Narendra Modi:印度总理——权力、民主、战争与和平|Lex Fridman Podcast #460
Modi 的核心地缘政治主张是,印度的影响力来自14亿人口与深厚文明底蕴,因此能够与大国平等相对,既不受人轻视,也不仰人鼻息。 他将中印关系正常化,以及推动国际机构演进,都视为这一姿态的体现。对投资者而言,关键前提是保持有纪律的竞争:“竞争不是坏事,但绝不能演变成冲突。”
谈到俄罗斯与乌克兰,Modi 拒绝中立,明确表态:“我站在和平一边。” 他的路径是由莫斯科与基辅直接谈判——盟友之间的讨论无法替代交战双方坐到同一张桌前——并认为当前已经出现更有利于有效谈判的窗口。他还将这场冲突与席卷全球南方的粮食、燃料和化肥冲击联系起来。
Modi 将行政改革定义为可量化地消除资金渗漏、废旧规则和中间人。 他表示,政府清理了1亿个虚假或重复的福利身份,通过直接福利转账节省近3万亿卢比,取消4万项不必要的合规要求,废止近1,500部过时法律,并推出 GeM Portal。这些数字构成了本期节目最清晰的国家治理能力论点。
印度的 AI 叙事建立在人才密度、广泛的基础设施接入和实际应用之上,而不是声称任何一个国家能够独自构建 AI。 Modi 表示,AI“没有印度就不完整”,并提出以市场化模式扩大 GPU 接入,同时援引印度 5G 的快速部署、200家航天初创企业,以及成本低于好莱坞大片的 Chandrayaan 任务。他的边界判断是绝对的:技术无法取代人的想象力,也无法取代关怀他人的冲动。
民主合法性在这里被呈现为一种以非凡规模运行的基础设施。 Modi 列出9.8亿名登记选民、2024年顶着高温投出的6.46亿张选票、超过100万个投票站、2,500多个注册政党,以及在一天内公布结果的能力——其中包括为1名选民设立的古吉拉特邦森林投票站。他的政治公式是无差别地向所有人提供服务:“信任是我的治理模式之基石。”
Modi 将快速决策归因于极其广泛的信息收集、简单的“国家优先”检验,以及个人承担下行风险。 他表示,疫情期间顶住了印钞并大规模发钱的要求,优先防止饥饿和社会紧张,并避免了其他国家经历的严重疫情后通胀。他概括风险责任的表述是:“我是人,可能犯错。但我不会出于恶意行事。”
支撑 Modi 政治实践的执行体系,是禁食、在场、服务,以及拒绝让困境定义一个人。 他以不同形式禁食已有50至55年,认为禁食能够提升感知和思考,并通过一个理念将童年贫困、喜马拉雅漂泊、RSS 训练和今日职位串联起来:“服务人类就是服务上帝。”他的建议也遵循同一逻辑:“走捷径,路会越走越短”,持续学习,梦想着去做什么,而不是成为谁。
1. 禁食是一种执行纪律,而不只是停止进食
Lex 在饮水禁食45小时后开场,表示这一实践让他的感官和临场感更加敏锐。Modi 将此视为个人致意,并将禁食置于印度教的语境中,称其是一种“生活方式”,旨在让身体、心智、理智、灵魂与人性达到平衡。
Modi 区分了自愿禁食与被迫饥饿:“禁食其实是一种科学过程。”在长时间禁食前,他会花5至7天采用阿育吠陀疗法、瑜伽和清洁方法,并尽可能多喝水;禁食开始后,身体上的克制转化为虔敬、内省和自律,而不只是胃中空空。
他的日程要求极高。从大约6月中旬到排灯节之后,持续4至4个半月,他每24小时只进食一次;九天的 Navratri 期间只喝热水,而 Chaitra Navratri 则是连续9天每天只吃一种选定的水果。他已经坚持这类实践50至55年。
Modi 表示,禁食从未降低他的工作量,反而可能加快思考和表达。一次禁食期间,他在白宫晚宴上只让工作人员端来热水,并对 Obama 开玩笑说:“看,我的晚餐来了!”Obama 下次见面时还记得这件事,告诉他要吃双份。
2. 匮乏训练了应变能力,却没有变成身份标签
Modi 的出生地 Vadnagar 让他意识到,历史是具体存在的:“每一块石头都在说话,每一面墙都有故事。”他担任古吉拉特邦首席部长期间发起的考古发掘,发现了可追溯至2,800年前的证据;按他的说法,这些证据显示当地历史从未中断,佛教、耆那教和印度教也曾长期共存。如今,这座城镇拥有一座国际级博物馆。
他的家人住在一间没有窗户、比采访房间还小的房子里,但他说,他们从未通过比较感受到贫困:“我们一辈子都没穿过鞋,又怎么会知道穿鞋是一件多么了不起的事?”匮乏只是他们生活和劳作的环境。
一位叔叔花大约10或12卢比给他买了白色帆布鞋,Modi 便收集废弃的课堂粉笔,调成糊状,把鞋擦得雪白。家里没有熨斗,他就用铜壶烧热水,再用铜壶给衣服熨平——这些小事体现了他重视的整洁、秩序和创造性。
他的父亲每天凌晨4:00或4:30左右出门,结实的鞋子成为村里人判断他准时与否的信号;他的母亲则在日出前用传统疗法照料当地孩子。Modi 认为自己的纪律性来自父母双方,而服务他人的冲动,则来自观察母亲照料各个家庭。
3. 求道最终走向服务,而非出家
Modi 给处于困境的年轻人的建议,首先是坚持:“无论黑夜看起来多么漫长,它终究只是黑夜,清晨必然会到来。”困境应当成为强化人的考验,而不是定义人的标签;铁路上的警示语“走捷径,路会越走越短”,则构成了他反对急功近利的理由。
他建议人们不要再梦想得到什么或成为什么,而要梦想去做什么。一个目标是做10件事、最后完成8件事的人,依然拥有有价值的工作和前进的势能;一个执着于成为某种人的人,即使取得真实成就,也可能仍把它视为失败。“真正的满足感”来自不断追问:“我能给予什么?”
Modi 少年时阅读 Swami Vivekananda,也进行身体上的尝试,包括在寒冷的12月夜晚睡在户外,以检验自己的耐力。他说,Vivekananda 在 Kali 女神面前无法开口请求物质帮助,可能给他留下了影响:索取的欲望永无止境,而“我能为世界给予什么?”这一问题,则打开了一条通往服务的精神道路。
Modi 曾在喜马拉雅山中漂泊,黎明前冥想,在冷水中沐浴,服务年长的圣人,并在自然灾害后帮助村民。Swami Atmasthananda 将他从隐居修行引向社会服务,对他说:“你肩负着更大的使命。”Modi 表示,求道者、尽责的儿子和总理这3种身份,始终保持着“同一种内在一致性”。
4. RSS 提供组织使命,文化提供凝聚力
爱国歌曲最初吸引 Modi 加入 Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh。它带给他的核心训练,是把国家使命注入每一项活动:学习是为了贡献,锻炼是为了具备服务能力,而判断一个人是否真正参与其中,不能只看他穿制服站了1小时,还要看他之后为社会做了什么。
Modi 用规模数据说明 RSS 的服务网络:Seva Bharti 运营约125,000个由社区支持的项目;Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram 在部落地区运营超过70,000所单师学校;Vidya Bharati 则运营近25,000所学校,以低成本教育约300万名学生。
他将历史上的劳动口号“全世界的工人,联合起来!”与受 RSS 影响的表述“工人联合全世界”作对比。Modi 表示,Indian Labor Union 覆盖约50,000个工会和数百万名成员;词序的变化,代表的是合作与社会建设,而不只是阶级动员。
Modi 认为,印度更深层的统一来自文化,而不只是行政管理:超过100种语言、数千种方言,以及每20英里就可能变化的风俗,和共同的故事、河流祈祷、朝圣与仪式并存。源自 Ram 的名字,以及连接 Kashi 与 Rameshwaram 的旅程,让同一个文明得以贯穿惊人的多样性。
5. Gandhi 的放大器,是把日常工作转化为国家行动
Modi 拒绝 Lex 对两人的比较:Gandhi 不只是20世纪的领袖,因为“他的意义跨越数个世纪”。Modi 最强调的是原则与行为的一致——Gandhi 倡导清洁,也亲自实践;他放弃舒适,并把个人行为变成公共领导的一部分。
Gandhi 最关键的贡献,是让每一个公民都成为参与者。教师、纺纱工、织工、清洁工,以及照料麻风病患者的人,都能把自己的工作理解为独立的一部分;Dandi March 则展示了“一撮盐”如何转化为超出英国人理解范围的大众政治力量。
Modi 将这一经验带入治理,强调参与,而不是只依赖国家:“我不相信把一切都交给政府。”Gandhi 对团结的呼吁,以及对普通人力量的确认,构成了 Modi 所说的偏好:与普通公民共同建设社会变革。
6. 印度的规模支撑“平等相对”的外交政策
当被问及领导人应当被爱戴还是被畏惧时,Modi 转移了问题的前提:“当我与一位世界领导人握手时,握手的不是 Modi,而是14亿印度人。”他表示,自己的权威来自这些公民、数千年的文化,以及他所代表的抱负,而不是个人的身量。
2013年,批评者称他只是地方领导人,缺乏外交政策经验。Modi 给出的治理原则是:印度既不接受被人俯视,也不仰视任何人,而是与对手“平等相对”。他说,这至今仍是印度外交的核心,同时要求尊重对方,而不是贬低对方。
他的国际倡议反复体现共同系统的逻辑:“一太阳、一世界、一电网”推动可再生能源合作;“一个地球、一个健康”覆盖人类、植物与动物;G20 的口号则是“同一个地球、同一个家庭、同一个未来”。没有任何国家能够独自繁荣,因此每个国家都必须学会与他国同步。
在 Modi 看来,问题出在联合国等机构诞生于两次世界大战前后,却没有随世界条件变化而演进。机构影响力衰退、改革缺乏实质进展,使一个彼此依存的世界缺少足够的合作机制。
7. 和平要求交战双方坐到谈判桌前
Modi 表示,印度之所以能在和平问题上获得倾听,是因为承载着 Buddha 与 Gandhi 的传统:“印度人的底层设定不是拥护冲突与争斗。”凭借与两国首都的关系,他既可以告诉 Putin “现在不是战争的时候”,也可以告诉 Zelensky,战场无法提供持久解决方案。
他的机制十分直接:如果俄罗斯不参与,乌克兰与其盟友之间的对话“不会有任何成果”。Modi 认为,当前局势为有意义的谈判提供了更好的机会;这场苦难的影响早已超出交战双方,蔓延为全球南方的粮食、燃料和化肥危机。
谈到巴基斯坦,Modi 从本届政府的视角回顾了分治、反复发生的恐怖主义,以及印度一次次伸出的橄榄枝。他提到,自己曾邀请巴基斯坦领导人及其他 SAARC 成员参加就职典礼,也曾亲自前往 Lahore,但表示“每一次推动和平的善意尝试,都遭到敌意与背叛”;不过,他仍相信巴基斯坦人民渴望和平。
体育提供了一座不那么正式的桥梁。Modi 没有对印巴比赛作技术判断,只是开玩笑说最近一场比赛的结果已经说明一切;随后他讲到部落地区 Shahdol 的“Mini Brazil”:足球运动延续了4代人,诞生近80名国家级球员,每年比赛吸引20,000至25,000名观众。
8. 个人信任支撑 Modi 对 Trump 与改革的判断
Modi 关于 Trump 最具代表性的故事,是 Houston 的“Howdy Modi”集会。演讲结束后,尽管安保压力巨大,他仍邀请 Trump 绕着座无虚席的体育场走一圈;Trump 立即答应。Modi 将这次即兴绕场解读为勇气与信任,并在 Trump 竞选期间遭枪击后,看到了同样的韧性。
两人第一次在白宫会面时,Trump 抛开礼节,亲自带他参观大楼,没有准备讲稿,还一路讲述总统历史。Trump 首任结束后的4年里,Modi 表示双方共同联系人不断传话:“Modi 是我的朋友,向他转达我的问候。”两人的关系建立在“美国优先”与“印度优先”的相互契合之上。
Modi 认为,Trump 第二次参选时准备得充分得多,拥有清晰路线图和有能力的团队。他不愿评价两人的谈判能力,称 Trump 的赞扬十分客气;但他将自己的方法概括为:积极而有力地争取印度利益,因为“我的国家就是我的最高指挥部”。
Elon Musk 对其“DOGE mission”的热情,引发了 Modi 对印度改革的对比。Modi 表示,印度清理了1亿个虚假或重复的福利身份,通过直接福利转账节省近3万亿卢比,取消4万项不必要的合规要求和近1,500部过时法律,并利用 GeM Portal 提高采购竞争和质量。
9. 中国必须保持竞争,但不能走向冲突
Modi 从文明相互依存出发:印度和中国数百年来彼此学习,佛教将两国连接起来,历史记录还表明,两国曾一度合计占全球 GDP 的50%以上。因此,两国合作不仅是双边问题,也是全球稳定与繁荣的必要条件。
他承认两国存在边界争议,并表示2020年的事件造成了显著紧张。在最近与 Xi 会面后,边境局势正逐步恢复正常,双方正在努力恢复2020年前的状态。不过,他提醒说,信任和活力需要慢慢恢复,因为“中间隔了5年”。
在将21世纪定义为亚洲世纪的同时,Modi 希望两国展开“健康且自然”的竞争。他更大的警告是,COVID 暴露了每个国家的局限,却带来了分裂而非团结;过时的国际机构、无法无天和战争,使合作与发展优于扩张主义。
10. Modi 将古吉拉特邦骚乱与更广泛的执政记录区分开,也将批评与指控区分开
Lex 询问了2002年古吉拉特邦骚乱,并将其描述为造成超过1,000人死亡的印度教徒与穆斯林暴力冲突;他还先指出,印度最高法院已在2012年和2022年两次认定 Modi 与此无关。Modi 没有接受 Lex 的表述,而是重构了此前的政治环境。
他的时间线从1999年 Kandahar 劫机事件开始,经过 Delhi Red Fort 遭袭、2001年9月11日美国遭袭、Jammu and Kashmir Assembly 遭袭,以及印度议会遭袭。Modi 当时刚被任命,正处于地震灾后恢复期,且在几天前才当选邦议会议员,随后于2002年2月27日面对 Godhra 杀戮事件。
Modi 反驳2002年是古吉拉特邦最大骚乱的说法,称此前已有超过250起重大骚乱,1969年的动荡更持续了近6个月。他强调司法机构的结论,并称在此前暴力反复发生之后,过去22年里,古吉拉特邦在发展导向、而非“票仓政治”之下,没有再出现重大骚乱。
他欢迎批评,称批评是“民主的灵魂”,但区分经过调查的批评与无端指控。他用新闻业作比:苍蝇传播污秽,蜜蜂采集花蜜却仍保有强力的蛰刺;新闻应当尖锐揭露不当行为,而蓄意扭曲事实可能“让社会承受数十年的伤害”。
11. 选举信任建立在普惠供给与极限物流之上
Modi 表示,自己在古吉拉特邦和印度执政24年,靠的是让福利平等地触达所有人:无论种姓、信仰、宗教、财富或意识形态,所有应得者都应获得服务。即便仍在等待福利,人们也应相信轮到自己的时候终会到来,因为系统是公平的。“信任是我的治理模式之基石。”
在他的叙述中,治理必须“扎根于人民,而不是选票”。他还表示,自己没有亲属或朋友能够借助职位获利;数百万没有头衔、也没有政治利益的 BJP 志愿者承担组织工作,他们在社区中获得的认可,最终转化为选举信任。
2024年大选登记选民达到9.8亿,Modi 称这一数字超过欧盟人口,是北美的两倍;尽管5月部分地区气温达到40度,仍有6.46亿人投票。整个系统包括超过100万个投票站、2,500多个注册政党,以及900多个全天候播出的新闻频道。
为了保障投票权,印度会动用直升机,在 Arunachal Pradesh 的高海拔地区设立投票站,也会在古吉拉特邦 Gir Forest 为1名选民设站。Modi 强调,尽管规模如此庞大,选举结果仍能在一天内公布,并提出印度选举委员会可以成为全球自由、公平选举管理的案例。
12. 权力被重新定义为服务、工作与摆脱既得利益
Lex 在节目开头表示,尽管亲身接触时觉得 Modi 温和而专注,但他对权力的腐化效应持怀疑态度。Modi 拒绝“强人”这一身份,自称“首席服务者”,说自己从政是为了把事情做成,如今仍然“更关注生产力,而不是权力”。
在 Modi 的“一加一”理念中,孤独并不存在:一个是 Modi,另一个是全能者。疫情期间,这一理念具体体现为他每天大约打40通电话给年龄在70岁以上的党内志愿者,与老同事重新联系,同时询问他们的健康、家人和当地情况。
农民、士兵、劳动者,以及早起晚睡的女性,是他面对疲惫时想到的人:他们的劳作让他反问自己:“我怎么能睡觉?”他反复重申2014年竞选期间作出的3项承诺——绝不在努力程度上落后,绝不出于恶意行事,绝不追求个人利益——并表示自己已经坚持了24年。
13. 快速决策始于广泛输入,终于风险自担
Ramanujan 体现了 Modi 对信息与知识的区分。这位数学家将自己的灵感归于所崇拜的女神;Modi 将其理解为完全沉浸其中,纪律性超过单纯努力。信息可以不断积累,但知识只有经过“处理、反思和理解”才会产生。
Modi 表示,在担任现职之前,他走访过印度85%至90%的地区,获得的是一手知识,而不是书本摘要。他的决策过滤器包括不带个人包袱、“国家第一”,以及 Gandhi 的检验方式:想象最贫困的人,再问这项行动是否会帮助他。
官员从来不是他唯一的信息渠道。Modi 通过众多活跃网络获取信息,像学生一样提出基础问题,在不同叙述相互冲突时扮演唱反调者,并与志同道合的人非正式测试正在形成的想法。这一审议过程依然推进很快,因为它只持续到他形成确信为止。
COVID 期间,经济学家和政党都主张大规模支出和货币发行;Modi 则优先防止饥饿与基本需求得不到满足所引发的紧张。他认为,克制帮助印度避免了严重的疫情后即时通胀,同时强调自己愿意承担个人损失、为失败负责,并告诉民众:“我是人,可能犯错。”
14. 印度的 AI 诉求建立在人才、接入与应用场景之上
Modi 最强烈的技术判断是经过刻意设计的:“无论世界如何发展 AI,没有印度,AI 都不会完整。”Lex 进一步回忆了 Modi 的例子:当图像系统被要求生成一名左撇子写字的人时,系统默认生成右手写字者;被排除的经验会造成系统性的盲点。
Modi 表示,印度正在针对具体场景开发应用,并建立能够扩大 GPU 接入的市场化模式。他以5G为先例:外界曾认为印度落后,但部署开始后,印度却成为全面铺开网络最快的国家。一位美国企业高管告诉他,一则印度工程师招聘广告的规模足以铺满一座足球场。
他将印度高管在全球取得成功归因于对出生地和工作场所同等忠诚、遵守伦理、团队协作、联合大家庭的生活经验,以及管理复杂群体的能力。知识本身并不够;理解他人、调动他人能力的本事,有助于解释印度人在企业、初创公司、创新领域和董事会中的广泛领导力。
Modi 表示,印度开放此前由政府控制的航天领域后,几年内便诞生了200家初创企业,而 Chandrayaan 的成本低于一部好莱坞大片。但他对 AI 的上限判断仍然以人为界:机器可以延展想象力,却无法取代其“无边界的创造力”;他还追问,AI 是否真的能够拥有人的关怀本能。
15. 教育应奖励学习、自信与目标感,而不是排名
Modi 认为,学校和家长把考试排名变成身份地位,让孩子觉得人生取决于10年级和12年级的成绩。他推动的新教育政策希望改变这一点,“Pariksha Pe Charcha”则让他能够直接听取学生、家庭和教育工作者的声音。考试只能评估某一领域,不能评估一个人的全部潜力。
他回忆,一位老师曾布置数出精确数量的鹰嘴豆、米粒和绿豆,把计数和辨认变成游戏。另一间教室用日记奖励连贯的句子;Modi 起初会提前到校写下第一句话,后来故意最后一个到,因为回应他人的内容需要更强的创造力。
职业上的失意,可以通过影响范围重新理解。一个没能成为医生、却成为教师的人,能够“培养出100名医生”,间接服务数百万患者。实际的建议是提升技能,观察分配任务之外的东西,保持自信,并将工作与更大的目标连接起来。
考试韧性在考试之前就开始形成:准备、反复书写练习、深呼吸、慢速阅读和明确分配时间,可以防止坏掉的笔或晃动的板凳变成灾难。终身学习同样要求在场和行动——你无法靠阅读驾驶员传记学会开车,必须“坐到驾驶座后面”,接受风险。
16. 在场感、死亡意识与精神完整性闭合全篇
当被问及是否害怕死亡时,Modi 反问:生命和死亡,哪个更确定?既然死亡不可避免,害怕它只会浪费并不确定的人生。“生命本身就是对死亡的低声承诺”,因此理性的任务,是在死亡到来之前充实并提升生命。
Modi 赞赏 Lex 诵念 Gayatri Mantra,并将其描述为对太阳光辉力量的召唤。随后,他将 Dhyaan 去神秘化,解释为摆脱干扰:在喜马拉雅山中,一位圣人让他忽略鸟鸣和风声,连续数小时聆听水滴从叶片落到倒扣碗上的声音——那是他的“神圣共鸣”。
他选择的咒语从完整性走向普遍福祉:“所有生命都是完整圆环的一部分”,精神关怀不能止于个人。反复出现的终点是“Om shaantih, shaantih, shaantih”——“和平、和平、和平”——Modi 将其视为印度教祈祷的收束,也视为支撑其政治实践的文明伦理。
Lex 在尾声回到 Herman Hesse 的《Siddhartha》:智慧来自直接沉浸,而不是借来的教诲;河流则将生命与时间连接在一起。它留下的实践三要素——“我能思考,我能等待,我能禁食”——成为 Lex 对清晰思考、耐心,以及以更少束缚实现蓬勃人生的总结。
My strength lies not in my name, but in the backing of 1.4 billion Indians and thousands of years of timeless culture and heritage. So wherever I go, I carry with me the essence of thousands of years of Vedic tradition, the timeless teachings of Swami Vivekananda, and the blessings, dreams, and aspirations of 1.4 billion Indians.
When I shake hands with a world leader, it’s not Modi, but 1.4 billion Indians doing so. So this isn’t my strength at all. It is rather the strength of India.
Whenever we speak of peace, the world listens to us, because India is the land of Gautama Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi. Indians aren’t hardwired to espouse strife and conflict. We espouse harmony instead. We seek neither to wage war against nature nor to foster strife among nations. We stand for peace, and wherever we can act as peacemakers, we have gladly embraced that responsibility.
My early life was spent in extreme poverty, but we never really felt the burden of poverty. Someone who is used to wearing fine shoes will feel their absence when they don’t have them. But we had never worn shoes in our lives, so how would we even know that wearing shoes was a big deal? We weren’t in a position to compare. That’s just how we lived.
When I became Prime Minister, I specially invited Pakistan to my swearing-in ceremony so we could turn over a new leaf. Yet every noble attempt at fostering peace was met with hostility and betrayal. We sincerely hope that wisdom prevails upon them and they choose the path of peace. I believe even the people of Pakistan long for peace.
Regarding what you said about criticism and how I deal with it, if I had to summarize it in one sentence, I welcome it. I have a strong belief that criticism is the soul of democracy.
