Avi Patel:打造 KLED、出售数据、回购及更多 | TG Podcast
KLED 已从概念兑现走向消费端 traction,不到4天应用下载量达到25,000次,并已向数据贡献者支付近100万美元。 Avi Patel 预计年底下载量达到100万。Thread Guy 认为,在极度恶劣的代币发行环境中活下来并持续交付,最终能为项目及其持有者赢得可信度:「活下来,然后坐下来继续交付……你最终会因此得到回报」(You survive it, and then you sit down and you still ship… then you’ll get rewarded for it)。
KLED 的核心业务,是一个由企业需求驱动、面向合法授权且高度具体的人类数据市场,而不是按统一价格出售通用相册内容的数据仓库。 一段跳舞视频,如果用于 Epic Games 生成 AI 表情动作,可能获得溢价;但对 Microsoft Azor 可能只值象征性价格。因此,KLED 希望成为「最大的数据采集引擎」,再把每套数据匹配给需求最强的买家。
Superpower 的100万美元 LOI,是 KLED 这一需求模型最清晰的验证。 Avi 表示,这家约3亿美元的医疗保健公司计划将这笔资金用于采购训练内部医疗 LLM 的数据集,KLED 则提议把匿名化数据接入患者与医生沟通的门户。Avi 的核心卖点是:这类由消费者产生的稀缺对话数据,无法从其他渠道直接获得。
Avi 表示,相关企业收入的三分之一会用于代币回购,但明确称当前买入只是「名义上的买压,毫无意义」,无法与真正的业务交付相提并论。 目前约有1000万枚代币已退出流通;他的假设是,只有在规模大得多时,这套机制才会产生实质影响——例如,一份10亿美元的合同将有3.33亿美元流向回购。
Thread Guy 提出、Avi 认可的长期 AI 瓶颈,是真实人类数据,因为模型无法在不发生退化的情况下无限训练自身生成的合成内容。 Thread Guy 将其称为「AI 近亲繁殖」(AI inbreeding):反复回收生成的金毛犬图片,会让模型产出的狗逐代偏离真实形态;而获取真实图片的计算成本也可能更低。KLED 表示,其验证系统会检查重复内容、互联网抄袭、EXIF 元数据和 AI 生成,当前检测有效率约95%,目标是对交付数据来自真实用户设备达到「字面意义上的99%确定性」。
Avi 认为,代币与其说是企业产品的必需品,不如说是分发和融资的加速器。 用户无需持有 KLED 代币即可使用应用;但上涨 K 线、推荐活动和数百万次曝光,会在创作者和硅谷投资者中制造可量化的 FOMO。他的判断是:「早期阶段,代币化初创公司永远会胜过未代币化的初创公司」(Tokenized startups at early stage will always beat untokenized ones),但他也认为,Crypto 需要先出现几宗真正成功的案例,才能消除行业污名。
KLED 下一轮增长循环,将受控引流与游戏化数据采集结合起来,而不是打开一个经济上不可持续的闸门。 随着合同规模增长,Avi 正将每批候补名单名额扩大至原来的3倍,并预告 KLED Games:系统每隔一段时间发布限时任务,可能配套5万美元奖金池,要求用户拍摄指定的真实世界图像,再由计算机视觉验证提交内容。短期内,他计划用15天争取更多旧金山合同,推出游戏、扩大公关,并推动中心化交易所上币。
1. KLED 正试图用已交付的产品取代发行期的怀疑
Avi 将 KLED 介绍为 Nitrily 在数据授权领域的新业务。Nitrily 是一家服务数十万名艺术家的音乐授权市场;KLED 则允许用户将相册和个人数据授权给 AI 及科技公司,再将部分收入直接返还给数据贡献者。
Thread Guy 称 Kled「可能是 ICM 里遭遇抛压最重的代币」,并表示熬过早期阶段让自己变得更坚韧。Avi 另称,团队在他所谓的噩梦中持续建设:4个多月里,KLED 发布约200次更新,并交付了一款按通常进度至少需要「一整年工作量」的应用。
上线后不到4天,下载量达到25,000次,目标是年底达到100万。Avi 还提到,用户获得的付款接近100万美元,相关创作者背后约有5亿粉丝;他当周与 OpenAI、Anthropic 和 Google 举行了会面,同时还在与大型实验室签署 LOI。
精简的运营结构,是 Avi 对团队速度的解释之一:Eli 和另外2名工程师负责工程工作,团队计划再招聘1名 AI 工程师;此外还有1名设计负责人、1名3D 创意负责人、UGC 运营团队,以及 Avi 所称的「庞大法务团队」。
2. 数据只有在回答买方的狭窄训练需求时才真正有价值
Avi 的框架是:图片或视频不存在统一价格,价值取决于企业使用场景。TikTok 风格的跳舞视频,可能是 Epic Games 生成 Fortnite 表情动作系统的高价输入,但同样的素材对 Microsoft Azor 可能几乎没有额外价值。
基础质量仍然重要,包括分辨率、有效文字、干净画面和准确标签;但稀缺性已经从「拥有大量数据」转向拥有其他地方无法获得的特定数据。Avi 认为,只要 KLED 能完成分类,并找到模型真正需要它的买家,「所有东西都有价值,真的全部都有价值」。
主持人问,为什么不提交自己的直播内容;Avi 给出了一个具体价格:约100GB 的高质量视频,视数据量和需求而定,可能获得约1000美元。一档拍摄质量良好、内容自然流动的播客,可以用于训练对话或播客系统;而特定地点的行车记录仪视频,则服务于完全不同的买家。
当前企业客户主要通过投资人引荐、线上关注度,以及数据所有者和数据买方的主动询盘获得。Avi 认为,Crypto Twitter 的曝光会传导到硅谷 Twitter:「网上的热度,对硅谷来说就是同一回事」。
3. Superpower 展示了匿名化私域数据的价值
Avi 将 Superpower 描述为一家约3亿美元的医疗保健公司,正在开发一名基于患者与顶尖临床医生真实交流训练的 AI「超级医生」。缺失的并不是公开的医疗文字材料,而是人们实际与医生沟通的方式。
