[BidClub_]
20VC · · 69 分钟

关于招聘、解雇和打造世界级销售组织的残酷真相|Chad Peets

Harry StebbingsChad Peets

YouTube
TL;DR
  • Chad Peets 的招聘标准就是毫不掩饰的痴迷:他要的是“脑子有点不正常”的销售,凌晨3点醒来、意识到自己醒着之前,脑子里已经在想工作。 面试很简单——问“你的激情是什么?”,区分那些靠工作赚钱来支持个人热爱的人,和他要的那种对工作本身的痴迷。正确答案应该像他自己说的:“我想成为自己所在领域的世界第一……而且,操,我就是想赢。”
  • 销售岗位最不可妥协的能力,是拿下净新增客户。 技术可以教,管理到位也可以把200K美元的交易做到2M美元;但“诚信、韧劲……以及拿下新客户”的能力教不了。如果候选人拿不出净新增客户的业绩记录,“面试很快就结束了”。在一家把50个从没听说过你的账户交给你的创业公司里,向继承账户做增购不算数。没有销售经验的候选人风险太高,因为他必须确认对方确实会卖。
  • 不要仅仅因为熟悉行业,就从竞争对手那里挖人。 “你的竞争对手很可能有一堆C级选手。” 这种招聘能换来更快的短期上手,但9个月后留下的会是“一堆糟糕的销售”,而不是一年后成为世界级组织所需的、无法训练出来的人才。
  • 创始人应该“为明天招聘,而不是为今天招聘”——这是最常见的CRO错误。 只管理过500M美元业务的领导,不懂如何从0做到500M美元;“如果你这么做,就永远到不了明天。” Peets 说,他见到的50位CEO里可能有48位不适合与他合作;通常第一次或第二次交流时,他已经看过对方的CRO和销售代表的LinkedIn,然后直说:“你得解雇你的CRO。”
  • 在他参与过的扩张期销售组织里,应按25%的总人员流失率建模。 至少淘汰底部10%,再加上晋升和主动离职;超过30–35%就是问题,但流失率过低同样是问题——“我们只需要解雇2%……你告诉我的只是,你们不让任何人承担责任。” 对 Harry 关于恐惧文化的担忧,他的回答是:“恰恰相反。” 真正逼走A级选手的,是不受问责的B级选手。
  • 配额本身不够用——有人可能靠一笔幸运交易做到130%,但仍然是他想解雇的人。 还要衡量新客户会议、销售流程步骤、转化率,以及销售代表是否真正站在客户面前。解雇也必须足够快:“我搞砸时,会承认自己的错误,并迅速修正……我会快速解雇吗?当然会,操。”
摘要 · 为研究而整理的核心内容

1. 招聘标准就是痴迷——“脑子得有点不正常”

  • Peets 的开场定义是:“我需要像我一样、脑子有点不正常的人……凌晨3:00醒来时,在意识到自己醒着之前,我想的已经是工作。我控制不了。这就是痴迷。”
  • 他的面试筛选从一个刻意设计的问题开始——“你的激情是什么?” 如果候选人画画只是为了支付账单,他可能“比我更好、更全面”;但 Peets 会把这种动机与自己由工作驱动的状态作对照。“我想赚钱”也不行:“废话……你本来就是来做销售的。” 他想听到的是:“我想每天学习,成为自己手艺上的世界第一,改变客户的采购方式。”
  • Harry 追问如何穿透表面、测试候选人的抗压能力时,Peets 转向了“韧劲”——这是 John McB(可能是 John McMahon)教给他的办法:问对方经历过什么。他举自己的例子:2000年毕业——他记得泡沫破裂——然后坐在办公室里,身边只有“1部电话、1个记事本、1台电脑、2个孩子、1笔房贷,以及没有任何赚钱的办法”。“对我来说,创业就是生死问题——如果你没经历过类似的事,你其实不懂。” 他会优先考虑有军队背景的人,或靠自己完成大学学业的人;如果是更年轻、来自美国上中产家庭的南加州大学毕业生 Peets,他自己也不会通过自己的筛选。