I want to tell all young people the following: No matter how dark the night may seem, it is still just night, and morning is bound to come.
The following is a conversation with Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India. It was one of the most moving conversations and experiences of my life. Allow me here to say a few words about it. Please skip ahead straight to our conversation, if you like.
Narendra Modi’s life story is incredible. He rose from poverty to lead a nation of 1.4 billion people, the biggest democracy in the world, where he won epic-scale elections for Prime Minister three times. As a leader, he fought for ideas that unite his nation of India, a nation composed of a large number of highly varied and disparate cultures and peoples who have a long history marked by religious, social, and political frictions.
He’s known for taking decisive, at times controversial, actions for which he’s loved by hundreds of millions of people and also criticized by many. We discuss all of this at length in this conversation. On the world stage, he’s respected as a peacemaker and friend by most major world leaders, even those whose nations are at war with each other, from the United States to China, to Ukraine and Russia, to Israel, Palestine, and the Middle East, and everywhere else.
At this moment in history, it’s clear, at least to me, that the flourishing of human civilization hangs in the balance, with several wars on the brink of escalation to regional and even global conflict, rising tensions between nuclear powers, technological developments from AI to nuclear fusion that aim to completely transform society and geopolitics as we know it, and, of course, generally increasing political and cultural turmoil.
So now more than ever, we need great leaders, great peacemakers, who build bridges, not destroy them; who may preserve the identity of their nations, but still celebrate the common humanity of all of us, all people on Earth. For this and many other reasons, this conversation with Prime Minister Modi was one of the most remarkable I’ve ever had.
You may hear such words and think that I’m just enamored by power or access. No, never was, never will be. I do not idolize anyone, especially those in power. I’m generally skeptical of power, money, and fame because of their natural corrupting influence on the mind, the heart, and the soul of a person.
The whole point of all the conversations I’ve had in my life, on mic and off mic, is that I try to see and explore the full complexity of every human being, the good and the bad. I believe we’re all the same in a deep, fundamental sense: all capable of good, all capable of evil, and all carrying stories of pain and stories of hope, whether you’re a world leader or a truck driver, a coal miner or a farmer in the American Midwest.
By the way, I will be talking to a lot of the latter kind of folk this year, off mic and maybe even on mic, as I travel the United States and the world. My brief statements here about Narendra Modi are about both him as a leader and, especially, him as a human being.
In the extensive time I spent with him, I spoke with him off mic and on mic. It was a deeply personal human interaction characterized by warmth, kindness, humor, inner and outer peace, and absolute focus on the conversation between us in the present moment, as if nothing else existed. I have heard from many people that he treats everyone he meets in this empathic way, no matter where they come from or what their position is in this world. For those and many other reasons, this really was an incredible experience I will never forget.
Oh, and by the way, we made captions and voiceover audio tracks available in English, Hindi, and other languages. You can also listen to the original mixed-language version where I speak English and Prime Minister Modi speaks Hindi. Separately, you can choose to turn on subtitles in your preferred language. On YouTube, you can switch between language audio tracks by clicking the Settings gear icon, then clicking Audio Track, and then selecting the language you prefer. For fully English overdub, select English, for fully Hindi overdub, select Hindi, and to listen to the original mixed-language version, where I speak English and Prime Minister Modi Speaks Hindi, please select Hindi Latin audio track. So you can listen either to a version that is all one language, or to the original mixed-language version with subtitles in your preferred language, the default is English overdub. All thanks to ElevenLabs and a great team of translators, we do our best to bring the Prime Minister's voice to life with AI voice cloning in English. I promise that we will continue to work very hard to break down the barriers that language creates, and try to make these conversations as accessible as possible to everyone in the world. Anyway, let me pause one more time to say a big thank you. What a wild ride this life has been. It's an honor for me to be on it with all of you. I love you all. This is the "Lex Fridman Podcast." And now, dear friends, here's the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi.
So, I should also say, I’m fasting right now. It’s been almost 2 days—45 hours. Just water, no food, in honor of this conversation, to get into the right mindset, to get to the spiritual level. I’ve read that you often fast for many days. Can you explain why you fast and where your mind goes when you fast?
First of all, I’m truly, pleasantly surprised and honored that you’re fasting, all the more because it feels like you’re fasting as a tribute of respect for me. So I express my deepest gratitude to you for doing this.
In India, our religious traditions are actually a way of life. Our Supreme Court once gave a brilliant interpretation of Hinduism. They stated that Hinduism is not about rituals or methods of worship, but rather a way of living—a philosophy that guides life itself.
In our scriptures, there is deep discussion on elevating the body, mind, intellect, soul, and humanity. They outline various paths, traditions, and systems to achieve this, and fasting is one of them.
But fasting alone isn’t everything. In India, whether you see it culturally or philosophically, fasting is a way to cultivate discipline. If I put it in simple terms, or explain it to viewers who are unfamiliar with India, it is a powerful tool to bring both the inner and outer self into balance. It shapes life in profound ways.
When you fast, you may have noticed—as you said, you’ve been fasting on water for 2 days—every single one of your senses, especially smell, touch, and taste, becomes highly sensitive. You may even notice the subtle aroma of water itself, something you probably never noticed before when drinking it.
If someone walks past you carrying tea, you will catch its aroma, just as you would with coffee. A small flower you’ve seen before, you will see it again today, but now you can perceive its details more vividly. Your senses become extra sharp, highly aware, and fully tuned in. Their capacity to observe and respond multiplies and grows sharper. I have personally often experienced this.
Another thing I’ve experienced is that fasting can greatly accelerate the thinking process and give a fresh perspective. You start thinking outside the box. I don’t know if everyone experiences this, but I certainly do.
Most people assume that fasting simply means giving up food or not eating. But that’s just the physical aspect of fasting. If someone is forced to go without food due to hardship, with an empty stomach, can we call that fasting?
Fasting is actually a scientific process. Whenever I fast for an extended period, I prepare my body in advance. For 5 to 7 days before the fast, I follow various Ayurvedic and yoga practices, along with other traditional cleansing methods, to internally reset my system.
Before actually beginning the fast, I make sure to drink a lot of water, as much as possible. So you could say that this detoxification process helps prepare my body in the best possible way.
Once I begin fasting, for me, it’s an act of devotion. For me, fasting is a form of self-discipline. Even while I go about my daily activities during a fast, my mind remains deeply introspective and focused inward.
That experience is profoundly transformative for me. My practice of fasting didn’t come from reading books, listening to sermons, or following a tradition just because my family happened to have observed it. It came from my own personal experience.
During my school days, there was a movement inspired by Mahatma Gandhi’s vision of cow protection. The government had not enacted any laws at the time. People across the country observed a one-day fast by gathering in public places in silent protest. We were just kids; we had probably just finished primary school. Something inside me said, “I should be part of this.” That was the first time in my life I experienced fasting.
At such a young age, I felt neither hunger nor any desire for food. Instead, I felt a new awareness, a surge of energy within me. So, I became convinced that fasting is a science, far beyond just skipping meals. It is something far greater than that. Then, gradually, I refined my body and mind through various experiments. Over time, it became a long and disciplined journey for me.
And one thing is certain: fasting never slows me down. I work just as much as usual; sometimes I even work more. Another fascinating thing I’ve noticed is that when I need to express my thoughts, I’m amazed at where they come from and how they flow. It’s truly an incredible experience.
Yeah. So you still do meetings with world leaders, you still manage the affairs of India, and you still carry out your role as a leader on the world stage, all while fasting—sometimes for 9 days?
Well, this practice has a long historical context. I hope it may be interesting for those listening. There is an ancient tradition in India called Chaturmas. During the monsoon season, we know that digestion tends to slow down. So, during this season, many people in India follow the practice of eating only a single meal within 24 hours.
For me, this starts around mid-June and goes on until after Diwali, around November. For about 4 to 4½ months, I follow this tradition of eating only once in 24 hours. Then comes the Navratri festival in India, which usually falls in September or October. During this time, the whole country celebrates Durga Puja, a festival of strength, devotion, and spiritual discipline. This lasts for 9 days.
