擎。他的竞选宣言很绝对:“我参选不是为了当政治家,而是因为我亲身经历了城市领导层失败达到极致是什么样子。”
摘要 · 为研究而整理的核心内容

1. 对抗性审查成了 Pratt 的辩论准备

  • Pratt 还想再要“2小时或3小时”,把他所谓在任官员的失败一一列出来。支持他的民主党籍母亲们曾劝他克制,因此他的战术难题是保持“冷静、镇定、沉着”,同时压住插话喊“骗子,骗子”的冲动。

  • 主持人开场观察到,观众原本没想到他会如此熟练地掌握事实和政策。Pratt 的解释是:政治人物接受的是友好采访,而他的每次媒体露面都迫使他确认“当时谁在那里、穿什么、早餐吃了什么”,让每一项说法都“无懈可击”。

  • 他的律师给出的辩论建议,后来成了整场对谈的主线。Pratt 问自己在反驳所谓谎言时如何保持镇定,律师回答:“Spencer,我永远拥有真相。”Pratt 说,持续遭到反对,实际上已经让辩论变成了他的日常训练。

2. 1月7日的大火击碎了他对税款换取防护的假设

  • Pratt 先讲的是预警失灵:儿子患肺炎期间,他仍不断查看手机,却不知道一场异常危险的干燥大风天气即将到来。1月7日,工人发现山坡起火后,保姆抱着2岁的孩子跑进屋里;Heidi 离开时,除了尿布和孩子的衣服几乎什么都没带。

  • Pratt 在自己徒步了9年的山路上看到Highlands附近冒烟,以及他认定更早发生的Lachman火灾;据称那处火已经闷烧了7天。但他当时仍很有信心,因为消防员经常在他家附近一座500万加仑的Palisades水库旁演练,水库配有消防水带接口和直升机取水点。

  • Pratt 称LADWP在2024年6月排空了Palisades水库。后来他又称,LADWP CEO Janisse Quiñones 在已知干燥火季即将到来前排空了两座水库,却“没有计划、没有备用方案、没有水罐车”。他回忆说,自己当时还拍视频说“等不及看直升机赶到了”,完全不知道附近的水已经没了。

  • Pratt 打电话给消防部门,询问能否给枯死灌木洒水,得到的回复是:“没有可用资源。”他的父亲试图用水管给山坡喷水,但 Pratt 最终让他离开;现场没有警报、警长车辆、LAPD警告,或其他能让这场紧急状况“像电影一样真实”的信号。

3. 他眼看房子烧毁,而911拒绝向父亲提供帮助

  • Pratt 一直留到火势在下午5:00或6:00左右沿山坡压下来。他反驳Bass关于极端风力的描述,称自己所在位置的风速没有超过40英里/小时。主持人指出当时仍有飞机在飞,Pratt 同意火势确实在移动,但称风并不可怕;他引用CBS的一篇报道及当时在现场的一名记者,作为后来支持其说法的依据。

  • Pratt 转述U.S. Forest Service Chief Bobby Garcia 的判断称,最初的火势并没有通过同时攻击两侧而被“压窄”。他把没有获得市政府请求的固定翼支援,归咎于Bass当时在非洲、她的副市长被软禁;县政府、Cal Fire和联邦资源最终都赶到现场。

  • Pratt 被困在10号与405号高速公路交汇处附近,只能通过安保监控看着每个房间逐一烧毁。儿子床下的火焰形成了类似心形的图案,但他当时最恐惧的是无法联系父亲;911告诉他“没有紧急人员可以过去”,尽管他的父亲后来表示,道路当时仍然可以通行。

4. 财务绝境将创伤转化为诉讼和参选

  • 火灾发生3天后,恰逢Heidi专辑发行15周年。Pratt 在TikTok上请求观众播放或购买专辑,因为“我们没钱了”;他说专辑可能在12个国家登顶第一,复兴带来了约15万美元收入——这对家庭是实质性缓解,但远远不够重建房屋。

  • 经济问题很快重新浮现:Farmers在承保8年后放弃了这个家庭,他们只能转入California FAIR Plan。Pratt 将流媒体收入与2006年作对比,认为同样的榜单成绩当年本可带来数百万美元;随后他开始追问,这栋房子为什么会烧毁。

  • 他联系了一名朋友;这名朋友的父亲曾与Edison打过官司,Pratt 请他代表自己起诉市政府、州政府和LADWP。Pratt 称,法官在辩论当天驳回了州政府和市政府的上诉,案件进入证据开示阶段;他还说,LAFD内部举报人称,消防队员在1月1日被命令离开仍在闷烧的Lachman火场。他指称事后报告被多次修改,Bass否认这一说法。

  • 主持人起初说有5000栋房屋被烧毁,Pratt 纠正为7000座建筑。发现没有人出来挑战Bass后,他打电话给Rick Caruso;Caruso 告诉他“去追Bass”,暗示自己不会参选,而 Pratt 强调自己本来就在战斗。

5. 竞选出售的是公民责任,而非党派身份

  • 竞选破圈广告将Bass的住宅、Nithya Raman价值数百万美元的房子,与Pratt的Airstream并置。Pratt 澄清,带有他名字的广告在法律上归他所有;其他具有强烈情绪感染力的视频则是独立的草根行动:“人们感受到了常识。”

  • Pratt 拒绝“政治家”这个标签,也拒绝被任何党派占有:“我是公民。我是愤怒的纳税人。”他援引Cincinnatus,将最初只做一届的承诺改为两届——用8年时间“把这一切锁定”——之后再回到家人身边。因此,Airstream是他的“前进基地”,不只是住所。

  • 他称Bass的在任者民调只有20%,创下历史低点,并预测自己会在6月2日以51%获胜,不进入11月决选。他不认可传统民调,称支持者会回避垃圾电话和陌生人;他还指称,Raman在报名截止前1小时才参选,成为一个与DSA结盟的替代选项,而她在此之前仅2周还曾支持Bass。

6. 他的无家可归者方案,用治疗园区替代零散床位

  • Pratt 的前提很绝对,但明确说明这是他的估计:洛杉矶街头每天有7人死亡,其中“90%是吸毒者”。因此他不接受单纯提供住房作为答案,主张先实施强制治疗,并把床位放进专门建设的设施,而不是学校或住宅旁边。

  • 他的模式来自朋友Matt运营的Bentonville退伍军人设施,以及他听说过的一座意大利戒毒园区。居民不会住进“看起来像监狱的水泥砖楼”,而是在自然环境中获得完整服务;资金则来自他所说政府已经支出的超过250亿美元。

  • 园区将按人群分流:退伍军人在一个区域,母亲和儿童或家庭在另一区域,惯犯型吸毒者则在其他地方。Pratt 认为这既可能更人道,也可能更便宜;同时他指责NGO反复发放吸食工具、针头和Narcan,却没有解决成瘾问题。

  • 他还驳斥Bass所谓无家可归人数下降17%的说法,称那是“最被做手脚的数据”,并将其与他所描述的RAND估计——增加30%——作对比。他质疑的是统计方法:工作人员从车辆上统计肉眼可见的人,却漏掉帐篷、灌木、立交桥下和下水道里的人。

7. NGO资金是他最想审计的腐败机制

  • Pratt 说,自己的第一个教训来自Palisades火灾后筹得的约1亿美元。他称受灾者不断告诉他自己什么也没拿到,而FireAid的法律回应显示,在名单列出的200多家机构中,只有“几家”直接提供了帮助;他特别强调,“几家”意味着不到10家。

  • 他最尖锐的住房案例涉及Weingart:据称,Westwood一栋建筑以1100万美元挂牌出售,6天后却获得约2800万-2900万美元市政府资金。Pratt 称,多年后那里仍没有人入住,纳税人也不拥有这处物业;Weingart的开发商建设成本达到每平方英尺750美元,而合理水平应为250美元。

  • 在他的叙述中,结构性问题是:NGO拿到拨款、支付高额高管薪酬、保留公共资金购置的物业,却没有任何必须安置居民的要求。他还称,California的Homekey规则可以在住房项目要求住户保持清醒时扣留资金,维持一个可能让每名居民成本达到70万美元、却不要求康复的体系。

  • 主持人追问这对政客有什么好处。Pratt 将可辩护的答案——NGO能让官员轻松制造“正在行动”的表象——与涉及PAC或竞选协助的“阴谋论路径”区分开来。他称消息人士预计市政府官员会倒台,并提出在上任第一周把所有NGO召集起来审计;此前他已与IRS刑事调查人员会面6次。他还声称City Hall内部人士告诉他文件正在被粉碎,但调查人员可以重建这些案件。

8. 执法安全是商业和可用公共交通的前提

  • Pratt 将失序直接与超过100家餐馆倒闭、居民依赖外卖,以及市中心上班族无法离开办公楼联系起来。他讲到一名律师的故事:对方的办公室只能叫外卖。“犯罪下降了,”他认为,部分原因是居民已经不再相信911会响应。

  • 他讲述了一起发生在Wilshire Boulevard的袭击:一名男子据称殴打一名女性,用PVC管砸毁汽车,并开始拆走一辆自行车,而报警者只能等待警察。Pratt 称警员想要行动,却受到相关政策限制——对没有地址的人开具罚单会被视为文化不敏感;他认为这也让涉嫌虐待动物的人获得了有罪不罚的空间。

  • Pratt 以San Francisco Mayor Lurie的执法方式为例,称砸车盗窃下降了87%。主持人随后用一位著名警察局长的名言强化这一教训:“一旦你开始给人戴上手铐,看看会有多少人离开。”Pratt 表示同意。