KLED 计划接入人们已经用于与医生交流的医疗门户,对数据进行匿名化,再提供给 Superpower。Avi 强调,隐私是关键:Superpower 可以获得有用的对话模式,却无法知道某条记录背后的身份。
已公布的100万美元 LOI,按 Avi 的解释,意味着 Superpower 将拨出100万美元用于购买数据集,而不是已经完成采购。这一框架更大的意义在于可复制性:如果 KLED 能证明100万用户愿意提供指定数据,就能为大量企业合同搭建定制化集成。
合法性是销售叙事的核心。Avi 认为,实验室有时会违法获取数据,或从任何能找到的地方搜集数据,使自己暴露于未来巨额索赔之下;KLED 则希望提供「尽可能合法授权的方式」,让清晰的数据来源既具备运营价值,也能在融资过程中成为卖点。
4. 合同规模同时驱动用户经济性和代币飞轮
Avi 表示,相关合同收入的三分之一会进入代币回购。他称约1000万枚代币已经退出流通,执行渠道包括 Jupiter 和 Phantom Swap;同时强调,回购可能在随机时间发生,而不是按照可预测的时间表执行。
他的让步非常直接:与创始人交付有用产品相比,当前回购「真的毫无意义」。这套机制只有在规模上来后才重要,不是因为一笔小额市场买入能制造短暂的 K 线;他设想的终点是,一份10亿美元的数据合同将产生3.33亿美元回购。
在之后的交流中,Thread Guy 提到 Avi 向盘口投入了3.3万美元。Avi 表示,未来可能会有更有效的流程,但确认 KLED 曾直接使用 Jupiter 和 Phantom 执行交易。
被问及8位数或9位数的合同是否现实,Avi 表示这类合同经常发生,并称 Whimo 曾购买「我想是40亿美元」的行车记录仪视频。主持人追问数据来源时,Avi 承认:「这笔交易的买家我其实不知道。」但他坚持认为,自动驾驶系统需要规模极大、且按地区划分的数据集。
他更具体的逻辑在于地理覆盖:进入洛杉矶市场,就需要洛杉矶道路上的视频;KLED 称目前已有约4000名 Uber 司机在当地上传内容。Avi 将 KLED 自身的合同进展描述为约5万美元、35万美元,随后是100万美元 LOI。
5. 当合成媒体污染训练集,真实数据的价值随之上升
谈到 Sora 2 时,Avi 称其「真的非常、非常好」,但认为把更强的算力用于广泛公开数据集只是第一阶段。KLED 的企业门户则可以提供极其狭窄的素材——例如一名教练上传的数千段体操视频——以针对下一代模型的具体弱点。
Avi 首先提出,实验室不断「把社交媒体和互联网垃圾化」,反而可能抬高可证明由人类产生的内容的价值。Thread Guy 随后给出「AI 近亲繁殖」的解释:如果模型用生成的金毛犬图片训练,再把这些输出回灌进训练集,每一代都可能进一步偏离真实的狗。他认为,真实数据也可能比反复生成合成样本更具可持续性。
KLED 表示,其数据接入系统会检查不同账户之间的重复内容,在互联网中搜索抄袭,检查 EXIF 元数据以判断来源和是否被修改,并使用 Mistral 标记 AI 生成文件。Avi 称当前有效率约95%,交付数据的目标可信度接近99%。
对 KLED Games 而言,验证也会以现场拍摄为起点,「像 BeReal 一样」,而不是允许玩家上传任意已保存文件。比如系统要求用户拍摄附近的汽车,用户必须使用实时相机,从源头堵住从 Google 下载10张汽车图片的明显漏洞。
6. 代币是获客和投资人 FOMO 的机制
用户无需代币即可访问 KLED,不过 Avi 预计未来会加入锁仓代币的功能。眼下更大的障碍是 Crypto 的使用门槛:他称自己可能亲自带过约10,000名新人使用 SOL 和 Phantom,而 KLED 正在为非 Crypto 原生用户开发内置钱包。
主持人问创作者是否拿钱推广应用时,Avi 表示绝大多数创作者都是其人脉圈中的朋友,而不是付费投放;他举例称,一个约30,000名粉丝的账号发布 Instagram Story,获得了约100,000次曝光。未来,这些关系仍可能转化为 UGC 机会。
Avi 表示,代币 K 线已经成为风投机构衡量 FOMO 的基准。他描述称,投资人会盯着 K 线,在价格上涨后发消息,寻求配额或提供引荐——尽管公司投资人并不会获得代币。他还表示,代币市值已经略高于公司当前约4000万美元的估值,并提到一轮计划中的1亿美元融资。
他的更大判断是,KLED 从创立之初就让公司与代币社区共同成长,因此积累了数百万流量、3000万次 Twitter 曝光和快速的应用采用。已经成立的公司如果在后期才发行代币,获得的增量价值可能更小:「早期阶段,代币化初创公司永远会胜过未代币化的初创公司」。
7. KLED Games 与持续交付,是扩大护城河的下一次尝试
Avi 正在控制候补名单的放量,因为如果引入的供应商数量超过合同收入能够支撑的水平,贡献者的收入就会被压低。每批名额扩大至原来的3倍;推荐码既能帮助用户提前排队,也能让 KLED 每天持续出现在各个社交平台上。
KLED Games 将开辟另一条增长路径:假设奖金池为5万美元,系统每30分钟发送一次任务提示,例如在本地拍摄20张汽车图片,用户只有几秒钟回应。所有人都贡献数据,最后留下的玩家获得主要奖金,可能另有约100人获得较小奖励;这种紧张的现实参与过程还会制造病毒式传播的短视频。
主持人的 AI 人才话题引出 Avi 的判断:除了少数几个项目外,「链上真的没有好的 AI 项目」;大多数产品都是空气,99%的 ICM 项目已经变成「即将推出农场」(coming soon farms)。他认为,只有持续交付,才能把传统 AI 和硅谷的严肃建设者重新吸引回 Crypto。
谈到与 Launchcoin 的竞争时,Avi 否认后者的估值决定了 KLED 的上限,并表示自己不再想靠争议制造流量:「拿一篇和某个大型实验室签下10亿美元合同的文章出来——那就是参与度 farming。」接下来的15天,他将专注于争取旧金山合同,随后推出 KLED Games、扩大媒体曝光,并推动中心化交易所上币。
完整逐字稿
How are you, twin?