During this time, I completely abstain from food and only drink hot water, although drinking hot water has always been a part of my daily routine. My past lifestyle was such that I naturally developed this habit over time. Then, in March or April, another Navratri occurs, called Chaitra Navratri. This year, it will likely begin around March 31.
During this 9-day fast, I eat only 1 specific fruit, once a day. So, if, let’s say, I choose papaya, then for all 9 days I won’t touch anything else—just papaya. I eat that only once a day. That’s how I follow my 9-day fasting routine.
So, there are numerous fasts I keep throughout the year, and this has become a deeply ingrained tradition in my life. Perhaps I can say that I’ve been following these practices for 50 to 55 years.
Have there been times when you met with a world leader and completely fasted? And maybe what do they think about that? What do they think about your ability to do that kind of thing?
And you’re right, I should mention that even after 2 days, my ability to be present, my ability to sense everything sharply, and my focus on this experience are elevated. But yes, are there stories with a world leader that come to mind when you were fasting?
Well, most of the time, I don’t even let people know about it. It’s my personal matter. So, I never publicized it, but people gradually started finding out. It became known only after I became chief minister and prime minister. Otherwise, it was purely personal.
But now that it’s out in the open, I don’t mind sharing. If someone asks, I tell them, so it might be useful to them. Because it’s not my personal property; it’s my experience. And if that can help someone, why not share it? After all, my life has always been devoted to the well-being of others.
For example, after I became prime minister, I had a bilateral meeting at the White House with President Obama, and he had also arranged a formal dinner. Then, as discussions between the 2 governments progressed, someone said, “Please, join us for dinner.” To which another replied, “But the prime minister doesn’t eat.” This left them a bit concerned. How do you host the leader of such a major nation at the White House without serving food?
When we sat down, they brought me a glass of hot water. I turned to President Obama and jokingly said, “Look, my dinner has arrived!” as I placed the glass in front of me. Later, when I visited again, he still remembered. He smiled and said, “Last time, you were fasting. This time, we’re having lunch. Since you’re not fasting, you’ll have to eat twice as much!”
Let’s go to the beginning. You rose from humble beginnings to lead the world’s largest democracy. I think there are a lot of people for whom this is truly inspiring. Your family was of very modest means, and you grew up in a 1-room house with a mud floor, with your whole family living there. Tell me about your childhood. How did those humble beginnings shape your outlook on life?
My birthplace is in Gujarat, specifically in North Gujarat, in Mehsana District, in a small town called Vadnagar. Historically, this town holds great significance. Vadnagar is where I was born and completed my early education.
Looking at the world as I understand it today, I can reflect on my childhood and the unique environment I grew up in. My village had certain fascinating aspects, some of which are quite rare, even globally. When I was in school, there was an elder in our village who would regularly tell students, “Listen, kids, wherever you go, if you find a carved stone or a stone with inscriptions on it, or anything with engravings, bring it and place it in this corner of the school.”
Over time, my curiosity grew, and I realized that my village had a rich and ancient history. Discussions at school often revealed more fascinating details about its past. Later, I learned that China had even made a film about it. I had read in a newspaper about a film that mentioned the Chinese philosopher Hiuen Tsang, who had spent a considerable amount of time in my village many centuries ago. Back then, it was a major center for Buddhist learning. That’s how I first learned about it.
And perhaps, around the 1400s, it was a prominent Buddhist educational hub. There was a Victory Monument from the 12th century, a temple from the 17th century, and in the 16th century, two sisters, Tana and Riri, who were renowned musicians. As I uncovered these historical traces, I grasped the depth of our heritage.
So, when I became chief minister, I initiated large-scale excavation projects. The findings from these very projects confirmed that thousands of Buddhist monks had, at one time, studied there. It was a place where Buddhist, Jain, and Hindu traditions coexisted harmoniously. For us, history wasn’t just confined to books. Every stone spoke, and every wall had a story to tell.
When we began the large-scale excavation work, we uncovered findings that hold immense historical significance. So far, they have discovered evidence dating back 2,800 years, proving that this city has remained unbroken and eternal for all those 2,800 years. They have discovered solid proof of how its development unfolded over these centuries.
Now, an international-level museum has been established there and is open to visitors. Especially for archaeology students, it has become a major area of study. So, the place where I was born holds its own unique historical significance. I see it as my good fortune; some things in life unfold beyond our understanding.
Kashi became my karmabhoomi. Now Kashi is also eternal. Kashi, also known as Banaras or Varanasi, is an eternal city that has remained vibrant and alive for centuries. Perhaps it was some divine design that led a boy born in Vadnagar to eventually make Kashi his karmabhoomi, living in the embrace of Mother Ganga.
When I think about my family—my father, my mother, my siblings, my uncles, aunts, and grandparents—we all grew up together in a small house. The place we lived was likely even smaller than where we are sitting now. There was no window, just a small door. That’s where I was born, and that’s where I grew up.
Now, when people talk about poverty, it’s natural to discuss it in the context of public life. By those standards, my early life was spent in extreme poverty. But we never really felt the burden of poverty. You see, someone who is used to wearing fine shoes will feel their absence when they don’t have them. But for us, we had never worn shoes in our lives, so how would we even know that wearing shoes was a big deal? We weren’t in a position to compare. That’s just how we lived.
Our mother worked incredibly hard, and so did my father. He was also extremely disciplined. Every morning, around 4:00 or 4:30 a.m., he would leave the house, walk long distances, visit several temples, and then reach his shop. He wore traditional leather shoes handmade in the village. The shoes were very tough and sturdy, making a distinct “tok tok tok” sound when he walked.
People in the village used to say that they could tell the time just by hearing his footsteps. “Oh yes,” they would say, “Mr. Damodar is on his way!” Such was his discipline. He worked tirelessly, late into the night. Our mother, too, ensured that we never felt the struggles of our circumstances.
But despite everything, these challenging circumstances of living in scarcity never left a mark on our minds. I remember that, in school, the idea of wearing shoes never even crossed my mind. One day, while I was on my way to school, I ran into my uncle. He saw me and was surprised. “Hey! You go to school like this? Without shoes?”
So, at that time, he bought me a pair of canvas shoes and made me wear them.
Back then, they must have cost around 10 or 12 rupees. But here’s the thing: they were white canvas shoes, and they would quickly get stained. So what did I do? In the evening, after school was over, I would stay back for a while. I would go from classroom to classroom, collecting leftover pieces of chalk that the teachers had discarded.
I would take the pieces of chalk home, soak them in water, mix them into a paste, and polish my canvas shoes with it, making them bright white again. For me, those shoes were a treasured possession, a symbol of great wealth. I don’t exactly know why, but from childhood, our mother was extremely particular about cleanliness. Perhaps that’s where we inherited that habit too.
I’m not sure how I picked up the habit of dressing neatly, but it’s been there since childhood. Whatever I wore, I made sure it looked proper. Back then, as you can imagine, we didn’t have any arrangements for ironing clothes. So instead, I would heat up water in a copper pot, hold it with tongs, and press my clothes myself. Then I’d head off to school.
That’s how I lived, and I found joy in it. We never thought about being poor or judged how others lived or what their struggles were. We lived carefree, enjoying whatever little we had, and kept working hard. Never once did we complain about these things.
All these aspects of my life, whether you call them fortune or misfortune, unfolded in such a way in politics that they started coming to light. When I was taking my oath as chief minister, TV reporters went to my village, questioned my childhood friends, and went to capture videos of my home. That’s when people started asking, “Who is this, and what background is he coming from?” Before that, very few people knew much about my life. That’s just how my journey has been.
My mother possessed an innate spirit of caring for others’ well-being; it was woven into the very fabric of her being. She possessed knowledge of traditional remedies and healing practices and would treat children with these remedies. Every morning, before sunrise, around 5 o’clock, she would start treating them. So all the children and their parents would gather at our home, with little children crying, and we had to wake up early because of it.
Meanwhile, my mother would continue treating them with care. This spirit of service, in a way, was nurtured through these experiences. A sense of empathy for society and the desire to do good for others—these values were instilled in me by my family. I believe that my life has been shaped by my mother, my father, my teachers, and the environment I grew up in.
There are a lot of young people listening to this who are truly inspired by your story, from those humble beginnings to becoming the leader of the biggest democracy in the world. What can you tell those young folks who are struggling, who are lost in the world, and who are trying to find their way? What advice could you give them?
I want to tell all young people the following: No matter how dark the night may seem, it is still just night, and morning is bound to come. That’s why we need patience and self-confidence. Yes, the challenges are real, but I am not defined by my circumstances. I am here for a purpose, sent by a higher power. And I am not alone; the one who sent me is always with me. This unwavering faith should always remain within us.
Difficulties are a test of endurance; they are not meant to defeat me. Hardships exist to make me stronger, helping me grow and improve, not to leave me hopeless or discouraged. Personally, I see every crisis, every challenge, as an opportunity. So, to all young people, I say, “Have patience. There are no shortcuts in life.”
At our railway stations, there hangs a sign for those who habitually cross the tracks instead of using the bridge. It reads, “Shortcut will cut you short.” I would tell young people the same: “Shortcut will cut you short.” There are no shortcuts in life. Patience and perseverance are essential.
Whatever responsibility we are given, we must pour our heart into it. We should live it with passion, enjoy the journey, and find fulfillment in it. I truly believe that if this mindset is cultivated, it transforms life. Similarly, abundance alone is not enough; there is no guarantee of success.
Even a wealthy person who indulges in comfort and idleness will eventually wither away. Instead, he must decide, “Yes, I may have resources around me, but I must use my abilities to grow them further. I must contribute more to society with my own strength.” Even if I am in a good position, there is still so much more to do. Even if I am not in a good position, there is still so much work to do. That’s what I believe.
I have also noticed that some people tend to think, “I’ve learned enough, that’s it.” But one should never let the student within them die. Learning should never stop. I believe that as long as I am alive, I must have a purpose. Perhaps I exist to keep learning, to keep growing.
My mother tongue is Gujarati, and we were not very familiar with the Hindi language. Nor did we know how to speak it eloquently or communicate effectively. But as a child, I used to sit at my father’s tea shop. At that young age, I got the chance to meet so many people. Every time, I learned something from them.
I observed their ways of speaking and their expressions. These things taught me a lot. Even though I wasn’t in a position to apply them then, I thought, “If I ever get the chance, why not? Why shouldn’t I present myself well?” So I believe the desire to learn should always remain alive.
Another thing I’ve observed is that most people dream about achieving something or becoming someone. They set big targets, and when they fall short, they feel disappointed. That’s why, whenever I get a chance to talk to my friends, I tell them, “Instead of dreaming about getting and becoming, dream of doing something.”
If you focus on doing something, and let’s say your goal is to reach 10 but you make it to 8, you won’t feel discouraged. You’ll still work toward 10 with determination. But if your dream is only to become something and it doesn’t happen, even your achievements may feel like a burden.
That’s why we must adjust our mindset in life. Instead of thinking about what I got or didn’t get, the mindset should be, “What can I give?” Because true contentment doesn’t bloom on its own; it grows from the depths of what you give.
I should say that, as a young kid, one of the things I dreamed of doing was this very thing: talking to you today. So this is very surreal. At 17, another fascinating part of your life began: you left home and spent 2 years roaming in the Himalayas, searching for purpose, for deeper truth, for God.
Not much is known about this period of your life. You lived a nomadic, minimalist existence, very much like a yogi, often sleeping without a roof over your head. What are some memorable spiritual moments, rituals, or experiences from that time?
It seems like you’ve put in a lot of effort. Look, I don’t usually talk much about this, but I can share a few external aspects of it. I grew up in a very small town. Our life was all about being part of a community. We lived among people, surrounded by them; that was just how life was.
There was a library in the village, and I used to go there often to read books. Whenever I read something in the books, I often found myself feeling inspired, thinking, “Why shouldn’t I shape my own life like that?” That desire was always there. When I used to read about Swami Vivekananda or Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, I would often wonder: How did they live? How did they build such remarkable lives?
For that reason, I constantly experimented on myself. Most of my experiments were physical in nature, testing my body’s limits. For example, where I lived, winters weren’t too harsh, but December nights could get quite cold. At night, the cold would bite; it was natural. So sometimes, I would decide to sleep outside in the open, with nothing to cover myself, just to see how my body would endure the cold.
From a very young age, I would often experiment with my body, and this became a regular thing for me. For me, going to the library, reading extensively, visiting the pond, washing the family’s clothes, and swimming became part of my routine. Swimming was my main physical activity. All of these things were deeply connected to my life.
Later, as I read Vivekananda, I became even more drawn to his teachings. One time, I read about Swami Vivekananda. His mother was ill, so he went to Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa for guidance. He would argue with him and debate with him. In his early days, he would often question everything intellectually.
He said, “My mother is sick. If I were earning, I could take better care of her.” Sri Ramakrishna said, “Don’t bother me with all this. Go to Goddess Kali. She is there. Ask her for what you need.”
Swami Vivekananda went and sat before Goddess Kali’s idol for hours, immersing himself in deep meditation. After a few hours, when he returned, Ramakrishna asked him, “So, did you request the goddess?” Swami Vivekananda replied, “No, I didn’t.” Ramakrishna said, “Go again tomorrow. She will fulfill your request. Ask her!”
He went the next day, and then again the day after. But each time, he found himself unable to ask for anything. His mother was unwell, and he needed help, but when he sat before Goddess Kali, he was completely absorbed in her presence. And yet, he could not bring himself to ask for anything. Each time, he returned empty-handed.
He told Sri Ramakrishna, “I came back empty-handed. I didn’t ask for anything.” To stand before the Divine Goddess and not be able to ask for anything—that moment, that experience, lit a flame inside him. There was a spark in his life, and from that came the spirit of giving. I believe that perhaps that small incident in Vivekananda’s life left an impression on me too: the thought of, “What can I give to the world?” Maybe true contentment comes from giving.
If my heart is only filled with the hunger to receive, that hunger will never end. Within that realization came the idea of Shiva and living beings as one: if you wish to serve Shiva, serve all living beings. Recognize the unity between the divine and the living. True non-duality is experienced through this realization.
I would often lose myself in such thoughts, my mind naturally drifting in that direction. I remember an incident. In the neighborhood where we lived, just outside, there was a Lord Shiva temple. One day, a saint came to stay there. He used to engage in meditation and spiritual practices, and I started feeling drawn to him, thinking that perhaps he possessed some spiritual energy. I had only read about Swami Vivekananda; I had never seen such figures in real life.
During Navratri, he was fasting, and he had placed jowar grains on his hand, a common tradition in our culture. In a way, it involves sprouting seeds on your palms and sleeping like that for 9 or 10 days. It was a kind of spiritual vow, and this saint was observing it.
During those same days, my maternal uncle’s family was preparing for my aunt’s wedding. Everyone from my home was going to my uncle’s house for the wedding. For any child, visiting an uncle’s house is always exciting. But I told my family, “I’m not going. I’ll stay here, and I will take care of Swamiji.”
Since he had these grains on his hand, he couldn’t eat or drink, so I would take care of him. As a child, I chose not to attend the wedding. I stayed back, serving Swamiji instead. Somehow, my mind was naturally drawn in that direction.
At times, whenever soldiers from my village came home during their holidays, they would walk around in their uniforms with such pride. I would run behind them all day, thinking, “Look at them! They are serving the nation.” There was always a strong feeling inside me to do something meaningful.
I didn’t fully understand what it would be, and I didn’t have a roadmap. There was a hunger within me, a deep longing to understand life and explore its meaning. So I just set out and began the journey.
During my time in the mission, I came across remarkable saints. They showered me with love and blessings. Among them, I formed a special bond with Swami Atmasthananda Ji. He lived for nearly 100 years, a life full of wisdom and service.
In his final years, I deeply wished for him to stay with me at the Prime Minister’s residence. But his responsibilities were vast, and he couldn’t come. However, back when I was Chief Minister, he used to visit, and I was fortunate to receive his blessings and guidance.