  • 他上任后的头几周会在全市张贴告示,禁止在公共场所吸毒、裸露、盗窃和虐待动物,2或3周后开始执法。他还会请CDC检测营地中的“中世纪疾病”;Metro扩张只有在乘客安全、车费收足,以及“芬太尼就在你孩子旁边”不再成为常态后才有意义。

9. Pratt 的运营模式是谦逊加上招募高管能力

  • 主持人最强的质疑是执行能力:Pratt 从未管理过数万名员工。Pratt 承认这一差距——“我知道自己从未管理过第二大城市”——但称有成就的运营者愿意暂停经营公司或以每年1美元任职;科技从业者则认为,算法可以让城市的建筑和开发官僚体系“提升100倍”。

  • 他称自己可能在1周内见过约10位亿万富豪,并将洛杉矶约150亿美元的预算,与那些已经在管理500亿美元预算的高管作对比。他的原则是,市长不需要成为每个房间里经验最丰富的人;但每一名任命的官员都必须是该岗位最有经验的人。

  • 一名潜在的副市长因Pratt担心遭到市政府报复而未公开姓名,这名人选将帮助执行法律。Pratt 认为,如果没有安全这一基础,Bass或Raman即使招募同一批顾问也仍会失败:“在洛杉矶的家庭相信普通街道、公园和餐馆安全之前,没有人会把钱投进这座城市。”

  • Pratt 起初说工会领导人支持Bass,但后来称LAFD工会和LAPD成员私下支持自己,只是害怕遭到报复。他会选择谈判而不是惩罚:履行合理福利承诺,暂时收紧支出,并以私营部门为基准确定加薪幅度。他认为警察和消防员薪酬极高,主要源于人手不足和加班;同时他称,如今60%的消防员是从外地飞来上班,因为他们的家人不觉得在洛杉矶本地生活安全。

10. 审计和自动审批构成重建方案的支柱

  • 主持人列出了LAUSD的投入产出错配:每名学生支出2.3万美元,教师平均薪酬10.1万美元,州内排名第170位,达到英语标准的学生只有46%,达到数学标准的只有37%。Pratt 的答案不是重做课程,而是审计——在这种支出水平下,家长不应仍然为课本和额外教师筹款。

  • 他希望每一美元税款都通过“像CliffNotes一样简单易懂的仪表盘”公开,并将透明度扩展到学校、消防、警察和采购。他提到消防站大门据称花费25万美元、冰箱花费5万美元,认为这说明追踪资金流向才是根本问题。

  • Pratt 起初反对一项30亿美元的会展中心扩建计划,因为设施外还有尸体。后来他缓和了立场:如果洛杉矶变得更安全、持续增长,该项目可能可以通过私人合作获得合理性,尤其是在一名匿名亿万富豪提出捐赠5亿美元,并提到其家族曾向纽约捐赠3亿美元之后。

  • 审批是另一个控制点。一名保障性住房开发商在承诺6个月完成的目标下,仍被卡了2年半。Pratt 计划中的建筑与安全主管称流程可以修复;主持人提出,对符合明确标准的项目采用基于AI的自动审批,Pratt 表示支持,认为这可以削减繁文缛节。

11. 小企业和独立好莱坞是增长引擎

  • Pratt 以Venice一家基础杂货店作为小企业样本:这家店既不卖酒,也不卖熟食,却被卡了1年。他希望简化审批,对符合明确标准的申请自动放行,并指出目前各部门无论许可证是否办完、街道是否干净或其他结果是否实现,都照样获得经费。

  • 他转述Clean LA一名叫Juan的街道清洁工的说法:洛杉矶约10亿美元的环卫业务,由真正关心这座城市的人运营,成本可以降到5亿美元。更大的愿景是用8年时间让起重机遍布城市,把审批周期从几年缩短到几周;在密度问题上选择装饰艺术风格,而不是“像监狱一样”的SB 79建筑;Metro的资金投入则应由超过Pratt所引用的5%客流占比来证明,而不是仅仅因为它占预算的15%。

  • 在好莱坞问题上,Peter Chernin 告诉Pratt,更大的产业格局主要是州长的责任,但建议从独立制作人开始。Pratt 希望取消阻碍拍摄的费用和许可要求,提供市政府资源,使用本地餐馆和剧组,并让街道安全到足以容纳摄影机和设备。他还联系了David Ellison和Ted Sarandos,希望大型制作、后期制作以及“Top Gun 3”都留在这里,而不是把工作外包到加拿大或英国。

  • Pratt 还表示会推动废除Measure ULA,同时承认自己无法单独做到;他要阻止租户买断和霸占房屋等滥用行为,并遏制Section 8欺诈。8年后的终局仍由执法主导:在住宅附近重建带取水点的消防体系,接入私人泳池,加派Chinook和Firehawk,恢复保险,让资本、电影人、餐馆和家庭回到洛杉矶。他希望对儿子们说的话很简单:“感谢上帝,美国有法律”,以及“你们的爸爸说:‘最新消息:我们来执行这些法律。’”

Speaker 1

Spencer Pratt, welcome to the All-In podcast.

Spencer Pratt

Thank you for having me.

Speaker 1

You had an unbelievable debate performance the other night. I have so many friends who were texting, and people were obviously tweeting about it. Let's start with that. How are you feeling after the debate?

Spencer Pratt

I just wish it had been 2 or 3 hours because the list of their failures that we didn't even get to touch on is unbelievable. It was the most fun I've had in years because what people don't realize is that they're pathological liars. When somebody gets to be onstage with only facts and the truth, that's why there's been this incredible response: Everybody who watches these lying politicians knows they're lying, and nobody gets to yell, “They're lying.”

It was very hard to be respectful, though, because all the lovely Democratic moms who love me and want to keep supporting me asked me to please stay calm, cool, and collected. The whole time, I was doing my best behavior not to interrupt the lying. If I hadn't been tasked with that mission, I would have been like, “Liar, liar.”

Speaker 1

A lot of people said they weren't expecting such a great performance. You were so well-prepped and so well-versed on a lot of the facts and the actions you were going to take. How did you get ready for the debate? Did you do any work to prepare for it?

Spencer Pratt

Thankfully, people argue with me all day long in every single media hit I've done for months because they don't want me to get into the machine. Every interview I do, unlike these politicians, is opposition. It's arguing, arguing, arguing.

When Mayor Bass or Councilwoman Raman talks to the media, they can just lie, and then the media people say, “Oh, thank you. Thank you, Mayor Bass. Thank you, Councilwoman.” If I say anything, I've got to have who was there, what they were wearing, and what they had for breakfast. I have to have my information so fact-based and be bulletproof to beat this machine. I debate people all day long.

Speaker 1

You're held to a higher standard.

Spencer Pratt

Exactly. I'm challenged all day long, and all I live in is facts and the truth. I called my lawyer, who is representing me in the case against the city, the state, and LADWP. He's one of the most famous lawyers in the world. I said, “Peter, how do you stay so calm when you're arguing with these liars?”

He said, “Spencer, I always have the truth.” I was like, “Ooh. Okay, I got that.”

Speaker 1

Good strategy.

Spencer Pratt

Yeah, so that was a great message I took into the debate. For people who don't know your story, I want to give you a couple of minutes to tell it. Let's go back to the fires. Where were you, and where were your family, your wife, and your kids when these fires kicked off? Where were you guys, and how did you end up evacuating? What was that evening like?

Let's even rewind to before the fires. It just shows you that our emergency situation is not at the level it needs to be because I didn't even know there was this crazy wind event. My son had pneumonia, so I was up every night checking his temperature. I'm on my phone a lot—I'm a phone person—and I didn't even know that this was extra-dangerous, dry weather. That just shows you that, if you rewind, we weren't even informed at the level we clearly should have been.

The morning of January 7, I was doing my normal routine, making my espresso, and about to dance to “Look What You Made Me Do” by Taylor Swift on Snapchat, which I've done since the Reputation album dropped. All of a sudden, I see our nanny running down the street. She comes in with our 2-year-old at the time and says, “The workers up the street said there's a fire on the hill.”

Again, this isn't crazy. Mayor Bass is like, “We never knew,” but we're well aware that fires happen. There had just been the Getty Fire that everyone ran out of their houses for.

Speaker 1

I grew up in L.A.

Spencer Pratt

I've been through the fires. They've been going on for 30 years. Three weeks before, all my friends fought a fire in Malibu. I was even planning on starting my own fire brigade, like my friends had, and I was talking to Heidi: “We need to get a hose. We need to get a truck.”

I was well aware of fires, no matter what anybody says. This wasn't a shock. We also know about Santa Ana winds.

I ran up the hill where we've hiked every day for the last 9 years, and I saw the smoke coming from the Highlands area, which is where the Lachman Fire was. We now know the fire was really from 7 days earlier and had been smoldering for a week. I FaceTimed my wife and said, “Yeah, maybe pack and go down to my parents' house just to be safe.”

My parents live in the Palisades. I grew up in the Palisades. It's the opposite side of where we are. We're at the top of the hill next to the state park, by the bluffs and next to the ocean. You would think that would be safe.

She loaded up just diapers and kids' clothes and went to my mom's house. I stayed up there, FaceTiming everyone locally and asking what was going on. I was very confident because I assumed that, since I've been paying—I don't have any money because all my money goes to taxes—all that tax money meant firefighters were coming. It had to be going somewhere.

I was very naive. I also live next door. Again, in the debate, Mayor Bass said I was lying, or that wasn't true. She said there was only 1 reservoir that was empty. “Ma'am, Mayor Bass, I live next to the one you don't know existed: the Palisades Reservoir, with 5 million gallons next door to my house.”