Been good. How are you?
I've been good, man. I feel like it's been a long time coming, dude.
Yeah, we've known each other for, what, like three months now? It's been a long time coming, for sure. I feel like you could have had me on Crash Out number 2, like weeks and weeks ago.
I was a little afraid of you, dude, honestly, to bring you on for mid-Crash Out. I didn't know what to expect, you know?
Yeah. Well, dude, I'm here now. I'm happy to talk about anything, whatever you want to. I feel like you've calmed down a little bit too.
Maybe. Dude, you know what it is? I think I've just been hardened. I think what happened, which I think is actually really important for all the ICM founders, is that if you just sit down and launch, and you go through—I think Kled was probably the most flooded token ever in ICM. I think I can comfortably make that statement.
But if you go through that and then you survive it, and you sit down and you still ship and actually prove on your promises, then you'll get rewarded for it. So I've just been hardened through that early stage, which was just a nightmare, dude. Honestly.
Kled holders have been through it, bro.
They've been through it. Yeah, which is great because they have the diamond hands. These guys are wizards. Seriously, they just don't know what the sell button is.
Yeah. You've mellowed out. I like it. I like this new arc that you're on.
Look, I figured it was a good time to bring you on now. I'm just going to be honest: the chart—I was like, "Yeah, let's do it right now." You have some announcements, things are going well, the market's kind of turning, and people are looking for more risk-on stuff to bid. They're looking at alts and Kled.
I don't know. You've been here grinding and locked in. Do you want to start with a quick introduction into who you are and where we are with Kled? I think most people here are familiar with you.
Yeah, I'm happy to. My name is Avi. I am the founder of Kled. I've owned businesses for the last three years, but I primarily work in the intellectual property world.
I own Nitrily, which is a music licensing marketplace that works with hundreds of thousands of artists. It basically lets you license any song out there.
Kled is our next vertical, which is data licensing. It basically lets you sell your camera roll and your personal data to the largest AI companies and tech companies that need it, and then we pay the users directly.
What started this whole run is that, for months and months and months, we've just been proving that the model works. We've paid out close to $1 million to users so far.
More importantly, we launched the mobile app less than 4 days ago, and it just took off. We're at 25,000 downloads now, which I haven't announced. We should hit 1 million by the end of the year.
We're going viral on most platforms. We're backed by creators with around 500 million followers, and we're backed by some of the biggest venture capitalists in Silicon Valley, like K5 Global, who's invested in X, Uber, and you name it.
Now I'm in this run in Silicon Valley. I'm in San Francisco right now meeting with all the big labs. I have OpenAI this week, Anthropic this week, and Google this week, and I've been signing LOIs with a lot of big labs.
I announced one of them today, which was Superpower. They're building a $300 million healthcare company that's going to be using some of our training data to build their own in-house healthcare LLM.
I should just be sticking it out. I'm excited to see what the rest of the week looks like.
Dude, you know, every time you name-drop some big lab or someone backing you, you get in trouble, right? It never goes well. Every time you—
I think at the start it was problematic because literally none of this was announced, right? But we went for three months where we just kept saying all these things, and now finally I get to show it all to everyone. Now it's real, which is the good part.
Yeah. Advisor list, all that. When did you launch the app, and why did you launch it? 25,000 downloads in 4 days feels like a lot.
Yeah, it's a lot, especially considering the fact that it's a pretty crazy concept, right? Selling your personal data is not something everyone's open to, but we just made it very friendly for everyone.
We launched the app literally less than 4 days ago. It was just a really hard app to build because the UI is probably one of the cleanest UIs possible. We've made it really user-friendly.
We've sped up pretty much everything. Data storage and labeling data are just not the easiest things to do, especially at scale. We host petabytes of data from users, and that's what took the longest to crack down on.
My team's also just a bunch of perfectionists. They literally refuse to launch anything that's not perfect and up to my standards, definitely.
So we got it out. It took some time, but the market clearly reacted positively toward it.
You said you've paid out $1 million to people providing the data. Are people actually using this thing who aren't Kled holders? Are there random consumers who are actually interacting with it?
I've been going hard on marketing on Instagram and everything. We have a ton of big creators posting videos about Kled, like Noah Boat with 10 million followers and Kios with [__] 20 million followers.
Are they paid videos?
No, these are just friends of mine. I text them and tell them, "Hey, help us out here, and in the future we can help with UGC opportunities."
The vast majority of it is just friends in a network. They've made a ton of videos, and then it's gone viral on my personal Instagram as well. One of my stories had 100,000 impressions about how we're paying out for camera rolls, and I have around 30,000 followers. That's just an Instagram story, so we've had a ton of inbound from there.
Now we're basically trying to make it frictionless so that users have wallets in-house on the app. You don't have to deal with anything complicated, so if you're new and not crypto-native, you can still use the app very easily.
So far, I've personally probably onboarded around 10,000 people to SOL or something crazy. I've sat down and walked normal people, big investors, and big creators through how to make a Phantom wallet and things like that.
That's what we're doing right now. We're going to make it really, really friendly for most people.
Do you need the token to use the app or the product?
No, but we're going to have token-lock features in the future, which will be nice.
How do you value different data and content? How do you decide what's worth more than others? What do you put the most emphasis on?
It depends on the enterprise contracts we get. Let's say, for example, Epic Games comes to me and says, "I need videos of TikToks of people dancing so I can train an AI that will make emotes for Fortnite game characters," something like that. They'll pay a lot more for that because there's a premium and a need for it.
Versus if you sell that same dataset to Microsoft Azor, they have literally no need for that, so they'll just buy it for a nominal rate.