2. 净新增客户不可妥协

  • 无论是外勤销售还是内勤销售,他都要求候选人具备一定销售经验:没有经验,风险太大,因为他必须确认候选人会卖。随后,他会对每一项业绩说法逐层追问:配额是多少,卖了什么,做成了多少笔交易,最大的交易是什么。真正的分水岭是记忆力——“如果我不是第一名,我面前肯定会放一块白板,标出我的排名……这会把我逼疯。”
  • 在他的创业公司里,销售的工作是生成管道并拿下新账户,因此向继承账户做增购“根本不算数”。“如果你不能告诉我自己带来了净新增客户,面试很快、非常快就结束了。”
  • 面对交易规模和创业公司经验之间的取舍,“你必须在某个地方让步”:有创业公司经验的候选人往往没有5M美元交易经验,因为“你知道哪家创业公司能签下5M美元的交易?” 规则是,只接受那些可以解决的短板——“我可以教你如何从做成200K美元交易进步到2M美元交易……但我教不了你诚信、韧劲、脑子有点不正常,或者如何拿下新客户。”
  • 同样的逻辑也否定了从竞争对手那里挖人:“他们的人行不行?”——“他们熟悉我的领域。”——“谁在乎。你的竞争对手很可能有一堆C级选手。” 为熟悉行业而招聘,买到的是眼下更快的爬坡速度;9个月后,你得到的却是“一堆糟糕的销售”,而不是世界级组织。

3. 创始人应为明天招聘CRO,而不是为今天招聘

  • 被问到创始人是否擅长招聘销售负责人时,他直接回答:“不。” 50位CEO里有48位不适合与他合作;通常第一次或第二次交流时,他已经完成了LinkedIn调查:“你得解雇你的CRO……他只在大公司工作过。” 接下来,新的CRO会解雇一半销售代表。大多数创始人会回答:“操,不行,我没准备好面对这个。” Peets 的回应是:“很好。认识你很高兴。”
  • 最典型的错误是:“我3年后会成为一家500M美元的公司,所以我需要一个管理过500M美元业务的人。” Peets 的反驳是:这个人懂什么叫从0做到500M美元?“他们是在为明天招聘,而不是为今天招聘。如果你这么做,就永远到不了明天。”

4. 配额不是衡量体系

  • 销售代表可能做到配额的130%,“因为走运做成了一笔交易”,但仍然可能是 Peets 想解雇的人。真正的衡量指标包括新客户会议、销售流程中的步骤、转化率、出差情况——“他们是否站在客户面前?” 当公司“停止衡量员工……停止要求员工承担责任”时,效率就会下降。
  • 一个疲软组织的诊断信号,是管理层对低流失率沾沾自喜:“我们只需要解雇销售组织里2%的人……你告诉我的只是,你们谁都愿意留,而且你们不让任何人承担责任。每年都应该清理底部10%。”

5. 按25%的流失率建模,并快速解雇

  • 对扩张期公司来说,数学很简单:至少解雇10%,再加上离开一线销售岗位的晋升和主动离职,总流失率约为25%;他会把这个数字直接写进生产率和招聘计划,“最后我会砍掉25%”。超过30–35%是问题,过低则是“另一种问题”;对更稳定的公司来说,约20%算是不错的水平。
  • Harry 提出一个值得保留的反驳:销售爬坡需要6个月,招聘周期需要3个月,这种流动会让组织“始终落后9个月”。 Peets 的回答是:你永远不能停止招聘——把每季度6%的人员流动率写入计划,并提前招聘。对于 Harry 更尖锐的质疑——每年解雇10%、再有10%主动离职,说明招聘流程已经坏了——他的回答是:“你在哪个世界里可以不淘汰底部10%?” 销售团队从50人扩张到300人,犯错不可避免;过度审查每一次招聘,只会让你完不成招聘指标。
  • 对于恐惧文化的担忧,他说:“恰恰相反。” A级选手看到不受问责的B级选手,会得出这样的结论:“我拼了命地干……你们却什么都不对他们做。去你的。我走。”
  • Harry 说,我们往往比自己承认的更早知道一次误招;最糟糕的情况也许只需要10天到2周。 Peets 则引用了前一天一场“有点紧张的谈话”:“你我之间的区别是,我搞砸时,会承认自己的错误,并迅速修正。你喜欢假装自己没搞砸……这会让问题持续发酵。我会快速解雇吗?当然会,操。”
Harry Stebbings