The fire department would do almost—not weekly, but biweekly—drills there. They would connect up, and they would make me move cars if they needed to bring the hoses. I was always saying to my wife, “Well, this is annoying, but gosh, we're set. They have a thing where the helicopter could dip in there.”

I'm not talking about the San Andreas Reservoir that she was referencing and lied about, saying it was for drinking water. If you Google it, the L.A. Times will show you that when it was made, it was for wildfire protection. That's why it has cisterns, and that's why it has helicopter dip sites.

I was very confident. I have a video of myself saying, “Can't wait till the helicopters get here,” not realizing that LADWP drained that reservoir in June 2024. I must have been away when they were emptying it or whatever.

I was very confident that, in 2025, in Pacific Palisades—which probably pays almost a quarter of the taxes for the whole city—I would guess that, at this point, they were not going to let the entire town burn to the ground. I didn't pack anything. I didn't prepare for our house to burn down.

I called the fire department directly because I have their number. I said, “Hey, we just see 1 truck up here because, if the fire comes around, there's just this 1 place of dead brush, and if you put water on it, it won't come and hit all these houses.”

They said, “We have no assets available.”

I was like, “Whoa.” That was scary. My dad came up, and we got the hose and he was hosing a hillside. Finally, I said, “Dad, let's get out of here. The firefighters are probably coming.”

Speaker 1

And your wife and kids are gone at this point?

Spencer Pratt

They're at my dad's house. Then the fire came from Temescal Canyon and crossed over. My older sister called and said, “What are your kids doing there? They better get out of there.” I was like, “What is happening?”

You know what? This is insane. It's like a bad movie. I never heard any sirens. Real locals will tell you, if you talk to them, there were no sirens.

Speaker 1

I've heard this from a lot of friends in the past.

Spencer Pratt

If I had heard sirens, I would have started packing things, maybe stayed, but you don't feel scared if you don't hear sirens. There were no sheriffs, LAPD, or emergency vehicles coming up the street telling everybody to get out, like in a movie. There was no movie stuff. You always think everything is like a movie, but nothing was like a movie.

I stayed until the fire came down the hill at 5 or 6 p.m. Again, when Mayor Bass was talking about the wind, I'm standing at the top of the Palisades, connected to the state park. There was no scary wind. It did not go past 40 miles per hour.

Now even CBS News has done a great debunking post, with a journalist who was up there, showing that I was correct and wasn't lying in the debate.

Speaker 1

And there were planes flying.

Spencer Pratt

Yeah, it moved. It was windy, but it wasn't scary.

I talked to Chief Bobby Garcia at the U.S. Forest Service about what he thought went sideways that day. We don't know, because the after-action report has been edited multiple times by Mayor Bass, which she denies, but the L.A. Times stands by its reporting.

He said the initial fire wasn't made skinny. You're supposed to attack the fire on both sides, and that did not happen. Ready for this? You know what Mayor Bass brought up? “Oh, there were no planes.”

No, Mayor Bass, you never called in fixed-wing support. She never did. You know why? She was in Africa. And you know who was supposed to do it? Her deputy mayor, but he was under house arrest. L.A. City never even called in fixed-wing air support to drop water.

Thankfully, LA County, Cal Fire, and the U.S. Forest Service showed up. But that's how out of the loop Mayor Bass was on this.

Speaker 1

So when did you find out your house was gone?

Spencer Pratt

I watched it burn on my security cameras. I watched my son's bed burn in the shape of a heart, which is the most spiritual, crazy shape—a heart coming through the bottom of his bed. Then I watched each room until—

Speaker 1

You're watching on the cameras?

Spencer Pratt

On my phone, in gridlock traffic, where the 10 goes to the 405, that one ramp. I'm just stuck in traffic watching it. But thank God, as I'm watching it, I can't reach my dad, who I'm thinking is dying trying to save his house on the bluffs.

I'm calling 911. I've been trying to get these audio calls posted, and they say they don't have them. I'm calling 911 to find out if my dad is okay, if he tripped, if—so even though I'm watching my house burn down, I can't reach my dad. That's taking away the material—

Speaker 1

Connection.

Spencer Pratt

I'm like, "My dad mattered more to me than my house burning." So I get on 911. They're like, "What's the address?" I'm like, "Oh, no emergency personnel can go there."

Speaker 1

Your dad lives on the bluffs. So you're losing your mind at that point.

Spencer Pratt

There are 12 ways to get to my parents' house.

Speaker 1

So this idea that there's no emergency personnel—

Spencer Pratt

—and I'm telling them my dad could be burning up. These 12 people who burned alive, I know firsthand that if one of their family members, relatives, or neighbors was calling 911, they were told no emergency personnel could go help them.

Thank God my dad obviously lived and he got out. I was like, "Dad, could you get out?" He's like, "Yeah, I drove. You could drive anywhere." So they didn't even brutal.

Speaker 1

So in the aftermath, this hits you. It must have hollowed you, wrecked you. How were the next couple of weeks, trying to put everything back together? At what point were you like, "Man, I'm going to try and figure this out"? Was it an immediate call to action for you, or was there a period of time when you were trying to put everything together?

Spencer Pratt

My wife and I, when we were very successful in 2009, spent millions of dollars on her pop music album with all the most famous music producers and writers in the world. We didn't have the money to promote it, so nobody ever heard it, but we did that.

The 15-year anniversary of that album happened to be January 10. The house burned down on January 7. I have zero money now because everything I ever put into this house for my sons—all everything I own—was in this house. I'm like, "Oh my God, we have no money. We're done."

I'm getting emails because January 10 is this anniversary date, 15 years of her album. So I go on TikTok Live and say, "Anybody, please, I have no money right now. Our house just burned down. Please stream my wife's album. Buy it." Thank God, Planet Earth got behind me. I think maybe 12 countries put it at number one. Everyone streamed it. It was the first time an album from 15 years ago went to number one on the Billboard charts.

That was taking me out of the dark trauma because I'm focusing right away on pivoting into, like, "We're going to rebuild." I was naive to think streaming music could get you a house back. Thank God I did make, like, $150,000, but if this was 2006, we would have made millions of dollars.

So it took my mind off it. Obviously, my wife is trying to get our kids into new schools. She's not even connecting to this. "This is so positive, honey. Everyone's supporting you." When that wears down, I realize, "Oh my God, this is not enough money to build anything."

We were stuck with the California FAIR Plan because we were dropped by Farmers after paying for 8 years, and we had no money to rebuild. I started questioning, "Why did our house burn down? It shouldn't have burned down."

I called up my friend, whose wedding I had just been a groomsman in, and whose dad had just fought Edison in the Camp Fire—I'm pretty sure it was the Camp Fire in Paradise—and he beat Edison. So I called him and said, "Can you represent me? I want to sue the city. I want to sue the state. I want to sue L.A.—"

Speaker 1

So you're a fighter. You go after it.

Spencer Pratt

I'm just done. Case by case.

Speaker 1

Fast-forward a little bit: 5,000 homes burned.

Spencer Pratt

7,000.

Speaker 1

7,000 structures. Yeah, 7,000 homes, whatever it is. Why are you the guy who comes out of the fire and says, "I'm going to fight, I'm going to do something about it, and I'm going to change it"?

Spencer Pratt

Thankfully, I had this experience of already being a hated media personality. When you put yourself out there, especially when you're fighting machines like Gavin Newsom and his social team, they're calling you a conspiracy theorist, and the L.A. Times is calling you a conspiracy theorist because they're saying this is climate change. There's nothing that could happen.

Well, guess what? The day of the debate, the judges overruled the appeal by the state and the city of L.A. Guess why? Because of the negligence that caused the Palisades Fire. It's moving forward. Discovery is open.

This idea that I was this conspiracy-theory, climate-change wingnut—if a normal person were attacked by the governor of California on social media, most people would back down. You burn my house down. You burn my parents out.

Speaker 1

You've been through it. You've been in the public eye. You've been a fighter in public. You've got this character that allows you to stand up. You have this capacity, and you have a bit of a platform going into it.

Spencer Pratt

So it was, yeah. Once I got the truth, all the LAFD whistleblowers were coming to me, telling me that they were told to leave the smoldering Lachman Fire on January 1. They told me that Mayor Bass was fighting the battalion chief. They're editing the after-action report—obstruction of justice.

They're telling me that the chief fought her for that $17 million and warned her that Angelenos would not be safe. So I'm getting all this information, and I don't feel like just this fringe social media voice. Man, I'm not crazy.

Speaker 1

So you fast-forward a little bit. The campaign's up and running now.

Spencer Pratt

Well, let's rewind. When I saw that no one was running against her, I reached out to Rick Caruso. I called him and said, "Are you going to run against Mayor Bass? She's guaranteed to win on June 2 with 51%. Totally. I cannot accept this as a human being at this point."

He said, "Go after Bass," implying he wasn't going after Bass. So, game on.

Speaker 1

No one else was stepping up. He told you to do it.

Spencer Pratt

Yes, but I was already doing it. If he was going to do it, obviously I wasn't going to go against—

Speaker 1

Totally.

Spencer Pratt

Yeah. I was like, "Okay, are you going to do it?" And he said, "Go after Bass."

Speaker 1

So how's the campaign going after this debate this week? I want to talk about the campaign ads, because the ads have almost elevated you to what I'm hearing from a lot of people is almost like a historic campaign. The ads are cutting through in a way that people have never seen before.

Are those your ads, or are they being produced by a third party and put out there? I've heard from some folks that there's a guy, Charlie Curran, who might be involved, or other people who might be separate from your campaign putting these out there. They're breaking through the mold. Everyone's like, "This isn't a political campaign. This is almost emotional. It's a movement." People want to get behind you, and they don't even live in L.A.