It depends on the enterprise contracts, which is why our goal is just to become the biggest data-collection engine. Depending on what these opportunities look like in the future, we can position this data and sell it to whoever accordingly.
Overall, higher-quality videos are always good. Higher-quality text documents and higher-quality images matter, and then it's all on us to label everything properly.
In reality, no matter what a picture or video is, they all have very specific use cases for training. These big labs are at the point where it's no longer about positioning yourself to have a lot of data; it's about positioning yourself to have specific data.
You can plug your data into any of these plays and print a significant amount of money, then pay that out to users accordingly. Everything's valuable—literally all of it, no matter what it is.
How do you get these enterprise contracts?
It's all networks. Our investors have thankfully made a lot of introductions. I'm in San Francisco right now, and these labs introduce themselves to you.
We have a lot of hype on Twitter, which people don't understand also drives crypto Twitter and Silicon Valley Twitter.
I was hit up by Nick Shvchenko this morning saying, “Look, I wanted to do something with OMI and get data to you guys.” I was speaking with three a16z partners yesterday. The hype online is literally the same thing for Silicon Valley.
We get a lot of cold inbound from people who want to monetize data—people who not only own data but also need it. It’s really not easy to get data. The internet has basically been scraped; everyone has taken data off the internet at this point, and these consumer data sets that are sourced naturally are very rare because they’re not available anywhere.
We’re giving you something competitive compared to anyone else. If Google has our data set and Anthropic doesn’t, Google is winning because they can tell their investors, “Hey, we have rarer data than Anthropic.” That means we can train our models better than Anthropic, as long as our compute is the same. That’s how it goes.
Why am I not submitting my streams and my videos? Is that—
That’s a great question.
What’s the Rasper [?] thing?
Yeah, Rasper [?] does it. We pay him tomorrow, I think.
How much are you paying him?
I don’t know the number off the top of my head. Eli has it all in-house. It’s literally a system where they check every part of the video, and I’ll get it straight into enterprise contracts.
Depending on how much he uploads, if you upload 100 gigabytes, you get paid $1,000 for high-quality content. Think about that for people in third-world countries. A lot of our users are based in India and other places that aren’t necessarily the best.
These guys have solid iPhones and will spam pictures all day long, record dashcam footage, and get paid rates that American people don’t even get paid. It’s pretty lucrative if you’re recording all day long and just uploading.
Hey, Rasma [?], you’re in the chat. Tell us how much you’re about to get paid.
What do you classify as high quality? Would this count as high quality?
This would definitely count as high quality. You’re also doing a lot of conversational things, so we’d literally plug this into someone looking to train podcasting models or conversational models. That’s what this is for.
Someone building humanoid AI agents could use it. There are a hundred different use cases. Yours is definitely high quality. It’s really nice camera quality, and the conversation is always free-flowing. You can plug that into pretty much anything.
Damn. I’ll let you know when Rasper [?] says how much. That’s awesome, though.
Tell me about Superpower, the company you just announced a partnership with. What is that?
Superpower is a $300 million healthcare company. They’re very big. Their whole gist is basically to give consumers the best healthcare experience possible, and a large part of that is letting consumers have access to the best doctors in the world at any point in time.
Their whole intention is that, at some point in the future, they’re going to have to train their own LLM. You’ll open your phone, go on the Superpower app, and type to any doctor you want. Not any doctor, but an AI agent trained on conversational models of people talking to their doctors.
You’re basically trying to create this super doctor that you can talk to and get advice from at any point in time. What that requires is data on how people communicate with top professionals and top doctors, and there’s no way to source that other than from consumers because no one has access to any of that.
What we’ll do in-house is set up integrations with these healthcare portals where people already talk to their doctors. Then we’ll make all the data anonymous so that you won’t know who it is. Privacy is obviously very important.
We anonymize the whole thing and provide it straight to Superpower to train their LLM. That’s what their data needs are for.
There are a ton of these use cases, but Silicon Valley is seeing that Kled is really good at sourcing data very quickly for very specific things because we have this big community of people who are willing to do it.
As long as we keep proving that there’s a big community of people—a million users, for example—who are willing to give whatever data they want, we can get contracts for anything. We can provide that integration to our users, they can supply the data, and these big companies can pay us for it.
The announcement said you received a $1 million LOI. What does that practically mean?
Basically, they’ll allocate $1 million toward buying data sets. We have a pretty interesting flywheel where a third of that goes into buybacks for the token.
Even though these nominal buybacks don’t matter at this stage, they do matter.
Nice little bag.
Yeah, it’s a nice little bag.
Yeah, that’s not nothing. That’s definitely not nothing.
Think about when we get a billion-dollar contract. Let’s say this keeps going, which it will. If we get a billion-dollar contract, a third of that going toward buybacks is pretty big.
It doesn’t matter at this stage, but with any buybacks, I hope everyone understands this: the flywheel at the stage that all ICM companies are at is literally meaningless. It’s nominal buy pressure that means nothing.
It’s way more important that the founders are shipping really good updates and getting all these people, but we have the flywheel in place. It’s all already set up. We’ve taken 10 million tokens out of circulation with it.
This matters a lot more when we get to that billion-dollar contract and we’re buying back $333 million of tokens.
How realistic is it to scale to get these? How realistic is an 8-figure contract or a 9-figure contract? Do these already happen with other companies, or is this uncharted territory?
All the time. Whimo just bought, I think, $4 billion of dashcam footage.
Whymo bought $4 billion of dashcam footage?
Yeah. These contracts are massive, and they happen every single day. AI has grown. I have it in our white paper: AI is the most explosive industry in the world right now.
The only things that improve AI are compute and data. Basically, all your spending from VC and revenue is going toward compute and data. Data is simply our game. That’s what we’re best at.
We’ll hopefully be signing some of the biggest dashcam providers and getting all this in-house from enterprises and consumers. These contracts are pretty realistic. We started with a $50,000 contract, and we’re already at $350,000. It’s been pretty parabolic up until now.