When we spoke last time, you said that recruiting was harder than ever because reps just don’t care anymore. Has something changed from that moment?

1. Obsession Sets the Hiring Bar

Chad Peets

Look, I need people, just to be blunt, that are a little fucked in the head like I am, right? When I wake up at 3:00 in the morning, before I become conscious of being awake, I’m thinking about work. I wake up at 3:00 in the morning, 6:00 in the morning, or 10 o’clock at night, and I can’t help it. I’m obsessed with making sure we’re doing things correctly, and I need people that are a little bit fucked in the head like that.

Harry Stebbings

How do you measure “fucked in the head”? I know this sounds—

Chad Peets

Look, if they’re being honest in the interview questions, it’s kind of easy. You ask questions like, “What’s your passion?” It’s a setup, for sure, and anybody seeing this will know it’s a setup, but you ask, “What’s your passion?” and just let them go.

If they’re like, “Look, man, my passion is I want to be the world’s greatest artist. I love to paint. That is my passion.” Okay, well, why do you work? “Well, I work because I’ve got to pay my bills. I’ve got to put food on the table.” Hey, listen, that probably makes you a better person than me, a more interesting person than me, and a more well-rounded person than me. But you work to basically fund your passion, which is painting. That’s fine. Good for you.

I work because I want to be the best in the world at what I want to do, and I want to be a part of important things. Fuck, man, I want to win. You ask people questions like that, right? I’ve asked them, “What drives you?” “Oh, I want to make money.” No shit, right? You’re in sales and you want to make money. Obvious. What actually drives you? What gets you up in the morning?

You get lots of different answers, but I want people to say, “Look, man, I want to learn every day. I want to be the best in the world at my craft. I want to have an impact. I want to change the way my customers buy.” Again, you want that obsession about what they’re doing for a living.

Harry Stebbings

That was the first layer, and a lot of salespeople can do that pretty well. Is there any way that you can actually stress-test that beneath the surface?

Chad Peets

Well, again, this goes back to—it’s not exactly stress-testing that, but the other thing you want to measure for is grit. John McB taught me that a long time ago. Ask them what they’ve been through in their life.

You wouldn’t have wanted to hire me. I grew up in an upper-middle-class family and went to USC. Coming out of college, I would have looked at me and said, “Nope, I don’t think so.” Now, ask me about some challenges I faced. I’ve been through some serious shit since then and come through the other side of it.

You want somebody who’s faced some challenges, right? So that when they’re in a sales cycle, they’re not generating enough pipeline, or I’m hammering them, or somebody’s hammering them about stuff, this isn’t the hardest thing they’ve ever done. Give me a military person, for example. I love that. Somebody who put themselves through college, right?

You don’t want to hear sad stories because you feel bad, but I want to know what you’ve been through. Like I said, I’ve been through some shit. I graduated in 2000—I think the bubble burst—and I left the firm I was working for. LinkedIn did not exist at the time. I had a phone, a pad of paper, a computer, 2 kids, a mortgage, and no way of making money. I sat in an office going, “Oh, shit.”