Spencer Pratt

The ad that blew up like crazy was when I showed Bass's house, Nithya Raman's multimillion-dollar mansion, and then my Airstream. That one broke every ad record in history.

If it has my name on it, it's legally mine. Anything like these incredible grassroots ads—if I don't put my name on them, they're legally not mine.

Speaker 1

So there are people out there creating these ads, not in your campaign—

Spencer Pratt

Correct. Because people feel the common sense.

Speaker 1

They feel the emotion. Totally. It's connecting.

Spencer Pratt

I keep trying to tell everyone that they try to put me in a box. I didn't run for a political party. I didn't run to be a politician. I ran because I experienced what city leadership failure at the ultimate level is. That's why I stepped up. That's what cuts through.

The media and everyone want to jump on and be like, "Oh, Spencer is our guy." No. I'm the citizen. I'm the angry taxpayer. You can be a Democrat and love me. You can be a Republican and love me. The only people who don't love me are communists and socialists, and I don't want them to love me.

Speaker 1

There was a saying from John Adams in 1776: "Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private virtue," implying that citizenship involves sacrificing your personal interest for the greater public good. Thomas Jefferson also spoke at length about taking a turn in providing civic duty. Everyone has a civic responsibility to support society at large.

But if you're going to go into government, if you're going to go into politics, you do a tour of duty. It's not a career. It was never meant to be a career. At the local, state, and national levels, there's an entire industry of people who have built a career in politics.

Then you come along. I would think Donald Trump has come along as well. He's another one of these enigmas that came out, and it resonated with people—that you're actually standing up and saying, "I'm the guy who's on the other side of the problem with all of this, and this is why this needs to change." It seems to be creating a movement.

Spencer Pratt

Yeah. I feel like I connect more with Cincinnatus, this guy who was a farmer and—

Speaker 1

I actually have Cincinnatus written down right now.

I was going to mention it, but I thought it might be too esoteric.

Spencer Pratt

Oh, no. That’s who I connect to, because I’m like, this guy went and fought this battle. They wanted to give him all the power, and he was like, “No, I want to go back to my family.” Initially, when I ran, I would say, “I want to do my 4 years and then go back.” I realize I need to do the 8 years. Lock this in, get L.A. the number-one city in the world, and then I can go back to my family. So I’m prepared to do the 8. That’s my tour of duty.

When people say, “Oh, this is your house,” I go, “No, that’s my forward operating base,” because this is a battle against good and evil. They let 7 people die in the street every day with our billions of dollars in tax money, and they say they need no new beds. It’s a drug problem. Ninety percent of these people are drug addicts. We need to get these people mandatory treatment.

Then we can get them beds, and they don’t have to have a bed on the Westside or next to people’s houses or in San Pedro, right next to schools. They can have beds in facilities that we build out. My friend Matt Hess has an incredible facility in Bentonville that he built for veterans. I’ve been talking with him about how veterans come there and have all these services. It’s beautiful. I’m like, how do we build this incredible compound with beautiful possibilities? I guess in Italy, some billionaire did this for addicts. That’s my vision, where we have all of this.

Speaker 1

Take care of people the right way.

Spencer Pratt

Exactly. All the services that you’ll ever need in a beautiful setting, not in a cement-brick building that looks like a prison. When an addict is getting off drugs, they don’t want to be in a 250-square-foot little cell with no services. We put them out in nature. We’re spending $25 billion-plus. We have enough money where it’s actually cheaper to build the most incredible facility out in nature and bring these services that provide for these addicts.

You separate people. Everybody doesn’t go in 1 building like they do right now. If you’re a veteran, you go over here. Single mothers with their kids and families go over here. Somebody who’s just a hardened-criminal drug addict goes over here, on this side of the hill. We need to build this out, and we have the money. But guess who doesn’t make money if I do that? The NGOs that are stealing all of our tax money to increase profit, giving these people pipes, giving them needles, giving them the Narcan, and letting them overdose 14 times a night.

Speaker 1

Let me just hit on the NGO point. What is the corruption there? Help people understand, because a lot of people think this is a MAGA talking point. I hear this thrown about all the time. People use “MAGA” as a term to dismiss when someone says something that is factually jarring to them. I’ve noticed this when someone comes along and points out something, and it’s like, “Oh, that’s a MAGA talking point,” as a way of just dismissing it instead of actually listening to what the person is saying.

Can you explain what goes on with these NGOs? How do NGOs create a system where the more we spend—and in the last 10 years, the city of Los Angeles, I think, has increased homeless spending by 10×, and the homeless population has doubled, and clearly it’s gotten a lot worse? Why is that relationship there, and what role do the NGOs actually play in this? I promise not to call you a MAGA guy for telling me.

Spencer Pratt

Well, first off, when you said homelessness has doubled, the count for homelessness—when Mayor Bass, in the debate, was like, “It’s down 17%”—these are the most cooked numbers. Even the RAND Corporation says what they’re saying is a 30% increase. But they just drive around and go, “1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.” They’re not going into these encampments and bridges and bushes, unzipping these tents, and going into the sewer. So we don’t even know the count.

But let me tell you my first experience with NGOs after the Palisades, when $100 million was raised. Every single person I talked to who was messaging me said, “No one’s getting this money. No one’s seeing a dollar.” I went to Washington and asked senators to investigate this. We opened up the case. Now, all of a sudden, FireAid puts out a legal letter to defend themselves. In their own legal letter from the law firm, they say several of these NGOs gave directly to fire victims.

The list for the $100 million is 200-plus. Google “several.” It’s under 10. So even in their defense, they’re telling you—and again, I don’t believe 1 of those 10 gave directly. The people that they said did were like, “We gave gift cards.” Who’d you give gift cards to? You don’t think 1 fire victim who’s messaging me all day long said, “Hey, I got a $500 gift card”? That’s when I learned firsthand that these NGOs will take $100 million and, right in your face, just steal it.

Back to it being a MAGA thing: The person who really exposed the details to me is this incredible Democratic mom, Samantha from the Integrity Project. She made her own little charity nonprofit because she’s now tapped out of her own money in her neighborhood in Westwood. She and her husband are both lawyers. Homeless housing went up on their block. It was for senior citizens. They kicked the senior citizens out, and it’s Weingart. Their audit is late. Let’s just put it that way.

They’re making hundreds of millions of dollars. This is the best part: The building goes on the market for $11 million. 6 days later, the city, with our tax money, gives Weingart $29 million—$28 million—to buy this same building that was $11 million. Nobody has been housed in this to this day, years later. Weingart has developers paying $750 a square foot. When I’ve talked to developers and contractors, this should be $250 a square foot.

So they make this money with these developer kickbacks. They have all these shell companies. “Oh, this is our developer,” which has nothing to do with it. Here’s one of my favorite parts about that $30 million: Who do you think owns that building in Westwood? Not the taxpayers. Weingart.

This is the Shelby House. I just went to San Pedro, right across the street from a school, 600 feet away, across from this beautiful little community with old people. They’re kicking senior citizens out of one in San Pedro, and they’re going to put hardened criminals in. Same thing. This one is about $80 million.

What they do is take our tax money, take grants, take fake federal and state grants, and cook up a little plan: “Here’s this. We’re going to house 80 people.” Yet they don’t tell us that’s $700,000 a person. But everyone’s making money. People at these NGOs get million-dollar salaries. The people below them get $500,000. Nobody’s actually helping anyone, because, ready for this, there’s no requirement to house people.

And then, in the state of California, this is the craziest part with the Homekey rules: The state won’t give the city a lot of the money if you require the people to be off drugs. If you say, “You can’t do drugs in this housing,” then you can’t get access to this money.

Speaker 1

That’s unbelievable. Just to be clear, what an NGO is legally is a 501(c)(3) organization. Anyone can set one up. Anyone can file the IRS form and create this entity. Once you’ve created the entity, you’ve legally created it. You’ve got an IRS form. It costs a couple hundred bucks to do it.

Theoretically, someone who might want to be, I don’t know, a crony or a thief—a criminal, as you might call them, or whatever you want to call them—can now use this entity that they’ve created to basically get access to all this money from governments that aren’t necessarily keeping a good eye on the money.

How do the politicians who are allowing it to happen, or the bureaucrats in the government who are allowing that to happen, benefit? Why would they do this? Why would they let this money flow out to these NGOs in a way that’s clearly not in the taxpayers’ best interest?

Spencer Pratt

Well, you can go the conspiracy route, or you can just look at all these things we’re doing. There are 2 ways to look at it. They get to say, “Oh, we have this housing and these services.” These people just bring them this easy out, like they’re trying to fix something while still looking good: “Oh, that’s this NGO. Oh, they’re criminals. They got caught.”

Then you go the conspiracy route, and you could say, “Well, are these people helping campaigns? Do they have PACs?” So, is money going there? Are they helping? That’s more conspiracy; that’s fringe. But in the simplest sense, it’s an easy way out: “Oh, we’re solving this. We’re working on this.” There are 2 ways you can look at it.

I think they’re all criminals. Thankfully, I’ve talked to Justice Department sources, and city officials are going to go down.

Speaker 1

They are complicit. Here’s the hard part about catching these people: They’re literally taking money in poker chips, goods, and services. Criminals are smart now. They’re not just saying, “Zelle me the money,” right?

Spencer Pratt

But from my sources, we are going to see actual city officials go down. Not quickly enough, because they’ve got to frame these people up. But again, how does Spencer stop this when he’s mayor? I’ve met with the criminal investigation team at the IRS 6 times. The first week in office, you bring all of them in. We audit every NGO and every document that hasn’t been shredded.