He once looked at me and said, “Why have you come here? You have a greater purpose to fulfill. Is your priority your own well-being, or is it the welfare of society?” Whatever Swami Vivekananda said was for the betterment of society. He said, “You are meant to serve others.”
I remember feeling a bit disheartened at that moment. I had come seeking guidance, but all I got were words. So I continued on my journey, wandering from place to place.
I spent time in the Himalayas, embracing the solitude of the mountains. I met many remarkable individuals along the way. Some were great ascetics, people who had renounced everything. But still, my mind remained restless. Perhaps it was my age—a time of curiosity, of wanting to learn and understand.
It was a new experience, a world shaped by the mountains, by ice, and by the towering, snow-covered peaks. But all of this played a huge role in shaping me. It strengthened me from within and enabled me to discover my inner power.
Practicing meditation, waking up in the sacred pre-dawn hours, bathing in the cold, serving people with devotion, and naturally tending to elderly saints became a seamless part of who I was. Once, a natural calamity struck the region, and I immediately devoted myself to helping the villagers.
These were the saints and spiritual masters with whom I stayed from time to time. I never remained in one place for long. I kept moving, constantly wandering. That was the kind of life I lived.
For people who don’t know about that moment in the Ramakrishna Mission ashram with the monk Swami Atmasthananda, as you mentioned, he helped steer you toward a life of service. There is another possible life that could have been, where you take sannyasa, give away everything, and become a monk. We could have had a monk Narendra Modi and a Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He helped you make the decision to live a life of service at every scale.
From the outside, people may call me a leader. Some call me the Prime Minister, and others call me the Chief Minister. That’s how they see me from their perspective. But deep within, there is only an unwavering spiritual commitment.
The Modi who lovingly helped his mother care for children during their treatments, tending to them with patience and compassion; the Modi who wandered through the Himalayas; and the Modi who now works from this seat of responsibility—they are all tied together by the same inner consistency. Every action is dedicated to serving others.
People may see a stark difference between a saint and a leader, but to me, there is no real difference. Yes, the attire changes, the way of life changes, the words spoken throughout the day shift, and the nature of the work evolves. But the core of my being remains unchanged, carrying out every responsibility with the same sense of calm focus and dedication.
Another part of your life, of who you are, is that you’ve spoken your whole life about putting your nation of India above all else. When you were 8, you joined the RSS, which espouses the idea of Hindu nationalism. Can you tell me about the RSS and what impact it had on who you are and the development of your political ideas?
Ever since childhood, I always had the habit of staying engaged in something or other. I remember there was a man named Makoshi, I don’t quite recall his full name, I think he was part of the service group, Makoshi Soni or something like that. He used to carry a small drum-like instrument called a tambourine with him. And he used to sing patriotic songs in his deep, powerful voice.
Whenever he came to our village, he would hold programs in different places. I would run after him like a crazy fan just to listen to his songs. I would spend entire nights listening to his patriotic songs. I enjoyed it. I don’t even know why, but I just did.
In our village, there was a shakha of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, where we played sports and sang patriotic songs. Something about those songs touched me deeply; they stirred something inside me. That’s how I eventually became part of the RSS.
One of the core values instilled in us at the RSS was: whatever you do, do it with a purpose. Even while studying, study with the goal of learning enough to contribute to the nation. Even when you exercise, do it with the purpose of strengthening your body to serve the nation. This is what we were taught.
Today, the RSS is a massive organization. It is now nearing its 100th anniversary. Such a massive volunteer organization likely doesn’t exist anywhere else in the world. Millions of people are connected to it. But understanding the RSS is not that simple. One must make an effort to truly grasp the nature of its work.
More than anything, the RSS provides you with a clear direction toward what can truly be called a purpose in life. Secondly, the nation is everything, and serving the people is akin to serving God. This is what has been said since the Vedic era, what our sages have said, what Vivekananda said, and what the RSS echoes.
A volunteer is told that the inspiration he gains from the RSS is not just about attending the one-hour session or wearing the uniform. What matters is what you do for society.
Today, inspired by that spirit, many initiatives are thriving. For example, some volunteers established an organization called Seva Bharti. This organization serves the slums and settlements where the poorest people live, which they call service communities. To my knowledge, they run approximately 125,000 service projects without any government assistance, solely through community support.
They spend time there, teach the children, care for their health, instill good values, and work toward improving cleanliness in these communities. Running 125,000 social service projects is no small feat.
Similarly, some volunteers nurtured by the RSS are dedicated to serving tribal communities through the Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram. They live among the tribal people, working for their welfare. They have established more than 70,000 one-teacher schools in remote tribal regions.
There are also some people in America who show their support for this cause and contribute donations of about $10 or $15. They say, “Skip a Coca-Cola this month. Don’t drink Coca-Cola, and donate that money to a one-teacher school instead.” Now imagine 70,000 one-teacher schools dedicated to educating tribal children.
Some volunteers have founded Vidya Bharati to revolutionize education. Today, they run nearly 25,000 schools, educating around 3 million students. I believe that millions of students have benefited from this initiative, receiving quality education at an incredibly low cost.
Alongside education, values are prioritized, and students remain grounded, learning skills so they don’t become a burden on society. In every aspect of life—whether it’s women, youth, or even laborers—the RSS has played a role.
In terms of membership size, if I may say so, we have The Indian Labor Union. It has around 50,000 unions, with millions of members across the country. Perhaps, in terms of scale, there is no bigger labor union in the world.
But what’s interesting is the approach they take. Historically, leftist ideologies have fueled labor movements worldwide. What has been their slogan? “Workers of the world, unite!” The message was clear: unite first, and then we’ll deal with everything else.
But what do the labor unions run by RSS-trained volunteers believe in? They say, “Workers unite the world.” Others say, “Workers of the world, unite,” and we say, “Workers unite the world.” It may seem like just a small shift in words, but it represents a huge ideological transformation.
The volunteers who come from the RSS follow their own interests, nature, and inclination, and in doing so, they strengthen and promote these kinds of activities. When you observe these initiatives, you’ll see how, over the past 100 years, the RSS has dedicated itself with the discipline and devotion of a seeker, staying away from the glare of mainstream attention.
I feel blessed to gain life’s values from such a sacred organization. Through the RSS, I found a life of purpose. Then, I was fortunate to spend some time among the saints, which gave me a strong spiritual foundation. I found discipline and a life of purpose, and through the guidance of saints, I gained spiritual grounding.
Swami Atmasthananda and others like him have held my hand throughout my journey, constantly guiding me at every step. The teachings of Ramakrishna Mission, Swami Vivekananda, and the service-driven philosophy of the RSS have played a crucial role in shaping me.
But they’ve also helped push the idea of India. What is the idea that unifies India? What is India as a nation? What is the foundational idea that unites all of these disparate worlds, communities, and cultures? What would it be?
Look, India is a cultural identity. It is a civilization that dates back thousands of years. Consider the vastness of India: over 100 languages and thousands of dialects. India is so diverse that we have a saying: every 20 miles, the language changes. Customs change, cuisine changes, and even clothing styles shift from region to region.
From the south to the north, you will see immense diversity across the country. But if you dig a little deeper, you will find a common thread. For example, the stories of Lord Ram can be heard everywhere in India. His name echoes in every corner of the country.
If you look closely, from Tamil Nadu to Jammu and Kashmir, you will always find people whose names include “Ram” in some form. In Gujarat, he might be called “Ram Bhai”; in Tamil Nadu, “Ramachandran”; in Maharashtra, “Ram Bhau.” This unique cultural bond is what unites India as one civilization.
Take something as simple as bathing in water. We have a ritual where all the rivers of India are remembered. They chant, “I am bathing with the waters of all these rivers: Ganga, Yamuna, Godavari, Saraswati, Narmada, Sindhu, Kaveri.” It’s a sentiment that unites a nation.
We have a long tradition of making such resolutions at the beginning of important events and rituals. The resolution itself can present a historical record and, in so doing, serve as a way of collecting and preserving historical data. It has been an incredibly unique system, guided meticulously by our scriptures.
When someone makes a resolution or performs a puja, or even during weddings, we start by invoking the entire universe, beginning with Jambudweep, Bharatkhand, Aryavrat, and gradually narrow it down to the village. Then we mention the specific family, and finally, we invoke the family deity. This practice is still alive, happening daily in every corner of India.
But sadly, Western and global models began viewing nations only as administrative systems. India, however, has had a variety of administrative systems throughout history. Many systems were fragmented, scattered, and varied across regions. Kings and rulers were numerous, but India’s unity lay in cultural bonds.
Pilgrimage traditions played a key role in preserving this unity. Shankaracharya established the 4 pilgrimage sites. Even today, millions of people travel from one place to another for pilgrimage. In Kashi, you’ll find people who bring water from Rameshwaram to Kashi and take water from Kashi to Rameshwaram.
Even if you look at our Hindu calendar, you’ll find so many things across the country that you can’t even imagine.
If we look at the historical foundation of modern India, along with yourself, Mahatma Gandhi is one of the most important humans to have ever lived, and certainly one of the most important humans in the history of India. What do you admire about Mahatma Gandhi?
As I had mentioned before, I was born in Gujarat, and Gujarati is my mother tongue. Mahatma Gandhi was also born in Gujarat. His native language was Gujarati, too. He pursued a career as an attorney and lived overseas for several years. He had plenty of great opportunities.
But the deep sense of duty within him, along with the values instilled by his family, led him to give up all comforts and devote his life to serving the people of India. He joined the struggle for India’s independence. To this day, he continues to deeply influence the life of every Indian in some way.
Mahatma Gandhi tried to live by his principles and practiced what he preached. For example, he strongly advocated for cleanliness and practiced it himself. He made it a point to discuss cleanliness wherever he went.
Another key factor to consider is India’s fight for independence. India was ruled by the Mughals, the British, and several other foreign powers. Despite being bound by the shackles of colonial rule for centuries, the flame of independence burned brightly in every corner and nook of India, never fading, always fueling the desire for freedom.
Millions of people sacrificed their lives so the light of freedom could shine on India. They laid down their lives for freedom, sacrificing their youth behind prison walls. Mahatma Gandhi also fought for India’s independence, but in his own way.
Indeed, the other freedom fighters were brave warriors and devoted sons of Mother India. They came, they fought, and their martyrdom immortalized them. They did indeed have a lasting impact. But it was Mahatma Gandhi who awakened a nation, leading a mass movement fueled by truth.
He wove even a sweeper into the very fabric of the freedom struggle. He told teachers their work was part of the freedom struggle. He told the people spinning thread and weaving clothes they were freedom fighters. He told those tending to lepers that their service was a step toward India’s freedom.
He viewed every task as a vital thread in the fabric of India’s independence movement. This transformed India’s common man into a soldier in the quest for freedom. Gandhi forged a mass movement so immense that the British could never fully grasp it.
The British never imagined that a pinch of salt from the Dandi March could spark a massive revolution, and he made it happen. His life, presence, style, and mannerisms all left a profound impact. I have seen many of his stories evolve into timeless legends.
I recall an incident from a Round Table Conference. I believe he was attending a Round Table Conference. He was supposed to meet King George at Buckingham Palace. Draped in his breechcloth, Mahatma Gandhi made his way to the palace. Many people were amazed that he had shown up in that attire to meet the King.
Gandhi remarked that he didn’t need to wear a lot of clothes. He said, “Your King is wearing enough clothes for the both of us.” This was the whimsical charm of his nature.
Mahatma Gandhi possessed many remarkable qualities. His call for unity and recognition of the people’s strength still resonates with me. In everything I do, I strive to include the common man and to ensure the participation of as many as possible. I don’t believe in leaving everything to the government. I am a firm believer in the power of social change.
He was probably one of the greatest leaders of the 20th century. You are one of the greatest leaders of the 21st century. Those 2 centuries are very different, and you have been masterful in the game, in the art of geopolitics.
So, let me ask you: when negotiating on the world stage with super-powerful nations, is it better to be loved or feared? It seems like you are a master class in being loved by everybody, but everybody knows and feels the strength. Finding that balance—can you speak to that balance?
First and foremost, I don’t think this is a fair comparison. Mahatma Gandhi wasn’t just a 20th-century leader. His relevance transcends centuries. Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy will last for centuries to come, and he remains relevant to date.
As far as I am concerned, I have a responsibility to fulfill. Yet, the weight of that responsibility pales in comparison to my country. I am nowhere near as great as my country. My strength lies not in my name, but in the backing of 1.4 billion Indians and thousands of years of timeless culture and heritage.
So, wherever I go, I carry with me the essence of thousands of years of Vedic tradition, the timeless teachings of Swami Vivekananda, and the blessings, dreams, and aspirations of 1.4 billion Indians. When I shake hands with a world leader, it’s not Modi, but 1.4 billion Indians doing so. So, this isn’t my strength at all. It is rather the strength of India.
You see, I recall something that happened all the way back in 2013. It was when my party declared I would be their prime ministerial candidate. My critics often tried to corner me on one point. It became a topic of widespread discussion.
“Modi is nothing more than a state leader. What does he know of foreign policy? Does he even understand global geopolitics?” This was on everyone’s lips, and I was asked this question in every interview.
I gave a well-thought-out answer at the time. I said, “I won’t lay out my entire foreign policy in an interview, nor is it needed. That said, India will neither allow itself to be looked down upon, nor will it ever look up to anyone. India will now see eye-to-eye with her counterparts.”
This was my belief in 2013, and it still lies at the heart of my foreign policy. For me, the country always comes first. However, belittling someone or speaking ill of others is neither part of my cultural values nor my traditions.
Moreover, our culture upholds and advocates for the welfare of mankind. India has always championed the ideas of global peace and brotherhood. For centuries, we have envisioned the world as one big family. Our noble ancestors envisaged the welfare of the whole world and universe.
And that’s why you must have noticed the nature of our conversations, as well as the ideas that I have presented on the global stage, which are rooted in respect and positivity. For example, I spoke about the environment in one of my speeches. I proposed the concept of “One Sun, One World, One Grid.” During the COVID pandemic, I delivered a speech at the G20 Summit. I put forth the vision of “One Earth, One Health,” where humans and nature would live in harmony.
And I have always worked toward this. We hosted the G20 Summit with the motto, “One Earth, One Family, One Future.” We have inherited this timeless wisdom, and it’s our duty to share it with the world. To give you an example, I have advocated for embracing renewable energy. We founded the International Solar Alliance with the motto, “One Sun, One World, One Grid.”
Even when it comes to global healthcare, I had proposed “One Earth, One Health.” This initiative extends not only to humans but also to all flora and fauna. I have always aimed to initiate efforts that foster global well-being, and the global community needs to join hands to accomplish that.
We must also understand that the world has become one small village today. No country can thrive in isolation. Today, we all depend upon one another. No one can make it far by themselves. That is why you must learn to synchronize with everyone, and everyone else must learn to synchronize with you. That’s the only way to propel this initiative forward.
Organizations like the United Nations came into being after the First World War, but they failed to evolve with the times. This inability to adapt has sparked a global debate about their relevance.
You have the experience, you have the skill, and you have the geopolitical leverage to be the biggest peacemaker in the world today, on the world stage, and there are several wars going on. Can you explain how you approach the process of making peace, helping make peace between 2 warring nations—for example, Russia and Ukraine?
Well, I represent the country that is the land of Lord Buddha. I represent the country that is the land of Mahatma Gandhi. These are the great souls whose teachings, words, actions, and behavior are entirely dedicated to peace. That is why, culturally and historically, our background is so strong that whenever we speak of peace, the world listens to us.
India is the land of Gautama Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi. Indians aren’t hardwired to espouse strife and conflict. We espouse harmony instead. We seek neither to wage war against nature nor to foster strife among nations. We stand for peace.
Wherever we can act as peacemakers, we have gladly embraced that responsibility. Returning to your example, I have a close relationship with Russia and Ukraine alike. I can sit with President Putin and say that this is not the time for war. I can also tell President Zelensky, in a friendly way, “Brother, regardless of how many people stand with you in the world, there will never be a resolution on the battlefield.”