I want somebody who’s been through that in life. To me, startups are life and death, and if you’ve not been through something like that, you don’t really know. That’s the other thing: I want somebody who’s been at a small company. If you’ve been at nothing but large companies, you just don’t know.

Harry Stebbings

Do you mind taking people who’ve never been anywhere before? I’m 22. I’m straight out of college. I’m fucking hungry. I’m here to work. I’ll devote myself, but I haven’t had a job before. Are you okay with that?

Chad Peets

Well, remember, we fill field sales positions, right? Inside sales positions, so on and so forth. There is a certain level of experience. We can teach you a lot, but there’s too much risk in that person. I’ve got to know whether or not you can sell, and in order to know that, you have to have had some sales experience. Otherwise, there’s just too much risk.

Harry Stebbings

Okay, some sales experience, dude. Again, so many founders take notes and listen religiously to this: some sales experience. Everyone says that they were the number-one seller and they closed big deals. What do you look for? What is the, “Yep, Harry’s a good dude. We want to have him”?

2. Sales Track Records Need Verification

Chad Peets

If a guy’s got a track record of exceeding his quota, first of all, I always pull that string. For example: “You were at 103% of your quota last year.” “Yes.” “Okay, what was your quota?” “Okay, what did you sell against that quota? How many deals did it take? What was the biggest deal? Walk me through the biggest deal.”

Somebody who’s passionate about their career will know every single one of these details. They’re proud of it. They hang their hat on it, right? Somebody who’s not is like, “I think I was at 104% last year. I’d have to check.” You’d have to check?

Tell me, where do you rank amongst your peers? How many sales reps are in the company? “102.” Where do you rank? “Yeah, I don’t know.” How do you not know? I’d know. Fuck, if I wasn’t number one, I’d have a whiteboard in front of me that showed me where I ranked, and I’d keep track of it every day because it would drive me insane that I wasn’t number one.

Harry Stebbings

Okay, so we learned that, but actually, dude, that was in a different category from what we’re in: customer service, and that was in—I don’t know—compliance management, whatever we want to call it, healthcare records, whatever. How important is it that they’ve sold in the same category that we have versus the same contract size?

3. New Logos Matter Most

Chad Peets

Look, the most important thing—and again, I hope this isn’t redundant with our last call—is that they’re selling software. Fine, but there are lots of different ways of selling software. So, what’s the job I’m hiring for at any one of my companies? The number-one thing is pipeline generation and landing new accounts.

When I say, “Tell me about the deals that you’ve closed,” I don’t care if you say, “Well, look, I inherited this customer and I went and upsold them.” I don’t give a shit. That’s not a value to me at a startup, because at a startup I’m going to give you 50 accounts that have never heard of us. So I want to know how many net-new logos you brought in. If you can’t tell me that you brought in net-new logos, the interview’s over super quickly.

That’s the one thing that you have to have first and foremost: a demonstrated track record of closing new accounts. Then let’s talk about deal size. I’m getting to your domain question, but let’s talk about deal size for a moment.

Somebody will say, “Listen, we’re closing $5 million deals over here,” which for a startup is very unique. That’s the problem, because if you want to hire people who have startup experience, they’re not going to have really big-deal experience, because most startups aren’t doing really big deals.

Oftentimes, what I’ll get is somebody saying, “Listen, this guy—or gal—doesn’t have enough experience closing $5 million deals.” I say, “Okay, listen. I can go get you somebody who’s been closing a bunch of $5 million deals. They’re not going to have startup experience.” “Well, why not?” What startups do you know that are closing $5 million transactions?

You have to give on something. If you’re not able and capable of doing pipeline generation and closing new logos, I cannot teach you that. I can teach you, with proper leadership, how to go from closing $200,000 deals to $2 million deals. I can teach you that. By the way, the sales leader who sits on top of you and the system that we build is oftentimes like a super-rep, so I want the gaps to be gaps that I can solve for. I can solve for that gap.