Some insiders at City Hall have told me they’re shredding these documents. I have more faith in my criminal investigation team. They’ll be able to figure it out without the documents, even if they’re shredded. But that’s what’s happening: They’re shredding the documents.

Speaker 1

So, let me ask about Karen Bass. A lot of people, you would assume, would feel like she failed the city with the fire. Why is she still able to stay in office? Why is she in the lead in the polls for running for mayor? Why are people still voting for her?

Spencer Pratt

She’s the lowest in the history of the polls for an incumbent. So she has 20%.

So 80% of LA do not believe that. The polls are confusing. She's got the worst record in the history of the city, so 80% of people do not think she's doing a good job. Twenty percent is crazy bad.

That's why Councilwoman Raman jumped into the race 1 hour before the closing, because she saw I was going to beat Mayor Bass and her DSA team. For people who don't know, the Democratic Socialists of America—that she co-governs with as a city council member—were like, "Get in. You can be the fake Democrat, and Spencer will take out Bass, and then you'll get in."

She endorsed Mayor Bass 2 weeks before she jumped into the race. They worked together on all these things. Mayor Bass door-knocked to get Councilwoman Raman, who was about to lose her council seat. She door-knocked with her to get her in and backed her.

Nobody backs Mayor Bass, and any of the media that's trapped in these lies are on her side. It's not Mayor Bass's fault. It was high winds. It's an unprecedented disaster. It's not true. It's precedent. We had the Bel Air fire when Mayor Bass was alive. We had the Mandeville Canyon fire when Mayor Bass was alive. It's not unprecedented.

So the polls mean nothing. Everyone who's voting for me is not taking a spam call. First off, they're not talking to a stranger on the street because they already feel so unsafe. They're not letting a random person approach them. Period.

Speaker 1

You know, it's interesting. Both candidates, Raman and Bass, are—I don't know if Bass is a self-declared socialist, but obviously she spent time with Castro's organization in Cuba.

Spencer Pratt

She's a Venceremos Brigade member. She spent 20 times going to Cuba. So when they say Spencer doesn't have any experience—look, he was a reality star in The Hills. No, I wasn't training with terrorists that would later bomb the Capitol. That's who Mayor Bass is, who only denounced anything communist when they were trying to make her the vice president.

Speaker 1

But my point is, we have a self-declared socialist mayor in Seattle and now in New York. What is going on in cities where people are standing up and raising their hand or filing a ballot saying, "I want a socialist to be my mayor"? Now we're seeing this emerge on a national basis.

I've talked about this a lot. I've got my own perspective on it, but what do you think is going on with people on the street as you meet with them and get to talk to them? Why do they want that persona? Why do they want that socialist policy?

Spencer Pratt

I don't even think they're aware of it. I think we have such tribal politics that people who are against me just think, "Oh, he's not with us. It's gang gang." They don't even realize who they're with and what these people represent. They just think, "Oh, it's not that group."

That's the problem when you nationalize politics. We should be a city. We should all be together, making sure the streets are safe, the lights are on, there are no potholes, and the sidewalks are there. It's that basic.

But we've gotten to this nationalized politics where they don't even care who. They just think, "Oh, they're not that person. They're not connected to that party."

They also tell these people, "We're going to make things more affordable. We're going to give you free money." This idea that that works—I had this guy Rafa, who manages a bunch of the Dodgers. He's Venezuelan, and he came up to me at an event recently. He's like, "I felt like I was in a scene from Braveheart. It was so intense. It was like William Wallace in my face." Big Venezuelan dude.

He's like, "I fled Venezuela because of socialism, and I fought everything for my family. I will not let my kids have this socialism in LA. I know what—" And I was like, "I know, bro. We're good. Join the team. You're with me. Let's go door-knock."

But people who know what this idea of giving you money does know that it does not work. It's a fake lie. What people forget is they can't lower the cost of goods. The only thing you can do to make things more affordable as mayor, which I will be able to do, is put more money in people's pockets.

We need to put more revenue in the city. They're always asking me, "How are you going to balance this budget, Spencer? There's going to be no money to do this." We should be the number 1 city in the world. We should have money shooting out of ATMs. We're Los Angeles. There will be plenty of money when we let the systems work, when we let business work.

How can you let business work if you have drug addicts going number 2 and number 1 in front of every café? We lost over 100 restaurants in LA—not because they didn't have good food, but because you have drug addicts scaring people from going out. That's why they're ordering Uber Eats. They're using DoorDash.

I talked to a mom the other day who works downtown as a lawyer. I know her because of her friend, and her kids are my friends' kids. She said, "Spencer, we're not allowed to leave the office building. Our food has to be delivered in."

That's why restaurants are closing around downtown LA, because the workers who are still trying to work can't go outside of their buildings because it's unsafe. The number 1 thing in a functioning city that we don't have is safety.

If you don't have a safe city, Mayor Bass will tell you, and Councilwoman Raman will tell you, "Crime's down." They'll say the murder rate's down. Well, that's a national trend. Please don't try to take credit for that.

Crime's down because people have given up calling 911. I talked to a guy today at lunch. He said he watched a lady the other day on Wilshire Boulevard, right in front of the federal building, the FBI building—a nice Latina woman—get punched in the chest by a crazy drug addict.

He pulled over his car, tried to be a Batman hero, jumped out, and said, "Stop that." The lady was so used to it, she was like, "Thank you," and got on the bus and left.

He watches this guy get a PVC pipe and start banging on cars. He calls 911, and they just act like it's no big deal. It's just normal LA. Finally, the guy starts ripping a bike off a bus. He calls 911 and says, "He's ripping the bike."

No big deal. Now the guy's coming at him. He says, "He's coming after me," and they're like, "Okay, somebody's coming. The police are coming." He's like, "Arrest this guy." They're like, "Well, nobody's here, and there are no witnesses." He's like, "Arrest this guy." He's arguing with the cops.

Every cop I talk to wants to enforce the law, but they can't because of the powers behind them. They're not taking any of these citations seriously because it's culturally insensitive to cite and ticket someone without an address.

That's why the dogs are being abused, tortured, mutilated, and raped on the side of the streets. People are filming this. They know what's happening. But even Staycee Dains, or whatever her name was—she was head of Animal Control, or whatever, Animal Services—she said, "Oh, we can't."

The mayor's office said, "Culturally insensitive. Don't. We can't go after people without addresses."

Speaker 1

Dude, that's unbelievable. It makes me so angry.

Spencer Pratt

That's the problem. They keep calling me the angry white guy. They don't get it: every race, every gender, however you identify—if you live in LA and you're paying your taxes, you are angry.

Speaker 1

But most people don't see it, which is the other thing. Most people aren't in Skid Row all the time. We host our All-In Summit in downtown LA. It's our last year—we're doing it in September. It's a really big event, but we're not coming back.

Most people I know don't get down there. We have people from all over the world—60 countries—come to our event. They're like, "What the hell is this place? We can't be down here." When you see it, you're like, "What?"

Spencer Pratt

Well, here's the problem. We keep talking about Skid Row in LA, but this is all over the Valley. This is in Westwood. This is in Hollywood. This is everywhere.

Before my house burned down, in front of Palisades Elementary School, across the street from my son's Methodist preschool—where I went to preschool—there was a lady cleaning her private parts in front of kids almost every morning at 7:45 a.m.

We'd call the LAPD. They'd come and say, "Ma'am, no more." She'd walk down the street and go number 2 in front of Joe's Barber Shop. So it was coming to the Palisades. It's coming everywhere.

When I went to USC, it was Skid Row. So we have this issue in LA and in San Francisco, where I live, and Mayor Lurie came in. I don't know if you followed what he's done. He's an unbelievable guy, an old friend of mine, and he's done an incredible job.

He arrests people. He puts them in jail. The crime has stopped. Car break-ins are down 87% in the city—87%. You no longer have hordes of people walking into stores, stealing everything, and walking out. As soon as you just enforce the law that's already in place, boom, you're 90% of the way there.

It doesn't take a miracle. It just takes a will and someone who can actually manage and organize to get the stuff done. Give them the votes. Get them there.

Speaker 1

I met with Victor Coleman, who owns most of these studios and a lot of real estate in LA, and he talked to me about Mayor Lurie in San Francisco. He said, "Spencer, when they tell you you have no experience, you just tell them Mayor Lurie didn't have any experience running a city."

What he did was come in and enforce the law. He said, "My portfolio in San Francisco is booming again. My portfolio in Los Angeles isn't doing as well, let's say." And he said, "You just need to enforce the laws that exist."

A lot of people always say this to me. They go, "What are you going to do with all these people?" A famous police chief told me, "Once you start putting handcuffs on people, watch how many people leave."

Spencer Pratt

One hundred percent.

Speaker 1

This idea that everyone—if you let everyone do drugs and do whatever they want, and let the criminals make the outside a slum with no guards—if you let them do that, they're going to do that.

Spencer Pratt

So when I’m mayor, my plan is: in the first 3 weeks, put signs up across the city—no more nakedness, no more drug use, no more robbing. The clock’s ticking, and we’re going to go around warning everybody: “Hey, you’ve got 3 more weeks of this.” Just keep telling everyone, so the people who are aware are like, “Oh, wow, there’s a new mayor in town.” They may start leaving.

Then, when the 3 weeks are up—or maybe we’ll even do 2 weeks; maybe people will want it faster—once we start enforcing the laws, boom, the streets will be back. You know who else I’m going to bring in? The CDC, because there are medieval diseases in these encampments. They’re not swabbing these encampments, and they’re not swabbing the streets.