The resolution will only come when both Ukraine and Russia come to the negotiating table. Ukraine may hold countless discussions with its allies, but it will bear no fruit. Discussions must include both parties instead. Initially, it was challenging to find peace, but now the current situation presents an opportunity for meaningful and productive talks between Ukraine and Russia.
There has been a lot of suffering. Even the Global South has suffered. The world has been grappling with a food, fuel, and fertilizer crisis. The global community should unite in the pursuit of peace.
As for me, I have always maintained that I stand with peace. I am not neutral. I have a stance, and that is peace. Peace is what I strive for.
Another difficult, historic relationship and conflict is between India and Pakistan. It’s one of the most tense conflicts in the world: 2 nuclear powers with strong ideological differences. You are a great peacemaker. Looking out into the future as a visionary, what do you see as the path for friendship, for peace, and for good relations between India and Pakistan?
I would like to delve into periods of our history that the world may be unfamiliar with. Before 1947, during the struggle for independence, everyone was fighting side by side, shoulder to shoulder. The nation was eagerly waiting to celebrate freedom, the joy of independence.
Now, we could have a lengthy discussion on what led to the events that unfolded. But the fact remains that the policymakers of the time agreed to India’s partition. They agreed to the Muslim side’s demand for carving out a separate nation. With hearts weighed down by grief and silent tears, Indians embraced this painful reality.
However, what unfolded was an immediate, heartbreaking saga of bloodshed. Trains filled with bloodied, wounded people and corpses started arriving from Pakistan. It was a harrowing sight. After getting their own way, we expected them to live and let live. Yet they chose not to foster a harmonious coexistence.
Time and again, they decided to be at odds with India. They have waged a proxy war against us. Don’t mistake this for ideology. What kind of ideology thrives on bloodshed and the export of terror?
We are not the sole victims of this menace. Wherever terror strikes in the world, the trail somehow leads to Pakistan. Let’s take the September 11 attacks, for example. The main mastermind behind them, Osama bin Laden—where did he eventually emerge from? He had taken refuge in Pakistan.
The world has recognized that, in a way, terrorism and the terrorist mindset are deeply rooted in Pakistan. Today, it stands as an epicenter of turmoil, not just for India but for the world. We have repeatedly asked them, “What good can come from this path?” We have urged them to abandon the path of state-sponsored terrorism for good.
What do you hope to gain by surrendering your nation to lawless forces? I’ve even personally traveled to Lahore in the pursuit of peace. When I became Prime Minister, I specially invited Pakistan to my swearing-in ceremony so we could turn over a new leaf.
Yet every noble attempt at fostering peace was met with hostility and betrayal. We sincerely hope that wisdom prevails upon them and they choose the path of peace. I believe even the people of Pakistan long for peace, because they must be weary of living in strife and unrest. They must have grown weary of relentless terror, where even innocent children are killed and countless lives are destroyed.
Are there any memorable stories from your past attempts to improve relations with Pakistan that could guide the path forward into the future?
As I mentioned, my first attempt at improving bilateral relations was when I invited my Pakistani counterpart to my swearing-in. It was a gesture of goodwill, a diplomatic gesture unlike any in decades. The very people who once questioned my approach to foreign policy were taken aback when they learned I had invited all SAARC heads of state.
Our then-President, Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, beautifully captured that historic gesture in his memoir. This was a testament to how clear and confident India’s foreign policy had become. It sent a clear message to the world about India’s commitment to peace and harmony. But we didn’t get the desired outcome.
Maybe a little bit of a lighter question: Who has the better cricket team, India or Pakistan? The 2 teams have an epic rivalry on the pitch. More seriously, given the geopolitical tensions that you spoke to, what role do sports, cricket, and football play in fostering better relations?
I think sports have the power to energize the entire world. The spirit of sports brings people together across different nations. That’s why I would never want to see sports being discredited. I truly believe that sports play a major role in human evolution. They’re not just games; they connect people on a deeper level.
Now, coming to the question of who’s better and who’s not: when it comes to techniques in sports, I’m not an expert. Only those who specialize in the technical aspects can judge which techniques are superior and who the best players really are.
But sometimes, the results speak for themselves. Just a few days ago, India and Pakistan played a match. The result reveals which is the better team. That’s how we know.
Yeah, I’ve watched the series called “The Greatest Rivalry: India vs. Pakistan,” which describes so many incredible players and so many incredible games. It’s always beautiful to see a great rivalry.
You’ve also spoken about football. Football is very popular in India. So, another tough question: Who is the greatest football player of all time? We’ve got Messi, Pelé, Maradona, Cristiano Ronaldo, and Zidane. Who do you think is the greatest football player to have ever played?
It’s absolutely true that many regions in India have a strong football culture. Our women’s football team is performing really well, and the men’s team is also making great progress. But if we talk about the past, back in the 1980s, one name that always stood out was Maradona. For that generation, he was seen as a true hero. If you ask today’s generation, they’ll immediately mention Messi.
Now that you’ve asked, another interesting memory just came to mind. There’s a state in India called Madhya Pradesh, right in the center. There’s a district called Shahdol, a completely tribal region where a large tribal community resides. I really enjoy interacting with people from such communities, especially the self-help groups run by tribal women. So I decided to visit them and have a conversation.
But when I got there, I noticed something fascinating: around 80 to 100 young boys, kids, and even some older youth, all dressed in sports uniforms, standing together. Naturally, I walked over to them. I asked them, “Where are you all from?” And they replied, “We’re from Mini Brazil!”
I was surprised and said, “What do you mean by Mini Brazil?” They said, “That’s what people call our village.” Curious, I asked, “Why do they call it Mini Brazil?” They explained, “In our village, football has been played for 4 generations.
Nearly 80 national-level players have come from here. Our entire village is dedicated to football. They also told me, “When we host our annual football match, nearly 20,000 to 25,000 spectators come from nearby villages to watch.”
I see the growing craze for football in India these days as a positive sign because it not only fuels passion but also builds true team spirit.
Yeah, football is one of the great sports that unites not just India but the whole world. That just shows the power of what sport can do.
You recently visited the United States and reinvigorated your friendship with Donald Trump. What do you like about Donald Trump as a friend and as a leader?
I’d like to share with you an event that stands out in my memory. Perhaps from that, you’ll get a better understanding of the point I’m trying to convey. For example, we had an event in Houston, Howdy Modi. Both President Trump and I were there, and the entire stadium was completely packed.
A massive crowd at an event in the United States is a huge moment. While packed stadiums are common in sports, this was extraordinary for a political rally. The Indian diaspora had gathered in large numbers. Both of us delivered speeches, and he sat down below, listening to me speak. That’s his humility: the President of the United States sitting in the audience while I spoke from the stage. That was a remarkable gesture on his part.
After finishing my speech, I stepped down. As we all know, security in the United States is extremely strict and thorough. The level of scrutiny there is on a completely different level. I went over to thank him and casually said, “If you don’t mind, why don’t we take a lap around the stadium? There are so many people here. Let’s walk, wave, and greet them.”
In American life, it’s almost impossible for the President to walk into a crowd of thousands. But without even a moment’s hesitation, he agreed and started walking with me. His entire security detail was thrown off guard. But for me, that moment was truly touching. It showed me that this man had courage.
He makes his own decisions, but he also trusted me and my lead in that moment enough to walk with me into the crowd. It was that sense of mutual trust, a strong bond between us, that I truly witnessed on that day. The way I saw President Trump that day, walking into a crowd of thousands without even asking security, was truly amazing. If you watch the video now, you’ll be amazed.
When he was shot during the recent campaign, I saw the same resilient and determined President Trump—the one who walked hand in hand with me in that stadium. Even after being shot, he remained unwaveringly dedicated to America. His life was for his nation. His reflection showed his “America First” spirit, just as I believe in “Nation First.” I stand for India First, and that’s why we connect so well. These are the things that truly resonate.
I believe that across the world, politicians are covered so much by the media that people mostly perceive each other through its lens. People rarely get the chance to truly meet or personally know one another. Perhaps third-party intervention is the real cause of tensions.
When I visited him in the White House for the first time, there was already a lot written about President Trump in the media. At that time, he was still new to office, and the world had a rather different perception of him. Even I had been briefed in many different ways before meeting him.
But to my surprise, the very moment I stepped into the White House, he broke all formal protocols right away. He personally took me on a tour of the White House. As he showed me around, I noticed something striking: he wasn’t holding any notes or cue cards, nor was anyone accompanying him to assist. He pointed things out himself.
“This is where Abraham Lincoln lived,” he said. He even explained why the courtroom was designed so long. He would point at the table and tell me which President signed here and on what date. I found that incredibly impressive. It showed how much he honored the presidency and how respectful and deeply connected he was to America’s history. I could feel that.
He spoke to me freely, discussing many things openly. That was my experience from our first meeting. Later, when his first term ended and President Biden won, 4 years passed. But during that time, whenever someone we both knew met him—and this must have happened dozens of times—he would say, “Modi is my friend. Convey my regards.”
That kind of gesture is rare. Even though we didn’t meet physically for years, our direct and indirect communication, our closeness, and the trust between us remained unshaken.
He said that you’re a much tougher, much better negotiator than he is. He said this recently when you visited. What do you think of him as a negotiator, and what do you think he meant about you being a great negotiator?
That’s not something I can comment on, since it’s his graciousness and humility. It is very kind of him that he openly appreciates me on various occasions and in different contexts.
But about negotiation, I always put my country’s interests first. That’s why, in every forum, I speak up for India’s interests—not to harm anyone, but in a positive manner. Because of that, no one takes offense. People know that if Modi is present, he will strongly advocate for these things. After all, the people of India have given me this responsibility. For me, my nation is my High Command, and I will always honor their will.
You’ve also had a bunch of productive meetings with several other folks on your visit to the United States: Elon Musk, JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and Vivek Ramaswamy. What are some things that stood out from those meetings? Maybe key takeaways, key memories.
Look, I can say this: I have observed President Trump both during his first term and now in his second term. This time, he seems far more prepared than before. He has a clear roadmap in his mind, with well-defined steps, each one designed to lead him toward his goals.
I also had the chance to meet members of his team, and I truly believe he has put together a strong, capable group. With such a strong team, I feel they are fully capable of implementing President Trump’s vision, based on my interactions with them.
I met several people: Tulsi Gabbard, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Elon Musk. There was a family-like atmosphere. Everyone had come with their families. As for Elon Musk, I’ve known him since my time as Chief Minister. He was there with his family and children, so naturally, the atmosphere felt warm and friendly.
Of course, we had discussions and talked about many different topics. Now, with his DOGE mission, he is incredibly excited about how it’s progressing. Honestly, it makes me happy too, because when I took office in 2014, I wanted to free my country from the deep-rooted issues and harmful practices that had crept in, and I’ll continue striving to eliminate as many of them as I possibly can.
For example, after I took office in 2014, I observed that back then, we weren’t part of many global discussions—not like how President Trump and DOGE are being talked about today. But let me give you an example so you can see the kind of work that was done.
I noticed that the benefits of certain government schemes, especially welfare programs, were being exploited by so many people who never even existed in real life. There were ghost names, pensions being issued to fake people, widow pensions being granted even before marriages took place, and disability pensions being given without any real disabilities.
Then I launched a scrutiny process, and you’ll be shocked to know what we found: 100 million people. That’s 100 million fake or duplicate names that I removed from the system. Because of that, we saved a massive amount of money.
Then I introduced Direct Benefit Transfer, ensuring that every rupee sent from Delhi reached the rightful person without leakage. As a result, my country saved nearly ₹3 trillion that would have otherwise ended up in the wrong hands. Just because of Direct Benefit Transfer through technology, we eliminated middlemen, ensuring transparency in the system.
I also introduced the GeM Portal for government purchases, which has helped save both time and money. It has increased competition and improved quality. In India, we had an overwhelming burden of compliances. I eliminated 40,000 unnecessary compliances and removed nearly 1,500 outdated laws that served no purpose.
In a way, my efforts have been about freeing governance from unnecessary dominance and inefficiency. Naturally, when bold changes happen, just like DOGE’s mission, they become a topic of discussion worldwide.
You and Xi Jinping have considered each other friends. How can that friendship be reinvigorated to help de-escalate some of the recent tensions and resume dialogue and cooperation with China?
Look, the relationship between India and China isn’t something new. Both nations have ancient cultures and civilizations. Even in the modern world, they play a significant role. If you look at historical records, for centuries, India and China have learned from each other. Together, they have always contributed to the global good in some way.
Old records suggest that at one point, India and China alone accounted for more than 50% of the world’s GDP. That’s how massive India’s contribution was. I believe our ties have been extremely strong, with deep cultural connections.
If we look back centuries, there’s no real history of conflict between us. It has always been about learning from each other and understanding one another. At one time, Buddhism had a profound influence in China, and that philosophy originally came from here.
Our relationship should remain just as strong in the future. It should continue to grow. Of course, differences are natural. When two neighboring countries exist, occasional disagreements are bound to happen. Even within a family, not everything is always perfect. But our focus is to ensure that these differences don’t turn into disputes.
That’s what we actively work toward. Instead of discord, we emphasize dialogue, because only through dialogue can we build a stable, cooperative relationship that serves the best interests of both nations. It is true that there have been ongoing border disputes between us. In 2020, incidents along the border created significant tensions between our countries. However, after my recent meeting with President Xi, we have seen a return to normalcy at the border. We are now working to restore conditions to how they were before 2020.
Slowly but surely, trust, enthusiasm, and energy will return. But of course, it will take some time, since there’s been a 5-year gap. Our cooperation isn’t just beneficial; it’s also essential for global stability and prosperity. Since the 21st century is Asia’s century, we want India and China to compete in a healthy and natural way. Competition is not a bad thing, but it should never turn into conflict.
The world is worried about a brewing global war. With tensions between China and the United States, in Ukraine and Russia, in Europe, in Israel, and in the Middle East, what can you say about how we, in the 21st century, can avoid a global war and avoid an escalation toward more conflict and more war?
Look, COVID exposed the limitations of every nation. No matter how much we consider ourselves a great nation, no matter how progressive we think we are, or how scientifically advanced we believe we’ve become, everyone has their own way of looking at things. In the end, we all found ourselves on the same ground. Every country in the world faced this reality.
At that time, it felt like the world would learn from it and that we would move toward a more unified world. Just as a geopolitical order emerged after World War II, many thought something similar would happen post-COVID. But unfortunately, instead of moving toward peace, the world became even more fragmented, ushering in a period of uncertainty. The wars have only made it worse.
I believe that modern wars are no longer just about resources or interests. Today, I see so many kinds of conflicts happening. Physical battles are often discussed, but struggles are happening in every domain. International organizations that were once powerful have become almost irrelevant, and no real reforms are happening. Institutions like the UN are failing to fulfill their roles.
People who disregard international laws and rules continue to act freely, and no one can stop them. In such situations, the prudent choice for everyone is to let go of conflict and move toward cooperation. A development-driven approach is the way forward; expansionism will not work. As I’ve said before, the world is interdependent and interconnected. Every nation needs one another; no one can stand alone.
From all the different forums I attend, one thing is clear: everyone is deeply worried about these conflicts. We can only hope that peace is restored very soon.
I’m not very good at this.
You keep looking at your watch.
No, no, no. I barely know what I’m doing, Prime Minister. I’m not very good at this.
In your career and throughout your life, you have seen a lot of difficult situations in the history of India. One of them was the 2002 Gujarat riots. They were one of the most challenging periods of modern Indian history, when there was violence between Hindu and Muslim citizens of Gujarat that led to over 1,000 deaths. It revealed the intensity of religious tension in the region, and you were, as you mentioned, the Chief Minister of Gujarat at that time. Looking back, what lessons do you draw from that time?