When you talk about domain expertise, again, what can’t I teach you? I can’t teach you how to have integrity. I can’t teach you how to have grit. I can’t teach you to be fucked in the head. I can’t teach you how to go close new logos. But I can teach you my technology. With proper enablement, I can teach you that.

Again, lots of CEOs would be like, “Look, here are my 3 competitors. Go recruit from them.” My first thing back to them is, “Tell me about the quality of their sales organization.” “Well, what do you mean?” You want me to go take their people? Are their people any good? “I don’t know. They know my space.” Who gives a fuck?

Your competitors likely have a bunch of C players. You want to go hire C players simply because they know the space? That’s a short-term solve. Basically, what you’re solving for is that you want to reduce ramp time. You want them to be able to get enabled faster because they know the domain. Fine.

The problem is, 9 months from now, I’ve got a bunch of shitty fucking salespeople versus letting me go hire for talent and things I can’t train. Fine, maybe my ramp time takes longer, but a year from now I’ve got a world-class sales organization. You’ve got a bunch of B players who know your space.

Harry Stebbings

Do you think founders are good at hiring CROs and heads of sales?

Chad Peets

No.

4. Founders Hire the Wrong CRO

I'm not trying to be critical, but as I mentioned, we were offline. If I talk to 50 CEOs, 48 of them I'm going to very quickly determine are probably not right for me to work with. Doesn't mean they're not great, just not for me. Usually what'll happen is, by the first or second conversation, I will have looked up his or her CRO, and I'll go into the conversation and say, “Listen, if we're going to partner together, you're firing your CRO.”

Listen, the CRO you hired is the wrong one. You've never talked to him. I don't have to talk to him. I know where he's worked and the quality of sales organizations he's worked for. He's only worked for large companies. You have the wrong CRO. By the way, prior to this call, I went through LinkedIn and looked at every one of your sales reps. Not only are we going to get rid of the CRO, I'm going to hire the right CRO that's going to go fire half your sales reps. Are you prepared for that?

Most of them are like, “Fuck no, I'm not prepared for that.” I say, “Great. Nice to meet you. Have a great day.” They'll hire for the stupidest shit, man.

Harry Stebbings

What do they get wrong? Imagine you're a founder listening. What do they get wrong?

Chad Peets

Here's the most common one, right? “Listen, I'm going to be a $500 million company in 3 years.” Wonderful. I hope that's the case. “So I need a guy or gal that's managing a $500 million business.” Oh, you do? What does a guy that's only managed a $500 million business know about building a company from 0 to $500 million?

What they do is they hire for tomorrow, not today. If you do that, you'll never get to tomorrow.

Harry Stebbings

You mentioned being brought into Snowflake to maybe increase efficiency and performance. What are the number-one ways that you see sales teams lose performance and efficiency?

5. Quota Alone Is Insufficient

Chad Peets

Well, first of all, you have to define what is good. What am I expecting of you? You have to define, “Here's what I'm expecting from a sales organization.”

How are you measuring your salespeople? “I measure them by quota.” Okay. How else are you measuring salespeople? I get that you have a quota. Fine. By the way, you can miss quotas. That's also possible. I could set them too high or too low, but I could have somebody at 130% of their quota because they got lucky and did a deal that I want to fire them over. It can't stop with quota.

I want to understand what they do. I want to understand how many new customer meetings they're having. I'm going to hold them accountable to that number of new customer meetings. I want to look at steps in the sales process. I want to look at things like conversion ratios. I want to look at travel. Are they in front of customers? Are they doing things? There's a wide, long list of things that you have to be measuring.

What I see is companies get away from that. They stop measuring people. They stop holding people accountable. Look at attrition rates, for example. Tell me what your involuntary attrition is, which means people that you fired. “We're so proud of this. We only had to fire 2% of our sales organization last year. Such a great place to work.” I'm like, all you're telling me is you will let anybody work there and you don't hold anybody accountable. You should be shooting the bottom 10% of your sales organization every year.