People are just living in feces, using drugs, burning dogs, and leaving bodies around. We need these streets cleaned.

Speaker 1

No more burning dogs in the street.

Spencer Pratt

No more dog abuse. Put it on every sign, on every billboard. We’re going to go around and warn everybody.

Speaker 1

What about building the team to execute? You’re looking to sit in this executive role. Have you ever had a role where you’ve overseen tens of thousands of employees before? I’m assuming not. I’ve read your bio, but how do you execute? Who do you bring in under you who actually knows how to manage the system, manage the people, and deliver the message?

You can form strategy and set objectives and so on, but walk us through how you’re actually going to deliver as mayor operationally when you step in on day 1.

Spencer Pratt

The great news about running for mayor of LA is that everyone wants to save LA. Everyone wants LA to be number 1. The meetings I’m taking every week now—the lunches, brunches, and dinners with beyond-successful people who are willing to work for $1 a year and pause their companies to come in—are with people telling me that, with algorithms alone, we can 100x the bureaucracy of the city in building and development.

There are so many cranes in the city because we’re going to be rebuilding. Just last week, I probably met with 10 billionaires who are ready to come in and build LA up to be the number 1 city in the world. So when they say, “Oh, you have no experience,” what I do have is humility. I’m humble. I know I have never run the 2nd-largest city.

I know smart people who have done it. We need to bring in CEOs who have run the biggest corporations in the world to come in and work with us, because they’ll tell you, “No, you need to know the city at a certain level.” You bring those people in. The people who execute multibillion-dollar budgets exist.

They say, “Oh my gosh, Spencer, this is a $15 billion budget.” There are people I’m meeting with who have $50 billion budgets. These people exist, and I will surround myself with them.

I already have a deputy mayor, but I can’t say who because of fear of retaliation in the city of LA. That person will help me enforce the law, and that’s the priority. When we enforce the law, all these creative ideas on execution work. But if you don’t enforce the law, Mayor Bass could bring in all the same people I’m meeting with, but she won’t enforce the law.

Councilwoman Raman can bring in all the same people I’m meeting with. It won’t work if you don’t enforce the law. No one is putting money into the city of LA until they know there’s a mayor who’s going to make sure the streets are safe for all the moms, the kids, the dads—everyone who just wants to be a normal human being who pays their taxes, goes to the park, and goes to dinner.

Until you do that part, all this talk about who’s going to be on the team is irrelevant.

Speaker 1

For sure, because I hear it from a lot of executives I’m friends with. They’re like, “Man, this message resonates. People want to get involved. They want to step up.” Like I said, people who aren’t from LA want to step up.

Outside of keeping the streets safe and building reasonable fire-suppression infrastructure—getting back to basics—what about education? LAUSD spends $23,000 per student, and the average teacher salary is $101,000. It’s number 1 in the country. But LAUSD, as a school district, ranks 170th in the state of California, and only 46% of students are meeting or exceeding standards in English and 37% in math.

What is there to do about education in the city to give the next generation the opportunity to progress, realize their potential, and not fall into the traps of socialism and communism because they’re despondent and don’t have opportunity in front of them? How do we get that generation to succeed?

Spencer Pratt

From my own experience with my son, who was in LAUSD—and it was even a charter with Pali—this is supposed to be the best version at all times. Every parent is just trying to fundraise for books, for learning, for teachers, and for an extra teacher, and it’s like, “What is going on?” If I’m going to spend this much money, I’m going to put my kid in a private school.

First off, we’ve got to get back to auditing. The biggest issue I’ve learned with the city of LA is that, whether it’s the school system or anything else, everyone needs to be audited. Where is all this money going? First off, look at the fire department and the police department, and the waste of this taxpayer money.

Let’s figure out first where the money is going, because if it costs this much for each student, yet as a dad I’m always trying to donate and have fundraisers, we’ve got to track the money. And that’s another thing: when we talk about what Mayor Pratt stands for, it’s accountability and transparency.

Every dollar of tax money in the city of LA needs to be on very easy, CliffsNotes-level dashboards so we can track it and get results on where all of our tax money is going. But back to how we make kids know that socialism and communism don’t work: we give their parents hope again, and we make the parents demand it.

I have parents right now who are pulling their kids out of a public school that my kids are in because of that messaging. There’s no more Pledge of Allegiance. There’s no more “America’s good.” We need to get back to having pride in being Americans.

We’ve gotten so far off from just saying, “America’s awesome,” because everyone’s fighting politically. It’s like, “Oh, the American flag? I can’t put that up.” We need to get back to the basics of where our grandparents were when they were fighting in World War II and had pride in being Americans.

But to me, it’s the money. Where’s the money going? If you want things to be better, we’ve got to stop wasting money. The fire stations I meet with are charging $250,000 for doors and $50,000 for refrigerators. So I think tracking money is the source of all of this.

Speaker 1

I have a buddy whose house burned down, unfortunately, as well. So I said, “I’m going to meet with Spencer Pratt. Any questions?” He said, “What about this stupid-ass $3 billion expansion of the convention center?”

My favorite part about the convention center is that, less than a month ago, there was just a dead body in the bushes in front of it. The idea that we’re going to put billions of dollars into something that has dead bodies in the bushes in front of it—why aren’t we putting those billions of dollars into getting dead bodies off the streets every day?

Spencer Pratt

I don’t want to say that initially I was like, “Stop that,” but now I’m in this mindset that LA’s got to be the number 1 city in the world. So maybe we don’t need to use LA money, but let’s do a private partnership. Who’s going to come in with money to do something we can’t afford right now?

I don’t want to be the one who’s now like, “We don’t want to stop building.” I actually like the idea of having a convention center, because the LA that I’m about to build—when I destroy 40 blocks of drugged-out zombies who are taking over all these empty buildings—will bring in so much business and commerce that we’re probably going to need that convention center.

Currently, it makes no sense with the current administration. Mayor Bass being elected is the dumbest thing you ever heard. If Councilwoman Raman is elected, that’s the dumbest thing. Mayor Pratt goes in, and we’re putting billions of dollars back into LA. Restaurants are back. We’re probably going to need that convention center.

Initially, when I was first fighting this fight, my message was, “Let’s get back to the LA I grew up in.” Then I started taking meetings with billionaires who were ready to give me $500 million. I met with an anonymous billionaire who agreed to be the funder. He said, “My family gave $300 million to New York for a project. We’ll give you $500 million to bring fun back to Los Angeles.”

I said, “Can I tell people about you?” He said, “No, no, I’ll be anonymous.” This person is for real. So when I hear there’s $2 billion for the convention center, if I make it a little bit more fun and I have $500 million, then we can make it the fun convention center, and I just cut that cost in half.

Speaker 1

Have you met with union leaders?

Spencer Pratt

No, they all back Mayor Bass. They’re all going to love me because everyone’s going to have more revenue, and everyone’s going to have jobs. LA’s going to boom.

When they say, “You’re not going to win because you don’t have the unions,” I say, “I don’t need the unions to win. I have the moms. I have the animal lovers.” That’s more than any union. You can’t get that endorsement: moms across the city of LA.

Not just moms in the Valley. Not just moms in San Pedro. Not just moms in South Central. Not just moms in East LA. Not just moms in Boyle Heights. Not just moms in Eagle Rock. Everywhere, moms don’t feel safe.

The city is unsafe. No matter what the crime statistics say, the feeling of being unsafe is resonating. My message—that I will be the guy fighting to get safety back—is going to get me elected.

And I keep telling people, “I’m going to win on June 2nd with 51% of the vote.” November is their fight for November. I win June 2nd.

But the unions—obviously, people think it’s this big issue. When you win, when your city is amazing—

Speaker 1

How are you going to work with them? So you win on June 2nd. All the union leaders call up your deputy mayor and say, “I want a meeting with Mayor Pratt.” They come into your office one at a time. They sit down across a table from you. What’s the message?

Spencer Pratt

The message is, “We’re going to work with you to make sure you get these benefits that you want, but they need to make sense right now for our trajectory.” We’re going to get to where what you need to feel comfortable in your city role is great, but there may be a minute here where we’ve got to tighten things up.

I’m going to find all these homeless NGO billions that are being laundered, but we need to get real accounting. Right now, we don’t have outside budget advocates. We don’t look at whether we’re increasing a union’s salary by 10% even though everybody else in the private industry isn’t getting an increase. We need to have a balance. We need to make sense for all Angelenos.

You can’t have everything just for this small percentage because they’re cooking votes. But don’t get me wrong: unions, I’m going to make so much money in this city that we’re going to have plenty of money for you to be paid what you’re supposed to be paid. Law enforcement is going to get paid what they’re supposed to get paid.

We cannot lose law enforcement because they’re getting paid more in Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, or Orange County. So we can’t risk losing them. We’re already losing too many law enforcement officers. We’re losing too many firefighters. We cannot make it so they don’t want to work.

A lot of the issues where people see these salaries that are so crazy are overtime. But if you don’t get hiring up to speed, then you have to pay these crazy salaries in overtime. And even those people who do get paid these crazy amounts you read about on Google—it’s a niche amount of people, and they’ve sacrificed their families. They’re working 32-hour shifts. These people are crazy. They’ve given everything they have to be that firefighter or whatever. So, again—

Speaker 1

The unions aren’t your enemy. You’re going to find a path to working with them. Even though they’re not here for you right now, they work for Mayor Bass. You’re there for them.