We should also say that India’s independent Supreme Court twice upheld, in 2012 and 2022, that you had no involvement in the violence of the 2002 Gujarat riots. I was wondering if you could speak to the broader lessons you draw from that time.
Regarding your first point, when you humbly said that you don’t know what you’re doing and that you’re not good at this, I disagree. I personally feel you’ve put in tremendous care. You’ve done extensive research and have delved deeply into every small detail, so I think you’ve done very well. All the efforts you’ve put in during our conversation, and in all your conversations, are appreciated.
Rather than simply interviewing me, I feel you’re trying to deeply understand India. That’s why I strongly feel there’s genuine honesty in your sincere effort to uncover the truth. For that sincere approach, I genuinely congratulate you.
Thank you.
Regarding the earlier events that you mentioned, like the 2002 riots in Gujarat, I’d like to paint you a clearer picture of the 12 to 15 months leading up to that, so you can fully understand the atmosphere of that time. For instance, take December 24, 1999, roughly 3 years earlier: An Indian flight from Kathmandu to Delhi was hijacked, redirected to Afghanistan, and landed in Kandahar. Hundreds of Indian passengers were held hostage. It caused massive turmoil across India, as people faced life-and-death uncertainty.
Then, in 2000, the Red Fort in Delhi was attacked by terrorists. Yet another crisis struck the nation, intensifying fear and turmoil. On September 11, 2001, the Twin Towers in the United States faced a devastating terror attack, once again shocking the entire world. Ultimately, the people behind these attacks are driven by a similar mindset. Then, in October 2001, terrorists attacked the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly. Soon after, on December 13, 2001, India’s Parliament was targeted.
Within just 8 to 10 months, these major global terrorist attacks took place—violent incidents that led to bloodshed and the loss of innocent lives. In such a tense environment, even the smallest spark can ignite unrest. The situation had already become extremely volatile. Then, suddenly, on October 7, 2001, I was given the responsibility of becoming Chief Minister of Gujarat. This was an enormous challenge.
At that time, Gujarat was recovering from a devastating earthquake, the largest of the previous century, which had left thousands dead. My first major task as Chief Minister was overseeing the rehabilitation of survivors. This was a crucial task, and from day 1 after my oath, I immersed myself in it. I was a person who had absolutely no prior experience with government. I had never been part of any administration and had never even served in government before.
I had never contested an election, never even been a State Representative. For the first time in my life, I had to face elections. On February 24, 2002, I became a State Representative, an elected representative, for the first time. It was only around February 24, 25, or 26 that I stepped into the Gujarat Assembly for the very first time.
On February 27, 2002, we were seated in the Assembly for the budget session. It had been just 3 days since I’d become a member of the state legislative assembly when, suddenly, the horrific Godhra incident occurred. It was a tragedy of unimaginable magnitude; people were burned alive. You can imagine, against the backdrop of incidents like the Kandahar hijacking, the attack on Parliament, or even 9/11, and then to have so many people killed and burned alive, how tense and volatile the situation was.
Of course, this was tragic for everyone. Everyone prefers peace. The perception that these were the biggest riots ever is actually misinformation. If you review the data from before 2002, you’ll see that Gujarat faced frequent riots, with curfews constantly being imposed somewhere. Communal violence could erupt over trivial issues, like kite-flying contests or even minor bicycle collisions.
Before 2002, Gujarat witnessed over 250 significant riots. The riots in 1969 lasted nearly 6 months. So there was a long history, long before I was in the picture. But that one tragic incident in 2002 became a sparking point, leading some people toward violence.
The judiciary thoroughly investigated the matter. At that time, our political opponents were in power, and naturally, they wanted all allegations against us to stick. Despite their relentless efforts, the judiciary analyzed the situation meticulously, twice, and ultimately found us completely innocent. Those who were truly responsible have faced justice from the courts.
But the most important thing is that in Gujarat, where riots used to happen somewhere or the other every year, after 2002, in 22 years, there hasn’t been a single major riot in Gujarat. Gujarat remains completely peaceful. Our approach has always been to avoid vote-bank politics. Instead, our mantra has been: “Together with everyone, development for all, trust from all, and efforts by everyone.”
We’ve shifted away from the politics of appeasement to the politics of aspiration. Because of this, anyone who wishes to contribute joins us willingly. We’ve continuously strived to turn Gujarat into a well-developed state, and today, Gujarat is actively contributing toward building a developed India as well.
A lot of people love you. I’ve heard that from a lot of them, but there are also people who criticize you, including people in the media. People in the media have criticized you over the 2002 Gujarat riots. What’s your relationship like with criticism? How do you deal with critics and with criticism coming from the media, from your own inner circle, or just in your own life?
Regarding what you said about criticism and how I deal with it, if I had to summarize it in one sentence, I welcome it. I have a strong belief that criticism is the soul of democracy. If democracy truly runs in your veins, you must embrace it.
In our scriptures, it’s said: “Always keep your critics close.” Critics should be your nearest companions, because through genuine criticism, you can improve quickly and work democratically with better insights. In fact, I believe we should have more criticism, and it should be sharp and well-informed. But my real complaint is that nowadays, what we see isn’t real criticism.
Genuine criticism requires thorough study, in-depth research, and careful analysis. It demands finding the truth from falsehoods. Today, people look for shortcuts, avoid proper research, and skip deep analysis. Instead of identifying genuine weaknesses, they jump straight to accusations.
There’s a big difference between allegations and criticism. The references you’re giving are allegations, not criticism. For a strong democracy, genuine criticism is necessary. Allegations benefit no one; they just cause unnecessary conflicts. That’s why I always welcome criticism openly. Whenever false accusations arise, I calmly continue serving my country with complete dedication.
The thing you speak of is very important to me because I admire great journalism. Unfortunately, in the modern day, a lot of journalists seek clickbait headlines and make accusations because they operate under an incentive to get the headline and take the cheap shot. I think there is room, desire, and hunger for great journalists, and that requires deep understanding.
It saddens me how often this is missing. One of the reasons—I don’t think I’m very good at this—but one of the reasons I really wanted to talk to you is because I don’t see enough high-effort, deep-dive research. I don’t know how many books I’ve read. I’ve read a lot in preparing, just to experience and try to understand.
It requires a lot of preparation and a lot of work. I would love to see great journalists do that more. From that place, you can criticize; from that place, you can really investigate the complexity of a situation and of people in power—their strengths, their flaws, and the mistakes they have made. But that requires great, great, great preparation. I wish there was more of that, more great journalism.
Yes. Clear, well-directed, and specific criticism genuinely helps in the process of effective policymaking. It leads to a clear-cut policy vision. I specifically pay close attention to such constructive criticism; in fact, I actively welcome it.
Regarding your point about journalistic headlines, if someone is attracted by catchy headlines or plays with words, I honestly don’t mind that much. But when there’s a deliberate agenda behind the actions and the truth is deliberately ignored, that can cause damage that lasts for decades. If someone focuses on pleasing their readers or viewers with attractive headlines, maybe we can compromise a little. But if there’s a hidden motive, or if things are intentionally twisted to serve an agenda, that’s a serious issue worth worrying about.
And in that, the truth suffers, I think.
I remember once, in London, I was invited to give a speech at an event organized by a Gujarati newspaper there. During my speech, I casually said, since it was an event attended by journalists, “What kind of journalism should we have? Should it be like a fly or a bee?”
I explained: A fly sits on dirt and spreads the dirt around. But a bee lands on flowers, collects nectar, and then shares that sweetness everywhere. Yet if something wrong occurs, the bee can sting so powerfully that you’d have to hide your face for 3 days straight!
However, some people selectively picked up just half of my analogy and created a huge controversy out of it. Honestly, was I being negative about anyone? Not at all. I was simply highlighting the incredible strength of a bee, that even its small sting can leave such an impact that it can make someone hide their face for days. You can’t show your face. That’s the power journalism should have. But unfortunately, some people prefer the fly approach instead.
I now have a new life goal of becoming the bee you mentioned.
You mentioned democracy, and not knowing much about government until 2002. But from 2002 to today, you’ve won 8 elections, as far as I could count. In many of those elections, more than 800 million people vote in India. What does it take to win an election like that, and to win an election in a country of 1.4 billion people, where you get to represent those people in the biggest democracy in the world?
Well, I’ve been actively involved in politics for years. Before stepping into active politics, my focus was primarily on organizational work. This also included managing elections and strategizing campaigns. That was where I dedicated my time.
For 24 years, the people of Gujarat and India have placed their trust in me to lead. With unwavering dedication and a deep sense of duty, I try to fulfill the sacred duty entrusted to me by the people I revere as divine. I remain committed to honoring their trust, ensuring it never falters.
They see me for what I truly am. My government is committed to ensuring welfare schemes reach every citizen. Every scheme must reach its intended beneficiaries. Every beneficiary must be treated equally. No one should face discrimination based on caste, creed, faith, wealth, or ideology. We must strive to ensure the well-being and prosperity of everyone.
This way, even those not directly benefiting never feel left out or treated unfairly. They find comfort in knowing they, too, will benefit in due course. This fosters a deep sense of trust, and trust is the cornerstone of my governance model.
Secondly, my governance flows beyond the ebb and flow of elections. My governance is rooted in the people, not the polls. It is committed to the well-being of my citizens and the greater good of the nation.
As you may know, I once set out on a quest for spiritual awakening. So now, I revere my nation as the divine itself, and I revere the people as a manifestation of the divine. Like a devoted priest, my heart is set on serving the people. I don’t distance myself from the people. I live among them, as one of them.
I tell everyone I work with, “If you work hard, I will work harder.” People see this, and it builds trust. Besides, I have no conflicts of interest. I have no friends or relatives who stand to gain from the position I hold. The common man appreciates this lack of vested interest. That’s probably just one reason why.
Moreover, I come from a party with millions of dedicated volunteers who are completely devoted to the welfare of India and its citizens. They have had no stake whatsoever in politics. They’ve held no title, nor strayed where influence holds sway.
My party is blessed with millions of volunteers who work tirelessly. I am proud to belong to the world’s largest political party. It’s not as though my party has been around forever. It reflects the hard work of millions of volunteers. Their selfless service is widely recognized and valued by the community.
It fortifies people’s trust in the BJP, echoed in the election results. I never tallied our election triumphs, but we have had people’s blessings.
I was wondering if you could speak to the incredible logistics of running the elections in India. That blew my mind. There are a lot of interesting anecdotes that arise. For example, no voter should be more than 2 kilometers away from a polling station. The result is that you have these stories of voting machines being carried to remote regions of India. It’s really incredible—every single voter counts.
The machinery of having more than 600 million people vote is also incredible. Is there an anecdote you could speak to that is particularly impressive to you? Or maybe you could speak generally to the logistics of what it takes to run an election that big, in a democracy that big?
First and foremost, I am truly grateful for your insightful question. Anyone who believes in democracy should listen to what I am about to share with you. We often discuss election results, but all the behind-the-scenes work is overlooked.
Let’s take the recently concluded 2024 general elections as an example. There were 980 million registered voters. Each of those voters had a registered voter ID and all the necessary details in a vast database. This number is twice the entire population of North America. It even surpasses the total population of the entire European Union.
Out of the 980 million registered voters, 646 million people ventured out and braved the intense heat of May, determined to cast their votes. Temperatures soared to 40 degrees in some areas, yet they chose to go. The size of this voter base is double the population of the United States.
We had more than 1 million polling booths. Can you fathom all the manpower involved in this? My country has more than 2,500 registered political parties. This staggering figure, with such a vast array of political parties, has the power to leave the entire world in awe!
My country has more than 900 round-the-clock television channels. There are over 5,000 newspapers published daily. They each play a role in upholding democracy in their own way. Even the humblest villages here embrace technology with remarkable swiftness.
While some other countries take months to declare election results, we announce the results within a day, despite the mind-boggling number of voters. You were spot on in saying that even the remotest villages have polling stations. We even use helicopters to transport polling stations.
I believe Arunachal Pradesh has the highest-altitude polling booth on record. In Gujarat, a polling booth was set up in the Gir Forest for just 1 voter who was in the middle of nowhere. But we ensured a polling booth was set up for that person.
All I mean to say is that we truly leave no stone unturned in our unwavering commitment to strengthening democracy, ensuring that we are always fully prepared and election-ready, no matter the circumstances. I firmly believe that India’s Election Commission sets a global standard as a benchmark for conducting free and fair elections. It is the apex decision-maker.
This in itself is such a remarkable story that the world’s top universities should consider it a case study. They should analyze the management behind it as a valuable learning example. Given the sheer number of voters, can you truly grasp the immense depth of political awareness? All of this will make for an excellent case study for the younger generation worldwide.
I love democracy. This is one of the main reasons I love the United States. But there’s just nothing quite as beautiful as democracy when it functions in India. You know, like you said, 900 million people registered to vote. It really is a case study.
It’s beautiful to see that many people come together willingly and passionately, casting a vote for someone to represent them. They’re putting their heart into that. It’s really important for a person to feel like their voice is going to be heard. It’s beautiful.
Speaking of which, you are loved by a lot of people. You are one of the most powerful humans in the world. Do you sometimes think about whether this much power has a corrupting effect on your mind, especially across the many years that you’ve been in power?
Well, I don’t think the word “powerful” quite reflects the journey of my life. I can never claim to be powerful, for all I am is a humble servant. I identify myself not as the Prime Minister, but as the Prime Servant. Service is the guiding principle of my work ethic.
As far as power is concerned, it is something I have never bothered about. I entered politics not to play power games, but to serve. Rather than seeking power, I stay committed to doing and getting work done. I am more focused on productivity than power.
I have always dedicated myself to serving the people. I have always devoted myself to bringing about a positive change in their lives.
Like you mentioned, you work a lot. You give your whole soul to your work. Do you ever get lonely?
Look, I never experience loneliness because I am an ardent believer in the philosophy of one plus one. This philosophy of one plus one is aligned with my moral compass. Whenever I am asked to elaborate on this outlook, I say, “The first one represents Modi, and the other one represents the Almighty.” I am never alone, for He is always there to keep me company.
This is just how I function. Having wholeheartedly embraced the ideals of Swami Vivekananda, I firmly believe that service to mankind is service to God. For me, the nation itself is divine, and mankind is a reflection of the divine. I walk this path with the conviction that serving the people is serving the divine. That’s why the very notion of struggling with loneliness has never even remotely crossed my mind.
During the pandemic, with the lockdown and travel restrictions in place, I came up with a way to make the most of my time. I designed a governance model that operated seamlessly through video conferencing. I kept myself occupied with remote work and virtual meetings.
Another thing I did was connect with the people I had worked with throughout my life. Among my party’s volunteers nationwide, I made a list of those who were 70 and older. Some of the volunteers had very humble beginnings and came from very modest backgrounds. I personally called every volunteer aged 70 and above.
I made it a point to inquire about their health and their families’ well-being. I inquired about how their area was coping. I asked these questions to make sure they were doing well. This allowed me to build rapport with them, and we would go down memory lane. They were touched that the Prime Minister would check on them during the pandemic.
I made around 40 calls every day, without fail. I carried on with this throughout the pandemic. It gave me the chance to reconnect and relive old memories with familiar faces. Loneliness is never a concern for me, as I always find ways to stay engaged. I have long been at peace with myself. The time I spent in the Himalayas has helped me develop this.
I’ve heard from many people that you are the hardest worker they know. What’s your philosophy behind that? Maybe you put in crazy hours every single day. Do you ever get tired? What’s your source of strength and perseverance through all of that?
Look, first of all, I don’t believe I’m the only one working. I look at the people around me and always think, “These people work harder than I do.” When I think about farmers, I realize how hard they work. They toil and sweat under the open sky, day after day.
When I look at our country’s soldiers, I think about how many hours someone spends working tirelessly in snow, deserts, or even underwater, day and night. When I see a laborer, I think about how hard they’re working. I always think about how hard our mothers and sisters work in every family for the happiness of the family.