Harry Stebbings

What's yours? Is yours 10%?

6. Scaling Requires Attrition Planning

Chad Peets

Total attrition. There's context for a scaling company. Total attrition should be about 25%. People hear that and they're like, “Oh my God,” because, by the way, it's super expensive to have that type of attrition—especially when I build you a productivity model and tell you what your forecast is going to be, and at the end of it I chop off 25% because I say you're going to lose 25% of your reps. They're like, “Oh my God, it's 25%.”

I think I want to shoot 10% for sure. At a minimum, I'm getting rid of 10%. Then I've got promotions. That's considered a type of attrition, right? Because I'm taking reps out of the field and bumping them up. Then I've got people who are going to quit. Every scaling company that I've ever been a part of, we will model 25% attrition, and we're typically right there.

If you start to get above 30–35%, you have a problem. If you're too low, you have a different kind of problem. As a company reaches a more stable state, which means they're hiring less and scaling slower, 20% attrition is pretty good.

Harry Stebbings

What do people respond to that? They say, “That's bullshit,” because my response to you would be, “Dude, we're constantly slowing down the organization. If we have a 6-month ramp time and a 3-month hire period, I'm consistently 9 months behind on the 3- and 6-month periods.”

You plan for it with overhiring.

Chad Peets

What does that mean?

Harry Stebbings

You plan for it with overhiring. You hire too many at the same time. You plan the hire.

Chad Peets

You keep hiring. You don't stop hiring. Okay, so when I'm building a productivity plan or a hiring plan for a company, I have to bake in the fact that I'm going to have 6% turnover every quarter. I have to hire ahead of that turnover.

Harry Stebbings

Very blunt: how would you feel if I said 10% you fire and 10% quit? Maybe your hiring process isn't good enough. If 10% are quitting, that's quite a lot. And if you're firing 10%, maybe you're not actually being stringent enough with meeting your criteria.

7. Poor Performers Get Fired Fast

Chad Peets

No. I mean, look, man. In what world are you not getting rid of the bottom 10% of your performers? Just bifurcate it. Okay, let's take that 10%: 5%, 4%, 3%. Come on, man. Everybody's going to have poor performers. You can't hire perfectly, especially when you're scaling.

If I'm going to go from 50 reps to 300 reps, you're going to hire fast. When you hire fast, you're going to make some mistakes. The consequence is you overscrutinize every hire and slow down the hiring process. Now you're not going to hit your recruiting numbers. You can't have that either.

Harry Stebbings

How do you respond to people who say that creates a culture of fear? That's not a good culture to work in.

Chad Peets

Bullshit. It's the opposite of that. If you have A players in your company and they're surrounded by a bunch of B players, and you're not holding those B players accountable, your A players will quit.

They do not want to look around and say, “I'm busting my ass. I'm an A player. I'm killing myself. I'm a shareholder in the company, and I've got 3 reps next to me that don't work hard, don't do the shit I do, and you do nothing to them.” Fuck that. I'm not going to put up with that. I'll quit.

Harry Stebbings

Will you fire fast when you see someone not working? How fast? I think the trouble is, you often know—honestly, I think way quicker than we give ourselves credit for. Sometimes it's 10 days to 2 weeks in the worst of cases. Will you fire fast, or do you give them time?

Chad Peets

Listen, we're all going to make hiring mistakes. As I just said to somebody yesterday in what was a bit of a tense conversation, we're all going to fuck up. The difference between you and me is, when I fuck up, I own my fuck-ups and I fix them quickly.

You like to pretend like you didn't fuck up, and you want to give it more time and claim that you didn't make a mistake, which allows the problem to fester and get bigger. So, will I fire fast? Fuck yeah. Yes, I will fire fast.

关于招聘、解雇和打造世界级销售组织的残酷真相|Chad Peets — 文字稿与摘要 | BidClub