Spencer Pratt

They’re still hardworking people. I meet with them. I’ve gone to a lot of fire stations. LAFD’s union for sure endorses me; they’re just scared to do it publicly for fear of retaliation. LAPD—for sure, the members all endorse me. I promise you. The interaction, who’s messaging me, who’s calling me, who’s texting me—the union powers—they, Mayor Bass, currently write their deals and their checks. That’s real. I don’t judge them for that. It’s the system they’re in.

But the membership, they want to feel safe. Most of the firefighters can’t even live in California anymore. Sixty percent of these guys fly in. And I say, “Well, why don’t you guys live here?” They say, “It’s not safe for our families.” I want them to move back. I want that tax money.

Speaker 1

One of the other stories about LA over the last decade or two—you know, I grew up here. I have a lot of friends who grew up in Hollywood, in the industry, and it’s been gutted. There’s no business in LA anymore, and that’s a huge employer for so many Angelenos working in Hollywood and all of the ancillary supporting industries.

Do we rebuild Hollywood in LA? Is Hollywood done because of AI and YouTube and independent production, and studios don’t matter anymore? No one does broadcast. What’s the future of Hollywood? Is there a future for Hollywood in LA, and what do you do about it?

Spencer Pratt

When I was 20 years old, I sold the first reality show to Fox as the youngest executive producer ever. I sold it to Peter Chernin when he was the co-chair of News Corp. It was with David Foster, who’s actually hosting my fundraiser on Monday. Full circle. Shout-out David Foster, legend.

But I called Peter Chernin a few weeks ago. I said, “Mr. Chernin, PDC, how do I save LA?” He’s one of the smartest human beings on Earth. He said, “Spencer, as mayor, you’re not going to be able to change the bigger picture of Hollywood. That’s more governor—you know, uncap. What you can do to really bring back jobs, bring back Hollywood, is bring back independent filmmakers, independent production, and independent artists. You prioritize the indies, you could have Hollywood booming in a tier that people didn’t see coming.”

All my friends who haven’t given up, who are still fighting—I grew up in LA. I went to Crossroads. All my friends are creators. They’re artists. They’re still fighting. They’re not giving up. When I talk to them, they’ve all doubled down on the indie route. They say, “This is what we need to hear. We want to make this work.”

And you work with them. Mayor Bass brags, like, “Oh, now you can film at the Griffith Observatory. Instead of $70,000, it’s $30,000.” No. When I’m mayor, I’m going to help you produce these freaking movies. We’re going to have whole blocks, and we’re going to use the restaurants to keep them alive. We’re going to use the crews. We’re going to eat out of there. We’re going to use all the city resources to almost be in production with the indies, but making money together—not like a communist or socialist, but bringing the city in to enable them, give them the support, get rid of these fees and the clearance, and make it easy.

Right now, like I said in the debate, I talked to producers. If you want to film on the streets of LA, it’s so unsafe, you’ve got to pay gang members off to get through. We’re going to have it so safe that an indie crew can pop out with all their cameras and gear and not get stolen.

So again, someone like Peter Chernin—I said, “Peter, when I’m mayor, can I keep calling you?” His exact quote was, “I’m always here to make you smarter, Spencer.”

Speaker 1

So these are the type of people, when they say, “Oh, you have no experience,” these are the people that are going to make LA number one.

Spencer Pratt

But that is the future. I mean, everyone is all about independent production. If you work for a big studio or work for Netflix, you’re getting paid cost plus 10%. You’re better off producing on your own. There’s definitely a flourishing happening; it’s just happening everywhere else. It’s not happening in LA.

And obviously, I’ve reached out to David Ellison’s team. I’ve reached out to Ted Sarandos. I’ve reached out to everyone because I don’t just want to be the indie guy. I want to figure out how I go fight whoever the new governor is. Get uncap. Get post-production uncapped. Nobody should be going to the UK. Nobody should be going to Canada. With respect to these countries—I love you guys—but we’re not sending our filmmakers there anymore.

So whatever I can do as a mayor—you know, the other night in the debate, they’re like, “We’re going to do it.” You guys have had 10 years combined. You haven’t done anything. I love fighting these people. I’ve been fighting Sacramento since my house burned down. You get me bodyguards to fight these people, trust me, we are going to a whole new level of fight.

So again, I don’t want to not have studios come back. We have all these empty lots. I would love big productions to come back, but initially, as mayor, I can fight for indies. But don’t get me wrong: I want Hollywood to be Top Gun 3 right here, taking off from LAX.

Speaker 1

Tell me how you address transportation in LA. There’s always a new scheme or a new system being developed. What’s your view on what’s wrong about transportation in LA? How much are we wasting on things that don’t really matter that we could recoup and reinvest elsewhere? What are those kinds of priorities for you?

Spencer Pratt

I just went to the new opening of the D Line today, just to troll, to get some YIMBYs to yell at me. The funniest part about transportation to me is, it’s a beautiful idea when there’s no human urine, human poop, or a drug addict’s butt hanging out.

People forget: every single person in LA sends me their photos. I’m now 311. I see what LA looks like. These people go, “How do you know all this information?” My phone—I can’t even open it anymore because it’s just naked drug addicts. It’s the craziest thing you’ve ever seen.

Who cares how many lines the Metro connects to, or where it could connect to the moon right now, if drug addicts are smoking fentanyl next to your kid? You’re not going to the moon on it. So, first off, it’s back to safety. We need these Metro lines, the subway, whatever you want to ride. Bicycles aren’t even safe. The YIMBYs want more bicycles. You couldn’t even pay me to get on a bicycle. A drug-addict zombie will hit me with a crowbar when I’m riding by.

We need to get safety back. And of course, I love these transportation ideas. I hate sitting in traffic, but I’ve grown up in LA. I’m aware that traffic is a part of it. So yes, we need this, but we also need the money for it. We need to build LA up.

Right now, I think 15% of the budget goes to the Metro, if 5% of people use it. Again, I feel like if I made it safe, I could get 15% to use it, and we could even that out. We’ve got to make sure that nobody’s hopping any turnstile. We need to make sure you’re paying to be on it so that there are safe people on it.

Again, when I clear downtown LA for you, you can drive for 40 blocks. When I clear all these abandoned buildings that the drug addicts are burning down and using all our firefighters’ resources and risking their lives, when we clear that all out and we use this 3D printing—

I talked to an architect today, one of the most famous architects in the world. He has a crew of about 12 architects. They already did all these designs for these buildings that nobody listened to. They met with Newsom. They met with Bass. Of course, I’m like, “Let’s do it. Send me the decks.”

We're going to have LA so beautiful. No more of these high-density SB 79 prison-like structures. We need to bring Art Deco back. All the architects who moved out of here because it was so hard to build—it takes 8 years—are going to be moving back because we're going to speed up building. It's not going to take 8 years.

We need LA to have the most beautiful architecture in the world. I don't want to go to Venice. I don't want to go look at Venice; I want to go to Venice in downtown LA. I'm going to have a canal, and then the YIMBY people can have all their bike lanes going through the sky, through tunnels, and things. We need to get creative with LA.

Speaker 1

Can you address the regulatory and permitting problem with construction and building in the city? As mayor, do you have enough authority to do this? Can you talk a little bit about the actions you would take to unleash this kind of wave of building that you want to see happen, that everyone talks about wanting to see happen in LA, but there just seem to be so many layers of permitting, so many processes, so much approval?

It's statutory. It's written into the law of the city. Do you have the authority as mayor to actually go in and address that and unleash this without getting these folks who are the Assembly people and whatnot to work with you?

Spencer Pratt

So, I had lunch today with someone who volunteered to be the new head of LA Building and Safety. I said, “Well, you're the first person to volunteer who does this at the highest level in private business in Los Angeles and knows everything.” We'll add him to the website. The goal here is to put the whole team together and list their bios.

He said, “Spencer, we could do this so easily. We can fix all these things. I know all the errors, because private businesses are the ones fighting this city all the time. They know where all the stops are.” I met with this affordable-housing developer, Carlos, on Monday. He said when Mayor Bass announced her initiative, she was going to rush it 6 months. He's at 2 and 1/2 years in the permit process.

He said, “Spencer, we can fix this so easily and build beautiful affordable housing.” He said they're getting these tax incentives to build cells for people. Cells. He said they get more incentives to put more people in the building. We need to change that. He's saying he can do a nice 2-bedroom for $250 a square foot versus $750 a square foot. These other developers are using the tax incentives, charging the city, and then putting more bodies in there.

So, yes, we can do all this stuff when we take these people out. Perfect example: my Airstream. It took weeks—weeks—for LADWP to put 1 wire to my Airstream from a pole across the street. That's the cut-the-red-tape town. That's the fastest—

Speaker 1

Operationally, you can address that. But all of the permits that are required, design review, like AI—I know people don't like AI, but even Caruso, initially, he had this whole thing. He put the money up, was steadfast, and offered this AI program to Mayor Bass. Certain zoning situations, if it meets all this, boom, you're right.

Right now, it's like something out of a bad movie. Some guy comes in, he misses 3, and he has to do 1 checkbox. He's like, “Oh, I'll come back and do that.” It's out of a bad movie. If you go there, nobody's even in these offices. You have to set an appointment; you can't just go into these places. They all work remotely.

Speaker 2

Yeah, they work 3 days a week, don't they?

Spencer Pratt

We're in crazy land. So, again, all these meetings I keep having with very successful heads of companies tell me, “Spencer, when people say you don't have experience, tell them these are people who have multiple companies.” They say, “I'm never the most experienced person in any of the rooms of my companies, but everyone in my company is the most experienced person in what they need to do in that role.”

I'm well aware I don't know any of this stuff, but I know I want LA to be the number 1 safest and most beautiful. How do we get there? Who are you? What's your résumé? What's your background? Oh, wow. Okay, come on.