They’re the first to wake up and the last to go to bed, taking care of everyone in the family while also managing social responsibilities. Thinking of all this, I’m in awe of how hard people work. So I think, “How can I sleep? How can I relax?” Naturally, the motivation is right in front of my eyes. Those very things around me keep me motivated.
Secondly, my responsibilities keep pushing me forward. The responsibilities entrusted to me by my fellow citizens always remind me that I’m not here to enjoy privileges. I will always give it my absolute best. Perhaps there are a couple of things I may not accomplish, but there will never be a lack of effort or hard work from me.
When I was campaigning in 2014, I made a promise, first in Gujarat and later across India. I promised my fellow citizens that I would never fall behind in hard work for my country. Secondly, I promised I would never act with bad intentions. Thirdly, I vowed I’d never do anything for personal gain.
Today, it’s been 24 years. For such a long period, the people have entrusted me as head of government. I’ve continuously held myself to these 3 standards, and I still live by them today.
My inspiration comes from serving 1.4 billion people, understanding and fulfilling their aspirations, and addressing their needs. I’m always determined to do as much as I can and work as hard as possible. Even today, my energy remains just as strong.
As an engineer and as a person who loves mathematics, I have to ask: Srinivasa Ramanujan was an Indian mathematician from a century ago. He’s widely considered to be one of the greatest mathematicians of all time. He was self-taught and grew up in poverty. You have often spoken about him. What do you find inspiring about him?
Look, I deeply respect him, and everyone in my country respects him as well. I strongly believe there’s a deep connection between science and spirituality. If you closely observe many scientifically advanced minds, you’ll find they’re often spiritually advanced too. They’re not disconnected from spirituality.
Srinivasa Ramanujan once said that his mathematical ideas came from the goddess he worshipped. Meaning, ideas emerge from spiritual discipline. Discipline is more than just hard work. It means fully devoting yourself to a task and completely immersing yourself into it, so much that you become one with your work.
You see, the more open we are to new and different sources of knowledge, the more new ideas we’ll have. I think it’s important for us to clearly understand the difference between information and knowledge. Some people mistakenly confuse information with knowledge, carrying around large amounts of information. But I don’t believe information alone equals knowledge.
Knowledge is something deeper. It gradually evolves through processing, reflection, and understanding. Recognizing this difference is important in how we handle both.
You have a reputation for being a decisive leader. So can you walk me through, on this topic of ideas, how you make decisions? For instance, when facing a high-stakes choice with no clear precedent and a lot of uncertainty, having to balance input, how do you make decisions?
There are many factors in my decision-making. First, I’m perhaps the only politician in India who has stayed overnight in around 85 to 90 percent of the districts across the country. This was before my current role. I used to travel extensively, and I learned a lot from those experiences. They gave me firsthand knowledge of the ground realities and grassroots-level issues, not something asked or heard, or learned merely from books.
Secondly, from a governance perspective, I carry no baggage of any kind. I don’t carry any baggage that weighs me down or forces me to act a certain way. Thirdly, I have a simple yardstick for decisions: my country first. I always question whether what I’m doing harms my nation in any way.
Additionally, Mahatma Gandhi once said that if you’re ever unsure when making a decision, think of the poorest person’s face, remember them, and ask yourself, “Will this help them?” Then your decision will be right. That wisdom always guides me: remembering ordinary citizens and considering how my actions affect them.
Another factor in my approach is that I’m very well-connected. In my administration, my officials know this well and probably feel overwhelmed by it, by the fact that my information channels are numerous and very active. Because of that, I receive lots of insights from various sources. So when someone comes to brief me, that’s not my only source of information. I always have additional perspectives available to me.
Another thing is that I maintain a learner’s mindset. Suppose I’m not familiar with something and an official explains it to me. I approach them like a student and ask, “Can you clarify this? How does it work? Then what happens next? And how?” Whenever I have different information, I deliberately play devil’s advocate and ask challenging questions.
I thoroughly analyze the issue from multiple angles, hoping that careful evaluation will yield something valuable. Then, once I converge toward a decision or action that is worth taking, I share the idea informally with like-minded people, just to gauge their reactions and see how they respond, gathering insights and feedback before moving forward. Finally, I develop a strong conviction that my decision is right.
This entire decision-making process doesn’t actually take much time. My speed is very fast. Let me share an example: how did I make decisions during COVID? I had Nobel Prize winners advising me, giving countless economic examples from around the world.
They’d say, “This country is doing this; that country did that; you should do it too.” Renowned economists constantly bombarded me with suggestions. Political parties pressured me relentlessly, urging me to spend huge amounts of money. But I didn’t act immediately. I paused and reflected: “What exactly should I do?”
Then, considering the unique conditions of my own country, I made a clear decision: I wouldn’t let the poor sleep hungry. I wouldn’t allow social tensions to arise over basic daily needs. These core principles guided my approach.
The entire world was in lockdown; global economies were collapsing. Everyone pressured me to empty the treasury, print more currency, and flood money everywhere. But I decided that this was not the right economic route to follow.
And so, instead, the path I chose—after carefully listening to experts, understanding their opinions without opposing them, and combining their advice with my own country’s situation and my personal experiences—created a system that worked effectively. As a result, when the whole world suffered from severe inflation immediately after COVID, India did not.
Today, my country is steadily advancing at a rapid pace, emerging as one of the fastest-growing major economies in the world. The main reason is that during that crisis, with patience and discipline, I resisted the temptation to apply every global theory blindly.
We didn’t worry about what newspapers would say, whether they’d praise or criticize. Ignoring all that, I stayed focused on basic fundamentals, and by doing so, we succeeded and kept moving ahead. So ultimately, my economy benefited as well. My approach has always been to stay focused on these fundamentals.
Another strength is my risk-taking capacity. I don’t worry about potential losses for myself. If something is right for my country, for the people, I’m always prepared to take the risk.
Secondly, I take ownership of my decisions. If something goes wrong, I don’t shift blame to others. I stand up, take responsibility, and own the outcome.
When you take ownership, your team also becomes deeply committed. They know this person won’t let us down, won’t abandon us; he’ll always stand with us. They see that I’m making honest decisions, not for myself, but for the nation.
I’ve openly told the country from the start, “I’m human; I can make mistakes. But I won’t act with bad intentions.” People remember those words clearly. Even if something doesn’t go as planned, they trust that Modi’s intentions were right. They think, “He probably meant to do something good, even if it didn’t work out.” So society sees and accepts me just as I am.
You gave a powerful speech on AI a few weeks ago at the AI Action Summit in Paris. In it, you spoke about the talent pool for AI engineers in India. I think it’s probably one of the biggest pools of brilliant engineers in the world.
So how can India become the leader in the space of AI? Currently, it lags behind the United States. What does it take for India to start winning and leading the world in AI?
One thing I’m about to say might sound strong, and it may even upset some people. But since you’ve asked, I’ll speak openly from my heart: no matter what the world does with AI, it will remain incomplete without India.
I’m making this statement very responsibly. Tell me, you’ve heard my speech at the AI Summit in Paris on global cooperation. What do you think? Can anyone develop AI entirely on their own? What is your perspective on this?
In your speech, you gave a brilliant example of the positive impact of AI and the limitations of AI. I think the example you gave is that when you ask it to generate an image of a person writing with their left hand, it’s always going to generate a person writing with their right hand.
In that way, the West creating an AI system where India is not part of that process is always going to generate the person with the right hand. It’s an essential part of what the world is historically, but especially in the 21st century.
I agree. I believe AI development is fundamentally a collaboration. Everyone involved supports one another through shared experiences and learning.
India isn’t just developing theoretical AI models; it is actively working on and bringing to life AI-driven applications for very specific use cases. To ensure that GPU access is available to every section of society, we have already created a unique marketplace-based model to ensure its broad accessibility.
A significant mindset shift is taking place in India, though historical influences, traditional government procedures, or the lack of strong support infrastructure made us appear to be lagging behind to others. Take 5G, for example: the world initially believed we were far behind. But once we started, we became the fastest nation globally to roll out comprehensive 5G networks.
Recently, an American company executive visited me and shared his experiences about this very fact. He told me that if he were to advertise in the United States for engineers, he would only receive enough applicants to fill a single room, at best. But if he did the same in India, even a football field wouldn’t be enough to hold them.
This indicates that India has access to an extraordinarily vast pool of talent, and that’s our greatest strength. After all, artificial intelligence is fundamentally powered, shaped, and guided by human intelligence. Without genuine human intelligence, AI can’t thrive or progress sustainably. That real intelligence exists abundantly in India’s youth and talent pool, and I believe that’s our greatest asset.
But also, if you look at the top tech leaders—not just tech talent, but tech leaders in the United States—many are of Indian origin: Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, Aravind Srinivas. You’ve met with some of them. What spirit of their Indian origins do you think they carry in them that enables them to be so successful?
Indian culture emphasizes that there should be equal respect for the place where you’re born and the place where you work. There should be no difference. As much as there is dedication to the land of birth, there should be the same sense of dedication to the land of work. You should always give your best, wherever you are.
Because of these rich cultural values, every Indian strives to give their best effort, regardless of their role or position. They don’t wait until they’re in senior roles; even in smaller roles, they give their best. Secondly, they never get involved in anything questionable or unethical. They tend to remain dedicated to what’s right and ethical.
Their nature is collaborative; they easily get along with others. Eventually, for success, just having knowledge isn’t enough. The ability to work effectively as part of a team matters significantly more. Understanding people and harnessing their abilities is an incredibly valuable skill.
Generally, people raised in India, especially those coming from joint families and brought up in an open society, find it easier to lead complex tasks and large teams effectively. That’s why today, in major corporations across the globe, you’ll find Indians holding key leadership positions.
The problem-solving abilities, along with the analytical thinking, of Indian professionals are truly exceptional. I believe this capability is so strong that it makes Indians globally competitive and extremely valuable on the international stage. This is the reason why, in fields like innovation, entrepreneurship, startups, and boardrooms, you’ll find Indians achieving extraordinary results everywhere.
Take our space sector, for example. Previously, it was entirely government-controlled. But just a couple of years ago, I opened it up to the private sector, and now we already have 200 startups working in space technology.
Moreover, our missions like Chandrayaan are extremely cost-effective. India’s Chandrayaan mission cost less than what Hollywood spends making a single blockbuster film! So when the world sees how cost-effective our work is, they naturally think, “Why not partner with India?”
This automatically generates respect for Indian talent globally. I believe this is a hallmark of our civilizational ethos.
So you spoke about human intelligence. Do you worry that AI, artificial intelligence, will replace us humans?
It’s true that in every era, a competitive atmosphere was created between technology and humanity. At times, it was even portrayed as a conflict. It was often portrayed as if technology would challenge human existence itself. But every time, as technology advanced, humans adapted and stayed a step ahead. It has always been the case.
After all, it is humans who find the best ways to use technology to their advantage. And I believe that with AI, humans are now being forced to reflect on what it truly means to be human. This is the real power of AI.
Because of the way AI functions, it has challenged how we perceive work itself. But human imagination is the fuel. AI can create many things based on that, and in the future, it may achieve even more. Still, I firmly believe that no technology can ever replace the boundless creativity and imagination of the human mind.
I agree with you. It does make me and a lot of people wonder what makes humans special, because it seems that there is a lot that makes humans special: the imagination, the creativity, the consciousness, the ability to be afraid, to love, to dream, to think outside of the box, to take risks—all of those things.
Now, look, humans have an innate ability to care for each other, a natural tendency to be concerned about one another. Now, can someone tell me, is AI capable of this?
This is one of the big open questions of the 21st century. Every year, you host Pariksha Pe Charcha, where you interact directly with young students and give them advice on how to prepare for exams. I watched a bunch of them, so you give advice on how to succeed in exams, how to manage stress, and all those kinds of things.
Can you explain, on a high level, the different exams that students in India need to take in their educational journey, and why it’s so stressful?
By and large, a strange mindset has developed in society today.
Even schools measure their success by students’ rankings. Families, too, feel pride when their child achieves a high rank because they believe it improves their educational and social status. This mentality has resulted in increased pressure on children. Kids also began feeling that their entire lives depend on 10th- and 12th-grade exams.
We’ve introduced significant changes in our new education policy to address this issue. But until those changes take effect on the ground, I feel another responsibility: If our children face challenges, it’s my duty to listen to them, understand them, and ease their burden.
In a way, when I conduct “Pariksha Pe Charcha,” I get insights directly from the students, understand their parents’ mindset, as well as the perspectives of people in the educational field. So these discussions don’t just benefit the students; they benefit me, too.
Exams are valuable for assessing knowledge in a specific domain, but they can’t become the sole measure of someone’s overall potential. Many people may not score high academically, yet can hit a century in cricket because that’s where their true strength lies. When the focus shifts to actual learning, scores tend to naturally improve.
I remember when I was a student, I had a teacher whose learning techniques still greatly appeal to me today. He would give us children specific instructions. To 1 child, he would say, “Tomorrow, bring exactly 10 chickpeas from home.” To another, he might request, “Bring 15 grains of rice, no more, no less.” A third child could be told, “Bring 21 moong beans, precisely that number.”
Different students got different quantities and varieties. So each child would think, “I need to get exactly 10,” and counting them at home helped them memorize numbers naturally. Then they’d learn what chickpeas were, and after returning to school, they’d pool it all.
The teacher would then ask, “Take out 10 chickpeas, 3 chickpeas, 2 moong beans…” This way, children learned math and could identify chickpeas and moong beans effortlessly. I’m talking about early childhood education here. Such learning techniques educate children without burdening them, and we’ve incorporated similar methods into our new education policy.
When I was in school, I observed 1 of my teachers using an innovative idea. On his very first day, he placed a diary on the table and said, “Whoever arrives earliest each morning will write 1 sentence in this diary, along with their name.” The next student would then need to write a related sentence.
At first, I’d rush to school very early every day. Why? So that I could write the first sentence. I once wrote something like, “Today’s sunrise was magnificent; it filled me with energy.” I’d write my name, and whoever arrived after me had to write something connected to the sunrise as well.
After a few days, I realized my creativity wasn’t improving much from this. Why? Because I’d arrive with a fixed thought already in mind and simply write it down. So I decided I’d start going last instead.
What happened then was that I’d read what others had written first and then try to give my very best. As a result, my creativity began to improve even more. Sometimes, teachers do these small, simple activities that greatly impact your life.
These experiences, combined with my own background in organizational work, made human resource development a key area of focus for me. That’s why I engage with children through events once or twice each year. Over time, these efforts have resulted in a book that’s benefiting thousands of children, serving as a valuable reference for them.
Can you speak a little bit more, by way of advice to students, about how to be successful on their path in their career, how to find a career, and how to find success in India—and to all the people across the world who find inspiration in your words?
I believe that whatever task you get, if you perform that task with complete dedication and sincerity, you inevitably become an expert sooner or later, and your enhanced capabilities open doors to success. While working, one must continually strive to improve their skills and should never underestimate their ability to learn.
When someone constantly neglects their ability to learn, they limit their growth. But for those who look beyond their tasks and observe what others around them are doing, their capacity can double or even triple. To young people, I’d say this clearly: There’s no need to feel discouraged. There’s certainly some task out there destined just for you. Don’t worry. Focus on enhancing your skills, and opportunities will come.
You may think, “I wanted to be a doctor but became a teacher. My life is wasted.” Thinking like that won’t help you at all. All right, you didn’t become a doctor, but as a teacher, you can shape 100 doctors.
If you had become a doctor, you’d serve only your patients, but now, as a teacher, you can inspire students to fulfill their dreams of becoming doctors, so that both you and your students can together serve millions of patients. Then he gains a new perspective on life: “I couldn’t become a doctor, so I was miserable, and I was unhappy being a teacher. But now I realize, as a teacher, I can create doctors.”