Now we’re at $1 million, so these contracts just get bigger and bigger over time. I’m going to keep stacking as many of them as possible, and that goes straight to users.
Is that where Waymo spends most of its money? They spent $4 million. Do they just need unlimited dashcam footage?
That’s how they have to do it. It’s area-specific, too. Let’s say they want to expand to Los Angeles; they need a bunch of Uber drivers in Los Angeles, which I just so happen to have. I have 4,000 of them uploading to Kled.
That data can be bought. The same thing applies if they want to expand to some rural town. They need people recording themselves driving on the streets all day long so they can train their cars not to crash. That would be bad.
Data is really important for them.
Who did they buy from? Who did they give $4 million to? Who sourced all that data?
I actually don’t know the buyer for this one, but traditionally, over time, they’ll partner with Tesla. They’ll partner with dashcam companies. They’ll partner with people who have uploaded to public drives. Whatever it is, it’s dog-eat-dog. They’ll get it from anything. They don’t care where it’s from; they just need to get it somehow.
Sometimes they’ll even do it illegally. That’s the problem, and it’s what’s causing all these companies to face big lawsuits.
The big differentiator here is that Kled is providing legal data. You’ll get it in the most legally licensed way possible, and you won’t get sued for $10 billion later, which is really important to these companies because it’s a value proposition when they’re raising money.
It’s also a value proposition because they’re not getting sued for $20 billion by some random company, like Disney suing OpenAI.
Billions and millions of dollars of losses are flying left and right every single day, basically.
Okay, so you're putting $33K into the chart. What's your process? You're just on-ramping it into crypto and swapping the coin, basically?
I'm sure there's a more effective way of doing that at some point in time.
Just throw it in a Phantom wallet and raw-dog it.
That's basically it. Yeah, that is how it goes.
Whenever you feel like it, too.
Yeah, whenever. You just never know when everything goes. You'll never know, and that's what I want, right? I want our holders to be in here because they have conviction, not because they're timing certain events.
I'll do crazy random shit that's really going to impact the company's chart because it's impactful to the company, and I'll do it at random times. We have a Kled holders group chat that everyone's pretty aware of. It's not on Telegram, and it's not private. Anyone can join it, basically.
In there, I literally say, "Be on your toes. I'm literally just going to drop shit at any point in time, any time of the day, and you'll just never know." It might just—you get my point. But yeah.
Yeah. Are you on Jupiter, or are you just raw-dogging Phantom Swap?
We've done Jupiter, and I've raw-dogged it as well.
That's awesome.
Yeah.
That is awesome. This is off topic, but what do you think of Sora 2? Another reason I wanted to bring you on right now is that Sora 2 just launched, and it's pretty crazy. What do you think of that?
Sora 2. Yeah.
Yeah, Sora 2. Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, it's really good. It's really, really good, right? But again, right now they're competing with Google pretty heavily, and Google's really kosher about how they license data. OpenAI currently is not, which is why their data needs are very, very high right now.
They're either fully complicit in crime, which kind of seems like they are, but even if they're not, they still need more data. Sora was trained off some of the biggest public datasets in the world, and all they've really done is improve compute.
I can only imagine how good it's going to be once we start introducing very specific, trainable datasets to Sora. If you go on our enterprise portal right now and search, "I need 5,000 videos of a girl on a high beam doing gymnastics," we literally have that there.
There's a user who uploaded thousands of videos of his—he's a gymnastics coach. I'm sure he's going to reply to this—and he's uploaded all of his stuff. We have thousands of videos of gymnastics, for example.
If Sora is going to try to improve its next model, it can come to us with very, very specific things to train on and help itself out, right? Instead of training on these general datasets, you're now really specifying things.
If someone types into Sora, "I need a gymnast doing the typical thing," and they need to build an LLM that's training on all of that at the same time, it gets very complex. Data is fundamental to why Sora is getting better, and data and compute are fundamental to why it's getting better.
Also, maybe this is cope, but I have this thesis that as all these labs spend trillions of dollars slopifying Twitter, social media platforms, and the internet more broadly, there's an increased value on—
Human, exactly. Provably human stuff like this. Anyone not watching, that's a scientific concept. It's called AI inbreeding.
If you have a picture of a dog and ask ChatGPT to generate an image of a golden retriever, it generates 20 images, and then you plug those 20 images back into ChatGPT and say, "Train off these images that you just generated," the next time you generate an image of a dog, it's going to look less like a dog. It's just going to keep happening over and over again.
The need for natural images that are very real is always going to be there. You can't solve inbreeding. It's not a solvable concept, right?
Data is always going to be needed. Even if you solve inbreeding to some extent, generating those images is so compute-intensive and difficult that it's more sustainable, cost-wise, to get real user data instead.
That's at the heart of all of this. You can't generate it with AI. You need it from normal human people, and the slop platforms are not going to plug their own slop back in. They need real stuff to plug back in.
So when you go talk to these serious AI people in San Francisco about what you're doing, and then you say the word crypto, do they get soft? Is the narrative changing around that? What's the vibe?
You don't have to say crypto, right? My holders don't care if the labs are interested in my token. The holders care that the labs are giving me a billion dollars to buy data. That's all they care about, right? You don't even tell people you're working in crypto.
Yeah, I don't have to. You know what? The best part is that sometimes they find out, right? I had a founder a couple of days ago say, "Holy shit, you just put out this announcement, and now your company's valuation is—basically, your crypto coin is now worth more than your company's valuation, right?"
We'll be raising $100 million, but at our current $40 million valuation, the coin's worth a little bit more, which makes sense, obviously, for the big raise that's coming up. That's really interesting to them.
You'll have people asking for allocation so they can then incentivize me by saying they'll make introductions, et cetera. But I think that process has to happen naturally.
I think crypto will be fully destigmatized if there are Kled and 5 other success stories. Right now, it seems like there's just Kled and maybe a couple more, but it needs to happen naturally. You can't force it.
I'm not going to mention it to these guys. I'd much rather just get these big market buys, you know.