Keep in mind Janisse Quiñones, who was the CEO of LADWP, drained 2 reservoirs leading into a known year of the driest fire-weather season. She took out the water with no plan, no backups, no tankers. She was getting paid $750,000 a year plus her benefits.

There are people across the United States running water and power in functioning cities that we can go recruit and say, “Hey, come to LA. It's going to be safe and clean, and we're going to get you a nice place. You take over.” People want to live in LA. I'm not trying to give people jobs with respect to Antarctica. Hello. We have talent that will come here.

Speaker 1

You know, they don't have the beach. You're going to be able to swim without poop in the water. It's going to be incredible.

Speaker 1

Well, I grew up in the Valley, and you go down Ventura Boulevard; it's all strip malls. These are all small businesses owned by families. They have typically been there for 1, 2, or 3 generations—Armenian, Persian, and Hispanic populations, folks who grew up in the Valley.

Small business, I think, is the lifeblood of this city. It's such an important part of the city. We've never had major corporations that everyone works for. There's a couple of them, but generally, it's a small-business town.

How much have you looked at the regulatory permitting, all the nonsense that goes into opening a nail salon, starting a coffee shop, getting the permits required to open a new store, and what can be done there to accelerate, to fast-track, to enable all these folks—many of them first- or second-generation immigrants—who want to come here and build, who want to start businesses, who want to have their own company?

How do we get them? Because the complaint is it's just so freaking hard today. It's so expensive. It takes so long. Have you gone through this and figured out what are the things you can just delete as mayor and what are the things you can just fast-track as mayor to make it so much easier for people to start and run small businesses in the city?

Spencer Pratt

So, my friend in Venice—his neighbor just bought the local bodega that's been there forever. He was telling me they're about to give up. It's been a year. He said they're not even selling alcohol. There's no food. It was just going to be this basic bodega.

The list of things that it's taken in a year is so crazy. They'll make them put in 1 thing, and then they come in and say, “Oh, no, actually”—it's like a maze. We need to just streamline all these things. What I keep learning, whether it's transportation or sanitation, is there's no accountability. People get paid no matter if they're a failure. It's not results-based.

Speaker 1

How many turns?

Spencer Pratt

Yes. Nobody cares if you don't get this many permits. For instance, somebody called me yesterday. They go, “Why is FilmLA a nonprofit?” I was like, “What do you mean?” He's like, “This should be for-profit to incentivize bringing production.” So they're getting paid; they don't care. It's this idea that I'm getting paid no matter what. Nobody cares. There's no checks and balances.

The mayor is fine as long as she's driving to the airport to go to Ghana to have a cocktail party. There's nobody that cares, right? Because I met with this guy Juan from Clean LA, who cleans the streets of all the trash. He's from Ecuador. He came over here and said, “What is this, Spencer? I'm from a third-world country. It's so much more beautiful. I can't live here with my family.”

So he started cleaning trash on his own. I said, “Well, Juan, what's going on?” He's like, “Spencer, nobody cares. They don't care.” He says, “I watch these trash-truck things. They pick up the trash, and it just throws it out like a meme, and it just goes back on the street.” He says, “They're sleeping in the cars. There's no accountability. There's no responsibility.”

I said, “Juan, when I'm mayor, can I hire you?” He said, “Spencer, I will help run sanitation.” He goes, “It's supposed to be $1 billion. I could do it for easily $500 million.” So, I'm thinking, I just saved $500 million for taxpayers because Juan cares. And he says, “I'll bring in people that care.”

Speaker 1

As mayor, you can probably auto-stamp a lot of stuff, too, that today they're just delegating down to people who take a long time getting things done, that you probably don't need to spend a lot of time looking at. Just auto-stamp the bodega license and let them run. You really need to have the guy go in and figure out where everything is?

Spencer Pratt

This goes back to: if it meets these criteria, we need to—

Speaker 1

Like, here's the auto green light.

Spencer Pratt

LA needs to be annoying with how many cranes we see for the next 8 years. It needs to look like we're in China, where they're building these bridges in 2 weeks. We need all these cranes. There's no cranes. You can't even see a crane. My kids probably don't even know what a crane looks like.

Speaker 1

If 1 of the other 2 candidates wins, what happens to LA?

Spencer Pratt

Well, I will have to move to Bentonville or I'm done. People don't get that I want my sons to grow up in LA. You cannot grow up in LA.

You're done. You listen to them in the debate. They're talking about more beds. They don't even accept that LA is in a nightmare. Yes, I love LA. It has the potential to be the greatest place on planet Earth, but we need to acknowledge that we're in a scary part right now in LA.

The lights don't work on the streets. They don't fix roads within a year. They don't fix every pothole; every pothole is breaking everyone's tires. You can't get 311 to fix anything. We don't have enough cops to call 911. There aren't enough firefighters. Towns burn down.

Bel-Air is going to burn. Mandeville Canyon, Sunland-Tujunga, Hollywood Hills—all of these are going to burn. It's guaranteed. And like I said in the debate, I'm going to put these dip sites a mile from everyone's house. They're all going to connect. They're going to connect to private owners' swimming pools.

I'm going to work with the insurance companies so we can bring insurance back to California—first, LA—because we're going to show them the model. If they have these dip sites for these helicopters, we bring in more of these Chinooks that LA County uses to work with the Firehawks that we have with LA City and Cal Fire. We can bring insurance back, which is the biggest problem right now for people building.

We're going to get rid of Measure ULA. I know I can't do it myself, but I'm going to fight to make sure these communist-type things don't ever happen to development, so people can sell their properties and build housing. I'm going to stop letting these tenants be squatters and criminals, making it so landlords have to pay them $50,000 cash to leave, and then they go to a new landlord.

I'm going to stop the Section 8 scam so that the real people who deserve Section 8 get it—veterans, families that need it—not just drug-dealing criminals who are abusing the system with fraud. But yes, if I lose, we're done. I'm trying to tell people this is like out of a movie. This is Independence Day. The aliens have attacked. They got in. The invasion is here.

And then, as mayor, I have to fight all these DSA city council members to make sure they're never reelected. So not only do I have to do all that, but I have to fight to make sure that in my next 4 years there's never a DSA fake Democrat. They're not Democrats. Democrats love Spencer Pratt. All my friends are Democrats. All my supporters are Democrats. These people I'm up against use the word “Democrat” in front of the word “socialist.”

Go look at the Democratic Socialists of America website, people. Go look at it. That's not a Democrat. Bill Clinton was a Democrat.

Speaker 1

It's not American.

Spencer Pratt

Thank you. It's even worse. These aren't even Americans. And when you say that, people are like, “Oh my God, this country was founded because people fled tyranny in Europe and then everywhere else in the world.” This was the bastion where you could find hope and an opportunity to be free: to choose how you want to behave, what you want to do, how you want to pray, and to have freedom where the government doesn't tell you what to do and how to do it.

That tyranny existed all over the world, and that's why this country was started. Socialism is the most tyrannical form, the most tyrannical system, that humans have ever come up with. So you got the word “socialist” in there. You've already made the mistake because you've revealed yourself. That's my opinion. Sorry, I had to rant on my own show. I just took advantage of the opportunity.

Speaker 1

I have very smart friends who are from LA, and I say they're DSA. They have foot soldiers, and they go, “What's a DSA?” So it's a sneak attack. It's like Ninja Turtles. They're in the sewers. They're like Shredder and Company.

So, fast-forward 8 years. You've been mayor for 8 years. It's a 4-year term, right? Two terms? You're sitting down with your sons, and they're saying, “Dad, what did you do to save LA?” What do you tell them? Tell me about that journey in retrospect.

Spencer Pratt

I would say, “Thank God people voted for laws, son, and I enforced the laws that are there.” I did what everyone did before the current leadership. So I keep telling people, the experience—I don't need to invent anything. I don't need to come up with this utopia of how a city works.

You make a city safe, and people will put money into it. They'll want to live here. Commerce comes back. Families will be able to go to parks and go to the beach and not live in fear. So, to my sons, again, I'm showing them you can fight evil.

These people are evil. They let every innocent person who pays their taxes feel unsafe on the streets that they pay taxes for. A lot of people don't have money to do things because they pay all their taxes, like me, and then the city and the government fail them.

Whether your house burns down or you have a screaming drug addict in front of you—a naked drug addict in front of your kids, causing trauma—there are literally drug addicts having sex on meth in front of kids. Parents are telling me they have to have their kids glued to an iPad in the back seat of their cars, driving them to school. Some parents don't have cars. In other communities, they have to walk under these underpasses and walk past this.

So I'll be able to tell my sons, “Thank God America has laws,” and your dad said, “Hey, breaking news: let's enforce them.” And we did it, and it worked. Then people came in with tons of money, and we got businesses booming and more jobs.

Hollywood—we're making even better movies than we've made in 10 years because the independent creative artists are inspired again. They're feeling supported. The vision is so real. And that's my fight.

I go back to: if God is burning somebody's house down to fight these people, you're burning my house down, and then you burn my mom's house down, and you have me listening to my crying mom every day for 18 months. I don't do this to be a politician. I do this to fight evil, and this is evil that has taken this beautiful city that I loved.

I didn't even want to travel to visit my wife's family in Colorado because I'm like, “Can they come to LA?” That's how much of an LA person I am. These people that I'm running against aren't even LA people.

Speaker 1

No.

Spencer Pratt

So I'll tell them: “The law, son.”

Speaker 1

Spencer Pratt, thank you for joining me on the All-In interview.

Spencer Pratt

Thank you. What a blast.

Speaker 1

That was awesome.

Spencer Pratt

Thank you. I'm going all in.