Connecting your life to a greater purpose brings a sense of inspiration and meaning. I have always believed that God has given everyone unique capabilities. Never lose faith in your own abilities. You should always maintain trust in your own abilities. Keep believing in yourself, and trust that when the opportunity comes, you’ll perform and you’ll succeed. That confidence makes a person deliver results.
How did those students deal with stress, with struggle, with difficulties along that path?
Parents must first understand that life is not just about taking exams. Families should understand that their children aren’t trophies meant to be displayed or models to show off in society. It’s not about saying, “Look, my kid scores so high!” Parents really need to stop using their kids just as status symbols.
Secondly, students should always keep themselves well-prepared beforehand. Only then can they appear for exams feeling stress-free and confident. They should have complete trust in themselves and their abilities.
Sometimes I see students panic over the smallest issues during exams. They take papers or other things, and when their pen suddenly stops working, it causes anxiety. Sometimes they feel uneasy, thinking, “Oh no, I don’t like sitting next to this person.” If the bench wobbles, their whole attention goes there, indicating self-doubt.
Those lacking confidence constantly keep looking for distractions. But if you’re confident and have genuinely worked hard, just take a minute. Take some deep breaths, relax your mind, and refocus your attention calmly.
Slowly read through the questions and allocate your time systematically: “I have this amount of time; I’ll dedicate these minutes per question.” In my experience, students who regularly practice writing test papers can easily overcome such situations without any trouble at all.
You said to always focus on learning. What’s your approach to learning? What advice can you give on how to learn best, not just when you are young, but throughout your life?
Let me share a personal example with you. I used to learn a lot from reading, but these days, more and more, I learn by being fully present. Whenever I meet someone, I am fully present in the moment. I give them my full attention. This complete focus allows me to grasp new concepts quickly.
When I’m with you, I’m fully present, grounded in the moment. No calls or messages can pull me away from this moment with you. I am fully present, focused on the here and now. That’s why I always believe this is a habit everyone should embrace. It will sharpen your mind and improve your learning ability.
Besides, knowledge alone cannot light the way. You must immerse yourself in the flow of practice. You cannot master driving merely by reading the life stories of great drivers. You must get behind the wheel and take the road yourself.
You must dare to take risks. You can never master the road if fear of accidents or death holds you back. I truly believe that those who live in the present are the ones who live life to the fullest. That’s because they know that every moment lived has already slipped into the past.
So you must embrace the moment before it fades into the past. Otherwise, chasing the future only turns the present into the past. It’s not a trade worth making. Most people stress so much about the future that their present quietly slips away. Before they know it, the moment has already faded into the past.
Yeah, I’ve heard a lot of stories of you having meetings with people, and it’s—usually all the distractions are—
There are no distractions. You keep looking at your watch.
No no no, I am barely know what I am doing Prime Minister. I am not very good at this.
Let me ask maybe a difficult, maybe a human question. Do you contemplate your mortality? Are you afraid of death?
Can I ask you a question instead?
Sure.
I have a very interesting question. Life and death are 2 sides of a coin, but which of the 2 is more certain?
Death.
Exactly. Now, with that out of the way, we know for a fact that life itself is a whispered promise of death, and yet life is also destined to flourish. So, again, in the dance of life and death, only death is certain. So why fear what is certain?
That’s why you must embrace life instead of fretting over death. That’s how life will evolve and flourish, for it is uncertain. That’s why you must commit to enriching, refining, and elevating your life so you can live fully and with a purpose before death comes knocking.
That’s why you must let go of the fear of death. After all, death is inevitable, and there’s no use worrying about when it will arrive. It will arrive when it’s meant to.
What gives you hope about the future, not just of India, but all of human civilization—all of us humans here on Earth?
Well, I am an optimist at heart.
Pessimism and negativity are simply not ingrained in my mindset; they don't align with the way I think. That’s why I always gravitate toward the bright side instead. If we take a moment to reflect on the history of mankind, we see the incredible crises humans have overcome with resilience and strength.
We also see the major changes humanity has embraced to evolve with the times. And this continuous transformation has carried on for millennia. In every era, it is in human nature to adapt to the ever-flowing current of change.
And while our progress has gone through cycles of ups and downs, it is those people who can break free from the constraints of these historical cycles and outdated thinking patterns. It is they who can help humanity achieve extraordinary positive breakthroughs with an unshackled speed and grace, transcending the limitations of the old way of doing things by embracing change.
In this moment, I was wondering if you could guide me, perhaps, through a Hindu prayer or meditation for a few moments. I'm trying to learn the Gayatri Mantra, and in my fast, I was trying to do the chants. Perhaps I could try chanting, and you could tell me about the importance of this mantra and maybe others in your life, in your spirituality. Should I try?
Yes, please.
Om Bhur Bhuvah Swah
Tat Savitur Varenyam
Bhargo Devasya Dheemahi
Dhiyo Yo Nah Prachodayat
How did I do? Is it okay?
You did great!
Om Bhur Bhuvah Swah
Tat Savitur Varenyam
Bhargo Devasya Dheemahi
Dhiyo Yo Nah Prachodayat
This mantra is dedicated to the radiant power of the Sun and is considered a powerful tool for spiritual enlightenment. Many mantras in Hindu philosophy are deeply intertwined, in some intricate and interesting ways, with science and nature. Each is woven into different facets of life. Chanting mantras on a daily basis brings profound and lasting benefits.
In your own spirituality, in your quiet moments, when you are with God, where does your mind go? What role do mantras play when you're fasting, when you're just alone with yourself?
The word meditation has been overused to the point that it feels like a cliché. In Indian languages, we usually refer to it as “dhyaan.” If I associate dhyaan with meditation, it might seem burdensome to some. One might think, “This is too difficult. I'm not an enlightened being.” But it's not rocket science. It just means freeing yourself from distraction.
For example, even when you're in class, your mind wanders to recess. All you think about is lunch, not the lesson. Meditation is simply being present in the moment. I recall an incident from my time living in the Himalayas. There, I encountered a wise sage who taught me a simple, practical technique.
It was nothing spiritual. There are several little streams in the Himalayas. He positioned a large leaf to catch water from one of those streams and placed an upside-down bowl below, so water would drip rhythmically from the leaf onto the bowl. He asked me to focus only on the dripping water, ignoring all other sounds.
Ignore the chirping birds and the soft rustle of the breeze. He would place the leaf, and I would meditate there for hours. I felt my mind slowly tuning in to the rhythmic sounds of the water droplets falling onto the bowl, like a melody guiding me into deep focus. And it's not like I was chanting mantras or reciting God's name. I like to call it the divine resonance.
It was by tuning into that divine resonance that I learned the art of concentration. This practice slowly evolved into meditation. Sometimes, you happen to stay at a fancy hotel. You get a lavish, luxurious room. The decor is impeccable, and you have been wholeheartedly fasting.
But there's a dripping faucet in the bathroom. That faint sound is enough to make a luxurious room feel worthless. At times, we realize the value of concentration in life's inner journey. We come to appreciate the difference a little bit of concentration can make.
One very interesting concept comes to mind from our scriptures. Since we spoke about life and death, I would like to quote a mantra:
Om purnamadah purnamidam
purnatmapurnamudacyate
In other words, all life is part of a complete circle. And this mantra emphasizes the path to achieve that completeness. Similarly, Hindus never focus solely on individual well-being.
Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah
Sarve Santu Niramayah
In other words, we wish for the well-being and prosperity of all.
Sarve Bhadrani Pashyantu
Ma Kashchid Duhkha-Bhag Bhavet
This mantra encompasses the idea of universal well-being and prosperity. And you know how this mantra ends?
Om Shantih, Shantih, Shantih
Every Hindu mantra ends on the same note: “Peace, peace, peace.” These ancient and powerful rituals, born in India, have emerged from thousands of years of spiritual practice by sages. They connect us to the essence of life.
Shantih, shantih, shantih.
Uh-huh.
Thank you for this honor. Thank you for this incredible conversation. Thank you for welcoming me to India, and I can't wait to break the fast with some Indian food tomorrow. Thank you so much, Prime Minister. This was an honor.
I am thankful for the opportunity to have this conversation with you. After fasting for 2 days, I recommend you ease into eating slowly. And I hope you reap great benefits from this fasting experience.
I’ve explored several new realms of thought for the first time ever with you today. I had long kept those thoughts tucked away within myself. But today, you've brought those thoughts to light. I hope—
Thank you.
I hope your viewers may enjoy this. It was a great pleasure speaking with you.
Thank you for listening to this conversation with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. And now let me answer some questions and try to reflect on and articulate some things I've been thinking about. If you would like to submit questions or get in touch with me for whatever reason, go to lexfridman.com/contact.
First, let me give a shout-out to the amazing team around the Prime Minister. Everyone was super kind, excellent at what they do, efficient, great at communication, and just great people all around. And since I spoke English and Prime Minister Modi spoke Hindi, I have to comment on the interpreter who was doing simultaneous interpreting for both of us. She was absolutely amazing. I can't sing her enough praises.
From the equipment used, to the quality of the translation, to just the human touch of it all. And in general, my travels around Delhi and India revealed to me some early glimpses of what felt like another world, almost like another planet, different culturally from anything I've experienced before. A chaos of human interactions, big dynamic personalities and characters.
Obviously, India is composed of many distinct subcultures, and Delhi represents just one slice, much like neither New York nor Texas nor Iowa alone represents America. They're all different flavors of America. On my visit, I walked around and rode rickshaws everywhere, just aimlessly wandering the streets, looking to talk to people about life.
Of course, like many places on Earth, there are always some people, especially those who have something to sell, who will at first see me as a tourist, a foreign traveler, one with some money to spend. As always, I avoided such shallow interactions and went straight past the small talk to the meaningful conversations, shooting the shit about what they love, what they fear, and what kind of hardship and triumph they've experienced in their lives.
I think the cool thing about people anywhere on Earth is that they quickly do see the real you, past the facades that strangers put up for each other, if you're vulnerable and honest enough to let them. And I try to do just that. I should say that, for the most part, everyone was super kind in the genuine human way. Even when they didn't speak English, it was always easy to understand them.
Probably more than any other people I've interacted with, in India, people's eyes, faces, and body language all communicated a lot of information, a lot of emotion—not reserved at all. When I travel through Eastern Europe, for example, reading a person is much tougher. The meme does have some truth to it. There's often a protective layer between the heart of the person and the outside world. In India, it's all there on full display.
So I had a lot of epic conversations and interactions as I walked around Delhi for a couple of weeks. In general, on the topic of reading people, I do believe the eyes can often say more than words can. We humans are a fascinating bunch. There really is a deep, turbulent ocean behind the surface waves we show the world.
In some sense, what I try to do in conversations, on and off the mic, is to get to that depth. Anyway, the few weeks I spent in India were a magical experience. Traffic alone was a wild time, like the world's most difficult test for self-driving cars. It reminded me of watching nature documentary videos of swarms of fish, when there are thousands of them swimming around at insane speeds, seemingly in complete chaos. And yet, when looking at the big picture, it all works like a perfectly tuned orchestra.
I will most certainly travel around India with my friend Paul Rosolie in the near future, maybe with some other friends, all the way from the north of India to the south. Now allow me to also comment on one of the books that first drew me toward India and to its deep history of philosophical and spiritual traditions. The book is Siddhartha by Herman Hesse.
I first read most of Hesse's major works as a teenager, but then reread them again through the years. I first found Siddhartha when I was immersed in a very different kind of literature: Dostoevsky, Camus, Kafka, Orwell, Hemingway, Kerouac, Steinbeck, and so on.
Many of these explore the same human condition that puzzled me when I was a young man and still puzzles me today, even more so. But “Siddhartha” was my introduction to the Eastern way of looking at these puzzles. It was written by Herman Hesse, and, by the way, please allow me this pronunciation of his last name. I’ve heard some people say “Hesse,” but my whole life I’ve always said “Hesse.”
So anyway, it was written by Herman Hesse, a German-Swiss Nobel Prize-winning writer, during one of the darkest periods of his own life. His marriage was failing, World War I had shattered his pacifist ideals, and he suffered from debilitating headaches, insomnia, and depression. During this period, he began psychoanalysis with Carl Jung, which in part led him to explore Eastern philosophies as a way to heal his fractured psyche. Hesse immersed himself in translations of ancient Hindu and Buddhist texts, studying the “Upanishads” and the “Bhagavad Gita.”
And so, the writing of “Siddhartha” was, in itself, for him, a journey that paralleled that of the main character in the book. Hesse started writing the book in 1919 and finished it 3 years later, experiencing an extensive psychological crisis in the middle. The book follows Siddhartha, a young man in ancient India, as he leaves behind wealth and comfort to search for meaning. You can feel his personal struggle on every page: Siddhartha’s restlessness, his dissatisfaction with conventional wisdom, and his need to find truth through direct experience. Again, the book wasn’t simply a philosophical exploration for Hesse; it was psychological survival. He was writing his way out of suffering and toward his own enlightenment.
I won’t go into a deep analysis of the book here, but I will mention 2 key lessons I took away and carried with me to this day. The first lesson comes from a scene in the book that, to me, is one of the great scenes in all of literature. Siddhartha is sitting by a river, just listening, and in that river he hears all of life, all sounds, all voices, all of time—past, present, and future—flowing together as one.
That scene gave me the experience and the notion that, while in some grounded human sense the linear arrow of time does exist, in another sense, time is a kind of illusion. In fact, everything exists simultaneously. Our lives are both momentary and eternal. It is hard to describe these ideas with words. I think they must be experienced as personal revelations.
I’m reminded of the fish story that David Foster Wallace, another one of my favorite writers, described in a commencement speech 20 years ago. The story goes: 2 young fish are swimming along when they encounter an older fish swimming the opposite way. The older fish nods and says, “Morning, boys. How’s the water?” The young fish swim on, and eventually one turns to the other and asks, “What the hell is water?”
The illusion of the forward progress of time is water in this metaphor. As humans, we’re fully immersed in it, but enlightenment in part involves being able to step back and get a glimpse at another, deeper perspective on reality, where all things are inextricably interconnected across both time and space.
Another key lesson from the novel that was especially formative to me as a young man was that one should not blindly follow others or learn about the world exclusively through books, but rather forge your own path and thrust yourself into the world, where the lessons of life can only be learned by experiencing them directly. Every experience—both positive and negative, mistakes, suffering, and even seemingly wasted time—is an essential part of growth.
To this point, Hesse draws a distinction between knowledge and wisdom. Knowledge can be taught by others. Wisdom can only be gathered through experiencing the full mess of life yourself. In other words, the path to understanding isn’t through rejection of the world, but through complete immersion in it.
Those are my early steps in seeing the world through the lens of Eastern philosophy. But many of Hesse’s books had an impact on me. I would recommend reading “Demian” when you are younger, “Steppenwolf” when you are older, “Siddhartha” throughout your life, especially in moments of crisis, and “The Glass Bead Game” if you want to take on Hesse’s magnum opus, which rigorously explores the ways the human mind and human civilization can engage in the pursuit of knowledge, wisdom, and meaning.
But “Siddhartha” is the only one I’ve returned to more than twice. In my own life, when faced with a difficult situation, I often return to the moment in the book when Siddhartha is asked what skills he possesses, and his answer is simply, “I can think, I can wait, I can fast.” Let me elaborate.
Indeed, for the first part, “I can think,” as Marcus Aurelius said, “The quality of your life is determined by the quality of your thoughts.” For the second part, “I can wait,” patience and waiting are often indeed the optimal decision when facing a problem. Time does bring clarity and depth of understanding.
For the third part, “I can fast,” when needed, being able to live and flourish with less is a prerequisite of being free, when the mind, the body, and society are all trying to put you in cages.
All right, friends. Now, sadly, our time together in this episode has come to a close. As always, thank you for being here and thank you for your support through the years. Let me leave you with a few words from the “Bhagavad Gita”: “He who experiences the unity of life, sees his own self in all beings, and all beings in his own self, and looks on everything with an impartial eye.”