Okay. Well, you definitely mention it to investors who are investing in the company. Do they feel weird about the fact that there's this liquid token that's worth more than the company's current valuation? Are they getting tokens? Is that taken into account? I was always curious how that works.
They don't get tokens. They just get FOMOed like crazy. It's a massive FOMO mechanism.
Right before the stream, I was with Keenan from K5 Global, and the way he literally greeted me was, "Patel mode." These investors are looking at the charts.
That is insane.
These investors are looking at the charts for sure. The amount of Silicon Valley investors who follow me from Twitter, for example, is surprising because you'd think my entire audience is crypto-based, at least on Twitter. My Instagram's a little different, but it's very high.
They look at the charts and use them as a benchmark to measure FOMO. When they see a massive green candle, I get 50 texts from everyone—people who never supported us or doubted us way before that—saying, "Oh my God, this is the greatest thing ever. You proved it all out," or whatever it is.
That's why the chart does matter, and the investors actually want to see the chart. That's the best part of ICM.
I mean, I hit you up after a couple of green candles.
Yeah, exactly. Eric Zhu, who refused to tweet about us, hit me up. Everyone who said, "No, Avi, I'm not supporting this shit," is now spamming the timeline.
Whether it's because they have a bag, who knows, right? Or it's just, "Avi proved it out, so now it's okay." That's where it's at right now.
Do you have motion on Instagram?
I do have motion on Instagram, yeah.
For what? How?
I've done a lot of social hacking. The reason I have motion on Instagram is that every big influencer on planet Earth follows me there.
Okay, I'd say 30K is decent motion.
If you scroll through the 30K, though, it's just blue checkmarks the whole way down. Not Meta Verified blue checkmarks—blue checkmarks from people with 10 million followers, the whole way down, basically.
Every big creator—three days ago, the entire David Dober team followed me, other than David. He'll do that in 3 days when I sponsor his shit Halloween party or whatever it is.
Yeah, we'll see.
Adam Wed follows me. I had an entire spreadsheet 2 years ago when I was doing artist outreach, with thousands of people I knew. It had all the big influencers organized by follower count, what they do, everything, and I had a VA who ran the whole thing.
I don't do that anymore because it takes way too much time, but Instagram is just packed with celebrities and influencers. That's it.
You're like the L.A. name-drop final boss.
Yeah, probably. Yeah.
You are. It's okay, which you are. You are.
It works.
Well, you asked, right? Like, I told—I asked. I asked: how was the— That's all I have. How was the sperm racing?
Uh, dude, the Speed one was a mess, man. We hosted at UCLA. We went to UCLA.
Okay. What?
We hosted—we set everything up at a frat, and the competing frat heard about it and called the police. UCLA basically shut it down, and within an hour and a half, me and everyone who was there had to find a venue to host the new event. We went to a new venue, moved everything in an hour and a half, and organized security while people were crowding the place because it was leaked somehow that it was happening.
We organized buses for all the USC and UCLA kids. Speed finally showed up. He was on stream for 10 or 15 minutes. K's logo was on all the racers, whatever it was, and then Speed left the stream because he wasn't feeling well or whatever it was. There was a lot of chaos and [__].
I just said hi on the way out, but I know his team now, at the very least, which is nice. And yeah, that was that. David's was cool. It was fun. These are my boys, right? I like supporting them.
David's was really cool. That one went very well, and the UCLA-USC one before that went well. You were at that one. I might have seen you there.
Yeah, I was there. On the—what was it? DYOR Speed. They had the Solana logo in the middle. That [__] was lit.
That was lit. Yeah, it was for Speed. But yeah, Jakey—the streamer Jakey, the crypto streamer Jake—was supposed to get a picture with a Solana phone with Speed in it as well, and that would have really done it. But the problem is Speed left early. Otherwise, that would have all happened. There would have been a lot more that happened if Speed decided to stay.
I met Speed in a camera store in L.A. He was actually hella cool.
Really? Yeah. Cool.
Okay, I had a goal coming into this that I was not going to ask you about Ben Pasternak. I just wasn't going to do it. I'm just like, I don't care.
Yeah, I honestly don't care.
I don't know the extent. I know you guys go back and forth on Twitter sometimes, but I'm curious. Not to do price talk, but Kled's at $52 million and Launchcoin is at $106 million. I think that's the closest our ratio has been. Do you feel like Kled is boxed in and has a ceiling, which is how successful Launchcoin is in this ecosystem?
So again, look, I wish Ben and the entire team infinite success. Seriously, because we all want ICM to win, right? Whether that's them or whoever's launchpad, I wish every founder success.
I just couldn't give enough of a singular [__] about the drama anymore. It's a waste of time—a time suck. I don't give a [__]. There's no ceiling because I'm not part of Believe, and I'm not part of any of this, which is what everyone's realized, which is good.
There can be an ICM runner organically that outcompetes Launchcoin. And look, it's no shade to Ben. Again, no drama at all anymore. I don't care about that anymore, right? But my goal, obviously, is that if Ben's at $100 million, I want to be at [__] a billion, right? That's the whole point.
So it gets competitive, sure, but yeah. No drama. Peaceful. Me just in San Francisco, signing labs. That's the type of vibe right now—just mellowed out all the time. Yeah, that's basically it.
WLED PR team.
No, Wav PR team, bro. The Kled PR team is saying to do much worse than that, but there's no point, guys. I don't want to engagement-farm this [__] anymore. It's just a waste of time.
You know what's engagement-farming? [__] putting out an article with whatever big lab for a billion dollars. That's engagement-farming right there. That's what really instantly sends one candle to $500 million, whatever you guys want, right?
But this engagement-farming stuff for mindshare is just useless. I'm over the drama. There's no point. I wish everyone success. Seriously.
I love how you're making announcements and watching the 1-minute chart. It's kind of a movie.
Yeah. Yeah.
Do you—I was always curious. When the ICM stuff first happened, before I even knew him, I remember asking Bobby from Dupe if there was any meaningful increase in traffic on the Dupe website after there were token holders, because I know people in the Solana trenches would try anything. They'll play any—
I put out a case study. Maya Hedge is here with me in San Francisco, literally. We were just at lunch. Maya Higa, you know.
Yeah, yeah. I do know Maya Hedge, actually. Yeah, 100%.
I was just with Maya and K5. We were meeting with investors, right? Maya is helping us with the tokenized equity, and he actually wrote a case study on this.
Kled's traffic is really good for a company with nothing—just a founder, or just a project that's not really public-facing—and just a founder who is supposed to be a public-facing product to launch a coin, because you will literally build your entire company from the start off the coin.
I think the thesis here is that tokenized startups at an early stage will always beat untokenized ones. I think Kled is the perfect example of that, because traffic is in the millions, with 25,000 users in 4 days on just the mobile app, let alone the waitlist, which has grown significantly.
Payouts to users. We did 30 million impressions on Twitter alone, right? If you search Kled on Twitter, it's flooded with positive [__] by the second. I had an investor search Kled on Twitter, and it's just flooded with positive [__]. Every 20 seconds, there's a post, and they're like, “Holy [__], I've never seen this before.”
Silicon Valley runs on FOMO. It's the biggest FOMO driver of all time, right? So that's why it's important. I think Bobby's probably seen an impact, but because his was established before he launched the coin, it might have been different. But yeah, I'm sure you've seen the impact.
That's—I like that take. The communities will just use anything. They'll pump any product. Also, I see this picture of you and Speed. Eric tweeted, “Patel mode is hard.”
Yeah, it's funny. Yeah, I mean, dude, I think the token's really, really useful for a lot of people. I think everyone in the startup scene should be doing something similar. I think it's really dumb not to, but it's not obvious yet.
Kled will be the success story and make it really obvious. I think that's the best way to look at it.
Someone keeps asking in the chat, “Please ask when waitlist people can get in.”
Guys, look, I'm literally tripling the amount of people I let into this waitlist every single batch. Once these big contracts ramp up in size, then it's much easier, right? Because you have to throttle this. If I don't have enough money to pay people, then some people are going to get paid a lot less than what they deserve because there are simply too many people inside the app, right?
It's not because the app isn't ready. The app is clearly ready. We have thousands of users in it, right? But it's really important. It also drives a ton of FOMO.
If you go to the timeline and look, we have this social-sharing thing for getting referrals. There's a ton of people spamming their referral codes for Kled, and it helps them get earlier on the waitlist. It also makes sure that we're viral every single day, and I think that's important.
So yeah, we'll triple down on the waitlist every time a new batch opens up, and more people will be let in. More importantly, I'm introducing Kled Games, which we talked about, but we haven't talked about publicly, so this is actually the first time.
Imagine we had a $50,000 prize pool set aside. Every 30 minutes on your phone, you get a notification from Kled saying, “Upload 20 pictures of cars in your area,” and you have 10 seconds to do it. If you upload them in time and we recognize that it's true, then you're in the next round. Basically, you survive, and the last person standing gets all $50,000.
We collect data from everyone. We clip-farm the [__] out of it, because imagine a high school kid, for example, is in the final round. He's in math class taking a test, gets a notification, jumps out of his [__] classroom window to sprint to the parking lot to take pictures of cars because that's what it takes, and starts spam-celebrating. That's the TikTok clip that goes viral everywhere.
We can ramp up these prize pools over and over and over again. We can let every user into that because we collect data from everyone. One user wins, and we can probably have 100 people who get marginal prizes as well. It's going to be a really cool game that'll probably go very, very viral, and the winners also get access to the waitlist.
So we can do these mechanisms, and that's actually not hard to do. I just have to do image-recognition and video-recognition software, and that takes—it's very fast as well. Once that's done, we can release that, and everyone's technically off the waitlist. Then, once the contracts come in, we can let everyone into the main app as well.
That's kind of a movie. When does that launch?
Eli is finishing a Wallers protocol integration right now for decentralized storage. After that, he has a big update he's pushing tomorrow, which is very exciting. He's pushing a massive update for Kled tomorrow. The day after he's done with Walrus, he can get started on the image-recognition software.
Once the image-recognition software is done, our front-end guy is a freak. He'll finish up the front end, and then we'll deploy it.
Whoa, that's kind of a movie. How do you determine if any of this data—these images—is AI-generated?
We have—
Do you miss any?
We're literally at 95%. Eli has set up a system that will detect duplicates across every single account and check the entire internet's history for plagiarism across the board when we're first searching images and—
Exactly.
We'll also double-check the EXIF metadata. If there are any alterations in the image, you won't get paid for it. We'll check the metadata of the image itself. If it's not off your device, you won't get paid for it.
If it's AI-generated, we use Mistral to check whether it's AI-generated, and you won't get paid for it. We have 10 layers of checks for plagiarism, so that anytime an AI lab gets our data, it's with literal 99% certainty pretty much the safest data, straight from the user and off the real device.
We let anyone upload anything, sure, but every single time we'll filter out the bad stuff.
So even if you went on Google and searched for cars and just saved 10 images, you would reverse-search them and be like, “This is not original. This is already on the internet”?
Well, think of it like BeReal. It's not going to be like that. It's not going to be “upload.” It's going to be you—
Like, take a picture. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And same with the videos.
Yeah.
Damn. BeReal was a movie.
Yeah, it was. It was.
That was peak social media.
It definitely was, dude. That—
Hey, do you subscribe to or believe in the great AI talent migration into crypto and more financial products?
What is the great AI talent migration? Do you just think more AI engineers are coming here? There's the thought that AI is a talent vacuum, and definitely from a venture perspective, all these labs are raising at ridiculous valuations. A lot of that money is going to trickle back into crypto products because—
Think about it: the upside to building a successful financial product in crypto is—
It's like pumping liquidity—$2 million a day in perpetuity and a deca-billion-dollar valuation in year 1—versus AI slop company number 75 that makes no money and has zero clear plans for monetization at any scale.
Got it.
I think if AI is doing very well, which it is, then obviously things trickle back into the system. But there are literally no good AI projects on-chain. They just don't exist, other than a very small handful.
Until you see good developers taking crypto seriously, this is just not going to happen. Hopefully Kled spearheads it, right? Most of these products are vaporware. They're literally just useless vaporware, and it's sad to see that people are bidding them because they're simply bored of the other conditions in the market, which are nonexistent. So, yeah, that's the current state of it, I think.
Do you think during the 2024 AI season in crypto—there was, I don't know how much attention you paid to it, but there was this 3-month period—
Zero. Literally zero. I'm the most unc—
You didn't look at anything?
I didn't look at anything. I don't know anything about any of these, so educate me. Tell me what happened.
There was this 3-month period where crypto was always a little bit late, right? There was a mainstream trend that happened, and then it trickled down in a lighter version on-chain. There were about 3 months where I was extremely excited about crypto AI, myself included.
There was this really small subset of developers who seemingly were a relatively big deal in Web2 AI and were coming and launching crypto projects—ex-OpenAI, all this stuff. It went really high. AI coins on Solana probably topped out at around $15 billion, versus the launchcoin ecosystem—ICM topped out at around $1 billion or $2 billion—so it was substantially bigger.
ICM was a little bit euphoric for a couple of days. That was basically it for 3 months, and then it kind of just disappeared. Most of the coins got crushed, and most of the developers left.
It felt like this little pocket where, for the first time in a long time, there were actual people from Web2 coming into crypto and launching. Even if they were just GPT wrappers, it was at least interesting.
We reminisce on it all the time, I feel like, and we're like, “When is it going to happen again? When are the AI devs going to come back and launch in crypto simply because they can make more money?” But there's basically been no indication that that's going to happen again. So I guess it's TBD.
Yeah, TBD for sure. I think crypto's tired of a lot of shit. I want to preface this before I say it: I think 99% of every project has failed to deliver on anything they said at the very start.
Specifically in ICM, there are very, very few founders who have delivered. Bobby obviously has, and Chris from Polycule obviously has, but 99% of these projects are coming-soon farms. They're actually coming-soon farms. They'll just play narratives when hype is riding high, farm the coming-soon forum, and then it goes up.
Yeah, these are disgusting, disgusting projects.
This isn't directed toward any one person. I think everyone who is building here just needs to deliver more. If that's the case, the market will react accordingly and collectively bring us up. That will then cause more actual, traditional AI Silicon Valley founders to come back to crypto.
Unless you're literally as crazy as me, no one is going to do that. It's not realistic, right? Hopefully Kled is the example that will make that happen. The reality is that there just needs to be more people actually giving a shit, and that is not the case right now.
Honestly, man, I root for you, Avi Patel. In my heart, I root for you as a non-Kled holder. As a former Kled holder, I honestly root for you, dude.
I appreciate that, dude. I think there was a lot of shit-hate at the very start, but all I'm happy to see is that if you search Kled on Twitter and scroll down that list, there is zero FUD. That's one of the most surprising things I've ever seen. I never thought the day would come.
I feel like you finally took a breath, man.
Yeah.
I feel like it wasn't the breath, though, because drama never stops in Patel land, right?
What really happened is that we sat down, shipped, and delivered. We put out 200 updates in the last 4 months. The app is not an app worthy of 4 months of work. It's a year's worth of work minimum for a really good team.
We just delivered on the stuff that we said we were supposed to deliver on, and that's what did this.
Well, yeah. Frank just made this comment too, and I think it's true: people's opinions happen based on how the first couple of weeks go, but on a long enough time frame, it's hard to keep the grifter label when you just keep shipping, keep launching cool stuff, keep coming on, keep doing media, and keep launching. Eventually, things turn around.
Yeah, it's literally not physically possible. There are very few people who would stick it out like we have and fight through it all. I try to shield my team from this as much as possible.
It's a lean team. That's why we're shipping fast. Eli and 2 other engineers are handling all of our engineering, and Eli's doing pretty much all of it for the most part. We're going to have an AI engineer come in-house.
Then we have a design lead, which is really important because it's a consumer app, so it has to be really nice and functional. We also have a 3D lead handling animations, creatives, and editing for content creators, and then our fat legal team. That's basically it.
Yeah. And then we have a UGC team, obviously.
You probably have a monster legal team, bro.
Yeah, it’s Latham & Watkins. It’s literally the best lawyers in the world—arguably the best lawyers in the world. They run everything.
Dude, this was sick. As a wrap, what are you most excited about that you’re working on, launching, or making happen? What’s your focus from here?
I mean, I like to think as short-term as possible. We’ve just had 1 day in San Francisco. I haven’t even announced what happened on day 2 or day 3.
I will not announce what happened.
You made it sound like you were about to do it. I was asking. So, I’ll drop it on the timeline randomly and no one will expect it.
But yeah, look, I have 15 days in San Francisco here. I’ll just do as much damage as physically possible here, and then I’ll go back to New York, do the development rounds, and get games out as fast as possible. Hopefully, start securing these really large contracts, get PR and press, and go more viral.
We’ve established the groundwork. Now, let’s just hit the ground running and use the momentum properly. I’m also focused on CEXs. I think a lot of ICM founders haven’t focused on it, but we’re at the market cap now where I can actually get the CEX listings.
I’ll be hitting up Arjun from Kraken, whoever, and just see what happens. That’s the main thing for Kled right now.
He’s a former guest on the Thread Guy stream. If you need an intro—
I have his number. We’ve texted back and forth.
I’m just saying. I’m just saying. He appeared on the stream.
I might, if it’s a warm intro. Yeah, sure. I mean, if it’s like, “Hey, Avi’s crushing it. Go list this shit.”
Yeah. Maybe $100 million, buddy.
Maybe a couple racks.
Avi, you’re the GOAT, dude. It was honestly a long time coming. Congratulations on the last couple of weeks. You’re a fun interview and stream guest, so I appreciate you coming on.
I appreciate it. Okay, sick. I’ll talk to you soon.
Thanks, bro. Have a good one. Peace.
You too.